:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學法修正後大學體育教師之難題與轉變--以敘事探究取向之研究
書刊名:臺灣體育學術研究
作者:劉先翔 引用關係周宏室 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Hsien-hsiangChou, Hung-shih
出版日期:2010
卷期:49
頁次:頁1-27
主題關鍵詞:大學理念體育理念體育課教育商業化敘事探究The idea of the universityThe idea of the PEPE curriculumEducational commercializationNarrative inquiry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1447
  • 點閱點閱:41
本研究旨在探討大學體育教師在大學法修正後,所遭遇之難題與轉變。研究採取質性研究之敘事探究取徑,藉以貼近大學體育教師教學現場,經由反覆分析訪談資料,並對照理論後發現,大學體育教師所面臨的難題爲:大學法修正致使體育課逐漸降低以及近年來教育商業化等衝擊,造成大學體育逐漸式微。然而,體育教師在講求學術的大學殿堂,卻也造成自我認同問題、主體性喪失的異化現象。爲能解決這些難題,受訪教師以積極的面對難題,澄清大學體育之理念以及在教學、研究與服務方面尋求轉變,藉以改變旁人對體育的刻板印象,並在教學實踐下,體育教師從工具性價值中得到了解放。透過研究,給了研究者反思,體育教師轉型至休閒系,藉由休閒相關科系的學術活動,延伸了體育的觸角,擴展了專業的範圍,在講求學術的殿堂中有了立足點,並將專業形象回饋於體育,在此二者角色的良性互動下,爲體育的發展找到一個出口。
The major purpose of this paper is to present the difficulties and changes of University Physical Education (PE) Teachers after amendment to the University Act. Using the narrative inquiry approach, the researcher is able to approach their teaching field. Data were collected with interview and analyzed in comparison with theories. The result showed that the difficulty university PE teachers encountered resulted from the amendment to the University Act, leading to reduce of PE courses and increase of commercialization of university, and so the decline of importance of physical education in the universities. Essentially, however, university aims to pursue academic excellence. In terms of university PE teachers, the most significant role they play is teaching students how to play sport rather than committed themselves to academic achievement. Thus they have difficulties with ”self-identity” and that also explain in part ”self-alienation” among them. In order to overcome existing adversities, they struggle to show the value by presenting academic performance, transferring to leisure related department, and taking a positive attitude towards teaching, research and service. Based on these, university PE teachers increasingly free from instrumental value within teaching. Finally, author has been reflective of the findings and came to a key point: The roles of PE and Leisure are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, by transferring to leisure related field, university PE teachers can extend their role into a wider professional domain, find their own foothold in the academic discipline, and therefore return professional image back to physical education. As a consequence, the university PE teachers truly find a solution for physical education.
期刊論文
1.林逢祺(2002)。市場化:高等教育的危機或轉機。今日教育,67,121-127。  延伸查詢new window
2.王慧蘭(19990500)。教育政策社會學初探。教育研究資訊,7(3),87-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Kelchtermans, Geert(1993)。Getting the story and understanding the lives: From career stories to professional development。Teaching and Teacher Education,9(5/6),443-456。  new window
4.田芳華(19981000)。自傳記憶與事件--生命史調查之應用與前瞻。調查研究,6,5-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.謝思琪(2004)。我國大學教師優質教學模式之探索研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李加耀(2003)。網球運動員追求卓越的過程:運動人類學領域的解析(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.曾瑞成(2000)。我國學校體育政策之研究:1949-1997(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳慎慎(2003)。教師專業認同與終身學習:生命史敘說研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.范信賢(2003)。課程改革中的教師轉變:敘事探究的取向(博士論文)。國立台北師範學院。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.石明宗(2005)。山難經驗:一個運動與宗教觀點的考察(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李佑峰(2007)。經驗、知識、記憶--一位高中籃球教練的敘說探究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.紀宓妏(2004)。高等教育市場化與通識經典教育間張力關係之探究--以南華大學經典教育為例(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳春蓮(2004)。體育教學的反省與實踐。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.許義雄(1998)。運動教育與人文關懷(上):政策與思想篇。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉一民(2005)。運動哲學新論:實踐知識的想像痕跡。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.金耀基(2003)。大學之理念。臺北:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡元培、胡適、楊東平(2001)。大學精神:五四前後知識分子論大學精神之經典文獻。臺北:立緒。  延伸查詢new window
6.Angrosino, M. V.(1989)。Documents of interaction: Biography, autobiography, and life history in social science perspective。Gainesville, FL:University of Florida Press。  new window
7.Crossley, Michele L.、朱儀羚、康萃婷、柯禧慧、蔡欣志、吳芝儀(2004)。敘事心理與研究:自我、創傷與意義的建構。濤石文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.許義雄(1998)。運動教育與人文關懷(下):課程與教學篇。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃俊傑(2004)。全球化時代大學通識教育的新挑戰。台北:中華民國通識教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
10.許立宏(2005)。運動哲學教育。臺北:冠學文化。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。臺北巿:五南。  延伸查詢new window
12.Goodson, I. F.、Sikes, P. J.(2001)。Life History Research in Educational Settings: Learning from Lives。Open University Press。  new window
13.江良規(1968)。體育學原理新論。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳向明(20020000)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.高永謀(2005)。請問大學校長。臺北:先覺。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.阮大年(1992)。吾父•吾子。危機與轉機。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE