:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:劉壽曾《昏禮重別論對駁義》疏論
書刊名:興大中文學報
作者:曾聖益 引用關係
作者(外文):Tseng, Sheng-yi
出版日期:2011
卷期:29
頁次:頁213-233
主題關鍵詞:劉毓崧劉壽曾劉端陳壽祺士昏禮親迎廟見Liu YusongLiu ShouzengLiu DuanChen ShouqiWedding ceremony of ShiTo marry personallyWorshiping ancestors in ancestral temple
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:121
  • 點閱點閱:115
《儀禮‧士昏禮》及《禮記‧昏義》記載之士昏禮是否適用於大夫以上,漢儒即存異說,歷代更是各有主張,聚訟不止。清代學者透過訓詁考據探求古代習俗及文物制度,於禮制及禮意均多所發明。但於〈士昏禮〉之儀節是否是適用於士族以上之全體,則仍存歧異之觀點。〈士昏禮〉六禮止於親迎,然「親迎」是否表示昏配已經完成,既合二姓之好,亦足以上事宗廟,下濟後世,則影響到婦人之地位,及後續相關的禮儀,如喪期服制等細節。劉毓崧繼承其父劉文淇,精研禮制,據文獻記載,強調〈士昏禮〉之若干細節並不適用於大夫以上,其中「三月廟見」為大夫以上特有之儀節,且至此昏禮方為完成。士人則無「三月廟見」之事,親迎當夕,即成婚配。劉端則主張〈士昏禮〉乃士大夫以上階層一體適用,「三月廟見」乃成婦之儀式,與昏禮無涉。劉毓崧著有〈大夫以上先廟見後成昏說〉三篇,劉壽曾闡發其義,欲見精微,劉端著有《古義昏禮重別論》若干卷,二家往復論對,經劉壽曾整理成《昏禮重別論對駁義》,頗見二說之要義。茲分梳二家之說,以闡述其要旨,亦藉以略見清儒於此問題之考辨與論述情形,於清代禮學之研究,或有可參酌之處。
There has been different viewpoints by scholars in the Han dynasty about whether the wedding ceremony of Shi recorded in 'Liyi‧Shihunli' (《儀禮‧士昏禮》) and 'Liji‧Hunyi' (《禮記‧昏義》) is applicable to the 'dafu' rank and above. There are also various propositions during different dynasties, which aroused continuous arguments. Scholars of the Qing dynasty were familiar with textual criticism on the interpretation of ancient texts, and are proficient in cultural system, and there are numerous inventions on rites and rituals. However, there are still different viewpoints on whether the ritual of the wedding ceremony of shi is applicable to all the 'shi' rank and above. The six rituals of the wedding ceremony of Shi are completed with the ritual of marrying personally. However whether or not the ritual signifies the completion of the marriage which brings together two families, serving the ancestors and assisting the coming generations, has an important influence on the status of the woman, and related rituals like attires and duration of mourning thereafter.Being the successor of his father Liu Wenqi, Liu Yusong had attained thorough study in the system of ritual. Referring to text records, he emphasized that several aspects of the wedding ceremony of Shi are not applicable on the 'dafu' and higher ranks. Among which, worshiping ancestors in ancestral temple after three months of marriage is only carried out by the 'dafu' and higher ranks, and only then is the wedding ceremony considered complete. This is not found in the wedding ceremony of 'shiren'. The ritual is complete when the wedding ceremony is carried out without the ritual of ancestor worshiping.On the other hand, Liu Duan proposed that the wedding of Shi is applicable to the 'shidafu' and all higher ranks. The worshipping ceremony has no concern about the wedding, but rather a ritual of transition from a maiden to a woman.Liu Shouzeng had presented the precise meaning in his elaboration of the three articles of 'da fu yi shang xian miao jian hou cheng hun shuo' (〈大夫以上先廟見後成昏說〉) written by Liu Yusong. Liu Duan had also written several articles entitled 'gu yi hun li zhong bie lun' (《古義昏禮重別論》). With repeated comparison, these articles are summarized into 'hun li zhong bie lun bo yi' (《昏禮重別論對駁義》) which showcased the essence of the two writers.In order to present the research and discussion on the problem by scholars of the Qing dynasty, this article summarized the viewpoints of the two scholars to elaborate on their main ideas. Hoping that this could present some point of discussions on the study of Lixue in the Qing dynasty.
期刊論文
1.林素娟(20030600)。古代婚禮「廟見成婦」說問題探究。漢學研究,21(1)=42,47-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.季旭昇(19870600)。禮記曾子問「三月廟見」考辨。中國學術年刊,9,51-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李源澄(19630301)。先配後祖申杜說並論廟見致女反馬諸義。制言半月刊,12。  延伸查詢new window
4.管東貴(1975)。我對「廟見」與「反馬」的看法。大陸雜誌,64(2)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳壽祺(1968)。福建通志。華文書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃以周、王文錦(2007)。禮書通故。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.張壽安(20010000)。十八世紀禮學考證的思想活力:禮教論爭與禮秩重省。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.孔穎達(1987)。禮記正義。十三經注疏。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱冠華(1998)。劉師培春秋左氏傳研究。北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.張貽琯(2002)。鳳臺縣續志。北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.胡鳳丹(2004)。青冢志。香豔叢書。揚州。  延伸查詢new window
8.孔穎達(1987)。春秋左傳正義。十三經注疏。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉文淇(2008)。劉文淇集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉毓崧(1984)。通義堂集。  延伸查詢new window
11.高壽恆(2008)。太湖縣志。合肥。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳吉(1999)。福州市郊區志。福州。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉壽曾(1987)。昏禮重別論對駁義。皇清經解續編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.楊士勛(1987)。穀梁傳注疏。十三經注疏。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉恭冕(2006)。廣經室文鈔。寶應劉氏集。揚州。  延伸查詢new window
16.萬斯大(1977)。學禮質疑。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.管東貴(1981)。中國古代的媵娣制與試婚制。中央研究院國際漢學會議論文集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)劉壽曾(2001)。劉壽曾集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE