本文主要探討明代中葉到清初「閩學」傳統的重建情形及其被系譜化的過程。全文主要分為兩個部分：第一部分在指出明初福建朱子學傳播不盛的前提下，再現明代「閩學」先驅蔡清及其追隨者的學術活動，並以福建莆田學者馬明衡從學於王陽明和江西永豐人聶豹在福建宣講陽明學為例，探討陽明學與福建朱子學的學術互動，以及這種互動對重建「閩學」傳統的影響。第二部分重點以中晚明至清初持續出現的多種「閩學」系譜作品為分析對象，從中觀察「閩學」被作為地域性理學傳統而加以系譜化的書寫情形。透過這些討論，本文的主旨在於檢討中晚明理學的多元競爭格局對於地域性理學傳統重建的影響，以及建立理學系譜源頭的「根基故事」、不同時期的系譜變化與學術思想潮流間的關係、理學系譜書寫中建立人際傳承的基本原則等議題。

University This article focuses on the Neo-Confucian tradition of the Min (Fujian) Learning and its relationship to the building of a philosophical school in the world of Ming Confucianism. I hope to throw light on the evolution of Ming intellectual communities as well as on the general intellectual history of late imperial China. This study reconstructs the conflicts and debates between Confucian scholars in Fujian and the school of Wang Yangming. To distinguish themselves from both the Wang Yangming school and other philosophical schools, scholars in Fujian came together as a group and formulated their own philosophical doctrine based on the tradition of the Zhu Xi school. What emerged was a strong and unyielding philosophical school which was able to give theoretical coherence to its disciples in order to spread its teachings, thus influencing established schools of thought. The scholars of the Zhu Xi school in Fujian advanced their doctrine by establishing academies, publishing works, organizing discussions and debates, lecturing to large audiences, engaging in philosophical exchanges through correspondence with outsiders, and constructing an intellectual genealogy of local scholars through historical investigation and even creating out of whole cloth such relationships as teacher and disciple among the older and younger generations in Fujian.