:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:(反) 全球化下的傳播研究:Mead、Bakhtin、Wittgenstein
書刊名:中華傳播學刊
作者:方孝謙 引用關係
作者(外文):Fong, Shiaw-chian
出版日期:2002
卷期:1
頁次:頁41-55
主題關鍵詞:姿勢內在話語家族相似性接近性類似性GestureInner wordsFamily resemblanceSimilarityContiguity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:62
  • 點閱點閱:63
以Mead、Bakhtin有關傳播的理念,建構出合乎主流實證主義的理論模型之後,筆者認為主流的模型當然還有提供概念、指導研究的作用。但是屆此(反)全球化時代的到臨,我們也許更應該秉持Wittgenstein「家族相似性」概念的精神,開拓所謂「想像的傳播探索」。想像的發揮要從常識上大相逕庭的事物中看出它們的類似關係,這跟實證主義主論所依仗的理-從事物在時間點的接續順序中找出因果關係的思維-是分別極大的思考方式。在把想像、理性及它們與語言的關係一一釐清之後,我們以兩個實例說明依「想像的傳播探索」所做的結果如何。
In the pre-global age, what is popular in communication studies seems to be a positivist-rational paradigm, which remains useful in guiding research judging from a model that combines ideas from both Mead and Bakhtin. This paradigm pivots upon the power of reason, a thinking style that emphasizes the causal relations among events located in time series. However, on the eve of the (anti-)global age, we would propose an imaginative framework of communication inquiry which draws upon the concept of “family resemblance” as expounded by Wittgenstein. Imagination stresses the ability to see the similarity between things and events that are widely considered as disparate. The enhancement of this ability can be aided by the use of literary tropes such as metaphor and irony, which are in opposition, but also supplementary, to metonymy and synecdoche, the two tropes that are highly correlated with the use of reason.
期刊論文
1.Homans, George C.(1982)。The Present State of Sociological Theory。The Sociological Quarterly,23(3),285-299。  new window
圖書
1.黃沛榮(2009)。部件教學法的運用及其局限。漢字教學的理論和實踐。臺北:樂學書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Volosinov, V. N.、Titunik, I. R.(1976)。Freudianism: A Critical Sketch。Indiana University Press。  new window
3.Baker, G. P.、Hacker, P. M. S.(1980)。Wittgenstein, Understanding and Meaning。Oxford:Basil Blackwell。  new window
4.Vološhinov, V. N.、Matejka, Ladislav、Titunik, I. R.(1973)。Marxism and the Philosophy of Language。Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Wittgenstein, Ludwig、Anscombe, G. E. M.(2001)。Philosophical Investigations。New York:Macmillan。  new window
6.Mead, George Herbert、Morris, Charles W.(1934)。Mind, Self and Society。University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Morris, Pam(1994)。The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, Voloshinov。London, UK:Edward Arnold。  new window
8.方孝謙(2001)。殖民地臺灣的認同摸索:從善書到小說的敘事分析,1895-1945。臺北:巨流出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Appadurai, Arjun(1996)。Modernity At Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization。University of Minnesota Press。  new window
10.Rorty, Richard(1979)。Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature。Princeton University Press。  new window
11.Olson, Mancur Jr.(1971)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Rajagopal, A.(2001)。Politics after Television: Hindu Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Public in India。Politics after Television: Hindu Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Public in India。Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.薛承泰(2004)。老人照顧老人 將是臺灣現象,http://ntu.edu.tw/~psc_news9312/120701.htm, 20041207。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE