王弼「聖人有情說」為清談玄論的重要議題，由於關涉魏晉士人時代的核心問題與普遍意識－「情」，故其定位每游移於「玄學理論脈絡」與「士風文化面向」兩端，而交映出頗多的理解爭議與探討旨趣。 本文即透過王弼聖人有情說之兩種詮釋向度－「著力於玄學內在理路」與「側重於士人尚情心態」－的反省，探索「貴無」與「滯有」這兩種論述取向的特色與得失，並在兩端的對顯下，經由「聖凡之際」與「情智之際」兩面向的檢視，一則開啟玄學與士風的合理分判及關涉，二則揭示王說的詮釋空間與論述限域，使王說的內在義涵及影響論述，在此關照下都能有一更為適切的闡釋與定位。 本文期能在玄論與士風、貴無與滯有、抽象思維與具體現象、理論根源與社會現況的交相對話下，尋繹一辨異又能兼攝兩端的有效論述，從而為王弼聖人有情說的探討樹立另一種可能。

Wang Bi's shengren youqingshuo (discourse on 'sainthood with affection') is a significant topic of Chinese metaphysics. Since it involves qing (affection), a core issue that Wei-Jin's intellectualists were generally aware of, discussions about it shift between "metaphysical theoretical underpinning" and "cultural intellectualism". As such, it has given rise to much controversy and room for further exploration. By examining the two approaches to Wang Bi's discourse on sainthood with affection-"emphasis on metaphysical theorizing" and "focus on intellectuals' attitude toward affection", this paper investigates their respective strengths and weaknesses. The paper will juxtapose the two approaches-one highlighting "not having" (gueiwu) and the other sticking to "having" (zhiyiou) and will consider the lines between sainthood and secularism, between affection and wisdom. It will initiate a dialogue between metaphysics and intellectual climate on one hand, and will reveal interpretive flexibility and restraint in Wang's treatment on the other hand. It is hoped that the meaning and value of Wang's discourse can be properly appreciated and evaluated. This study will bring into a dialogic cross-fertilization metaphysical and intellectual discourses, "not having" and "having", abstract thinking and concrete phenomena, theoretical origins and social situations. Overall, it aims to provide an alternative framework in which to understand Wang Bi's discourse on sainthood with affection.