:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台灣原住民族就業障礙與對策之研究:從社會排除觀點探析
作者:邱汝娜
作者(外文):Ju-Na Chiu
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:社會政策與社會工作學系
指導教授:詹火生
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:台灣原住民就業社會排除勞動市場排除就業政策Taiwan Indigenous Peoplesemploymentsocial exclusionlabor market exclusionemployment policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:70
台灣原住民族,是台灣島上的先住民。在台灣社會,以「少數族群」勇敢面對主流社會不同政體文化的衝擊,並從20世紀中期後,進入快速發展的資本主義經濟的勞動市場工作,並呈現許多就業問題;1996年底政府成立部會層級的原住民族事務機關-行政院原住民族委員會,2001年底頒布「原住民族工作權保障法」,但有關原住民的就業調查報告與研究都呈現出「就業劣勢」的地位。原住民的就業障礙在哪裡?本研究特從「社會排除」的觀點來探究,希望從研究發現中提出對策建議。
社會排除,是近年被歐盟國家用來制定與分析社會政策的概念,以防範社會解組。社會排除概念的特點,係重視問題的相對性、多面向、動態過程及關注造成排除的社會機制。
本研究以「社會排除」概念探析原住民族的就業障礙,研究方法採量化與質化併用的「三角檢測」。量化資料分析係利用1994年的原住民就業狀況調查資料,以「失業」、「長期失業」、「低工作所得」、「低工時」及「社會歧視感」為勞動市場排除的衡量指標,探析原住民在勞動市場相對一般民眾被排除的程度,及影響被排除者的人口特徵。質化研究則從「被排除者」的工作生命史探討被排除的「過程」及其陷入排除的能動力;同時也訪談「熟悉原住民事務者」對原住民就業排除的觀點。
研究結果發現台灣原住民族的「就業障礙」為:
1. 原住民在勞動市場,相對一般民眾呈現被排除的現象:其排除呈現在「失業」、「長期失業」、「低工作所得」及「低工時」等經濟面向,同時潛存「社會面向」及「制度與管理面向」的排除。
2. 影響原住民在勞動市場被排除的人口特徵,以「教育程度」影響程度最大、次為「年齡」、再次為「族別」、「婚姻狀況」、「行政區域」等。
3. 原住民在勞動市場被排除者的排除過程,發現呈現從「穩定性工作」流向「不穩定的低技術性工作」,並呈現「與教育訓練剝離」的現象;也發現其流動受「非自主性導向」的影響,並在多次流動後有「回歸原鄉」的趨勢。
4. 影響原住民在勞動市場被排除的原因:除教育程度及年齡等個人條件外,社會結構因素的影響重大,此包括:經濟產業結構因素、政策與管理因素、地域因素及社會歧視因素等。
本研究並從研究發現提出去除業障礙的對策建議:
1. 提升教育政策:建議(1)提升原住民教育程度(2)增強就業能力(3)培養自信及自我管理能力(4)普及多元文化的社會教育;
2. 加強就業政策:建議(1)落實原住民就業保障政策(2)就業資訊可近性與多元性(3)職業訓練多元化與在地化(4)有效管理外勞政策;
3. 經濟產業政策:建議(1)積極發展原鄉產業(2)建立政府、產業及部落的合作架構(3)鼓勵企業展現種族包容的作為;
4. 福利照顧政策:建議(1)建構以「家庭關懷」為基礎的社區照顧服務體系(2)建立族群社會工作制度(3)鼓勵建立原住民互助支持網絡。
Taiwan Indigenous Peoples (TIP) started living on Taiwan before Han peoples. However, they are a minority group in Taiwan today, and they bravely face the different cultural challenges from the main society of Taiwan. Since the mid-twenty century, they have participated in the labor market of the fast growing capitalism economy; and have confronted numerous employment problems. At the end of 1996, the Central Government of Taiwan established a Cabinet level council, “the Council of Indigenous People (CIP) ” to manage the Indigenous peoples affairs. At the end of 2001, the “Indigenous Peoples Work Rights Protection Act” was enacted. However, the employment status surveys of Indigenous Peoples have consistently shown that the Indigenous Peoples are in a disadvantaged position in labor market. What are the major obstacles standing in the way of Indigenous People’s employment? This research has been conducted by “social exclusion” and hoped to find some policy suggestions.
Social exclusion is a new concept used by European Union (EU) in recent years to formulate and analyze social policy to prevent social disintegration. The features of the social exclusion are that it emphasizes the relativity, agency and dynamics of social problems.
This research studied and analyzed the employment obstacles of Taiwan Indigenous Peoples from social exclusion perspective. Research methodology adopted trianglation which includes both quantitative and qualitative. For quantitative analysis, it used data from the 2004 Employment Status Survey of Indigenous Peoples. It selected unemployment, long term unemployment, low working earnings, low working hours and social discrimination as measurable index for labor market social exclusion. We compared the different degree of exclusion between Indigenous vs. Han Peoples and analyzed the characteristics of the excluded. For qualitative studies, working life story method was used to interview and record the process of exclusion for those being excluded; and in-depth interviewed experts who were familiar with Indigenous Peoples affairs.
Major findings on employment obstacles for Taiwan Indigenous Peoples are as follows:
1. Comparing with the general population, TIP are excluded in the labor market: they are excluded in terms of “unemployment”, “long term unemployment”, “low working earnings” and “low working hours”. These exclusions do not only exist in economic dimension, they also exist in social dimension as well as regime dimension.
2. The characteristics of TIP that had significant effect on employment exclusion are: gender, ages, educational levels, marital status, tribes and living areas. The differences in degrees of exclusion were most obvious in different educational levels, followed by ages, tribes, marital status and living areas.
3. Observing the TIP on their process of being excluded, we found that their work tended to move involuntarily from “stable work” to “unstable low skilled work” and away from what they were trained for and eventually retreating back to their own home villages.
4. Major factors that caused TIP to be excluded in the labor market: Beside personal factors, social structure had severe impact too. It included economic industrial structure, policy and management factor, regional factor and social discrimination etc.
Based on the research findings this research also proposes some policy suggestions:
1. Improving education policy: It includes upgrading indigenous peoples’ educational levels, improving employability and their self-confidence on the work, improving self-control and financial planning, promoting more diversified concepts in culture and education.
2. Re-enforcing employment policy: It includes the complete implementation of the Indigenous Peoples Work Right Protection Act and accessible and diversified employment opportunities, localized and diversified job training programs and, improving effective management of immigrant workers.
3. Industrial development policy: promote regional (tribal) industries, establish the cooperating mechanism among governments, industries and indigenous tribes; Encourage corporates to show their equal treatments to all ethnicities, and provide job opportunities for Indigenous Peoples.
4. Social welfare policy: construct a “family-care” based community care services system; establish social work systems; and encourge building social support network.
中文部分
中央研究院民族所(1983)。山地行政政策之研究與評估報告書。台北:南港。
王明珂(1996)。誰的歷史:自傳、傳記與口述歷史的社會記憶本質。思與言,34(3),147-184。new window
王麗雲(2000)。自傳/傳記/生命史在教育研究上的應用,載於中正大學教育學研究所(主編),質的研究方法(265-306頁)。高雄:麗文文化。
王學新、許守明(2000)。日治時期東台灣地區原住民勞動力之利用,載於夏黎明、呂理政(主編),族群、歷史與空間。台東:國立台灣史前文化博物館籌備處。new window
王永慈(2001)。「社會排除」:貧窮概念的再詮釋。社區發展季刊,95,72-84。new window
王永慈(2004)。「社會排除」現象的再檢視。台灣的社會階層化及其效果,台灣地區社會變遷調查研討會,中央研究院社會所。
尤哈尼‧伊斯卡卡夫特(2001)。對原住民自治區的看法,原住民族人權與自治。台北:前衛。
巴蘇亞‧博依哲努(浦忠成)(2002)。思考原住民。台北:前衛。new window
台灣總督府警務局(1938)。高砂族調查書(一至六編)。
古允文、詹宜璋(1998)。台灣地區老人經濟安全與年金政策:社會排除觀點初探。人文及社會科學集刊,10卷第2期,191-225。new window
古允文(2001)。建構社會安全體系照顧弱勢團體。國政研究報告。財團法人國家政策研究基金會。
古允文(2004)。超越政治:重尋福利政策的社會基礎,社會整合與社會排除公民論壇論文集。東吳大學社會工作學系。
江文瑜(1996)。「口述史法」,載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(249-270頁)。台北:巨流。
行政院原住民族委員會(1997)。原住民就業安全三年實施計劃。
行政院經濟建設委員會(1999),國內經濟結構轉型與勞動市場變化的研究。
行政院原住民族委員會(2001)。九十年上半年台灣原住民就業狀況調查報告。
行政院原住民族委員會(2001)。九十年下半年台灣原住民就業狀況調查報告。
行政院原住民族委員會(2002)。九十一年台灣原住民就業狀況調查報告。
行政院原住民族委員會(2003a)。九十二年台灣原住民就業狀況調查與政策研究-就業狀況調查報告。
行政院原住民族委員會(2003 b)。九十二年台灣原住民就業狀況調查與政策研究-就業政策研究報告。
行政院原住民族委員會(2004)。九十一年台灣原住民統計年鑑。
行政院原住民族委員會(2004a)。九十三年台灣原住民就業狀況調查與政策研究-就業狀況調查報告。
行政院原住民族委員會(2004b)。九十三年台灣原住民就業狀況調查與政策研究-就業政策研究報告。
李庚霈(1997)原住民失業問題與因應對策之探討及評析。就業與訓練, 24-31
李誠(2001)。跨世紀勞動市場的變遷與挑戰,載於詹火生(主編),新經濟世紀勞動政策。台北:厚生基金會。
李淑容(2004)。新貧階級與社會排除。載於中華民國國際社會福利協會東吳大學文學院(主編)社會整合與社會排除公民論壇論文集。36~41。
吳忠吉(2001)。「台灣勞動供需情勢分析」。載於詹火生(主編),新經濟世紀勞動政策。台北:厚生基金會。
周憲文(1954)。台灣之原始經濟。台灣銀行季刊, 7(1),229-243。
邱汝娜(2003)。整合資源建構原住民就業服務完備體系。就業安全,1(12),75-81。
邱汝娜(2007)。原漢就業差距縮小?「原住民族工作權保障法」實施成效評估。被接受刊登台灣厚生學刊,第三期。
胡幼慧(1996)。「多元方法:三角交叉檢視法」,載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(271-288頁)。台北:巨流。
徐震、李明政、莊秀美(2000)。社會問題。台北:學富文化。
高德義(1997)。邁向「多元一體」的族群關係:原住民基本政策之回顧與展望,載於中華民國台灣原住民文化發展協會(主編),原住民政策與社會發展(140~182頁)。
高正尚(2001)。建構台灣成為最重視原住民人權的國家,原住民族人權與自治。台北:前衛
孫健忠(2001)。建構原住民社會救助制度之研究。台北:行政院原住民委員會
孫大川(2000)。夾縫中的族群建構:台灣原住民的語言、文化與政治。台北:聯合文學new window
莊昆祐(2003)。臺灣原住民之就業歧視。國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
陳樹強(2003)。社會排斥:對社會弱勢群體的重新概念化。中國勞工通訊。
陳皇廷(2003)。台灣山地原住民族與制度性剝奪之探討─以屏東縣來義鄉來義村為例。國立中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文。
郭振昌(1999)。原住民就業問題與對策。中國勞工,995,27-29。
曾碧淵(1998)。「就業市場」,在行政院勞委會職業訓練局編,就業安全辭典。頁141-142。
張菁芬(2004)。公民權與勞動市場排除。社會整合與社會排除公民論壇論文集。台北:東吳大學社會工作學系。[沒有寫參考的頁數]
張菁芬(2005)。社會排除現象與對策-歐盟的經驗分析。台北:松慧。new window
傅仰止(1994)。台灣原住民困境的歸因解釋比較漢人觀點與原住民觀點。中研院社會學研究所。
森丑之助(2000)。生蕃行腳。(楊南郡譯)。台北:遠流出版。
詹火生(2001)。建構彈性靈活的勞動政策,迎接知識經濟時代的來臨。載於詹火生(主編),新經濟世紀勞動政策。台北:厚生基金會。
詹宜璋(2004)。「原住民勞動統計再分析與相關政策意涵探討」。原住民勞動力資源運用與發展學術研討會:大葉大學。
賈士蘅 譯(Wolf原著)(2003),《歐洲與沒有歷史的人》,台北:麥田出版。
廖文生(1984)。台灣山地社會經濟結構性變遷之探討。台灣大學社會研究所 碩士論文
蔡明哲(2002)。台灣原住民史:都市原住民篇。南投:台灣省文獻會。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與運用。台北:心理。
謝高橋(1993)。台灣地區山胞就業與失業問題之調查研究。台北:勞委會職訓局
謝高橋、陳信木(1997)。加強原住民謀生技能提升職業層次專案研究。台北:台灣省政府經濟建設及研究院考核委員會。
謝高橋、陳信木(1998)。生計方式與文化:論原住民勞動力的文化資本條件對於就業之影響,載於台灣師範大學人文教育研究中心(主編),台灣本土文化國際學術研討會論文集(257~278頁)。
衛民(1998)。原住民族就業安全服務體系的探討,原住民社會福利體系之規劃。台北:行政院原住民族委員會
盧政春(1999)。社會權保障與原住民就業輔助。東吳社會學報,8,195-221。new window
瞿海源(1983)。台灣山地鄉的社會經濟地位與人口。中國社會學刊7,5~175。new window
簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)。社會工作研究法。台北:巨流。new window
蘇癸玲(1996)。都市原住民就業概況及職業輔導問題之探討。社教雙月刊,75期,28-33。
楊國樞等(1989)。科學研究的基本概念。載於楊國樞等(主編),社會及行為科學研究法。第13版,(1-34頁)。台北:東華。new window
楊士範(2000)。日治迄今排灣族聚落移住與社會經濟變遷-一個 平和村(Piuma)的例子。思與言,38(4):185-230。new window
楊昀儒(2002年4月29日)。921災區民眾史:我們不是樂天派—花東新村的失業心聲。臺灣立報。第6版
趙幼蘭(2003)。台灣失業勞工的生活困境與社會排斥之探討。國立台北大學碩士論文。
劉仲冬(1996)。「量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路」,載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(121-140頁)。台北:巨流。

英文部分
Ahmad W. & Craig G., (1998). Race and Social Welfare. In Aclcock P., Erskine A. & May M.(Ed),The Student’s Companion to Social Policy. UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 91-97
Alcock P. & Erskine A., (2003),(林慧芬譯)(2006)「分化、差異與排除」,收錄在國立編譯館主譯,解讀社會政策,103-113。台北市:群學。
Barnes, Matt (2002).Social Exclusion and the Life Course.In Barnes et al (Eds.), Poverty and Social Exclusion in Europe. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Barry, Brain ( 2002 ). Exclusion, Isolation, and Income. In Hills et al (Eds.), Understanding Social Exclusion. UK:Oxford University Press..
Becker, H.S.(1970). The Life History and the Scientific Mosaic. In Becker, H.S.(Eds)Sociological Work: Method and Substance(pp. 63-73). Aldine Publishing Company.
Berg, B.L.(1998). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Science. Boston: Ally & Bacon.
Berghman, J.(1995).Social Exclusion in Europe: Policy Context and Analytical Framework”.In Room (Ed), Beyond the Threshold. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Bhalla, A. S. and Lapeyre, F.(1999).Poverty and Exclusion in a Global World. London: Macmillan Press.
BraginskyD.D. & Braginsky B.M.,(1975)”Surplus People: Their Lost Faith in Self and System”. Psychology Today. Aug. 1975. p.70
Brannen, J.(1992). Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approach: An Overview. In Brannen(ed.) Mixing Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative research (pp.3-37). Brookfield: Avebury.
Brenner H.,(1973). Mental Illness and the Economy. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brody, H.(1992). Philosophic Approaches. In Crabtree B.F. & Miller W.L.(Eds.). Doing Qualitive Research. Sage Publication.
Bryman, A.(1988).QuanIty and Quality in Social Research. New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A.(1992). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.
Byrne, D.(1999). Social Exclusion. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Burchardt, T.(2000).Social Exclusion: Concept and Evidence. In Gordon and Townsend (Eds.), Breadline Europe: The Measurement of Poverty (pp.385-405). UK: The Policy Press.
Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., and Piachaud, D.(1999).Social Exclusion in Britain 1991-1995. Social Policy and Administration, 33(3), 227-244.
Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., and Piachaud, D.(2002a).Introduction. In Hills et al (Eds.), Understanding Social Exclusion. UK: Oxford University Press.
Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., and Piachaud, D.(2002b).Degrees of Exclusion: Developing a Dynamic, Multidimensional Measure. In Hills et al (Eds.), Understanding Social Exclusion. UK:Oxford University Press.
Burden, Tom(2000).Poverty. In Janie Percy-Smith (Ed.), Policy Responses to Social Exclusion. Open University Press.
Burden, Tom and Hamm, Tricia(2000).Responding to Socially Excluded Groups. In Janie Percy-Smith (Ed.), Policy Responses to Social Exclusion. Open University Press.
Campbell, Mike (2000). Labor Market Exclusion and Inclusion. In Janie Percy-Smith (Ed.), Policy Responses to Social Exclusion. Open University Press.
Center for Contemporary Culture Studies (CCCS) (1982). The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in 70s Britain. London: Hutchinson.
Commission of the European Communities(1993). Background Report: Social Exclusion-Poverty and Other Social Problems in the European Community, ISEC/B11/93, Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Commission of the European Communities.(1994). White Paper: Growth, Competitiveness, Employment. Luxemburg.
Creswell, J. W.(1994)Research Design: Quantitative and Qualitative Approach. Sage Publication.
Deacon, A. (2003). “Employment”. In Alcock P., Erskine A., & May M., The Students’Companion to Social Policy. UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc., 280-285.
Denzin, N.K.(1978).The Research Act: A theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods(2nd ed.).New York: McGraw-Hill.
Denzin, N.K.(1989). Interpretive Biography. Sage Publication.
European Commission (1994). European Social Policy: A Way Forward for the Union. Brussels: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.
European Commission. (2004). Joint Report on Social Inclusion 2004, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.
Gallie. (2001). Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe. UK: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, D. et al.(2000).Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain. UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Goldstein, H.(1991). Qualitative research and social work: Partners in discovery. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XVIII(4), 101-120.
Gore, Charles(1995).Introduction: Markets, Citizenship and Social Exclusion. In Rodgers, Gore and Figueiredo (Eds), Social Exclusion: Rhetoric, Reality, Responses. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies. 1-40
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S.(1994). Competing in qualitative research. In N.K. Lincoln(Eds.)Handbook of Qualitative Research( pp.105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jones, Loring P.(1991).Unemployment: The Effort on Social Networks, Depression, and Reemployment Opportunities. Journal of Social Research, 15, 1-22.
Kohli, M.(1981). Biography: Account, Text, and Method. In Bertaux, D.(eds) Biography and Society. (pp59-75) Sage.
Kuper, A. & Kuper, J.(Eds)(1996). The Social Science Encyclopedia. (2nd ed). Routledge.
Larsen, J. E.(2003).Social Inclusion and Exclusion in Denmark, 1976 to 2000, paper prepared for the Australian Social Policy Conference, Social Inclusion, University of New South Wales, 9-11.
Littlewood, P. & Herkommer, S. (1999). Indentifying Social Exclusion: Some Problems of Meanings, in Littlewood, P. et al. (eds.) Social Exclusion in Europe: Problems and Paradigms, Aldershot: Ashgate, 1-19
Marshall, C., & Rossaman, G.B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Marshell, T. H. (1964). Citizenship and social Class. In Marshall, T. M. Class, Citizenship, and Social Development (pp. 71~134). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Massey, D. & Denton, N.A. (1993). American Apartheid. London: Harvard University Press.
Moisio, & Tsakloglou (2002).Introduction: Empirical Approaches to Social Exclusion in European Welfare States.In Muffels et al. (Eds.), Social Exclusion in European Welfare States (pp1-18). UK: Edward Elgar.
Morse, J. M.(1991). Approaches to Qualitive - Qualitative Methodological Triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(1),120-123.
Muffels, Ruud J.A. & Tsakloglou, Panos (2002). Introduction: Empirical Approaches to Analysing Social Exclusion in European Welfare States. In Muffels et al.(Eds.), Social Exclusion in European Welfare States. Edward Elgar Publishing, UK.
Patton, M.Q.(1990).Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. California: Sage Publications.
Paugam, S and Russell, H.(2000).The Effects of Employment Precarity and Unemployment on Social Isolation. In Gallie, D and Paugam, S. (Eds.), Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe. Oxford Press.
Peach, C.(ed.)(1996). The Ethnic Minority Populations of Great Britain, Ethnicity in the 1991 Census, Vol. 2. London: HMSO.
Percy-Smith, J.(2000).Introduction: The Contours of Social Exclusion. In Janie Percy-Smith (Ed.), Plicy Responses to Social Exclusion. Open University Press.
Pierson, J.(2002). Tackling Social Exclusion. London: Routledge.
Rodgers , Gerry. (1995). The Design of Policy Against Exclusion. In Rodgers, Gore and Figueiredo (Eds), Social Exclusion: Rhetoric, Reality, Responses. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies
Room, Graham.(1992). Observatory on National Policies to Combat social Exclusion. Second Annual Report. Brussels, Directorate General V, Empolyment, Social Affairs, and Industrial Relations, Commission for European Communities.
Room, Graham.(1995).Poverty and Social Exclusion: The New European Agenda for Policy and Research. In Room (Ed), Beyond the Threshold, the Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion. The Policy Press, University of Bristol.
Rubin,A. & Babbie, E.(1997).Research Method for Social Work (3rd ed.). CA: Wadsworth.
Sales, Esther.(1995)Surviving Unemployment: Economic Resources and Job Loss Duration in Blue-Collar Households. Social Work, 40, 483-494.
Saunders, Peter.(2003)Can Social Exclusion Provide a New Framework for Measuring Poverty? Social Policy Research Center Discussion Paper, 127. Sydney, Australia:University of South Wales,
Silver, H.(1994).Social Exclusion and Social Solidarity: Three Paradigms. International Labour Review, 133, 531-578
Silver, H.(1995). Reconceptualizing Social Disadvantage: Three Paradigms of Social Exclusion, In Rodgers, Gore and Figueiredo (Eds), Social Exclusion: Rhetoric, Reality, Responses. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
Silver, H. & Wilkinson, F.(1995).Policies to Combat Social Exclusion: A French-British Comparion.In Rodgers, Gore and Figueiredo (Eds), Social Exclusion: Rhetoric, Reality, Responses. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
Spicker, Paul.(1993).Poverty and Social Security: Concepts and Principles. London: Toutledge.
The Scottish Parliament.(1999).Measuring Social Exclusion. Research Paper, UK:The Information Centre, The Scottish Parliament.
Tsakloglou, P. and Papadopoulos, F.(2002).Identifying Population Groups at High Risk of Social Exclusion: Evidence from the ECHP. In Muffels et al.(Eds.), Social Exclusion in European Welfare States. UK :Edward Elgar Publishing.
Tutty, L. M., Rothery, M.A., & Grinnel,R.M.(1996). Qualitative Research for Social Workers. MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Vleminckx, Koen & Berghman, Joe. (2001). “ Social Exclusion and the Welfare State: an Overview of Conceptual Issues and Policy Implications”. In Mayes, D.G. et al. (eds), Social Exclusion and European Policy, Cheltenham Edward elgar, 27-46.
Zastrow C., 1996). Introduction to social Work and Social Welfare. Brooks/cole PublishingCompany. 張英陣、彭淑華、鄭麗珍等譯,(1998)。社會福利與社會工作。台北:洪葉。
網路部分
1.行政院主計處網站:網址為www.dgbasey.gov.tw/census
2.行政院原住民委員會網站:網址為http://www.apc.gov.tw/
3.ILO. 1998. 1998-99 World Employment report. Available at www.ilo.org
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE