:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以階層分析法建構國民小學教師課務編排指標之權重體系
書刊名:初等教育學刊
作者:葉連祺 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Lain-chyi
出版日期:2001
卷期:9
頁次:頁75-112
主題關鍵詞:課務行政決定階層分析法Teaching worksAdministrative decision makingAnalytic hierarchy process
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:619
  • 點閱點閱:61
編排教師課務為國民小學學校行政的重要事務,惟迄今未見論者探討相關理論,也未見有學校應用客觀的編排方法。本文探討國民小學教師課務編排的相關課題,包括定義、影響因素、理念取向、原則、流程和一般模式,另簡介階層分析法 (AHP) 的理念、問題、最近研究成果和分析流程。此外,選取臺北市某所大型國民小學教師為樣本,應用階層分析法,建立一個國民小學教師課務編排指標的權重體系,並提出若干應用策略,以供參考。
The arrangement of teaching works is an important affair in elementary school administration, but there are no more the related theory and no more application of the decision making about it. The paper studies the related issues about the arrangement of teaching works in elementary school, which includes definition, influential factors, theoretical approaches, principles, process and general model. It also introduces simply the ideas, problems, recent researches and process about the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). And then it uses the AHP, which takes one big elementary school as sample, to construct a weighted indexes system of the arrangement of teaching works in elementary school and presents some applicable strategies.
期刊論文
1.Tarter, C. J.、Hoy, W. K.(1998)。Toward a contingency theory of decision making。Journal of Educational Administration,16(3),212-228。  new window
2.徐木炎(1997)。解鈴還須繫鈴人。臺北教育通訊,29,5。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉慶龍(1997)。教師授課時數檢討。新好教師月刊,14-15。  延伸查詢new window
4.Forman, E.、Peniwati, K.(1998)。Aggregating individual judgements and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process。European Journal of Operational Research,108(1),165-169。  new window
5.Lai, S. K.、Hopkins, L. D.(1995)。Can decision makers express multiattribute preferences using AHP and MUT? An experiment。Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,22,21-34。  new window
6.Saaty, T. L.(1990)。Eigenvector and logarithmic least squares。European Journal of Operational Research,48(1),156-160。  new window
7.Schenkerman, S.(1997)。Inducement of nonexistent order by the analytic hierarchy process。Decision Sciences,28(2),475-482。  new window
8.Tung, S. L.、Tang, S. L.(1998)。A comparison of the Saaty's AHP and modified AHP for the right and left eigenvector inconsistency。European Journal of Operational Research,106,123-128。  new window
9.Finan, J. S.、Hurley, W. J.(1999)。Transitive calibration of the AHP verbal scale。European Journal of Operational Research,112(2),367-372。  new window
10.Kang, M.、Stam, A.(1994)。PAHAP: A pairwise aggregated hierarchical analysis of ratio-scale preference。Decision Sciences,25(4),607-624。  new window
11.Lipovetsky, S.、Tishler, A.(1999)。Interval estimation of priorities in the AHP。European Journal of Operational Research,114(1),153-164。  new window
12.Ra, J. W.(1999)。Chainwise paired comparisons。Decision Sciences,30(2),581-599。  new window
13.Van den Honert, R. C.(1999)。Stochastic group preference modeling in the multiplicative AHP: A model of group consensus。European Journal of Operational Research,110(1),99-111。  new window
14.Weck, M.、Klocke, F.、Schell, H.、Ruenauver, E.(1997)。Evaluating Alternative Production Cycles Using the Extended Fuzzy AHP Method。European Journal of Operational Research,100(2),351-366。  new window
15.Zahir, S.(1999)。Geometry of Decision Making and the Vector Space Formulation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process。European Journal of Operational Research,112(2),373-396。  new window
16.翁興利(19950200)。政策假定與政策方案之研究:AHP、SAST與SAA之比較研究。公共政策學報,16,81-122。  延伸查詢new window
17.謝金青(19980200)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。新竹師院學報,11,449-486。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.鄧振源、曾國雄(19890700)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用。中國統計學報,27(7),13767-13786。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Vargas, Luis G.(1990)。An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications。European Journal of Operational Research,48(1),2-8。  new window
研究報告
1.賴世剛(1995)。分析階層程序法與多屬性效用理論之關係 (計畫編號:NSC82-0301-H005A-006)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王素芸(1994)。多重目標決策模式應用國民中學入學方式選擇之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.方溪泉(1994)。AHP與AHP'實例應用比較:以高架橋下土地使用評估為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝玲芬(1989)。多目標(多準則)評估技術之探討及其在組織績效評估之應用(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉牧青(1989)。AHP層級結構設定問題之探討(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張鈿富(1995)。教育政策分析--理論與實務。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華電視臺教學部(1973)。師專國民小學行政。臺北市:中華。  延伸查詢new window
3.王鴻年、柯維俊、楊吉仁(1972)。國民小學行政。臺北市:臺灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
4.田曉娜(1994)。中國學校校長工作實用全書。北京:國際文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳金香(1993)。國小教務行政。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hoy, W. K.、Miskel, C. G.(1996)。Educational administration: Theory, research and practice。New York:Random House。  new window
7.Saaty, Thomas L.(1990)。Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World。RWS Publications。  new window
8.Saaty, Thomas L.(1994)。Fundamentals of decision making with the analytic hierarchy process。Pittsburgh, PA:RWS Publications。  new window
9.Saaty, Thomas L.、Vargas, Luis G.(1982)。The logic of priorities: Applications in business, energy, health, and transportation。Boston, MA:Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing。  new window
10.Saaty, Thomas L.、Vargas, Luis G.(1991)。Prediction, Projection and Forecasting: Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Economics, Finance, Politics, Games, and Sports。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
11.謝文全(1993)。學校行政。臺北:文景:五南。  延伸查詢new window
12.秦夢群(1997)。教育行政:理論部分。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳清山(1991)。學校行政。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王秀芬(19970824)。學校排課吵翻天。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE