:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學學系核心能力評量機制之建構歷程
書刊名:教育資料與研究
作者:潘文福 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Wen-fu
出版日期:2014
卷期:114
頁次:頁229-264
主題關鍵詞:大學核心能力教學卓越總結性評量Core competenceSummative assessmentTeaching excellenceUniversity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:90
  • 點閱點閱:76
本研究採取PDCA 循環策略的行動研究,目的在於建構個案學系 核心能力總結評量的實踐案例,進而提供他系發展之參考。總結評量 發展社群由個案學系專任教授10 位,另外邀請學生、校友、學界與 業界代表各1 名,總計14 名組成,由研究者擔任主持人,從2011 年 3 月1 日至6 月30 日,前後共三次凝聚共識會議與四次向受評班級說 明,完成4 項規劃:1. 建立核心能力、學系課程與總結評量的關連架構; 2. 新增畢業專題實作作為總結評量課程;3. 透過系務會議與三級課程 委員會通過總結評量實施辦法;4. 建構網站專區蒐集並公開評量的準 備資訊。研究者建議,在建構總結評量機制時可依社群與施測觀點, 來完成評量的標準化作業程序,5 項個案學系的發展經驗亦可供他系 參考。
Relying on the PDCA strategy integrated into action research method, this research discusses the establishment of a summative assessment of core competencies. The action-research of an individual department is chosen to be the case of study. The task group consist 10 teachers of the case department, 4 representatives from students, alumni, industrials, and university teaching staff with the researcher as moderator (from 2011 March 1 to June 30). Three internal discussions and four orientations with scheduled classes were conducted. Four conclusions are made: (1) A related framework incorporating core competence, department curriculum (activity), and summative assessment is established for case department. (2) A capstone (as seen in the “Topic Creation before Graduation”) is also established for case department. (3) The Summative Assessment Guidelines of case department are accepted by the department and by the three-level curriculum committee of case university. (4) A webpage is built to collect and exchange information relating to assessment. Five principles are provided to serve as reference for other departments.
期刊論文
1.王昕紅(2008)。美國工程與技術教育認證的新進展。高等學校理工科教學指導委員會通訊,6。  延伸查詢new window
2.王金龍(20111100)。銘傳大學學習成果評量實施之經驗分享。評鑑雙月刊,34,21-27。  延伸查詢new window
3.王保進(2011)。100年校務評鑑認可基準尺規解析。評鑑雙月刊,30,10-14。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳清山(2011)。建立教師教學與學生學習檔案,迎接第二週期系所評鑑。評鑑雙月刊,31,1-3。  延伸查詢new window
5.侯永琪(2011)。亞太國家以學生學習成效爲本之校務評鑑--以紐西蘭與香港爲例。評鑑雙月刊,30,20-25。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊瑩(2011)。以學生學習成效爲評量重點的歐盟高等教育品質保證政策。評鑑雙月刊,30,27-34。  延伸查詢new window
7.Dodridge, M.、Kassinopoulos, M.(2003)。Assessment of student learning: The experience of two European institutions where outcomes-based assessment has been implemented。European Journal of Engineering Education,25(4),549-565。  new window
8.Ko, E.(2007)。Engineering education as liberal education?。Hkust Engineering,13,3。  new window
9.Malagon-Plata, L. A.(2009)。Curriculum relevance: A study of three university programs。Educ. Educ,12(1),11-27。  new window
10.Shavelson, R. J.(2007)。Assessing student learning responsibility: From history to an audacious proposal。Change,26-33。  new window
11.王金龍(201011)。銘傳大學學習成果評量推動之經驗分享。評鑑雙月刊,28,23-29。  延伸查詢new window
12.何卓飛、王明源(20091000)。我國大學課程的沿革與發展。教育研究,186,5-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.彭森明(20061200)。學習成就評量的多元功能及其相應研究設計。教育研究與發展期刊,2(4),21-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.李秉乾(20081100)。逢甲大學推動成果導向教學品保機制之經驗。評鑑雙月刊,16,31-34。  延伸查詢new window
15.彭森明(20080900)。將學生學習成果納入大學評鑑指標項目之必要性與可行性。評鑑雙月刊,15,9-14。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃政傑(20071000)。我國大學課程教學的改革方向與未來。課程與教學,10(4),1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.樊愛群、郭建志、饒忻、許政行(20091000)。談中原大學以學生基本能力培育落實大學教育之發展。教育研究,186,59-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.彭森明(20080900)。以學生評鑑確保大學生優良素質:美國策略。教育研究與發展期刊,4(3),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Angelo, T. A.、Cross, K. P.(1993)。Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Ebel, R. L.、Frisbie, D. A.(1986)。Essential of educational measurement。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.Erwin, T. D.(1991)。Assessing student learning and development: A guide to the principles, goals, and methods of determining college outcomes。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.Mouskou-Peck, A.(2001)。Critical discussion on the different purposes of student assessment。Nicosia, Cyprus:The Higher Technical Institute。  new window
5.Palomba, C. A.、Banta, T. W.(1999)。Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
6.Van der Horst, H.、McDonald, R.(1997)。OBE, outcomes-based education: A teacher's manual。Midrand, South Africa:Kagiso Education。  new window
7.Brown, G. A.、Bull, J.、Pendlebury, M.(1997)。Assessing student learning in higher education。London:Routledge。  new window
8.Brown, S.、Knight, P.(1994)。Assessing learners in higher education。London:Kogan Page。  new window
9.王文科(1992)。資優課程設計。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bloom, Benjamin S.、Engelhart, Max D.、Furst, Edward J.、Hill, Walker H.、Krathwohl, David R.(1956)。Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain。New York, NY:David McKay Company Inc.。  new window
11.Deming, W. E.(1986)。Out of the crisis, quality, productivity, and competitive position。Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University press。  new window
12.彭森明(2010)。大學生學習成果評量:理論、實務與應用。臺北市:高等教育文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
15.李坤崇(20110000)。大學課程發展與學習成效評量。臺北:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.李坤崇(2006)。教學評量。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
17.Anderson, Lorin W.、Krathwohl, David R.、Airasian, Peter W.、Cruikshank, Kathleen A.、Mayer, Richard E.、Pintrich, Paul R.、Wittrock, Merlin C.、Raths, James(2001)。A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives。Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
單篇論文
1.Hong Kong Polytechnic University(2008)。Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan [LOAP] 2008-12,http://www.polyu.edh.hk/obe/02_3_Learning_Outccomes_Assessment_Plan_2008-12.php。  new window
其他
1.Rogers, G.(2009)。The sample of the assessment planning flow chart,http://www.abet.org/fiow_chart.shtml。  new window
2.教育部高等教育司(2008)。97年度施政方針與計畫,http://163.27.45.201/law/vyhsdrz07101010503.doc。  延伸查詢new window
3.U. S. Department of Education(2006)。Action plan for higher education: Improving accessibility, affordability and accountability,http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/files/publications-action_plan_for_higher_education-092606.pdf, 。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wolff, R. A.(2009)。Future directions for American higher education accreditation。Public good and quality in higher education in Asia Pacific。New York, NY:Palgrave, MacMillan Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE