:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:王廷相對朱子人性論之批判與侷限
書刊名:淡江中文學報
作者:陳德和 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Te-ho
出版日期:2013
卷期:28
頁次:頁65-101
主題關鍵詞:張載理一分殊氣質之性本然之性Zhang ZaiDifferentiation of LiQiNatural dispositionMoral nature
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1740
  • 點閱點閱:66
本文旨在探究王廷相對朱子人性論之批判及其侷限。基於此,本文共分為四個環節探討王廷相對朱子人性論的批判與侷限:其一,本文從朱、王在理氣論上的差異,指出王廷相如何由「性生於氣」說反駁朱子「性即理」說。其二,由於王廷相認為朱子本然之性說的理論根據,是源自於對孟子人性論的誤讀,故一方面重新詮釋告子生之謂性說,另一方面則主張孟子亦非性善論者。本文嘗試指出王廷相是如何由「性有善惡論」提出反駁「性善論」的論點。其三,由於王廷相不由人之普遍道德性安立人之道德行為,故他並不認為人之道德實踐必須立基在恢復道德善性上,他反而主張必須透過外在道德規範與人對道德的認知能力,才能使人走向為善去惡之途。此即是他以「性成於習」反駁「復性說」的基本立場。其四,本文在釐析王廷相對朱子人性論之批判後,亦嘗試分點探討王廷相人性論的侷限。期望通過以上四個環節,能完整的呈現王廷相在人性論議題上的洞見與侷限。
The purpose of the Paper is to explore Wang Ting-siang's criticism and limitation of Zu-Xi's theory of human nature. Based on this, the Paper is divided into four sections to explore Wang Ting-siang's criticism and limitation of Zu-Xi's theory of human nature: First, the Paper points out how Wang Ting-siang refuted Zhu Xi's ”Human Nature is TianLi (Xin Ji Li)” from ”Human Nature derives from Qi” from the difference between Zhu Xi and Wang Ting-siang in Li-Qi Theory. Second, due to the fact that Wang Ting-siang considered Zhu Xi's theory to have originated from the misreading of Mencius's theory of human nature, on one hand, he re-interprets Gaozi's theory of human nature, on the other hand, and he also advocates that Mencius is also not part of the theory of the original goodness of human nature. The Paper attempts to point out how Wang Ting-siang presents the arguments for the ”theory of original goodness of human nature” from the ”theory of good and bad human nature. Third, due to that Wang Ting-siang does not determine the moral behavior of human from the general moral nature of human, he does not think that human moral practice must be established based on the resumption of moral goodness. He, on the other hand, advocated that it must go through external moral regulations and the human moral cognitive ability to allow people to be on the path of goodness. This is his basic position of using ”human nature derives from habit” to refute the ”Theory of Restoring Human Nature”. Fourth, after the Paper has analyzed the criticism of Wang Ting-siang on Zhu Xi's theory of human nature, it also attempts to explore the limitation of Wang Ting-siang's limitation of the theory of human nature. It expects a complete presentation of Wang Ting-siang's insights and limitations on the issue of the theory of human nature through the abovementioned four sections.
圖書
1.朱熹、朱傑人(2002)。朱文公文集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃宗羲(2005)。宋元學案.橫渠學案。杭州:浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.戴震、何光文(2008)。孟子字義疏證。北京市:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.葛榮晉(199201)。王廷相。台北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.孟軻、沈文倬、焦循(1988)。孟子正義。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭宗義(2009)。明清儒學轉型探析:從劉蕺山到戴東原。香港:香港中文大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.朱熹(2002)。四書章句集註。臺北:鵝湖出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.戴聖、鄭玄、孔穎達(2001)。禮記正義。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.王廷相(1989)。王廷相集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳確(1979)。陳確集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.袁保新(19920000)。孟子三辨之學的歷史省察與現代詮釋。臺北市:文津。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.牟宗三(1990)。心體與性體。臺北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.牟宗三(1985)。圓善論。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.王俊彥(20050000)。王廷相與明代氣學。臺北:秀威資訊科技公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.程頤、程顥、王孝魚(1981)。二程集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.張載、章錫琛(1983)。張載集。漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.高令印、樂愛國(1998)。王廷相評傳。南京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.司馬光(1919)。善惡混辨。溫國文正司馬公文集。上海:涵芬樓。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳德和(2002)。王陽明知行合一之釐定。儒家思想的哲學詮釋。台北:洪葉文化出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳德和(2002)。黃宗羲「理氣同體二分論」析繹--以《孟子師說》爲中心。儒家思想的哲學設釋。台北:洪葉文化出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.楊儒賓(2009)。《中庸》是怎樣變成聖經。宋代新儒學的精神世界--以朱子學為中心。上海:華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉述先(2007)。儒家傳統對於知識與價値的理解與設釋。理解詮釋與儒家傳統(理論篇)。台北:中央研究院中國文哲所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE