:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國居家照顧服務員職業證照與培訓制度之探究:從英國和日本的作法反思臺灣
書刊名:社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者:呂寶靜 引用關係陳正芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Lu, Pau-chingChen, Chen-fen
出版日期:2009
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁185-233
主題關鍵詞:照顧服務員居家服務職業證照在職訓練Care workersHome careVocational qualificationOn-the-job training
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(20) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:20
  • 共同引用共同引用:236
  • 點閱點閱:266
在地老化」爲工業先進國家長期照顧政策的目標,造成對居家服務需求量的劇增,亦凸顯了居家照顧工作人力短缺的問題,故照顧服務員進府和訓練是老人福利服務關注的議題。本研究側重在人力資源管理中任用議題的討論,先比較分析英國與日本有關照顧服務人力之職業證照、教育訓練及薪資待遇的作法,作爲台灣的借錢,發現兩國均實施照顧服務員證照制度,並建立職;星發展之升遷管道;至於在職訓練方面,英國採證照與在職訓練相結合之策略,而日本則開創介護福祉士多元的培訓途徑。其次,本研究針對台灣居家服務機構中569位照顧服務員及179位居服督導員進行問卷調查,瞭解彼等對職業證照和在職訓練的看法。最後,提出建議供我國規劃照顧服務人力培訓制度之參考。
'Ageing in place' has been set up as the goal for long-term care policy in developed countries. As a result, it creates a great demand for home care services and therefore the shortage of care worker workforce becomes deteriorated. Hence, the issue on employment and training for care workers caught attentions from researchers and policy makers in the field of gerontological social services recently. This study precedes the analyses focusing on the issue in employment from human resource management First, we compare the experiences regarding vocational qualification, training requirements and salary of care workers in Britain and Japan, and we found that these two countries both implemented vocational qualification requirements for care workers and also build up career ladder for workers' promotions, the difference between these two countries was in the training system: the measure to combine vocational qualifications and on-the-job training was employed in Britain, whereas there are many measures to train licensed care workers in Japan. Second, we present the results generated from the analyses of survey dataset, containing the responses form 569 home care workers and 179 direct supervisors for home care workers in Taiwan. Finally, policy implications have been discussed.
期刊論文
1.蔡啟源(20010900)。老人居家服務之檢析。社區發展季刊,95,228-238。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Mcfarlane, L.、Mclean, J.(2003)。Education and training for direct care workers。Social Work Education: The International Journal,22(4),385-399。  new window
3.官有垣、陳正芬(20020700)。我國居家服務購買服務契約體系運作之初探。社區發展季刊,98,170-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.葉淑惠、楊麗玉、楊麗珠、林麗味、葉明莉、曾錦花、李婉萍(20030300)。發展病患服務員與居家服務員整合性課程及配套措施。長庚護理,14(1)=41,31-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.邱泯科、徐伊玲(20050600)。老人居家照顧服務員考訓現狀與工作困境之探討。社區發展季刊,110,284-300。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃金益(19980500)。各國證照制度及技能檢定的特色。就業與訓練,16(3),72-76。  延伸查詢new window
7.蕭蔚(19910900)。老人居家照護的需求分析。社區發展季刊,55,64-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡啟源(20001000)。老人居家服務之探討。社區發展季刊,91,252-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳正芬、王正(20070800)。臺北市居家服務方案論時計酬適切性之研究。臺灣社會福利學刊,6(1),93-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳玉琴(20040600)。臺灣居家服務的現況與檢討。社區發展季刊,106,132-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.萬育維、羅詠娜(1993)。臺北市居家照顧服務人力資源之探究。社區發展季刊,62,34-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭建良(2002)。英、德與我國職業證照制度之比較分析。教育研究,10,137-146。  延伸查詢new window
13.Aronson, J.、Denton, M.(2004)。Market-modeled Home Care in Ontario: Deteriorating Working Conditions and Dwinding Community Capacity。Canadian Publicy Policy,30(1),111-125。  new window
14.Brannon, D.、Barry, T.、Peter, K.、Andrea, S.、Joe, V.(2007)。Job Perceptions and Intent to Leave among Direct Care Workers: Evidence from the Better Jobs Care Demonstrations。The Gerontologist,47(6),820-829。  new window
15.Fearfull, A.(1997)。Training, Vocational Qualifications and Employee Performance in Care Work in the UK。International Journal of Training and Development,1(3),158-172。  new window
16.Potter, S. J.、Churilla, A.、Smith, K.(2006)。An Examination of Full-time Employment in the Direct-care Workforce。The Journal of Applied Gerontology,25(5),356-374。  new window
17.Sargeant, A. V.(2000)。An exploratory study of the effects of progression towards National Vocational Qualifications on the occupational knowledge and care practice of social care workers。Social Work Education,19(6),639-661。  new window
18.Yamada, Y.、Sekiya, M.(2003)。Licensing and Training Requirements for Direct Workers in Japan: What Can the United States and Japan Learn from Each Other?。Journal of Aging and Social Policy,15(4),113-129。  new window
研究報告
1.中華民國老人福利推動聯盟(2007)。照顧服務員正規專技體系課程規劃結案報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華民國老人福利推動聯盟(1999)。建立居家服務人員認證制度可行性評估-成果報告。  延伸查詢new window
3.戴玉慈(2002)。長期照護服務員角色和培訓留任策略之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.江貞紅(1996)。居家照顧服務員之工作壓力及其因應方式研究(碩士論文)。國立陽明大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾怡華(2005)。影響照顧服務員工作滿意度之探討-以嘉義縣居家服務為例。  延伸查詢new window
3.詹秀玲(2005)。居家服務中照顧服務員之勞動特質及互動關係--以桃園縣為例(碩士論文)。元智大學,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐悌殷(2004)。彰化縣「居家照顧服務員」工作表現相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝育亞(2008)。「我真的錯了嗎?」--居家服務衝突事件的建制民族誌研究(碩士論文)。國立陽明大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭懷婷(2005)。養護機構照顧服務員之人格特質及組織充能對其工作滿足感之影響(碩士論文)。國立陽明大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳曼華(2003)。照顧服務員留任因素之探討-以臺北縣長期照護之機構為對象。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張紹勳(2002)。人力資源管理:領導與管理學觀點。滄海書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃源協(2008)。社會工作管理。雙葉書廊。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.中華民國紅心字會(1999)。居家照顧服務經營管理實務須知。居家照顧服務經營管理實務須知。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院(2007)。我國長期照顧十年計畫-大溫暖社會福利套按之旗艦計畫。我國長期照顧十年計畫-大溫暖社會福利套按之旗艦計畫。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.行政院社會福利推動委員會長期照顧制度規劃小組(2006)。改善長期照顧居家式服務各項措施規劃報告。改善長期照顧居家式服務各項措施規劃報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.Mettner, P. M.(2005)。人群服務組織管理。人群服務組織管理。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.厚生勞動省社會援護局(2006)。針對今後支援照護的人才-朝新的照護工作師之培訓及終身的能力開發之方向。針對今後支援照護的人才-朝新的照護工作師之培訓及終身的能力開發之方向。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
8.堀田聰子(2005)。何謂居家服務員。照護職的能力開發與雇用管理,第7集。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
9.福祉door research(2005)。福利、照護工作完全導覽。福利、照護工作完全導覽。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
10.American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging and Institute for the Future of Aging Services(2007)。The Long-term Care Workforce: Can the Crisis Be Fixed? Problems, Causes and Options。The Long-term Care Workforce: Can the Crisis Be Fixed? Problems, Causes and Options。Washington, DC。  new window
11.Department of Health(2006)。Options for Excellence: Building the Social Care Workforce of the Future。Options for Excellence: Building the Social Care Workforce of the Future。London, UK。  new window
12.Harris-Kojetin, L.、Lipson, D.、Fielding, J.、Kiefer, K.、Stone, R. I.(2004)。Recent findings on frontline long-term care workers: A research synthesis 1999-2003。Washington, DC:Institute for the Future of Aging Services。  new window
13.Kane, R. A.(2003)。Human Resources for Long-term Care: Lesson from the United States。Key Policy Issues in Long-term Care。Geneva, Switzerland。  new window
14.Public Health Resource Unit and Skills for Health(2008)。Public Health Skills and Career Framework: Multidisciplinary/ Multi-agency/ Multi-professional。Public Health Skills and Career Framework: Multidisciplinary/ Multi-agency/ Multi-professional。Oxford, UK。  new window
15.Stone, R. I.、Dawson, S. L.、Harahan, M.(2003)。Why Workforce Development Should Be Part of the Long-term Care Quality Debate。Why Workforce Development Should Be Part of the Long-term Care Quality Debate。Washington, DC。  new window
16.Stone, R. I.、Wiener, J. M.(2001)。Who Will Care for Us? Addressing the Long-term Care Workforce Crisis。Who Will Care for Us? Addressing the Long-term Care Workforce Crisis。Washington, DC。  new window
其他
1.內政部(2008)。內政部統計年報:老人福利服務。  延伸查詢new window
2.WAM NET(2006)。介護制度改革本部-介護保險制度改革の概要。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE