:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:評介歐門汀葛爾的《規劃理論》:現代主義到後現代主義的跨界對話
書刊名:國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報
作者:戴伯芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Tai, Po-fen
出版日期:2006
卷期:13
頁次:頁107-116
主題關鍵詞:規劃理論後實證主義現代性後現代主義Planning theoryPost-positivismModernityPostmodernism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:222
  • 點閱點閱:114
本文主要目的在引介與評論歐門汀葛爾的《規劃理論》一書。在現代主義轉向後現代主義之際,歐氏從後實證主義的類型學觀點,重新討論現代主義的系統論與理性論、馬克思主義與批判理論、新右派理論、實用主義、倡導論等諸學派,同時轉向後現代主義規劃與合作論的論述。本文一方面引介歐氏對於諸理論的介紹與批評,一方面對於他所提出的理論與架構進行評論。除了歐氏自省的類型學問題之外,本文認為他忽略了西方資本主義社會以外不同時、空所出現的社會主義與第三世界規劃理論與實務,同時也有意忽略女性主義規劃者對於規劃思維與實踐的反省,使本書流為西方英、美中心論、男性規劃菁英主導的規劃理論。
This paper aims to introduce and comment Allmendinger’s Planning Theory. Based on post-positivism, Allmendinger evaluates essential planning theories, including systems and rational theories of planning, Marxism and critical theory, new right planning, pragmatism, as well as advocate planning theory, and provides a prospect for postmodern planning and collaborative planning. There are three comments: shortcoming of typology, ignorance of planning theory and practice in Third World other than in West Capitalist society, and a criticism from feminism.
圖書
1.Falude, Andreas(1973)。Planning Theory。Oxford:Pergamon。  new window
2.Pred, Allan、夏鑄九、王志弘(1993)。空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本。臺北:明文書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Hayek, F.(1944)。The Road to Serfdom。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
4.Habermas, Jurgen、McCarthy, T.(1984)。The Theory of Communication Action。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
5.Castells, Manuel、Sheridan, Alan(1977)。The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach。Cambridge, Mass:London:MIT Press:Edward Arnold。  new window
6.Faludi, A.(1973)。Planning Theory。Oxford:Pergamon Press。  new window
7.Friedmann, John(1987)。Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action。Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Soja, Edward W.(1996)。Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places。Blackwell。  new window
其他
1.邢幼田(1990)。進步式規劃進步嗎?--國家體制內的進步規劃師。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.夏鑄九(1992)。理論建築。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾旭正(1990)。規劃理論與社會變遷--七○年代程序性規劃理論論戰的回顧。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Allmendinger, P.(2001)。Planning in Postmodern Times。  new window
5.Allmendinger, P.(2002)。Planning Theory。  new window
6.Bondi, L.(1990)。Gender Tourism in the Space Age: A Feminism Response to Postmodern Geography。  new window
7.Camhis, M.(1979)。Planning Theory and Philosophy。  new window
8.Castells, M.(1983)。The City and Grassroots。  new window
9.Fraser, N.(1990)。Rethinking in the public sphere, in Robbins。  new window
10.Forester, J.(1898)。Planning in the Face of Power。  new window
11.Friedmann, J.(1973)。The Public Interest and Community Participation: toward a Reconstruction of Public Philosophy。  new window
12.Foucault, M.(1972)。The Archaeology of Knowledge。  new window
13.Healey, P., McDougall, G. and Michael, J. T.(1982)。Planning Theory。  new window
14.Healey, P., McDougall, G. and Michael, J. T.(1997)。Collaborative Planning。  new window
15.Krumholz(1975)。he Cleveland Policy Planning Report。  new window
16.Moore-Milroy, B.(1991)。Into Postmodern Weightless。  new window
17.Massey, D.(1994)。Flexible Sexism。  new window
18.Rose, G.(1993)。Feminism and Geography。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE