:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:女性作為政治行動者:臺灣女性參政圖像的反思
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:姜貞吟 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiang, Chen-yin
出版日期:2009
卷期:76
頁次:頁277-316
主題關鍵詞:女性性別政治參與政治受難能動性立委選舉WomenGenderPolitical participationPolitical victimAgencyLegislative election
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:464
  • 點閱點閱:157
「女性參政」被多位性別研究者視為是觀察整個社會性別結構的起點,且認為制度性政治內的女性參政比例逐漸提高的量變情勢是質變的重要契機。過往研究經常以「依夫型」、「政治受難家屬」來定位上個世代的女性參政,並以高教育程度、專業技能、形象清新來對比詮釋年輕世代的女性參政。這些研究論述結果有兩個「看不見」,首先,過於強調政治受難家屬與依夫的象徵符號,看不見國民黨與其他小黨女性參政的意義,再者,也看不見女性參與政治過程的主體能動性。本研究主要係以第二屆到第六屆女性立法委員為分析對象,目的在呈現台灣女性參政的完整圖像與其主體能動性的展現。研究發現如下:從婚姻關係的共生生態,提出直線式前後繼承、交替形式與併同形式的參與政治模式,驗證許多女性的參選行為乃屬夫妻併同形式。她們藉婚姻關係累積政治資本,與先生同時期參選,具有明顯地行動者意涵,不應以代夫出征或依夫來矮化其主體性。女性以不同形式參與政治,一具具女性身體在場出席的實存意涵,即是性別在公私領域之間的具體的跨界與流動。
Political participation of women is a starting point in the study of social structure of gender for many researchers. They think that increasing rate of political participation of women signifies the improvement of women’s political status. In the past, some researches often have attributed the political participation of women, who belong to the previous generation, to their family background, such as “depending on husband’s political resource” or “coming from the family of political victim”. Moreover, the researches emphasize their characteristics of educational level, professional knowledge and “perfect image” to contrast the female politicians of younger generation. The results of these studies suggest two kinds of “invisibility”. First of all, overemphasizing the political symbol of victim families ignores the significance of women’s political participation from the KMT and the other small parties, and moreover, it disregards the agency of women in the process of political participation. The study object of this paper is female legislators of the second to sixth elections. This paper attempts to analyze the social bases of their political status. I argue that some female politicians and their husbands run the election campaigns at the same time; they form a special type of couple-collaboration. Those women accumulate political capital through their marriage; thus, they are in position of subject rather than depending on their husbands. The different types of women’ s political participation shows that their physical presence has the existential meaning; namely, gender’s fluidity and cross-border will exist between public and private spheres.
期刊論文
1.何金銘(19941100)。勝選因素:北高兩市二屆立委選舉比較研究。選舉研究,1(2),163-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.高永光(20040500)。臺北縣地方派系與黑道互動模式之研究。選舉研究,11(1),33-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.姜貞吟(2005)。兩性參政之現況問題與未來展望。國家政策季刊,4(1),33-68。  延伸查詢new window
4.Rule, Wilma(1987)。Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors and Women's Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-three Democracies。Western Political Quarterly,40(3),477-498。  new window
5.Richter, Linda K.(1990)。Exploring Theories of Female Leadership in South and Southeast Asia。Pacific Affairs,63(4),524-540。  new window
6.Mansbridge, Jane(1999)。Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"。The Journal of Politics,61(3),628-657。  new window
7.楊婉瑩(200012)。婦女的政治機會結構析論。國立中山大學社會科學季刊,2(4),65-95。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳偉立、洪永泰(20051100)。第五屆立委選舉臺聯候選人的得票分布:三種得票離散程度衡量工具的分析。選舉研究,12(2),189-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.唐文慧、王怡君(19991000)。女性參政者之角色扮演與政策議題--以一九九八年立法委員選舉為例。國立政治大學社會學報,29,75-116。  延伸查詢new window
10.趙永茂(20010600)。新政黨政治形勢對臺灣地方派系政治的衝擊--彰化縣與高雄縣個案及一般變動趨勢分析。政治科學論叢,14,153-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Waylen, G.(1994)。Women and Democratization: Conceptualizing Gender Relations in Transition Politics。World Politics,46(3),327-354。  new window
12.陳明通(19990100)。地方派系、賄選風氣與選舉制度設計。國策專刊,7,12-13。  延伸查詢new window
13.Eisenstadt, S. N.、Roniger, Louis(1980)。Patron-Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange。Comparative Studies in Society and History,22(1),42-77。  new window
14.梁雙蓮(19931100)。影響臺灣省女性省議員參政的背景因素分析(一九五一至一九八九)。社會科學論叢,41,1-30。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃長玲(20010500)。從婦女保障名額到性別比例原則--兩性共治的理論與實踐。問題與研究,40(3),69-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.蔡宗珍(19971000)。關於民意代表之婦女保障名額條款的另類思考。婦女與兩性研究通訊,44,5-7。  延伸查詢new window
17.洪家殷(19960600)。論我國婦女當選保障名額之規定。東吳法律學報,9(1),151-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.吳宜侃(20050500)。立法委員連任預測模分析--以第四屆立法委員為例。選舉研究,12(1),173-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃德福(19940500)。現代化、選舉競爭與地方派系:一九九二年立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究,1(1),75-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.王秋華(2005)。抗戰前中國青年黨和國民黨的矛盾。邢台學院學報,20(3),85-87。  延伸查詢new window
21.Kincaid, Diane(1978)。Over His Dead Body: A Positive Perspective on Windows in the U.S.Congress。Western Political Quarterly,31,96-104。  new window
22.Paxton, Pamela, Melanie M. Hughes and Jennifer L. Green(2006)。The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, 1893-2003.。American Sociological Review,71,898-920。  new window
會議論文
1.高永光(2002)。二十一世紀台灣地方派系的發展。2002年兩岸政治與經濟發展學術研討會。台北:政治大學社會科學院台灣研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.張茂桂、陳俊傑(1986)。現代化、地方派系與地方選舉投票率之關係:自由派理論再檢討。投票行為與選舉文化研討會。台北:中國政治學會。487-519。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙永茂(1998)。台灣地方派系的轉變:從解嚴到精省頁1-20。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝敏捷、吳芳銘、劉兆隆(1994)。地方派系與金權政治的循環機制。台南。頁73-90。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.廖峻宏(2003)。地方政治生態與選舉關係之研究--以台中市立法委員為例(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.許翠谷(2002)。影響我國女性政治參與之因素分析--以第四屆女性立法委員為例(碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳芳銘(1996)。地方派系的分化與結盟變遷之研究--以嘉義縣和高雄縣為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.涂一卿(1994)。台灣地方派系之社會基礎--以嘉義縣地方派系為例(博士論文)。東海大學,台中。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.江素慧(1996)。女性政治菁英之研究:以民進黨女性公職人員為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳乃德(1987)。The Politics of a Regime Patronage System: Mobilization and Control Within an Authoritarian Regime(博士論文)。University of Chicago。  new window
7.吳惠芳(2006)。台灣女性國會議員政治行銷取向對其連任之影響:以第五、六屆立法委員為例,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃長玲(2003)。婦女與政治參與。台灣婦女權益報告書. 全集。臺北:婦女權益基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Mandel, Ruth B.(1981)。In the Running: The New Woman Candidate。New Haven:Ticknor and Fields。  new window
3.Norris, Pippa、Lovenduski, Joni(1995)。Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.中央選舉委員會(1996)。第三屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北:中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.中央選舉委員會(1999)。第四屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北:中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.中央選舉委員會(2002)。第五屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北:中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.中央選舉委員會(1994)。第二屆立法委員選舉實錄。  延伸查詢new window
8.中央選舉委員會(2005)。《第六屆立法委員選舉實錄》。台北:中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
9.Lovenduski, Joni(1986)。Women and European Politics。Amherst:The University of Massachusetts Press。  new window
10.Norris, Pippa(1997)。Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Gertzog, Irwin N.(1984)。Congressional Women: Their Recruitment, Treatment and Behavior。New York:Preager。  new window
12.Sineau, Mariette(2001)。Profession: Femmes Politique。Paris:Presses de Science Po。  new window
13.Gertzog, Irwin N.(1995)。Congressional Women: Their Recruitment, Integration, and Behavior。Westport, Conn:Praeger。  new window
14.中央選舉委員會(1984)。中華民國選舉概況。臺北:中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
15.Chou, Bih-Er、Clark, Cal、Clark, Janet(1990)。Women in Taiwan politics: overcoming barriers to women’s participation in a modernizing society。Boulder, CO:London:Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc。  new window
16.財團法人婦女新知基金會(2000)。1999台灣女權報告。台北:財團法人婦女新知基金會。  延伸查詢new window
17.Lijphard, Arend、Aitkin, Don(1994)。Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies, 1945-1990。Oxford University Press。  new window
18.Jewell, Malcolm E.、Patterson, Samuel C.(1977)。The Legislative Process in the United States。New York, NY:Random House。  new window
19.陳明通(1995)。派系政治與臺灣政治變遷。月旦出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.王振寰(1996)。誰統治台灣?轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Putnam, Robert D.(1976)。The Comparative Study of Political Elites。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
22.Kvale, Steinar(1996)。Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing。Sage。  new window
23.中央選舉委員會(1990)。中華民國72年增額立法委員選舉概況。  延伸查詢new window
24.中央選舉委員會(1990)。中華民國78 年增額立法委員選舉概況。  延伸查詢new window
25.Désert, Sophie des(1999)。Tu seras élue, ma fille !。Le Nouvel Observateur。Paris。  new window
26.Lee, Rose J.(2000)。Electoral Reform and Women’s Empowerment : Taiwan and South Korea。Democracy and the Status of Women in East Asia。USA。  new window
27.Randall, Vicky(1987)。Women and Politics: An International Perspective。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
28.Sainsbury, Diane(1985)。Women’s Routes to National Legislatures: A Comparison of Eligibility and Nomination in the United States, Britain and Sweden。Barcelona。  new window
29.Waylen, Georgina(1996)。Analysing Women in the Politics of the Third World.。Women and Politics in the Third World。London and New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.Taagepera, Rein(1994)。Beating the Law of Minority Attrition。Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities。Westport, CT:Greenwood Press。  new window
2.梁雙蓮、顧燕翎(1995)。臺灣婦女的政治參與體制內與體制外的觀察。臺灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年。臺北:時報。  延伸查詢new window
3.Mannheim, Karl(1952)。The Problem of Generations。Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Clark, Janet、Clark, Cal(2000)。The Reserved Seats System in Taiwan。Democracy and the Status of Women in East Asia。Boulder, Colorado:Lynne Rienner。  new window
5.Kaufman, R.(1977)。Corporatism, Clientelism, and Partisan Conflict。Corporatism and Authoritarianism in Latin America。Pittsburgh:Pittsburgh University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE