:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學校組織動態能耐評量指標建構與實證之研究
作者:黃貞裕
作者(外文):Eng, Cheng Joo
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
指導教授:秦夢群
林邦傑
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2005
主題關鍵詞:動態能耐學校組織指標建構dynamic capabilitiessenior high schoolindicator construction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(12) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:55
二十一世紀是一個環境變遷快速的時代,組織必須隨時掌握外部環境與內部環境的變化,以快速回度環境與市場需求,維持其競爭優勢。因此,本研究主要目的即以動態能耐觀點為基礎,發展適用於學校組織動態能耐評量工具,進而以之做為評估學校組織動態能耐之工具,並對國內之高級中學與高級職業學校進行調查,以瞭解當前高中職之現況,並提出結論與建議。
在量表發展上,本研究以文獻分析與德懷術進行指標建構,完成後並以信度分析、探索性因素分析及二階驗證性因素分析來檢證其信度與效度。最後發展而成之量表共計七個層面,分別為行政整合、定位、科技應用、學習、創新、知識管理與策略彈性。研究結果顯示本研究所發展之「高中職動態能耐量表」具有良好之信度與效度,可做為高中職之動態能耐評量工具。在高中職之動態能耐現況部分,則採用調查研究法在進行,分層隨機抽取60所公私立高級中學及高級職業學校,共寄出996份問卷,回收有效問卷為690份。調查結果以t考驗、變異數分析等統計方法進行資料處理。
本研究之主要發現有以下幾點:
一、高中職動態能耐量表具有良好之信度與效度,且可由七個層面47個細項指標加以評量;
二、高級中學與高級職業學校之動態能耐沒有顯著差異;
三、私立學校之動態能耐高於公立學校,在「位置」、「知識管理」與「策略彈性」等三個層面之差異達統計顯著水準;
四、成立歷史較悠久之學校具有較佳之動態能耐。;
五、規模太小之學校其動態能耐偏低,競爭優勢不如規模較大之學校;
六、偏遠地區之學校其動態能耐明顯低於都市與鄉鎮地區之學校;
七、男性學校教育人員之動態能耐知覺明顯高於女性學校教育人員;
八、年齡較大之學校教育人員其動態能耐知覺顯著高於年齡較小者;
九、擔任行政職務之學校教育人員其動態能耐知覺高於一般學校教育人員;
十、不同教育程度之學校教育人員其動態能耐之看法沒有顯著差異;
十一、資深之學校教育人員其動態能耐知覺程度明顯高於資淺之學校教育人員;
十二、高中職在「科技應用」層面之表現最佳,而在「知識管理」層面之表現則有待改善。
根據以上之研究結果,本研究提出以下建議,以供未來量表應用、在教育行政機關決策、學校運作與未來研究時之參考:
一、對學校組織動態能耐量表應用之建議
1.應善用動態能耐量表做為組織進步之學校營運引導指標。
2.應進一步確認量表與模式之適當性。
二、對教育主管機關之建議
1.應隨時監控大環境之變化,擬定適當之政策並快速將訊息傳達給學校單位。
2.應致力降低偏遠地區學校與都市、鄉鎮學校之差距。
3.應適度調整公立學校與私立學校之教育資源分配,以使學生享有平等之教育資源。
三、對高級中學與高級職業學校之建議
1.應建立完善之資訊蒐集系統,以強化學校之動態能耐。
2.應增加學校成員參與行政事務之機會。
3.應加強行銷策略,以增進學校信譽資產之優勢。
4.應定時檢視學校之優勢與劣勢,以避免核心僵固的情況發生。
5.應建立學校之知識管理分享文化,以增進創新之能量。
6.應設法留住優秀與經驗豐富之學校教育人員。
四、對未來研究之建議
1.就研究對象方面,可擴大研究對象。
2.就量表施測方面,應佐以相關客觀資料與專家學者之評比進行結果分析。
3.就研究方法方面,在專家意見整合方面可改用焦點團體法或腦力激盪法;在意見調查方面可兼採質化方法。
4.就研究工具方面,可進一步進行量表之修正與驗證。
5.就研究內容方面,可研究動態能耐與其他變項之關係。
The dynamic capabilities approach is promising in terms of future research potential and as an aid to management endeavoring to gain competitive advantage in increasingly demanding environment. Dynamic capabilities identifying new opportunities and help organizations organize effectively and efficiently in regimes of rapid environments changes. The term ‘dynamic’ refers to the capacity to renew competences so as to achieve congruence with the changing outer environment; the term ‘capabilities’ emphasizes the abilities in appropriately adapting, integrating, and reconfiguring internal and external organizational skills, resources ,and functional competences to make the requirements of a rapidly changing environment.
The purpose of this study was to develop an inventory of dynamic capabilities that apply to the senior high schools and senior vocational schools in Taiwan. This research was conducted under two processes. At first, the fundamental indicators of the inventory were constructed under the groundwork of literature review and Delphi method. The inventory was examined with several statistical methods such as reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The result showed that the self-constructed dynamic capabilities inventory was with good reliability and validity. Secondly, the inventory was sent to 996 senior high schools’ personnel in Taiwan and 690 valid questionnaires were returned and analyzed by SPSS For Windows 12.0 version at .05 significant level. Statistical method such as descriptive statistics, t-test and one-way ANOVA were adapted to data analysis.
Major findings include the following:
1. The dynamic capabilities inventory that constructed by researcher is with fine reliability and validity and could measure schools’ dynamic capabilities with seven dimensions.
2. There is no difference between the dynamic capabilities of senior high schools and senior vocational schools.
3. The dynamic capabilities of the private schools are significantly higher that the public schools.
4. Schools that with longer history have greater dynamic capabilities.
5. The small- scoped schools have less dynamic capabilities.
6. Schools that located in remote area have less dynamic capabilities than the schools located in the city.
7. The perception of dynamic capabilities of male school personnel is significantly higher that the female school personnel.
8. Elder personnel have higher perception of dynamic capabilities than the younger personnel.
9. Personnel serve in administration sections have higher perception of dynamic capabilities than the personnel who are not served in administrative sections.
10. Educational background is not a decisive element to the perception of dynamic capabilities.
11. The senior school personnel have higher perception of dynamic capabilities.
Based on the findings, several recommendations were made for the application of DCI-S, for the superior authorities, for the senior high/vocational schools as well as for further research.
壹、中文部份
王立心(2005)。國民教育經費分配模式公平性與適足性之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。new window
王如哲(1998)。教育行政學。台北:五南。
王如哲(2000)。知識管理的理論與應用:以教育領域及其革新為例。台北:五南。new window
王如哲(2002)。知識經濟與教育。台北:五南。new window
王如哲、黃月純合譯,Edward Sallis & Gary Jones原著(2004)。教育知識管理。台北:五南。
王柏年(1999)。高科技產業革新性人力資源管理制度與組織創新之關係研究。中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
王振州(2000)。知識整合與新產品開發績效之研究:動態能力觀點。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。
王雅玄(1998)。德懷術(Delphi)在課程評鑑之應用。教育資料與研究,25,42-46。
王紀青、張明慧、陳智華、孫蓉華(2005.4.8)。1年減一班:國中出招搶人。聯合報,2004/4/8,取自:http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT4/2607588.shtml
王瑞壎(2003)。學校知識管理指標建構與實證分析之研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所博士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。new window
丘昌泰(2000)。後現代社會公共管理理論的變遷:從新公共管理到新公民管理。中國行政評論,10(1),1-32。new window
司徒達賢(2005)。管理學的新世界。台北:天下文化。new window
余雅文(2003)。企業動態能力之探究與衡量。國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
江志正(2000)。國民小學組織學習、教師個人學習與學校組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
江羽燕、林珊如(2003)。影響國小教師採用資訊科技創新教學因素之研究:以台北縣、桃園縣資訊種子國小為例。2003年創造力實踐歷程研討會(2003.3.21)。台北:國立政治大學創新育成中心。
吳天方、郭政源(2000)。從企業變革談學校組織文化的塑造。教育資料與研究,37,82-88。new window
吳明益(1994)。國家管制教育市場的合理地位與制度因應:以教育權的保障為中心。國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
吳秉哲(2003)。多層次動態能力分析模型之研究:以飛利浦電子為例。國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
吳春助(2001)。國民小學校長學校行政混沌現象敏銳度與學校組織文化塑造關係之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
吳素菁(2004)。學校創新經營之研究:以四所國民小學為例。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
吳清山(2005)。學校行政研究。台北:高等教育。
吳清山、黃美芳、徐緯平(2002)。教育績效責任研究。台北:高等教育。new window
呂錦珍譯,Michael J. Spendolini原著(1997)。標竿學習:向企業典範借鏡。台北:天下文化。
李仁芳(1998)。組織動態能耐創新能耐演化之研究。國科會專題研究計畫報告。(NSC8787-2416-H-004-006)
李仁芳(2000)。研發組織動態能耐發展之研究。國科會專題研究計畫報告。(NSC89-2416-H-004-018)
李仁芳(2001)。高科技事業產品開發耾隊之技術特質、技術網路與研發組織創新能耐關係之研究。國科會專題研究計畫報告。(NSC88-2519-S-004-003)
李仁芳、賴建男、賴威龍(1998)。臺灣IC設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究。科技管理學刊,3(1),37-80。new window
李再長譯,Richard L. Daft原著(1999)。組織理論與管理。台北:華泰文化。
李吉仁(2000)。出席國際會議報告。科學發展月刊,28(11),915-917。
李宏才(2003)。混沌理論應用在國小校長危機管理之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。new window
李希揚(1999)。我國教育事業民營化之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
李茂興、沈孟宜譯,M J Xvaier原著(2002)。策略性行銷。台北:弘智文化。
李晉求(2001)。知識管理活動中資訊科技與組織因素如何提升組織動態能力之研究。國立暨南國際大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
李素真(1996)。創造綿延競爭力的高績效組織,管理雜誌,264,38-43。
李國瑋(2001)。相關知識環境變動程度,業務型態對組織動態能耐演化影響之研究:以台灣無線通訊廠商專案團隊為例。輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
李新鄉(1999)。新舊教育實習制度對師院國小實習教師自我效能角色知覺與專業承諾影響之比較研究。國科會87年度專題研究成果報告。new window
李新鄉(2003)。新興的企業組織理論及其對教育行政之可能影響。教師之友,44(2),17-21。
李誠(2001)。什麼是知識經濟?--了解它才能發展它。國家政策論壇,1(5),143-145。
沈姍姍(1994)。英國進入二十一世紀的教育改革:一九八八年以來變革與紛擾。比較教育通訊,34,32-40。
沈明權(1999)。個人特質、組織特性與組織創新之研究。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。
周功如(2003)。科學與真理的脫節:物自身的不可知。校園,45(2),24-31。
林邦傑(1986)。統計方法的選擇與統計電腦套裝程式的使用:SPSSX,SAS,BMDP應用指引。台北市:正昇教育科學社。
林東清(2002)。資訊管理:e化企業的核心競爭能力。台北市:智勝文化。
林東清(2003)。知識管理。台北:智勝文化。
林佳慧(2000)。組織內部創新氣氛與知識管理機制關係之探討。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。
林怡婷、張錦弘(2004.8.16)。陳維昭:高教發展失準,必有大學倒閉。2004/08/16,取自: http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT4/2188257.shtml
林俊杰(2003)。後現代組織對策略之再思考。國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
林建煌(2003)。策略管理。台北:智勝。
林政緯(2004)。核心競爭力或核心僵固?企業高階管理團隊主導邏輯之觀點。國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
林海清(2002)。知識管理與教育發展。台北:元照。
林嘉君(2004)。技專校院品牌管理成效評估指標建構之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
林靜宜(2002)。知識移轉與動態能力的關係:台灣資訊電子廠商觀點。國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
林麗寬譯,Vos Jeannette & Dryden Gordon原著(1997)。學習革命。台北:中國生產力中心。
邱淑玲(1997)。混沌理論在政府組織管理中的運用。東海大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
邱皓政(2004)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉書廊。
紀慧如(2003)。組織創新能力與創新績效:以技職校院為例。朝陽科技大學企業管理碩士論文,未出版,台中縣。
范垂仁(2002)。資訊科技基礎企業動態能力之強化功能。國立暨南國際大學國際企業學系碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
馬信行(1999)。線性結構模式在教育上的應用及所遭遇之問題。教育心理與研究,22,1-14。new window
孫治本譯,Ulrich Beck原著(1999)。全球化危機。台北:商務。
徐中琦譯,George S. Yip原著(2005)。全球經營策略。台北:華泰。
徐振邦(2000)。國民中學學校行政混沌現象之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
徐振邦(2002)。混沌理論對學校行政之啟示。收錄於高強華(主編),學校組織與課程革新(pp.113-152)。台北:國立台灣師範大學。new window
徐啟明譯,Frederick Betz原著(1998)。策略性科技管理。台北:麥格羅希羅。
秦夢群(1995)。渾沌理論在教育行政上之應用。教育與心理研究,18,83-102。new window
秦夢群(2004a)。教育行政:理論部分(第三版)。台北:五南。
秦夢群(2004b)。教育行政:實務部分(第三版)。台北:五南。
秦夢群、黃貞裕(2002)。教育在知識經濟發展上的角色與策略。收錄於教育部(主編),知識管理與教育革新發展(pp.63-80)。台北:教育部。new window
秦夢群、黃貞裕(2003)。教育行政研究方法論。台北:五南。
馬建、黃麗華(2000)。企業過程創新:概念與應用。香港:三聯書店。
高行健(1997)。企業之資源基礎、策略導向與競爭力關係之研究:國內資訊服務業之實證。國立台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
高希均(2000)。知識經濟的核心理念。收錄於於高希均、李誠(合編),知識經濟之路(pp.1-25)。壹北市:天下文化。
高宣揚(1999)。後現代論。台北:五南。new window
高銛、王宏周、魏章玲合譯,Daniel Bell原著(1989)。後工業社會的來臨:對社會預測的一項探索。台北:桂冠。
涂敏芬(2002)。以混沌觀點探討產業與技術改變。國立清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
涂瑞德(1998)。技術知識特質、產品開發團隊與組織動態能耐關係之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
張世毅(2002)。台灣電腦晶片組廠商競爭優勢研究。國立清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
張玉文譯,P. F. Drucker原著(2000)。知識管理。知識管理。台北:聯電。
張光正、呂源德(2000)。知識經濟時代之領袖特質。收錄於高希均、李誠(合編),知識經濟之路(pp.89-113)。台北市:天下文化。
張明輝(2001)。知識經濟與學校經營。教育資料與研究,41,10-12。new window
張明輝(2002)。學校經營與管理研究:前瞻、整合、學習與革新。台北:學富。
張明輝(2003)。卓越校長的關鍵能力。收錄於台北市教師研習中心(主編),九十二年度學校行政人員專業發展:精緻學校經營研習班手冊(pp.37-43)。台北:台北市教師研習中心。
張則堯(2000)。赤字財政與民主政治簡論:追述布坎南等對凱因斯赤字財政論的批判。華信金融季刊,10,149-152。new window
張奕華(1996)。國民小學組織學習與學校效能關係研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
張奕華(2003)。美國中小學校長領導的新趨勢:科技領導。教育研究,114,147-159。new window
張振青(1994)。知識論。台北:五南。
張鈿富(2000)。教育行政與管理新趨勢。收錄於中正大學教育學院(主編),新世紀的教育展望(pp.429-445)。高雄:麗文文化。
張鈿富(2002)。OECD高等教育知識管理與成效分析。2004/11/28,取自:http://www.epa.ncnu.edu.tw/epforum/vol8/8-2.pdf。new window
張嘉雯(2001)。競爭策略、組織間關係策略、組織間關係管理型態與競爭優勢關係之探討。逢甲大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
張德銳(1999)。美國教育改革中的重建學校運動。收錄於黃政傑(主編),各國教育改革動向(pp.47-75)。台北:師大書苑。
莊立民(2002)。組織創新模式建構與實證之研究:以台灣資訊電子業為例。國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,台南市。new window
許仁華(2002)。應用多變量統計方法觀察私立大學校院財務績效之研究。實踐大學企業管理所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
許立一、許立倫、夏道維、辜柏宏譯,William Bergquist原著(2000)。後現代組織。台北:地景公司。
許燿鴻(2004)。應用資訊科技於提升學校經營績效之影響因素:以雲林縣國民小學為例。國立中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
陳木金(1996)。混沌現象對學校行政的啟示。教育資料與研究,9,69-75。new window
陳木金(1999)。混沌理論對學校組織變革因應策略之啟示。學校行政雙月刊,1,61-68。
陳木金(2000)。從奇異吸引子理論談新世紀的學校行政革新。學校行政雙月刊,5,30-44。
陳木金(2002)。學校領導研究:從混沌理論研究彩繪學校經營的天空。台北:高等教育。
陳水竹(2004)。組織行為:理論應用與產業發展(第二版)。台北:華泰文化。
陳宜中(1999)。英國工黨與「第三條路」。當代,140,80-87。
陳振祥(1998)。廠商多重業務形態互動與動態能力發展之觀念架構。銘傳學刊,9(2),63-82。new window
陳業順(2004)。由路徑依賴理論探討台灣IC封裝新進廠商的競爭策略。中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
陳賢舜(2004)。六標準差管理及其對教育行政管理之啟示。中華人文社會學報,2,1-29。new window
湯志民(2001)。知識經濟與教育轉型。教育資料與研究,41,13-16。new window
黃昆輝(1988)。教育行政學。台北:東華。
黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程模式理論與應用(第三版)。台北:五南。
黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。台北:師大書苑。
黃富順(2001)。以終身學習迎接知識經濟的挑戰。成人教育雙月刊,61,26-35。
黃義良(2004)。國民中小學學校行銷指標與行銷運作之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。new window
黃新福(1992)。危機管理之研究:從組織層面來探討。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃嘉明(2003)。完全中學經營策略之個案研究:以台北縣立清水高中為例。國立台灣科技大學管理研究所,未出版,台北市。
黃博聲(1998)。專業分工、知識管理與創新之關係研究。國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃瓊容(2004)。國民小學組織學習與組織創新之相關研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
莊立民(2002)。組織創新模式建構與實證之研究:以台灣資訊電子業為例。國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,台南市。new window
楊佳珮(2003)。跨領域整合大學實驗室之核心能力與知識創造活動之研究:以台大微奈米機電系統實驗室為例。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
楊思偉(2004)。教育市場化應休矣。師友月刊,450,9-11。
楊福清(2001)。私立技專校院經營競爭優勢之研究。長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南縣。
楊曙雄(2001)。知識型團隊特性與知識管理策略關係之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
傅振焜譯,Peter Drucker原著(1994)。後資本主義社會。台北:時報文化。
詹偉雄(2005)。由iPod熱賣、Cli停產看Apple之成功與Sony的挫敗。2005/6/30,取自:http://www.bnext.com.tw/mag/2005_05_15/2005_05_15_3243.html
齊思賢譯,Lester C. Thurow原著(2000)。知識經濟時代。台北:時報文化。
劉士豪(1994)。資訊系統與組織競爭優勢關係之研究:資源基礎理論之應用。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。new window
劉魁(1998)。後現代科學觀。台北:揚智。
劉鎮寧(2002)。知識經濟時代的新作為:教師行動學習初探。收錄於國立嘉義大學(主編),九十一學年度師範院校教育學術論文發表會論文集(pp.115-134)。嘉義市:國立嘉義大學。
劉鎮寧(2004)。國民中小學學習型學校指標建構之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所博士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。new window
樂為良譯,Bill Gates原著(1999)。數位神經系統。台北市:商業周刊。
歐用生(1999)。新世紀的學校。台北:台灣書店。
潘品昇(2000)。企業實施知識管理與電子商務關聯性之研究。大葉大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
蔡文杰(2002)。國民小學學校經營混沌現象敏銳度及組織權力關係重建之相關研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。new window
蔡依玲譯,William M. Boast原著(2000)。擅變:看傑出領袖如何掌握變局。台北:方智。
蔡宗宏、許瑋麟(2003)。組織動態能耐之研究:以臺灣某軟體公司為例。慈濟技術學院學報,5,29-44。
蔡培村、武文瑛(2004)。領導學:理論、實務與研究。台北:麗文文化。
蔡啟通(1997)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係研究。國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。new window
蔡敦浩(1998)。組織特徵、體制特性與產業創新成果的關係之研究。行政院國家科學委員會報告(NSC-88-2519-s-110-002)。2005/5/25,取自:http://tim.nccu.edu.tw/croci/outcome/87-A-reports--PDF/87-A%20%BD%B2%B4%B0%AFE.pdf
蔡敦浩(2000)。組織創新能耐、知識管理與組織學習:臺灣三家中小企業的個案研究。科技管理學刊,5(2),81-101。new window
蔡裕源(2003)以動態能力觀點探討資訊電子廠商代工之網絡關係模式。管理與資訊學報,8,119-145。new window
蔡碧鳳譯,Wright、Kroll、Parnell等人原著(1998)。策略管理(第四版)。台北:台灣西書出版社。
鄭祥福(1999)。後現代主義。台北:揚智。
盧正壽(2002)。企業動態能力與產業環境動態程度之適配性研究。國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
蕭琦蓉(2003)。教育民營化發展趨勢及其在我國中小學實施之可行性研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
賴文堅(2002)。高中職知識管理之評量工具發展與實證分析。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。new window
賴建男(1997)。台灣IC設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。new window
賴義龍(2001)。台灣軟體產業技術知識網路和組織動態能耐研究:以趨勢科技為例。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
濮世緯(2003)。國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。new window
謝文全(1989)。教育行政論文集。台北:文景。
謝文全(1993)。教育行政:理論與實際(第八版)。台北:文景。
謝文全(2003)。教育行政學。台北:高等教育。
顏玉如(2001)。公立國民中學學校本位預算之分析:以南投縣為例。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投市。
魏惠娟、林怡禮、潘慧玲、張明輝、陳嘉彌(2003)。驅動學校組織學習的因素分析。教育研究集刊,49(2),153-189。new window

蘇哲仁、林家五合譯,Alex Miller & Gregory G. Dess原著(1999)。策略管理。台北:五南。
蕭武桐(2002)。高階主管的管理藝術。公務人力月刊,80,2-4。

貳、英文部分
Aaker, D. A., & Mascarenhas, B. (1984). The need for strategic flexibility. The Journal of Business Strategy, 5(2), 74-82.
Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Ansoff, H. I. (1991). Strategic management in a historical perspective. International Review of Strategic Management, 2(1), 3-69.
Apple, M. W. (2001). Comparing Neo-liberal projects and inequality in education. Comparative Education, 37(4), 409-423.
Astiz, M. F., Wiseman, A. W., & Baker, D. P. (2002). Slouching towards decentralization: Consequences of globalization for curricular control in national education systems. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 66-88.
Atkinson, J. (1984). Manpower strategies for flexible organizations. Personnel Management, 8, 28-31.
Atkinson, J. (1987). Flexibility or fragmentation? The United Kingdom labor market in the eighties. Labour and Society, 12(1), 87-105.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J. (1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bartlett, C. A., Ghoshal, S. (1995). Sloan Management Review, 37(1), 11-23.
Bellum, J. M. (2003). Rogers’ innovation process in organization: Information systems implementation in educational organization. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation of University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln City.
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169-196.
Bierly, P. E., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1996). Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43, 368-380.
Bossidy, L., & Charan, R. (2002). Execution: The disciplines of getting things done. New York, NY: Crown Business.
Bossidy, L., & Charan, R. (2004). Confronting reality: Doing what matters to get things right. New York, NY: Crown Business.
Bukowitz, W.R., Williams, R. L. (1999). The knowledge management field book. London, UK: Prentice Hall.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: based on the competing values framework. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Center for Educational Research and Innovation(2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris: OECD.
Chan, D., & Mok, K. (2001). Educational reforms and coping strategies under the tidal wave of marketization: A comparative study of Hong Kong and the mainland. Comparative Education, 37(1), 21-41.
Chen, Y. (2004). The strategic impact of enterprise systems: A dynamic capabilities study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation of Carleton University, Ottawa.
Child, J. (1987). Information technology, organization and the response to strategic challenges. California Management Review, 30(1), 33-50
Clark, K. (1989). What strategy can do for technology. Harvard Business Review, 67(6), 94-98.
Clark, K., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industries. Cambridge, MA; Harvard university press.
Cohen, R.S., & March, J. G. (1986). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
Coleman, J. S. (1995). Achievement oriented school design. In M. T. Hallinan (ed.), Restructuring school: Promising practices and polices(pp.11-29). New York, NY: Plenum.
Collis, D. J. (1991). A resource-based analysis of global competition: The case of the bearings industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 49-68.
Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (1995). Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118-128.
Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Da Silveira, G. J. C. (2002). Improvement trajectories in operations and technology management: Concept, process and content issues. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(2), 227-241.
Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core of organization innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 193-210.
Daft, R. L. (2001). Organizational theory and design(7th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31-61.
Davenport, T., H. & Short, J. (1990). The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 32, 11-27.
David Skyrme Associates (2000). Knowledge management assessment tool. Retrieved 2005/5/20 from http://www.skyrme.com/tools/index.htm.
Davis, S., & Meyer, C. (1999). The role of knowledge in the connected economy. In R. Ruggeles & D. Holtshouse (eds.), The knowledge advantage: 14 visionaries define marketplace success in the new economy(pp.245-266). Dover, NH: Ernst & Young.
Deal, T. (1990). Reframing reform. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 6-12.
Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Middleton, WI: Green Briar Press.
Diamond, L., Dianda, M.R., & Corwin, R. G. (1994). A progress report on California’s charter schools. Educational leadership, 52(1), 41-45.
Drucker, P. F. (1995). Managing in a time of great change. New York, NY: Penguin.
Duncan, R. B., & Weiss, A. (1979). Organizational learning: Implications for organizational design. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp.75-123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Education Commission at the State(ECS)(2001). Statewide leadership academies: A 50-state scan. Retrieved 2005/3/5 from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/26/93/2693.htm
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
Eppink, J. D. (1978). Planning for strategic flexibility. Long Rang Planning, 11, 9-15.
Evan, W. M., & Black, G. (1967). Innovation in business organization: Some factors associated with success or failure. Journal of Business, 40, 519-530.
Evans, J. S. (1991). Strategic flexibility for high technology maneuvers: A conceptual framework. Journal of Management Studies, 28(1), 69-89.
Feeny, D. F., & Ives, B. (1990). In search of sustainability: Reaping long-term advantage from investments in information technology. Journal of management Information System, 7(1), 27-46.
Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom(40th Anniversary ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gardner, S. D. (2004). Understanding dynamic capabilities at the subunit level: Operational flexibility and the crucial role of organizational design and information sharing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation of University of Maryland, College Park.

Getzels, J. W., & Thelen, H. A. (1960). The classroom as a unique social system. In N. B. Henry (Ed.), The dynamics of instructional groups (pp.53-62). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gladstone, B. (2000). From Know-how to knowledge: the essential guide to understanding and implementing knowledge management. London: Spiro Press.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
Gravin, D. (1988). Managing quality. New York, NY: Free Press.
Greenfield, T. B. (1993). Theory about organization: A new perspective and its implications for schools. In T. B. Greenfield & P. Ribbins (Eds.), Greenfield on educational administration (pp.1-25). London: Routledge.
Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. (2001). A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 597-606.
Haas, J. D. (1989). Educational future: Six scenarios. In J. L. Burdin (Ed.), School leadership: A contemporary reader(pp.425-442). Newbury park, CA: Sage.
Hair, J. F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, & W. C. Black (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hamel, G., & Heene, J. (1994). Competence-based competition. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: Don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 104-112.
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Hayles, N. K. (1991). Chaos Bound: Orderly disorder in contemporary literature and science. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
Helfat, C. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarities and dynamic capability: The case of R&D. Strategic management Journal, 18(5), 339-360.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 63-84.
Hill, C. W., & Jones, G. R. (2002). Strategic management theory: An integrated approach(5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Higgins, J. M. (1995). Innovation the core competence. Planning Review, 23, 32-36.
Hitt, M. A., Nixon, R. D., Clifford, P. G., & Coyne, K. P. (1999). The development and use of strategic resources. In M. A. Hitt, P. G. Clifford, R. D. Nixon, & K. P. Coyne (Eds.), Dynamic strategic resource(pp.1-14). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Hoskisson, R. E. (2001). Strategic management: competitiveness and globalization. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College publishing.
Holt, K. (1988). The role of user in product innovation. Technovation, 12(5), 53-56.
Hotz-McMahon, B. (2003). Understanding positive school and community relationships: Marketing strategies of successful schools. Unpublished master’s thesis of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln City.
Iansiti, M., & Clark, K. (1994). Integration and dynamics capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 557-605.
Iansiti, M., & West, J. (1997). Technology integration: Turning great research into great products. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 69-78.
Imai, K., Ikujiro, N., & Takeuchi, H. (1985). Managing the new product development process: How Japanese companies learn to unlearn. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Jennings, D. & Wattam, S. (1998). Decision making: An integrated approach. Washington, DC: Financial times, Pitman Publishing.
Jivasantikarn, K. (2003). Marketing approaches used by private vocational schools in Thailand. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation of Illinois State University, Chicago.
Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1974). Organization and management: A systems approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1985). Organization and management: A systems and contingency approach(4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
Kiel, L. D. (1989). Nonequilibrium theory and its implications for public administration. Public Administration Review, 49(6), 544-551.
Krijnen, H. G. (1979). The flexible firm. Long Range Planning, 12, 63-75.
Lado, A., Boyd, N., & Wright, P. (1992). A Competency-based model of sustainable competitive advantage: Toward a conceptual integration. Journal of Management, 18(1), 77-91.
Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competence-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 699-727.
Learned, E. P., Christensen, C. R., Andrews, K. R., & Guth, W. D. (1965). Business Policy: Text and cases. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Leibowitz, S. K., & Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in and history. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 205-226.
Leibowitz, J. (2000). Building organizational intelligence: A knowledge management primer. London: CRC Press.
Lindsay, J. S. (1989). Chaos Theory: Implications for educational research. Paper presented at the twelfth annual meeting of the eastern educational research association. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED317593)
Lippman, S., & Rumelt, R. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under uncertainly. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 418-438.
Littrell, J., & Foster, W. (1995). The myth of a knowledge base in administration. In R. Donmoyer, M. Imer & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.), The knowledge base in educational administration: Multiple perspectives (pp.32-46). New York, NY: The State University of New York.
Long, C., & Vickers-Koch, M. (1995). Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 24, 620.
Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 140-141.
Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355-378.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984) (translated by G. Bennington & B. Massumi). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Mahoney, J. T. (1995). The management of resources and the resource of management. Journal of Business Research, 33, 91-101.
Marquis, D. G. (1972). The anatomy of successful innovation. Managing Advancing Technology, 1, 35-48.
Marsh, S. J., & Stock, G. N. (2003). Building dynamic capabilities in new product development through intertemporal integration. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(3), 136-148.
Mcguiness, T., & Morgan, R. E. (2000). Strategy, dynamic capabilities and complex science: Management rhetoric vs. reality. Strategic Change, 9, 209-220.
McLaughlin, M. (1998). Listening and learning from the field: Tales of policy implementation and situated practice. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of international change. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Metcalf, K. K. & Legan, N. A. (2002). Educational vouchers: A primer. The Clearing House, 76(1), 25-29.
Morris, Van C., Crowson, R. L., Hurwitz, E., & Gehrie, C. P. (1981). The urban principal: Discretionary decision making in a large educational organization. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.
Murphy, J. & Hallinger, P. (1993). Restructuring schooling: Learning from ongoing efforts. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Murphy, P. (1996). Chaos theory as a model for managing issues and crisis. Public Relations Review, 22(2), 95-113.
Nageswaran, K., & Kumiko, M. (2001). Management and policy concerns over shifts in innovation trajectories: The case of the Japanese robotics industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(3), 433-459.
Navarro, J. R., & Gallardo, F. O. (2003). A model of strategic change: universities and dynamic capabilities. Higher Education Policy, 16, 199-212.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies’ creating the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., Umemoto, K., & Senoo, D. (1996). From information processing to knowledge creation: A paradigm shift in business management. Technology in Society, 18(2), 203-218.
Oates, W. E. (2000). Musgrave and Buchanan on the role of the state. Regulation, 24(4), 40-44.
O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J. (1998). If only we knew what we know. New York, NY: The Free Press.
OECD(1996). The knowledge-based economy. 2004/11/28 Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/8/1913021.pdf.
Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241-265.
Pavlou, P. A. (2004). IT-enabled dynamic capabilities in new product development: Building a competitive advantage in turbulent environments. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation of University of Southern California, Columbia.
Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2004). From IT competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: A dynamic capabilities model. 2004/09/25 retrieved from: http://www.agsm.ucr.edu/faculty/pages/pavlou/isr_pavlou_elsawy.pdf Information system research.
Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2004). Capturing the “Black Box” of dynamic capabilities: A missing link to the strategic role of IT in turbulent environments? 2004/09/25 retrieved from: http://www.agsm.ucr.edu/faculty/pages/pavlou/ms_pavlou_elsawy_rev2.pdf. Management science.
Penrose, E. G. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.
Penrose, E. G. (1998). The analysis of dynamic capabilities in a competence-oriented organization. Technovation, 18(3), 179-189.
Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancick, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Pierce, D., & Hunsaker, T. W. (1996). Professional development teacher, and by teacher. Education, 117(1), 101-105.
Pisano, G. P. (2000). In search of dynamic capabilities. In D. Giovanni, R. R. Nelson & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities (pp.129-154). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Poincare, H. (1902). (Translated by W. J. Greenstreet). Science and hypothesis. In M. J. Alder (Ed.), Great books of the western world(pp.1-70). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Technique for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1991). How competitive forces shape strategy. In C. A. Montgomery & M. E. Porter (Eds.), Strategy: Seeking and securing competitive advantage (pp.11-26). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 40(3), 79-91.
Prahalad, C. K., & Oosterveld, J. P. (1999). Transforming internal governance: The challenge for multinationals. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 31-39
Quinn, J. B. & Hilmer, F. G. (1994). Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 35, 19-31.
Rawls, J. (1999). Theory of justice(rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Reilly, D. H. (1999). Nonlinear systems and educational development in Europe. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(5), 424-440.
Ritter, T. (1999). The networking company: Antecedents for coping with relationships and network effectively. Industrial Marketing Management, 28, 467-469.
Rumelt, R. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive strategic management(pp.556-570). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sanchez, R. (1995). Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic management Journal, 16, 135-159.
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
Schwartz, P. (2004). Inevitable surprises: Thinking ahead in a time of turbulence. New York, NY: Gotham.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., & Smith, B. (1999). The dance of change : The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Senge, P., Cambronu-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Shapiro, C. (1989). The theory of business strategy. RAND Journal of Economics, 20(1), 125-137.
Simonin, B., Helleloid, D. (1994). Organization learning and a forms core competence. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 213-234.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the public sector (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40, 55-79.
Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 537-556.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In D. Giovanni, R. R. Nelson & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities(pp.334-362). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (2004). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In M. L. Tushman & P. Anderson (Eds.), Managing strategic innovation and change (pp.308-332). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, H., & Nicholas, V. (2003). Strategic research partnerships: A managerial perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(2), 255-271.
Thurow, L. C. (2003). Fortune favors the bold: What we must do to build a new and lasting global prosperity. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Todorovic, Z. W. (2004). The entrepreneurial orientation of university departments and its relationship to the incidence of commercial activity. Unpublished Dissertation of University of Waterloo, Ontario.
Toulmin, S. (1990). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. New York, NY: Free Press.
Tripsas, M. (1997). Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the Typesetter Industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 341-377.
Tsoukas, H., & Mylonopoulos, N. (2004). Organizations as knowledge systems: Knowledge, learning and dynamic capabilities. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1986). Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), 74-92.
Van Slyke, D. M. (2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 296-315.
Vesey, J. T. (1991). Speed-to-market distinguishes the new competitors. Research Technology Management, 34(6), 33-38.
Volberda, H. W. (1996). Toward the flexible firm: How to remain vital in hyper-competitive environments. Organization Science, 7(4), 359-374.
Volberda, H. W. (1998). Building the flexible firm: How to remain competitive. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weick, K. E. (1978). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 541-552.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
Wick, C. W., & Leon, L. S. (1995). From ideas to action: Creating a learning organization. Human Resource Management, 34(2), 299-311.
Winter, S. (1987). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge (pp.163-180). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Yeung, A. K., Ulrich, D., & Nason, S. W., & Von Glinow, M. A. (1999). Organizational learning capability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a knowledge systems. California Management Review, 41(3), 125-134.
Zack, M. H. (2002). Developing a knowledge strategy. In C. W. Choo & N. Bontis (eds.), The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge(pp.255-276). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE