:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中學生的歷史概念、歷史學習態度與歷史批判思考傾向
書刊名:教育實踐與研究
作者:黃麗蓉賴思儀楊淑晴 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Li-jungLai, Si-yiYang, Shu-ching
出版日期:2011
卷期:24:2
頁次:頁65-97
主題關鍵詞:歷史批判思考傾向歷史思考能力歷史教育Historical critical thinking abilitiesHistorical critical thinking dispositionHistory education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:47
  • 點閱點閱:68
近年來,學生歷史思考能力的培養,已是歐美國家教育改革的主要方向;於此風潮之下,臺灣中學的歷史教育也出現了新變革。但是,針對中學生如何理解與認知「史料」、「證據」、「解釋」等重要歷史核心概念,至今則未見植基於「學習者中心」之觀點來進行探索。再者,國內學界對於學生如何看待歷史,以及歷史批判思維能力的相關測驗工具並不多見,故本研究參酌國內、外相關研究量表,據以為基礎進行改編,使其符合歷史科目之特性,最後乃編製成「歷史科批判思考傾向量表」,藉此探究目前中學生之歷史概念、歷史學習態度與歷史批判思考傾向。本研究對象為高雄市國中二、三年級學生以及高中二年級學生,有效問卷計 1,017份。研究結果顯示,學生在歷史課堂的學習,以歷史知識為主,對於歷史概念內涵的認知相當有限。此外,對歷史老師評價愈高的學生、愈常閱讀歷史小說或故事者、以及愈喜好歷史科的中學生,其歷史批判思考傾向則愈高。最後,本研究亦針對研究結果,提出具體建議以供教師、後續研究者作為適用與修訂之方向。
Exploring ways to cultivate learners’ historical critical thinking has been one of the main themes in recent US and European educational reform. However, the processes by which learners’ understand the concepts in history (i.e. historical documents, evidence, empathy, interpretation and accounts) have not been investigated from a learner-centered perspective. Furthermore, how learners view history and their disposition to historical critical thinking have not been fully explored. The purpose of the study is to design instruments that measure students’ history learning and to explore learners’ development of history concepts, attitude toward history learning, and their historical critical thinking disposition. The participants were 1017 8th, 9th and 11th grade students within the Kaohsiung County. Results showed that learners in history courses, in general, tend to focus on memorizing historical facts and display only limited understanding toward the concepts of history. In addition, analysis showed that learners with more positive evaluation toward teachers, read a greater number of historical novels and stories, as well as reported more liking of history. These learners also display much better performance on historical critical thinking disposition. Based on the findings, some suggestions were proposed for history teachers and future studies.
期刊論文
1.陳冠華(19990900)。英國歷史教育改革理念之歷史科的內容。清華歷史教學,10,24-44。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋佩芬(20080400)。講述中的歷史思維教學:一些可能與問題。師大學報:教育類,53(1),175-197。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Siegel, Harvey(1980)。Critical thinking as an educational ideal。The Educational Forum,45(1),7-23。  new window
4.陳麗華、李涵鈺、林陳涌(2004)。國內批判思考測驗工具及其應用之分析。課程與教學,7(2),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.張元(2007)。如何在一學期內教完中國歷史。清華歷史教學,18,1-3。  延伸查詢new window
6.Kaiser, Henry F.(1974)。An index of factorial simplicity。Psychometrika,39(1),31-36。  new window
7.李彼得、周孟玲(19940600)。兒童學習歷史的進程。清華歷史教學,3,5-14。  延伸查詢new window
8.張元、駱月娟(1996)。十一歲兒童歷史認知能力初探。清華歷史教學,5,4-30。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳冠華(2000)。追尋更有意義的歷史課--「英國學校委員會歷史科計畫13-16」。清華歷史教學,11,13-29。  延伸查詢new window
10.Andrews, R.、McGlynn, C.、Mycock, A.(2009)。Students' attitudes towards history: Does self-identity matter?。Educational Research,51(3),365-367。  new window
11.De La Paz, S.(2005)。Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms。Journal of Educational Psychology,97(2),139–156。  new window
會議論文
1.王健文(2000)。九年一貫制新課程架構下的歷史基本學力指標、評量與教學設計。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.宋明娟(2003)。「啟發歷史思維」的教與學─理論與實例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳荻卿(2000)。批判思考教學策略運用在國小五年級社會科之實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳志堅(2003)。理性理解歷史--國小歷史教學的個案考察(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃道遠(2003)。國小歷史教學的反思、理論與實際(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉曉芬(1991)。我國中學歷史教科書中臺灣史教材的分析(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.邵宗儀(2006)。國中生歷史思維能力教學之研究--以國三課程(世界文明的發展)為例。慈濟大學,花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉慶忠(2007)。國二學生歷史批判思考能力測驗之編製與表現現況之探討。國立臺南大學,臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.郭實渝、National Center for History in the Schools(1996)。美國歷史科國家課程標準:探討美國經驗。美國歷史科國家課程標準:探討美國經驗。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Facione, P. A.、Facione, N. C.(1992)。The California critical thinking disposition inventory。The California Academic Press。  new window
3.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.林慈淑(20100000)。歷史,要教什麼?:英、美歷史教育的爭議。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Ennis, R. H.、Millman, J.、Tomko, T. N.(1985)。Cornell Critical Thinking Tests, Level X & Level Z-Manual。Pacific Grove, CA:Midwest Publications。  new window
6.Bruner, J. S.(1971)。Toward a theory of instruction。London:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Norris, Stephen P.、Ennis, Robert H.(1989)。Evaluating critical thinking。Midwest Publications。  new window
8.吳翎君(2004)。歷史教學理論與實務。台北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳明隆(2009)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。  new window
11.教育部(1994)。國民中學歷史課程標準。台北。  延伸查詢new window
12.Angvik, M.、von Borries, B.(1997)。Youth and history: A comparative European survey on historical consciousness and political attitudes among adolescents。Hamburg:Körber-Stiftung。  new window
13.Bruner, J. S.(1969)。The process of education。London。  new window
14.Paul, R.、Elder, L.(2001)。Critical thinking: Tools for taking of your learning and your life。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
15.Siegel, S.、Castellan, N.(1989)。Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences。New York。  new window
16.Watson, G.、Glaser, E. M.(1980)。Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal。San Antonio, TX。  new window
17.林慈淑(2001)。史家?偵探?或記錄----10-14 歲兒童對歷史記述的一些想法。史學與文獻。台北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部中等教育司(200610)。普通高級中學課程暫行綱要,http://www.edu.tw/, 2008/09/24。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2003)。九年一貫課程基本能力,http://140.117.12.91/9CC/index_new.php, 20091129。  延伸查詢new window
3.National Center for History in the Schools(1996)。National standards for history,http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/nchs/catalog.html, 20080824。  new window
4.Qualifications and Curriculum Authority(2007)。History programme of study for key stage 3 and attainment target,London。,http://curriculum.qcda.gov.uk/uploads/QCA-07-3335-p_History3_tcm8-189.pdf, 20090824。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lee, P. J.(2005)。Putting principles into practice: understanding history。How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE