:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:勞動疆界的拓邊?--傳統女性勞動場域中男性勞動者之考察
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:馬財專 引用關係葉郁菁 引用關係
作者(外文):Ma, Tsai-chuanYeh, Yu-ching
出版日期:2008
卷期:72
頁次:頁1-48
主題關鍵詞:性別隔離性別認同男子氣概Gender segmentationGender identityMasculinity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:492
  • 點閱點閱:244
早期性別角色在傳統勞動市場的研究論述中,男女因性別隔離所產生了僵固化的工作類別。時至今日,當越來越多的男性跨越性別藩籬進入非男性的傳統工作場域之中,便開啟了對適當性別工作傳統認定及觀念的挑戰。因此,現代的勞動市場中,傳統兩性的工作類別疆界之毀壞及相互穿透的現象也越為普遍。從台灣勞動現象的觀察,就從事於傳統女性工作類別的男性工作者而言,男性對於女性傳統的工作領域所產生穿透(infiltration)程度亦有隨之升高的趨勢。 本文透過勞動市場中男、女對於工作場域與類別相互跨越的現象進行考察,探索勞動者在穿越傳統工作概念之後所產生的工作關係與適應。初步發現長期傳統社會化過程對於性別認同的塑造與性別的期待,似乎無法徹底的解消於現代台灣的勞動市場結構之中。此外,從經驗資料的考察與檢視顯示Williams 的玻璃手扶梯現象並未明顯的發生於這群受訪的男性勞動者身上。系統化的性別概念似乎仍然作用在多數初入傳統女性勞動職場的男性勞動者身上,並影響著部分勞動者的升遷與發展。當分析勞動者所承載的壓力與其壓力來源的差異時,可發現這群不同職類的勞動者亦透過不同的反應方式,例如透過關係的建立及積極的勞動認同、或與職場中女性勞動者產生保持距離亦或抗拒於勞動過程中。這群勞動者必須透過這些反應來轉化個人在職場上的壓力,並藉以重構其在職場上的社會關係。最後,本文的考察指出台灣傳統社會中普遍存在的男子氣概,在這群男性勞動者從事傳統女性勞動工作歷程中仍然存在隱晦的影響關係。
This paper is concerned with the early research in traditional labor market from gender role. The gender segmentation enhances the occupational division which causes their fixed work in the traditional labor market. Meanwhile, the more male workers crossed the gender boundary to enter the non-traditional male work and this gradual universal situation leads to many challenges in the traditional concept of suitable gender behavior. Therefore, the penetration of occupational categories by gender will increase in modern Taiwan's labor market. This research will concentrate on those men who did women's work and describe the situation of mutual infiltration in their work field. This paper points out the infiltration between male and female workers in workplace enhances the transformation in gender and labor work relationships which restructuralize and operate in Taiwan's labor market. Moreover, we recognize the long-term socialization and the respects creations of gender identification which can not disappear in Taiwan's labor market. By way of the collection of male workers in traditional female work and explores the response of male workers who are engaged in traditional female work. This paper analyzes the possible of interviewees’ different pressures and their emergence. By way of those different categories, interviewees rely on the different responses (identification, keep the distance and resistance) and reconstruct the transformation pressure from their labor process. Beside, we indicate the masculinity which undertakes the obscure influence in the labor process.
期刊論文
1.Donaldson, Mike(1993)。What Is Hegemonic Masculinity?。Theory and Society,22(5),643-657。  new window
2.嚴祥鸞(19970400)。工作場作性別文化的型塑。福利社會,59,18-22。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳月娥(20010600)。職業性別隔離影響因素之研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊,5(1),5-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Christle, A.(1998)。Is Social Work a "Non-traditional" Occupation for Men?。British Journal of Social Work,28(4),491-510。  new window
5.金春華、林壽惠、王子芳、葉明珍、呂淑美(199609)。臺灣地區男護士人力異動及工作性質之相關因素調查。榮總護理,13(3),278-288。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Williams, C. L.(1992)。The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the Female Profession。Social Problems,39(3),253-267。  new window
7.Cross, S.、Bagilhole, B.(2002)。Girls' jobs for the boys? Men, masculinity and non-traditional occupations。Gender, Work and Organization,9(2),204-226。  new window
8.陳建志(20001200)。臺灣地區科系、職業性別隔離與收入性別差異之變遷。教育與心理研究,23(下),285-312。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.藍佩嘉(19980700)。銷售女體,女體勞動:百貨專櫃化妝品女銷售員的身體勞動。臺灣社會學研究,2,47-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王春源(19951000)。臺灣產業結構變動之回顧、省思與展望。臺灣經濟,226,65-112。  延伸查詢new window
11.Birkelund, Gunn E.、Goodman, L. A.、Rose, D.(1996)。The Latent Structure of Job Characteristics of Men and Women。American Journal of Sociology,102(1),80-113。  new window
12.蔡淑鈴(19870500)。職業隔離現象與教育成就:性別之比較分析。中國社會學刊,11,61-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林津如(20000900)。「外傭政策」與女人之戰:女性主義策略再思考。臺灣社會研究,39,93-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.MacDougall, G.(1997)。Caring: A masculine perspective。Journal of Advanced Nursing,25(4),809-813。  new window
15.黃淑玲(20030600)。男子性與喝花酒文化:以Bourdieu的性別支配理論為分析架構。臺灣社會學,5,73-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.蕭英玲(20050600)。臺灣的家務分工:經濟依賴及性別的影響。臺灣社會學刊,34,115-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.呂玉瑕(19841200)。婦女就業與家庭角色、權力結構之關係。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,56,111-143。  延伸查詢new window
18.唐先梅(20011100)。雙薪家庭夫妻在不同家務項目之分工情形及個人影響因素。生活科學學報,7,105-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.張晉芬(20021200)。找回文化:勞動市場中制度與結構的性別化過程。臺灣社會學刊,29,97-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.徐宗國(20011200)。拓邊照顧工作:男護士在女人工作世界中得其所在。臺灣社會學刊,26,163-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Lennon, Mary Clare、Rosenfield, Sarah、Lennon, M.(1994)。Relative Fairness and the Division of Housework: The Importance of Options。American Journal of Sociology,100(2),506-531。  new window
22.Salzinger, Leslie(2000)。Manufacturing Sexual Subjects: 'Harassment', Desire and Discipline on a Maquiladora Shopfloor。Ethnography,1(1),67-92。  new window
23.Evans, J.(1997)。Men in Nursing: Exploring the Male Nurse Experience。Nursing Inquiry,4,142-145。  new window
24.Tony, Jefferson(2002)。Subordinating Hegemonic Masculinity。Theoretical Criminology,6,63-88。  new window
25.Lupton, Ben(2000)。Maintaining Masculinity: Men Who Do 'Women's Work'。British Journal of Management,11,33-48。  new window
26.嚴祥鸞(1996)。「兩性關係的課程是什麼?一個社會學的觀點」。臺灣社會學社通訊,17。  延伸查詢new window
27.Segal, L.(1993)。Changing Men: Masculinities in Context。Theory and Society,22,625-641。  new window
28.Evans, J.(1997)。Men in Nursing: Issues of Gender Segregation and Hidden Advantage。Journal of Advanced Nursing,26,226-231。  new window
29.Parsons, T.(1964)。Levels of organizations and the Mediation of Social Interaction。Sociological Inquiry,45,62-65。  new window
30.Sylvia, Walby(1998)。The New Regulatory State: The Social Powers of the European Union。British Journal of Sociology,50,118-140。  new window
31.Chusmir, L. H.(1990)。Men Who Make Nontraditional Career Choices。Journal of Counselling and Development,69,11-16。  new window
32.楊錦蘭(1999)。給女人們的一封信,男人也要看:談兩性平權。社教雜誌,254,15-18。  延伸查詢new window
33.Connell, R. W.(1998)。Masculinities and Globalization。Men and Masculinities,1-1,3-23。  new window
34.Collinson, D. L.、Hearn, J.(2004)。Naming Men as Men: Implications for Work, Organization and Management。Gender, Work and Organization,1(1),2-20。  new window
35.Villeneuve, M.(1994)。Recruiting and Retaining Men in Nursing: A Review of the Literature。Journal of Professional Nursing,10(4),217-228。  new window
36.Dellinger, Kirsten、Williams, Christine L.(1997)。Make-up at Work: Negotiating Appearance Rules in the Workplace。Gender & Society,11(2),151-177。  new window
37.Williams, C. L.(1995)。Hidden Advantages for Men in Nursing。Nursing Administration Quarterly,19(2),63-70。  new window
38.Egeland, J. W.、Brown, J. S.(1989)。Men in Nursing: Their Fields of Employment, Preferred Fields of Practice, and Role Strain。Health Services Research,24(5),693-707。  new window
39.Jacobs, J. A.(1994)。Sex Segregation at Work: Trends and Prediction。Social Science Journal,31(2),153-168。  new window
40.Conventry, B. T.(1999)。Do Men Leave Feminizing Occupations?。Social Science Journal,36(1),47-71。  new window
41.Harding, Sandra(1999)。The Case for Strategic Realism: A Response to Lawson。Feminist Economics,5(3),127-133。  new window
42.Harding, Sandra(2003)。Representing Reality: The Critical Realism Project。Feminist Economics,9(1),151-159。  new window
43.Sinn, J.(1997)。The Predictive and Discriminate Validity of Masculinity Ideology。British Journal of Management,117-135。  new window
學位論文
1.楊瓊樺(2003)。性別職業隔離的轉變:以彩妝師為例(碩士論文)。南華大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hearn, J.(1992)。Men in the Public Eye: The Construction and Deconstruction of Public Men and Public Patriarchies。London, England:Routledge。  new window
2.Williams, Christine L.(1989)。Gender Differences at Work: Women and Men in Nontraditional Occupations。Berkeley, California:University of California Press。  new window
3.Reskin, Barbara R.、Roos, Patricia A.(1990)。Job Queues, Gender Queues。Philadelphia:Temple University Press。  new window
4.Connell, R. W.(2002)。Gender。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
5.Walby, Sylvia(1990)。Theorizing patriarchy。Basil Blackwell Ltd.。  new window
6.MacInnes, J.(1998)。The end of masculinity。Buckingham, UK:Open University Press。  new window
7.Morgan, D. H. J.(1992)。Discovering men: Critical studies on men and masculinities。London, UK。  new window
8.Williams, C. L.(1995)。Still a Man's World: Men Who Do 'Women's work'。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
9.Hochschild, A.、Machung, A.(1989)。The Second Shift:Working Parents and the Revolution at Home。New York, N. Y.:Viking Penguin。  new window
10.王振寰、瞿海源(2002)。社會學與臺灣社會。臺北:巨流圖書有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Chodorow, Nancy(1978)。The Reproduction of Mothering: Psycho analysis and the Sociology of Gender。University of California Press。  new window
12.Cockburn, C.(1991)。In the Way of Women - Men's Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations。London, UK。  new window
13.Witz, A.(1992)。Professions and Patriarchy。London:Routledge。  new window
14.徐宗國(1995)。工作內涵與性別角色。臺北:稻香出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Connell, Robert William(1987)。Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics。Oxford:Cambridge:Stanford:Sydney:Polity Press:Stanford University Press:Allen and Unwin。  new window
16.Pleck, J. H.(1985)。Working wives/Working Husbands。Beverly Hills:Sage。  new window
17.Basow, S. A.、劉秀娟、林明寬(1996)。兩性關係:性別刻板化與角色。台北:揚智。  延伸查詢new window
18.謝國雄(19970000)。純勞動:臺灣勞動體制諸論。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Connell, Raewyn W.(1995)。Masculinities。Polity Press:Allen & Unwin:University of California Press。  new window
20.Denzin, Norman K.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(1994)。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
21.梁雙蓮(1995)。參政篇:女性政治參與的結構困境。臺灣婦女處境白皮書。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
22.Williams, C. L.(1998)。The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the "Female" Professions。Men's Lives。Needham Heights, MA。  new window
23.Kvande, E.、Morgan, D.、Brandth, B.(2005)。Gender, Bodies and Work。Gender, Bodies and Work。New York, NY。  new window
24.Bagilhole, B.(1994)。Women, Work and Equal Opportunity。Women, Work and Equal Opportunity。Aldershot, UK。  new window
25.Blood, R.、Wolfe, D.(1960)。Husbands and Wivies: The Dynamicx of Married Living。Husbands and Wivies: The Dynamicx of Married Living。New York, NY。  new window
26.Oppenheimer, Valerie K.(1976)。The Female Labor Force in the United States: Demographic and Economic Factors Governing its Growth and Changing Composition。The Female Labor Force in the United States: Demographic and Economic Factors Governing its Growth and Changing Composition。Westport, CT。  new window
27.Patrick, B.(2001)。Part-time Work: Solution or Trap?。Women, Gender and Work。Switzerland。  new window
28.Pleck, Joseph(1976)。Men's New Roles in the Family: Housework and Child Care。Men's New Roles in the Family: Housework and Child Care。Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
29.Anker, R.(1998)。Gender and Jobs: Sex Segregation of Occupations in the World。Gender and Jobs: Sex Segregation of Occupations in the World。Geneva, Switzerland。  new window
30.Meadow, P.(1996)。The Future of Work。Work Out - or Work in? Contributions to the Debate on the Future of Work。York, UK。  new window
31.Hearn, J.(1996)。Is Masculinity Dead? A Critique of the Concept of Masculinity/Masculinities。Understanding Masculinities: Social Relations and Cultural Arenas。Buckingham, UK。  new window
32.Gillian, Creese(1999)。Contracting Masculinity: Gender, Class and Race in a White-collar Union, 1944-1994。Contracting Masculinity: Gender, Class and Race in a White-collar Union, 1944-1994。Oxford, UK。  new window
33.(1999)。Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment。Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment。Oxford, UK。  new window
34.Kenneth, C.(1990)。Contemporary Perspectives on Masculinity。Contemporary Perspectives on Masculinity。Cambridge。  new window
35.Sylvia, Walby(1986)。Patriarchy at Work: Patriarchy and Capitalist Relations in Employment。Patriarchy at Work: Patriarchy and Capitalist Relations in Employment。Cambridge。  new window
36.Segal, L.(1999)。Why Feminism。Why Feminism。Cambridge。  new window
37.Collinson, D. L.、Hearn, J.(2000)。Critical Studies on Men, Masculinities and Managements。Women in Management: Current Research Issues. II。London, UK。  new window
38.Guba, E.(1990)。The Paradigm Dialogue。The Paradigm Dialogue。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
39.Bradley, H.(1993)。Across the Great Divide: The Entry of Men into Women Job。Doing 'Women's Work': Men in Nontraditional Occupations。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
40.(1997)。Generative Fathering: Beyond Deficit Perspectives。Generative Fathering: Beyond Deficit Perspectives。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
41.Brod, Harry(1987)。A Case for Men's Studies。Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity。0。  new window
42.Ehrensaft, Diane(1990)。When Women and Men Mother。Women, Class and the Feminist Imagination。Philadelphia, PA。  new window
43.Chodorow, Nancy(1994)。Femininities, Masculinities, Sexualities: Freud and Beyond。Lexington, KY:The University Kentucky Press。  new window
44.Gilmore, D.(1993)。Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity。Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity。New Haven, CT。  new window
45.張晉芬、林芳玫(2002)。性別社會學。社會學與臺灣社會,精簡本。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
46.Krais, Beate(1993)。Gender and Symbolic Violence: Female Oppression in the Light of Pierre Bourdieu's Theory of Social Practice。Bourdieu, Critical Perspectives。0。  new window
其他
1.(2004)。中華民國九十二年臺灣地區婦女婚育與就業調查報告,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院勞工委員會(2003)。兩性工作平等狀況調查報告,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院勞工委員會(2005)。性別統計調查,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪文龍(2000)。男性當兵的身體經驗,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.護理師護士工會全國聯合會(2008)。全國護士參與資料,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.婦女論壇(1997)。兩性教育篇,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.劉梅君(1999)。性別與勞動。性屬關係:性別與社會、建構。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.徐宗國(1996)。紮根理論研究法。質性研究。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
3.張晉芬(1996)。綿綿此恨,可有絕期?--女性工作困境之剖析。台灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年。台北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE