:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:質性評鑑興起中的觀念變遷與發展現況--因果、事實、正義
書刊名:市北教育學刊
作者:張芬芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Fen-fen
出版日期:2012
卷期:43
頁次:頁1-33
主題關鍵詞:教育評鑑質性研究方法論因果事實正義Educational evaluationQualitative methodologyCausationRealityJustice
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:115
  • 點閱點閱:47
期刊論文
1.游家政、曾祥榕(20041200)。教育評鑑的後設評鑑。教育資料集刊,29,53-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張芬芬(20070700)。後現代質性研究:特徵及其對課程研究的蘊義。課程與教學,10(3),31-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張芬芬(20071200)。英國教師評鑑之背景、趨勢與啟示:胡蘿蔔與棒子下的英國老師。初等教育學刊,28,1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃政傑(20041200)。質性教育評鑑之探討。教育資料集刊,29,95-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳清山、王湘栗(20041200)。教育評鑑的概念與發展。教育資料集刊,29,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林天祐(20041200)。教育評鑑實施過程與方法的專業化。教育資料集刊,29,27-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.馬信行(2007)。後設分析之方法論問題之探討。αβγ量化研究學刊,1(1),170-183。  延伸查詢new window
8.Greene Lincoln Y.、Mathison S.、Mertens D. M.(199803)。Advantages and Challenges of Using Inclusive Evaluation Approaches in Evaluation Practice。American Journal of Evaluation,19(1),101-122。  new window
會議論文
1.潘慧玲(2004)。邁向下一代的教育機構評鑑:回顧與前瞻。「教育機構評鑑回顧與展望」學術研討會,國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心 。臺北市:臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。11-23。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃從孝(2006)。桃園縣國民小學教師實施"認識世界"縣級課程之調查研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2005)。師資培育素質提升方案。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cronbach, L.(1982)。Designing evaluations of educational and social program。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Hunter, J. E.、Schmidt, F. L.(1990)。Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research finding。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
4.林火旺(2005)。正義與公民:自由主義的觀點。宜蘭:佛光人文社會學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.Campbell, D. T.、Stanley, J. C.(1963)。Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research。Boston:Houghton Mifflin。  new window
6.Miles, Matthew B.、Huberman, A. Michael、Newman, G.(1994)。Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook。Sage Publications。  new window
7.黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1989)。Fourth generation evaluation。Sage Publications。  new window
9.Cremin, L. A.(1988)。American Education: The Metropolitan Experience, 1876-1980。New York, NY:Harper & Row。  new window
10.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
11.Babbie, Earl Robert(1998)。The Practice of Social Research。International Thomson Publishing:Wadsworth。  new window
12.Patton, M. Q.(1997)。Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text。Sage。  new window
13.Patton, Michael Quinn(1990)。Qualitative evaluation and research method。Sage。  new window
14.Maxwell, J. A.(1996)。Qualitative research design: An interactive approach。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage。  new window
15.林玉体(2002)。美國教育史。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳伯璋主編(1986)。教育研究的新取向。臺北:南宏。  延伸查詢new window
17.Kopetz, P. B.、Lease, A. J.、Warren-Kring, B. Z.(2005)。Comprehensive Urban Education。Boston, MA:Pearson Education。  new window
18.Stake, R. E.(1975)。The art of case study research。London, United Kingdom:Sage。  new window
19.Suchman, E. A.(1967)。Evaluation Research。New York, NY:Russell Sage。  new window
20.張芬芬(2006)。質性研究資料分析。臺北:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Patton, M. Q.(2000)。Utilization-focused evaluation。Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation。Boston:Kluwer Academic。  new window
2.廖遠光(2009)。後設分析研究法。教育科技--理論與實務(下)--理論、研究方法篇。台北市:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Stufflebeam, D. L.(2000)。Foundational models for 21st century program evaluation。Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation。Boston, MA。  new window
4.Lincoln, Y. S.(1992)。Curriculum studies and the traditions of inquiry: The humanistic tradition。Handbook of Research on Curriculum。New York:Simon & Schuster Macmillan。  new window
5.王麗雲、侯崇博(2004)。方案評鑑的理論與實施。「教育評鑑回顧與展望學術研討會」會議手冊。  延伸查詢new window
6.丘延亮、OscarLewis(2004)。導讀三:演敘「貧窮文化」。貧窮文化:五個墨西哥家庭一日生活的實錄。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
7.張芬芬(2001)。研究者必須中立客觀嗎?行動研究的知識論與幾個關鍵問題。行動研究與課程教學革新。臺北市:揚智。  延伸查詢new window
8.游家政(2008)。國民中小學教科書評鑑的問題與改進--後設評鑑的觀點。課程評鑑--理念、研究與應用。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.蘇錦麗(2005)。審訂序。評鑑模式:教育及人力服務的評鑑觀點。臺北:高教。  延伸查詢new window
10.Campbell, D.(1982)。Experiment as Arguments。Evaluation Studies Review Annual。Beverly Hill, CA:Sage。  new window
11.Cook, T. D.(1985)。Postpositive critical multiplism。Social science and social policy。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
12.Greene, J. C.(2000)。Understanding social programs through evaluation。Handbook of qualitative research。London, United Kingdom:Sage。  new window
13.Hammersley, M.、Atkinson, P.(1994)。Ethnography and participant observation。Handbook of qualitative research。London, United Kingdom:Sage。  new window
14.House, E. R.(2005)。Qualitative evaluation and changing social policy。Handbook of qualitative research。London, United Kingdom:Sage。  new window
15.Lincoln, Y. S.、Denzin, N. K.(2005)。Epilogue: The eighth and ninth moments: Qualitative research in/and the fractured future。Handbook of qualitative research。London, United Kingdom:Sage。  new window
16.Madaus, G. F.、Stufflebeam, D. L.(2000)。Program Evaluation: A Historical Overview。valuation Models: Viewpoints on Educational & Human Services Evaluation。Norwell, MA:Kluwer。  new window
17.Nave, B.、Miech, E. J.、Mosteller, F.(2000)。The Role of Field Trials in Evaluating School Practices: A Rare Design。Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational & Human Services Evaluation。Boston, MA:Kluwer。  new window
18.Pitman, M. A.、Maxwell, J. A.(1992)。Qualitative Approached to Evaluation。Handbook of qualitative research in education。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
19.Scriven, M.(2000)。Evaluation Ideologies。Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational & Human Services Evaluation。Boston, MA:Kluwer。  new window
20.Vidich, A. J.、Lyman, S. M.(2000)。Qualitative Methods: Their History in Sociology and Anthropology。Handbook of qualitative research。London, United Kingdom:Sage。  new window
21.Walker, D. F.(1992)。Methodological issues in curriculum research。Handbook of research on curriculum。London, United Kingdom:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE