:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:跨年級中學生認知地圖之分析研究:以粒子行為試題為例
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:邱美虹 引用關係鐘建坪張志康白勝安
作者(外文):Chiu, Mei-hungJong, Jing-pingChang, Chih-kangBai, Sheng-an
出版日期:2011
卷期:56:2
頁次:頁207-240
主題關鍵詞:次級資料分析概念調查認知地圖雙層診斷測驗Secondary analysisConcept surveyCognitive mapsTwo-tier diagnostic instrument
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:67
  • 點閱點閱:48
摘要: 本研究針對全國概念調查的結果進行次級資料分析(secondary data analysis),目的在探索中學生的認知地圖及其形成的相關限制因素。研究的分析架構是以Hempel(1958)描述現象觀察的理論解釋與Wellman(1994)和其他學者(Chaib-draa & Desharnais, 1998; Pena, Sossa, & Gutierrez, 2008)詮釋因果推論的認知地圖為基礎。首先,研究者依據全國概念調查雙層診斷測驗試題內容(Chiu, 2007),找出特定概念間的相互關係;其次,透過雙層試題的語意連結,形成不同試題選項之認知地圖的質性描述;最後,分析跨年級中學生認知地圖的分布情形,藉以瞭解學生在概念發展上的差異。本研究結果指出:一、跨年級中學生正確連結理論系統與經驗觀察的人數比例,雖然隨年級增加而提高,但是比例仍然偏低。二、在相似情境試題中,跨年級中學生受到壓力、重量以及隨機性等不同限制因素的影響,會形成不同類型的認知地圖。本研究所確認的概念限制因素可解釋認知地圖在概念圖像化的因果推論關係,而以認知地圖作為次級資料分析的研究方法所產生的限制與對研究的意涵將在文末一併討論。
Abstract: The purpose of this secondary data analysis study is to explore the cognitive maps (CMs) held by the students and their constraints of conceptions while forming their qualitative inferences regarding the behaviors of gas particles. The data used in this study was derived from the National Science Concept Learning Study via the use of two-tier diagnostic instruments proposed by Treagust (1988, 1995). Unlike other studies only comparing student performance, the analytical method of this study adapted a model of scientific explanations proposed by Hempel (1958), and cognitive maps by Wellman (1994) and others (Chaib-draa & Desharnais, 1998; Pena, Sossa, & Gutierrez, 2008). The results are as follows: (1) although the performances of 11th graders were superior to those of 8th and 9th graders, the percentages of correct answers were still relatively low; (2) in similar contexts, due to the constraints (gravity, pressure, and randomness of motions) of factors, the students held various CMs of gas particles and causal inferences. The identified CMs of gas particles provide information regarding the constraints that students held in their mental representations. This study presents a discussion of the educational implications for designing two-tier diagnostic instruments, and the limitations of CMs.
期刊論文
1.Ioannides, C.、Vosniadou, S.(2001)。The changing meanings of force。Cognitive Science Quarterly,2(1),5-62。  new window
2.林靜雯、邱美虹(2000)。探究學生串聯電路認知特徵演化歷程之跨年級研究。教育科學研究期刊,54(4),139-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李賢哲、樊琳、張蘭友(20050900)。國小學童「電池」概念之診斷--以兩段式選擇題為例。科學教育學刊,13(3),263-288。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Sloman, Steven A.(1996)。The Empirical Case for two Systems of Reasoning。Psychological Bulletin,119(1),3-22。  new window
5.Vosniadou, S.、Brewer, W. F.(1992)。Mental meanings of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood。Cognitive Psychology,24(4),535-585。  new window
6.Stavy, R.(1988)。Children's Conception of Gas。International Journal of Science Education,10(5),553-560。  new window
7.Treagust, David F.(1988)。Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science。International Journal of Science Education,10(2),159-169。  new window
8.Nobes, G.、Martin, A. E.、Panagiotaki, G.(2005)。The development of scientific knowledge of the Earth。British Journal of Developmental Psychology,23,47-64。  new window
9.張容君、張惠博(20071200)。國中學生「燃燒」概念診斷之研究。科學教育學刊,15(6),671-701。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張芳全(20091200)。家長教育程度與科學成就之關係:文化資本、補習時間與學習興趣為中介的分析。教育研究與發展期刊,5(4),39-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Novick, S.、Nussbaum, J.(1978)。Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter。Science Education,62(3),273-281。  new window
12.Driver, Rosalind、Easley, Jack(1978)。Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students。Studies in Science Education,5(1),61-84。  new window
13.Vosniadou, S.(1994)。Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change。Learning and instruction,4(1),45-69。  new window
14.Vosniadou, S.、Ioannides, C.(1998)。From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view。International Journal of Science Education,20(10),1213-1230。  new window
15.曾建銘、陳清溪(20091200)。2007年臺灣學生學習成就評量結果之分析。教育研究與發展期刊,5(4),1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Leboutet-Barrell, L.(1976)。Concepts of mechanics among young people。Physics Education,11(7),462-466。  new window
17.Margel, H.、Eylon, B. S.、Scherz, Z.(2008)。A longitudinal study of junior high school students' conceptions of the structure of materials。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,45(1),132-152。  new window
18.Adbo, K.、Taber, K. S.(2009)。Learners' mental models of the particle nature of matter: A study of 16-year-old Swedish science students。International Journal of Science Education,31(6),757-786。  new window
19.Andersson, B.(1990)。Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16)。Studies in Science Education,18(1),53-85。  new window
20.Peña, A.、Sossa, H.、Gutiérrez, A.(2008)。Causal knowledge and reasoning by cognitive maps: Pursuing a holistic approach.。Expert Systems with Applications,35(1/2),2-18。  new window
21.Pozo, J. I.、Gómez-Crespo, M.(2005)。The embodied nature of implicit theories: The consistency of ideas about the nature of matter.。Cognition and Instruction,23(3),351-387。  new window
22.Klein, J. L.、Cooper, D. F.(1982)。Cognitive maps of decision markers in a complex game。Journal of the Operational Research Society,33(1),63-71。  new window
23.Wellman, M.(1994)。Inference in cognitive maps。Mathematics and Computers in Simulation,36(2),137-148。  new window
24.Treagust, D. F.、Chandrasegaran, A. L.(2007)。The Taiwan national science concept learning study in an international perspective。International Journal of Science Education,29(4),391-403。  new window
25.Treagust, D. F.、Chandrasegaran, A. L.、Crowley, J.、Yung, B. H. W.、Cheong, I. P. A.、Othman, J.(2010)。Evaluating students' understanding of kinetic pariticle theory concepts relating to the states of matter, changes of state and diffusion: A cross-national study.。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,8(1),141-164。  new window
26.Treagust, D. F.、Chiu, M.-H.、Guo, C.-J. Eds.(2007)。Taiwan's national science concept learning study: A large scale assessment project using two-tier diagnostic tests。International Journal of Science Education,29(4)。  new window
27.Chaib-draa, B.(2002)。Causal maps: Theory, implementation, and practical applications in multiagent environments。IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,14(6),1201-1217。  new window
28.Chaib-draa, B.、Desharnais, J.(1998)。A relational model of cognitive maps。International Journal Human--Computer Studies,49(2),181-200。  new window
29.Chiu, M.-H.(2007)。A national survery of students' conceptions of chemistry in Taiwan。International Journal of Science Education,29(4),421-452。  new window
30.diSessa, A. A.(1993)。Towards an epistemology of physics。Cognition and Instruction,10(2/3),105-225。  new window
31.diSessa, A. A.、Sherin, B. L.(1998)。What changes in conceptual change?。International Journal of Science Education,20(10),1155-1192。  new window
32.Helm, H.(1980)。Misconception in physics among South Africa students。Physics Education,15(2),92-105。  new window
33.Johnson, P.(1998)。Progression in children's understanding of a basic particle theory: A longitudinal study。International Journal of Science Education,20(4),393-412。  new window
34.Kautz, C. H.、Heron, P. R. L.、Loverude, M. E.、McDermott, L. C.(2005)。Student understanding of the ideal gas law, Part I: A macroscopic perspective。Am. J. Phys.,73(11),1055-1063。  new window
35.Trundle, K. C.、Atwood, R. K.、Christopher, J. E.(2007)。A longitudinal study of conceptual change: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of moon phases.。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44(2),303-326。  new window
36.Talanquer, V.(2009)。On cognitive constraints and learning progressions: The case of 'structure of matter。International Journal of Science Education,31(15),2123-2136。  new window
37.Tam, H.-P.、Li, L.-A.(2007)。Sampling and data collection procedures for the national science concept learning study。International Journal of Science Education,29(4),405-420。  new window
會議論文
1.陳正昌(2006)。教育基礎研究的兩個量化基礎--資料庫及統計。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Buzan, T.、Buzan, B.(1993)。The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain's untapped potential。New York:BBC Books。  new window
2.Duit, R.(2009)。Bibliography STCSE: Students' and teachers' conceptions and science education。Kiel:IPN--Leibniz Institute for Science。  new window
3.林正弘(1988)。伽利略、波柏、科學說明。臺北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Carey, S.(1985)。Conceptual change in childhood。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
5.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Eden, C. J.、Sims, D.(1979)。Thinking in organizations。London。  new window
7.Harrison, A. G.、Treagust, D. F.(2002)。The particulate nature of matter: Challenges in understanding the submicroscopic world.。Chemical education: Towards research-based practice。Dordrecht, the Netherlands。  new window
8.Hempel, C. G.(1958)。The theoretician's dilemma: A study in logic theory construction.。Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 2。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
9.Suppe, F.(1977)。The search for philosophic understanding of scientific theories。The structure of scientific theories second edition。Urbana, IL。  new window
10.Millar, R.(1990)。Making sense: What use are particle ideas to children?。Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles: A central problem in secondary science education。Utrecht, the Netherlands。  new window
11.Nussbaum, J.(1985)。The particulate nature of matter in the gaseous phase。Children's ideas in science。Milton Keynes, UK。  new window
其他
1.邱美虹,鐘建坪,張志康,白勝安(2011)。跨年級中學生認知地圖--致性分析。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Duit, R.、Treagust, D. F.(1995)。Students' conceptions and constructivist teaching approaches。Improving science education。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Treagust, D. F.(1995)。Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge。Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice。New Jersey。  new window
3.McCloskey, M.(1983)。Naive theories of motion。Mental models。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE