:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用多元教學策略於醫管倫理課程之教學實踐
書刊名:人文社會科學研究. 教育類
作者:尤素芬鄭惠珠
作者(外文):You, Su-fenCheng, Huei-chu
出版日期:2018
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁19-45
主題關鍵詞:多元教學策略主動學習倫理教育專業倫理教學實踐Multidimensional teaching methodActive learningEthical educationProfessional ethicsPedagogical praxis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:253
  • 點閱點閱:8
本文是專業倫理課程之教學實務研究,探討多元教學策略結合翻轉教學是否能提高學生的學習成效,並強化其自主學習能力。研究方法採用前後測問卷調查為主,輔以課程助理之課堂參與式觀察之方法。本研究發現,多元教學方法可以激發學生的學習興趣,而翻轉教學的確讓學生的學習準備度提高,並讓教師能帶動較具深度的討論。另外,本課程基於成人學習理論採用案例討論法與過程任務的設計,促成了同儕對話與合作學習的機制,且提升了學生和老師的對話互動。就學習成效而言,學生所具備的倫理知識及判斷在期初/期末有明顯的改變,對各倫理內涵的重視態度也是如此,並認同「掌握倫理內涵」是醫管人員應具備之能力,這些都表示課程有達到學習目標。最後,有關多元教學方法的評值,學生對「專家演講」及「主題報告」兩項在提升學習成效的認同上有達到顯著水準;相較之下,「閱讀寫作」及「創意海報」得到的回響較為分歧,認為能提升學習成效的分數也較低。整體來說,多數學生認同多元教學法,認為花更多時間在學習活動是值得的。本文認為,醫管倫理課程採用多元教學策略有明顯可見的效果,也能提升學生的主動學習能力,但在過程中仍然需要對學生提供足夠的引導。
This paper explores the teaching practice of Professional Ethics for the students in the Department of Healthcare Administration in some private university in Taiwan. It examines whether multidimensional teaching method combined with flipped classroom can improve students' learning outcomes and strengthen their capacity of active learning. We conducted pre-course and post-course questionnaire surveys and also participatory observation as a supplementary method. We found that the multiple teaching methods did arouse students' interest in learning. Meanwhile, flipped instruction has improved students' learning preparation and enabled teachers to drive in-depth discussion more. Based on the theory of adult learning, this course adopted case study and process tasks. Such a course design worked well in that it has facilitated the mechanism of cooperative learning, and has also enhanced the teacher-student interaction. The students' ethical knowledge appeared obvious changes at the end in comparison with that at the beginning of the semester, and likewise their attitudes towards attaching importance on ethical implications. They considered that ethical reasoning is part of the professional capacities. The above means that the goals of learning are well achieved. Regarding the evaluation of multidimensional teaching methods, both expert speech and topic report reached a significant level in contributing to learning progress. In contrast, both reflective writing and creative poster received lower level of scores. On the whole, most students agreed with the multidimensional teaching method and believed that spending more time on learning activities is worthwhile. Finally we argue that the multidimensional teaching method may result in good learning outcomes and also in enhancing students' capacity of active learning. It is necessary to provide enough guidance for students in the process.
期刊論文
1.簡麗瑜、黃翠媛、黃秀梨(20061200)。後現代主義思潮對護理課程的影響及護理教師的因應策略。醫學教育,10(4),259-266。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林思伶(20000400)。淺談倫理教育教學法。哲學與文化,27(4)=311,362-371+406。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳清惠、林秀娟、趙可式、林其和(20101200)。運用多元教學策略於醫學院大一新生「生命倫理學」課程教學之成效。醫學教育,14(4),262-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡甫昌、謝博生(20030700)。醫師專業精神與醫療組織倫理。臺灣醫學,7(4),587-601。  延伸查詢new window
5.白亦方(20070700)。後現代課程研究的內涵與應用性評析。課程與教學,10(3),17-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳茂祥(20010600)。自我導向學習理論及其在成人教育上的啟示。朝陽學報,6,65-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林義鈜(20081000)。論醫學倫理教育。澄清醫護管理雜誌,4(4),4-7。  延伸查詢new window
8.韓揆(20010600)。當醫管由總務「升」為企劃--韓氏檢視表及其設計理念。醫務管理期刊,2(2),1-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.游惠瑜(20090600)。關懷取向的專業倫理教育。哲學與文化,36(6)=421,103-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Roach, Travis(2014)。Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics。International Review of Economics Education,17,74-84。  new window
11.楊仁宏、陳家玉(20060300)。醫學教育典範的重要性:你我都可以是典範。醫學教育,10(1),8-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.邱亨嘉、林怡潔、陳楚杰、李偉強(20140700)。臺灣醫務管理專業教育發展和現況。醫療品質雜誌,8(4),4-8。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Shewchuk, R. M.、O'Connor, S. J.、Fine, D.(2006)。Bridging the gap: Academic and practitioner perspectives to identify early career competencies needed in healthcare management。Journal of Health Administration Education,23(4),366-392。  new window
14.Knowles, M. S.(1968)。Andragogy, Not Pedagogy。Adult Leadership,16(10),350-352+386。  new window
15.張芬芬(20070700)。後現代質性研究:特徵及其對課程研究的蘊義。課程與教學,10(3),31-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.龔心怡、林素卿(20090100)。教師課程意識與教學實踐模式之建構--以英語科為例。課程與教學,12(1),99-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.許朝信(20041000)。後現代課程理論之省思。課程與教學,7(4),27-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.朱建民(19960600)。專業倫理教育的理論與實踐。通識教育,3(2),33-56。  延伸查詢new window
19.馮丰儀(20120200)。案例教學法在大學專業倫理課程應用之探討--以教育行政倫理課程為例。慈濟大學教育研究學刊,8,1-30。  延伸查詢new window
20.黃政傑、張嘉育(20100700)。讓學生成功學習:適性課程與教學之理念與策略。課程與教學,13(3),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.林佩璇(20091200)。課程行動研究的實踐論述:從自我到社會文化。教育實踐與研究,22(2),95-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.張景媛、呂玉琴、何縕琪、吳青蓉、林奕宏(20020400)。多元思考教學策略對國小教師數學教學之影響暨教師專業成長模式之建構。教育心理學報,33(2),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.曾釋嫻、蔡秉燁(20150100)。翻轉課堂教學與傳統教學對大學生學習策略之差異研究。雙溪教育論壇,3,1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.邱珍琬(20121200)。批判思考與教學--以南部大學生為例。彰化師大教育學報,22,73-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.van den Hoven, M.、Kole, J.(2015)。Distance, dialogue and reflection: Interpersonal reflective equilibrium as method for professional ethics education。Journal of Moral Education,44(2),145-164。  new window
26.吳俊憲、吳錦惠(2015)。翻轉教室--啟動教室裡寧靜的革命。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(6),174-178。  延伸查詢new window
27.羅寶鳳(20161000)。學教翻轉:翻轉課堂的課程與教學。課程與教學,19(4),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.尤素芬(20160600)。反思性實務為基礎之倫理教學研究:醫管碩專班學生的學習歷程探討。科學教育學刊,24(2),195-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.吳秀玲、莊秋萍、林麗華、鄒怡真、熊道芬、桑潁潁、洪世欣、黃子珍、周幸生(20170600)。探討壓瘡防治多元教學策略對護理人員認知及病人壓瘡發生率之影響。榮總護理,34(2),118-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.林玉娟(2015)。翻轉創意--談慈大護理的多元教學策略。志為護理--慈濟護理雜誌,14(3),14-21。  延伸查詢new window
31.洪婉真、江佳芸、林巧薇、林書妤、林駿瑋、徐敏齡、張碩芳(20150600)。醫管職能與科系競爭力之評選模式。醫務管理期刊,16(2),173-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.洪瑞黛、張簡琳玲、林合懋(20160900)。運用多元教學策略的通識生命教育課程結合服務學習之學習成效研究--以中部某科技大學人文精神(一)課程為例。弘光學報,78,85-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.高美英、呂碧鴻、褚齡霙(20041200)。臺灣當前醫學人文課程之實施現況與推展困境。醫學教育,8(4),392-403。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.崔紘彰、何明蓉(20080900)。臺灣醫學人文教育推動的進展--深度訪談之質性分析。醫學教育,12(3),133-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.陳錦生(20100300)。漫談專業倫理教育。通識在線,27,8-9。  延伸查詢new window
36.劉競明(20100300)。醫學教育研究之現況與展望--醫學人文社會教育師資培育工作坊。醫學教育,14(1),58-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.錢昭萍、梁麗珍(20170900)。多元教學對不同學院與性別的學生學習態度與學習成效之影響--以科技大學大一國文課為例。人文社會學報. 國立臺灣科技大學,13(3),219-249。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.賴其萬(20070400)。醫學典範在推動醫學倫理的意義。澄清醫護管理雜誌,3(2),4-8。  延伸查詢new window
39.戴正德(20060600)。醫學倫理教學法的探討。臺灣醫學人文學刊,7(1/2),133-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.蘇芊玲(20170900)。大專校院通識性別課程的教學實踐。人文社會科學研究. 教育類,11(3),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Betihavas, V.、Bridgman, H.、Kornhaber, R.、Cross, M.(2016)。The evidence for 'flipping out': a systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education。Nurse education today,38,15-21。  new window
42.Franklin, Y.(2014)。Virtually Unpacking Your Backpack: Educational Philosophy and Pedagogical Praxis。Educational Studies,50(1),65-86。  new window
43.Jacobs, H. L. M.(2008)。Information Literacy and Reflective Pedagogical Praxis。Journal of Academic Librarianship,34(3),256-262。  new window
44.Lo, C. K.、Hew, K. F.(2017)。A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: possible solutions and recommendations for future research。Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning,12(1),(4)1-(4)22。  new window
45.Zuber, W. J.(2016)。The flipped classroom, a review of the literature。Industrial and Commercial Training,48(2),97-103。  new window
46.黃政傑(20141200)。翻轉教室的理念、問題與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(12),161-186。  延伸查詢new window
47.黃永和(20021000)。後現代思潮與課程改革--一種後現代科學的觀照角度。教育研究月刊,102,54-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.Chang, W.(2005)。The Rewards and Challenges of Teaching Innovation in University Physics: Four Years' Reflection。International Journal of Science Education,27(4),407-425。  new window
49.Chang, W.(2005)。Impact of Constructivist Teaching on Students' Beliefs about Teaching and Learning in Introductory Physics。Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education,5(1),95-109。  new window
會議論文
1.Baker, J. Wesley(2000)。The ''classroom flip'': Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side。The 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning。Florida Community College。9-17。  new window
2.Bishop, Jacob、Verleger, Matthew A.(2013)。The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research, American Society for Engineering Education。2013 ASEE Annual Conference。Atlanta, Georgia。  new window
研究報告
1.許怡欣、許玫玲、盧美秀(2006)。醫務管理倫理教育課程規劃及評估 (計畫編號:NSC94-2516-S038-003)。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.馮丰儀、張鈿富(2012)。高等教育典範轉變與創新發展--大專院校教師實施專業倫理課程之調查研究 (計畫編號:NSC 99-2410-H-260-037-)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.曾瑋莉(2003)。活化醫學倫理教育課程策略之探討--以臺北醫學大學醫學系為例(碩士論文)。臺北醫學大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.盧俞霞(2008)。醫務管理學生之醫務管理倫理態度與醫務管理倫理教育需求(碩士論文)。臺北醫學大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳武典(2008)。多元智能量表(丙式)(CMIDAS-C)指導手冊。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gardner, H. E.(2000)。Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
3.Hamdan, Noora、McKnight, Patrick、McKnight, Katherine、Arfstrom, Kari M.(2013)。The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled a review of flipped learning。Flipped Learning Network。  new window
4.黃永和(20010000)。後現代課程理論之研究:一種有機典範的課程觀。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Elliott, John(1991)。Action research for educational change。Open University Press。  new window
6.Darr, K.(2011)。Ethics in Health Services Management。Maryland:Health Professions Press。  new window
7.Knowles, M. S.(1984)。Andragogy in action。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass。  new window
8.Morrison, E. E.(2015)。Ethics in health administration: a practical approach for decision makers。Burlington:Jones & Bartlett Learning。  new window
9.Houle, Cyril O.(1961)。The Inquiring Mind。Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
10.Gardner, Howard E.(1993)。Multiple intelligences: the theory in practice。Basic Books。  new window
11.Gardner, Howard E.(1983)。Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences。Basic Books。  new window
12.Stenhouse, Lawrence(1975)。An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development。Heinemann Educational Books。  new window
13.McKernan, J.(1996)。Curriculum Action Research: A Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner。Kogan Page。  new window
圖書論文
1.Tough, A. M.(1989)。Self-directed learning: Concepts and practice。Lifelong education for adults: An international handbook。Elmsford, New York:Pergamon Press。  new window
2.石曜堂(2011)。一生守候:活出「意義」與「價值」。認識醫學倫理。新北市:前程文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡甫昌(2012)。踏上醫學倫理之旅。堅持5醫學倫理教學的創新與反思。臺北市:允晨文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Flood, R. L.(2002)。The Relationship of Systems Thinking to Action Research。Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE