臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：美國信託學校理念與制度之探討
書刊名：國立臺北師範學院學報
作者：黃嘉雄 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Chia-hsiung
出版日期：2000
卷期：13
頁次：頁177+179-199+201
主題關鍵詞：美國；信託學校
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:185
  • 點閱點閱:45
　　　　　本文採用文獻探討法，分析美國信託學校的發展緣起、意義、核心理念及其多樣化的制度實務，並予以評論。 主要結論為：信託學校係追求活化美國公共教育革新行動的一環，制度模式因州而異，呈現多樣化形貌，其合理性主要植基於自由主義的市場哲學和以高績效責任換取高自主的組織管理理念。比起傳統的公立學校，此種制度亦較能擺脫科層行政的束縛而更具專業主義精神；在政治策略上，則可做為教育券制度的替代方案。但是，此種制度的專業自主恐會受市場壓力的壓抑，開放自由選擇學校所衍生的學校教育商品化、工具化、目標窄化和對教育機會均等不利等之問題，則是採用施行此制度前須再深入討的課題。
　　　　　The article aims to describe and interpret the history, definition, rationality and institutional practice of charter school in USA. Also, the rationality based on charter school is criticized. The author makes several conclusions. Firstly, the creation of charter school is one of many movements for revitalization of American public education. Secondly, the diverse institutional pra ctice is found in the legislation of different states. Thirdly, the foundational rationality of charter school is based on the libertarian idea of creating a competitive market in education and the management idea of high accountability for high autonomy. Also, a charter school would have more professional autonomy than other public schools. Fourthly, enacting the idea of charter school is a better political policy to defend the argument of education voucher. Finally, some issues should be deeply reconsidered before implementing charter school system. Those are the issues of the limited autonomy constrained by a competitive educational market, the commercialism and instrumentality of education process arising from the choice of schools and the negative impacts on the equality of educational opportunity resulting from the competitive choices system.
期刊論文
1.林天祐(19981100)。特許學校--公立學校組織再造的新機制。國教月刊，45(1)，46-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳清山、林天祐(1998)。特許學校。教育資料與研究，22，73。  延伸查詢new window
3.李柏佳(1999)。試擬「臺北市試辦國民中小學委託民營實施條例」。學校行政，4，89-106。  延伸查詢new window
4.Budde, R.(1996)。The evolution of the charter concept。PHI DELTA KAPPAN，78(1)，72-73。  new window
5.Goenner, J.(1996)。Charter school: The revitalization of public education。PHI DELTA KAPPAN，78(1)，32-36。  new window
6.Hart, G. K.、Burr, S.(1996)。The story of California's charter school legislation。PHI DELTA KAPPAN，78(1)，37-40。  new window
7.Loveless, T.、Jasin, C.(1998)。Starting from scratch: Political and organizational challenges facing charter schools。Education administration Quarterly，34(1)，9-30。  new window
8.Manno, B. V.、Finn, C. E., Jr.、Bierlein, L. A.、Vanourek, G.(1998)。How charter schools are different? Lessons and implications from a national study。PHI DELTA KAPPAN，80(1)，489-498。  new window
9.Nathan, B. J.、Ysseldyke, J.(1994)。What Minnesota has learned about school choice。Phi Delta Kappan，75(9)，682-688。  new window
10.Nathan, J.(1998)。Heat and light in the charter school movement。PHI DELTA KAPPAN，80(1)，499-505。  new window
11.Premack, E.(1996)。Charter schools: California's education reform 'power tool'。PHI DELTA KAPPAN，78(1)，60-64。  new window
12.Wagner, T.(1996)。Social choice: To what end?。PHI DELTA KAPPAN，78(1)，70-71。  new window
13.Wells, A. S.(1998)。Charter school reform in California: Does it meet expectations?。PHI DELTA KAPPAN，80(4)，305-312。  new window
14.West, A.、Pennell, H.、Edge, A.(1997)。Exploring the impact of reform on school enrollment polices in England。Educational Quarterly，33(2)，170-182。  new window
15.Windler, W.(1996)。Colorado's charter schools: A spark for change and a catalyst for reform。PHI DELTA KAPPAN，78(1)，166-169。  new window
16.Zollers, N. J.、Rsmanathan, A. K.(1998)。For-profit charter schools and students with disabilities: The sordid side of the business of schooling。Phi Delta Kappan，80(4)，297-304。  new window
研究報告
1.黃嘉雄(1999)。英格蘭及威爾斯學校自主管理政策之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Nathan, Joe(1996)。Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education。San Francisco, California：Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
2.Whitty, G.、Power, S.、Halpin, D.(1998)。Devolution and choice in education: the school, the state and the market。Buckingham。  new window
3.Bauman, P. C.(1996)。Governing education: Public sector reform or privatization。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
4.Odden, A. R.、Busch, C.(1998)。Financing schools for high performance: Strategies for improving the use of educational resources。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
5.歐用生(1999)。新世紀的學校。臺北市：臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
6.張明輝(19990000)。學校教育與行政革新研究。臺北：師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張志明(1999)。公立學校制度改革的新途徑。新世紀的教育展望。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃嘉雄(1998)。析評紐西蘭的學校自主管理政策。學校行政新理念。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Wohlstetter, P.(1994)。Education by charter。School-based management: Organizing for high performance。San Francisco, CA。  new window
其他
1.Hollins, J.(1998)。What are public charter schools?，http://csr.syr.edu/definition.htm。  new window
2.Nappi, C. R.(1999)。Why charter schools? The Princeton story，0。  new window
3.US Charter Schools(1999)。Overview of charter schools，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Caldwell, B. J.(1993)。The changing role of the school principal: A review of developments in Australia and New Zealand。School-Based Management and School Effectiveness。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
2.張德銳(1997)。誰選擇？誰損失？--學校選擇權對教育機會均等的影響。社會變遷中的教育機會均等。臺北：揚智。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：793（臺灣：785，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67541229
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上