:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:歐陽脩古文之文體創發--以〈尹師魯墓誌銘〉、〈論尹師魯墓誌〉為中心
書刊名:嘉大中文學報
作者:蓋琦紓
作者(外文):Ko, Chi-shu
出版日期:2012
卷期:7
頁次:頁97-121
主題關鍵詞:歐陽脩尹洙碑誌題跋古文運動唐宋散文Ouyang XiuYin ZhuEpitaphInscriptive writingClassical prose movementProse in the Tang and Song Dynasties
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:176
  • 點閱點閱:96
唐宋古文運動具有文體革新、解放的意義,除了打破傳統文體的窠臼,亦創造新體製。北宋歐陽脩承繼唐代韓愈、柳宗元的古文理念,並在二人締造的古文高峰上力求突破。本文以〈尹師魯墓誌銘〉、〈論尹師魯墓誌〉為考察對象,前者承繼春秋書法,深化碑誌文體,建立「意深語簡」的謹嚴義例;又會通詩人之意,造就「意深言緩」的抒情性;後者則孕育一種值得玩味的題跋新體,又二文所形成的互文性視野,使古文理論與創作實踐密切結合,成為歐陽脩有力的古文宣言。
The Classical Prose Movement in the Tang and Song Dynasties brought about reformation and liberation in prose styles, through which clichés were abandoned, and new styles were created. In the Northern Song Dynasty, Ouyang Xiu, whose ideas of classical prose were inherited from Han Yu and Liu Zong-Yuan in the Tang Dynasty, continued to break new grounds on the achievements of his predecessors. This paper studies two prose works of Ouyang Xiu, “Epitaph of Yin Zhu” and “On the epitaph of Yin Zhu.” The former perpetuates the style and spirit of The Spring and Autumn Annals (Chunqiu), as it gives depth to the genre of epitaph and establishes an example of seriousness, expressing profound meanings through plain prose. The work also retains its lyricism, as the poet-essayist infuses depth with reserved emotions and subtle prose. The latter prose work develops a new style for inscriptive writing which is worth studying. The inter-textuality between these two works demonstrates the close connection between theory and practice in classical prose, and becomes Ouyang Xiu’s powerful proclamation on classical prose.
期刊論文
1.何春華。簡論韓愈的「破體為文」。廣東師院學報(社會科學版),19(2),34。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.謝敏玲(2006)。韓愈之古文變體研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李珠海(2001)。唐代古文家的文體革新研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.何晏、邢昺(1995)。論語注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.釋文瑩(1997)。湘山野錄•釋錄•玉壺清話。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙翼(2005)。二十二史劄記。北京:學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉夢得(1985)。避暑錄話。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.蘇軾、毛晉(1971)。東坡題跋。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.毛亨、鄭玄、陸德明、孔穎達、阮元(1955)。毛詩正義。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.馬茂軍(200804)。宋代散文史論。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.王基倫(2001)。唐宋古文論集。台北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.韓琦、李之亮、徐正英(2000)。安陽集編年箋注。成都:巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉知幾、浦起龍、呂思勉(1981)。史通釋評。華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.方苞(1960)。方望溪全集。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳必祥(199710)。古代散文文體概論。台北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.杜預、孔穎達、阮元(1955)。春秋左傳正義。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.黎靖德、王星賢(1987)。新校標點朱子語類。臺北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.歐陽脩(1966)。詩本義。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.何寄澎(1990)。唐宋古文新探。臺北:大安出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.陳善(1985)。捫虱新話。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.何寄澎(20020300)。典範的遞承:中國古典詩文論叢。臺北:文史哲。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.李建軍(2008)。宋代春秋學與宋型文化。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.紀昀(2000)。四庫全書總目提要。石家莊:河北人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.蘇洵、曾棗莊、金成禮(1993)。嘉祐集箋註。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.陳平原(2004)。中國散文小說史。上海人民出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.黃一權(2003)。歐陽修散文研究。上海:華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.張高評(20000000)。會通化成與宋代詩學。臺南:國立成功大學出版組。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Samoyault, Tiphaine、邵煒(2003)。互文性研究。天津人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.吳訥(1998)。文體序說三種。臺北:大安出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.馬通伯(1986)。韓昌黎文集校注。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
28.歐陽脩、李逸安(2001)。歐陽脩全集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
29.褚斌傑(1990)。中國古代文體概論。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
30.范仲淹、李勇先、王蓉貴(2002)。范仲淹全集。四川大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
31.宋太祖、曾棗莊、劉琳(2006)。全宋文。上海辭書出版社:安徽教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
32.黃庭堅、劉琳、李勇先、王蓉貴(2001)。黃庭堅全集。四川大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
33.蘇軾、茅維、孔凡禮(1986)。蘇軾文集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
34.章學誠、倉修良(1993)。文史通義新編。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
35.葉國良(1989)。韓愈冢墓碑誌文與前人之異同及其對後世之影響。石學蠡探。臺北:大安出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.王水照(2000)。歐陽修學古文於尹洙辨。王水照自選集。上海:上海教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李玉平(2007)。互文性與文學經典--一個視角主義的研究。文學經典的建構、解構和重構。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.李華瑞(2001)。北宋朝野人士對西夏的看法。宋史論集。保定:河北大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE