:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學健康與體育學習領域體育教學教師自我效能對教學承諾影響之質化取向研究
書刊名:國立臺北教育大學學報. 教育類
作者:潘義祥 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Yi-hsiang
出版日期:2006
卷期:19:1
頁次:頁211-224
主題關鍵詞:健康與體育教師自我效能教學承諾質的研究Health and physical educationTeacher self-efficacyTeaching commitmentQualitative research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:124
  • 點閱點閱:33
本研究目的主要在探討健康與體育學習領域體育教學教師自我效能對教學承諾影響的現象,研究方法以質化研究為取向,以觀察法、訪談法及文件分析等方法探究之,本研究以量表測量高低效能教師各一位作為研究對象,進行一學年田野研究。研究結論顯示教師自我效能影響教學承諾,並且呈現下列不同的影響現象:1. 高效能教師對健康與體育學習領域體育教學認同呈現深度化的體認,低效能教師產生較為模糊的認同印象。2. 高效能感教師較具有強烈的教學投入感,樂於對學生作各種動作技巧示範,會認真地作教學準備、動作示範及進行各種教學內容的評量,低效能教師則顯著較低的教學投入感。3. 高效能教師對於各教學內容有清晰的目標設定及關心教學目標達成的程度,低效能教師對教學目標產生模糊現象。4. 由於本身專業能力的關係,高效能教師易得到教學成就,較傾向留在健體領域繼續擔任體育教學工作,而低效能教師則有較弱的留業傾向承諾。本研究最後提出辦理健康與體育學習領域教師增能進修研習,提昇教師自我效能,以及深入探討影響教學承諾的因素等建言,作為國小健康與體育教學改進與後續研究之參考。
The purpose of the study was to explore how teachers’ self-efficacy affect their teaching commitment in physical education teaching of the learning field of health and physical education at the elementary school. The study employed qualitative research methods including observation, interview and document analysis. The research participants were one high self-efficacy teacher and one low self-efficacy teacher. Both were measured by the health and physical education teacher self-efficacy scale, and proceeded with the study for one year. The results of the study indicated that teacher self-efficacy affects teaching commitment, and revealed different phenomena as follows: (1) the high self-efficacy teacher did have higher teaching identification than the low self-efficacy teacher because the high self-efficacy teacher revealed deep recognition in teaching and the low self-efficacy revealed blurred one in teaching. (2) the high self-efficacy teacher did have higher teaching contribution than the low self-efficacy teacher; (3) the high self-efficacy teacher did have higher commitment of goal setting and achievement than the low self-efficacy teacher; (4) Due to the professional ability, the high self-efficacy teacher did have higher commitment to continue on the teaching work than the low self-efficacy teacher. Finally this study provided some recommendations to improve the teaching of health and physical education learning flied and suggested the follow-up study in the future.
期刊論文
1.Allinder, R. M.(1994)。The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special deucation teachers and consultants。Teacher Education and Special Education,17,86-95。  new window
2.Graham, G.、Housner, L. D.(1991)。Differences between experienced and inexperienced teachers' planning decisions interactions, student engagement and instructional decisions, interactions, student engagement and instructional climate。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,62(2),196-204。  new window
3.Firestone, W. A.、Pennell, J. R.(1993)。Teacher commitment, working conditions and differential incentive policies。Review of Educational Research,63(4),484-526。  new window
4.Coladarci, T.(1992)。Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching。The Journal of Experimental Education,60(4),323-337。  new window
5.Gibson, Sherri D.、Dembo, Myron H.(1984)。Teacher Efficacy: A Construct Validation。Journal of Educational Psychology,76(4),569-582。  new window
6.Bandura, Albert(1993)。Perceived Self-efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning。Educational Psychologist,28(2),117-148。  new window
7.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change。Psychological Review,84(2),191-215。  new window
8.孫志麟(20010900)。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係--實徵取向的分析。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,109+111-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳正昌(1998)。國小教師專業知能、專業自主與專業承諾關係之研究 (計畫編號:NSC86-2413-H153-010)。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Tang, M. T.(2001)。Learning from beginning science teachers: Conceptions of teaching, teaching efficacy, and commitment to teaching(博士論文)。  new window
2.林意苹(2002)。國小英語教師之教師效能感探究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.潘義祥(2004)。國民小學健康與體育學習領域教師自我效能、教學承諾與教學實踐及其線性結構關係模式之研究(博士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳彥玲(2000)。幼稚園實習教師任教意願與任教承諾之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.戴仁山(2000)。台北縣國小教師體育課任教意願及其影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
6.彭玉珍(2001)。高職餐飲管理科教師專業與教師效能之研究--以臺灣北區為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.魏方亭(2001)。嘉南地區國中教師工作價值觀、自我效能感及工作壓力與任教承諾關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.郭明德(1999)。國小教師自我效能、班級經營策略與班級經營成效關係之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.顏銘志(1996)。國民小學教師教學信念、教師效能與教學行為之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Siedontop, D.(1994)。Sport education: Quality PE through positive sport experiences。Mountain View, CA:Mayfield。  new window
2.Patton, M. Q.(1990)。Utilization-focused evaluation。New Bury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
3.Siedentop, Daryl(1994)。Sport Education: Quality PE Through Positive Sport Experiences。Human Kinetics。  new window
4.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
5.Denzin, Norman K.(1978)。The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Socilogical Methods。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
單篇論文
1.Ross, J. A.(1994)。Beliefs that Make a Difference: The Origins and Impacts of Teacher Efficacy(ED 379 216)。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE