:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論梁啟超《墨學微》的「致用」思想
書刊名:興大中文學報
作者:黃佳駿
作者(外文):Huang, Chia-chun
出版日期:2010
卷期:28
頁次:頁105-135
主題關鍵詞:梁啟超墨學微致用晚清諸子學實利Liang Qi-chaoStudy on Motse ThoughtPractical purposePhilosophers study of Late Qing DynastyUtility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1034
  • 點閱點閱:86
晚清,子學復興後,道、墨、法家的研究皆有相當的發展。而墨學受到西學與經世致用學風的影響,除了傳統「考據」法的運用外,亦能融入經世致用、西學等方法,在晚清子學中有其獨特的價值與意義。梁啟超之《墨學微》,是為清末民初重要的子學著作。該書的整理,係由墨學的四大理念為主幹,即由宗教、社會實利、兼愛、政治等議題所貫串。而梁氏大抵重視學術與當代社會發展的關係,故經由「致用」觀點深入其思維,對於探索其墨學研究之內涵亦有所助益。再者,梁氏亦能留意西學的研究視野,其「致用」觀無疑有西學所渲染之跡,如其對鬼神、經濟、國家、民族的論述,與西哲的觀點實密不可分,此亦梁氏中西會通的學術觀照。而梁氏又以為墨學理論的實現應可期待於政術的層面,故當代學者所討論的「民族」、「大同」、「自由平等」、「法治」等議題,亦能通過政體的改革從而聯繫墨學的政治理想。
At late Qing Dynasty, the study of Taoism, Motse, Legalist is found with significant development with the revival of diversified schools of philosophers. Besides, Motse thought has also been affected by western study and academic atmosphere for statecraft of practical purpose. In addition to the use of traditional "textual criticism" method, it has also combined statecraft for practical purpose, and methods from western study so that it has demonstrated unique value and meaning among diversified schools of philosophers in late Qing Dynasty."Study of Motse" by Liang Qi-chao is considered to be of important work by Philosophers' Study at late Qing Dynasty and early Republican. The organization of the work is believed to found on the four major notions of belief of Motse study, which is linked up by religion, social utility, altruistic love, and politics and other issues. To a great extent, Liang places much focus on the relationship between the academics and contemporary development of the society. In such a way, the perspective of "practical purpose" is employed to cut profoundly into its mindset and it can be rather helpful in exploring exploration the endowment of Motse study. Furthermore, Liang Qi-chao is also found with research vision seeing the development of western study, and his concept and thought of "practical purpose" is undoubtedly smeared with trace of western study. For instances, his elaboration on ghost and spirit, economics, country, and national is closely connected with western philosophy, and it can be well explicated by the fact that Liang Qi-chao has well versed with academic perspective of Chinese and western studies. Furthermore, Liang considers that the realization of theory by Motse can be anticipated within the domain of politics, and it is why issues as "race," "Great Harmony," "freedom and equality," and "rule of law" discussed by contemporary scholars can, as well, be linked to the political ideal of Motse thought through the reform of polity.
圖書
1.(1966)。湘學新報。臺北:華文書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.張永義(2001)。墨子與中國文化。墨子與中國文化。貴陽。  延伸查詢new window
3.中國國民黨中央委員會黨史委員會(1973)。國父全集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.章炳麟(1987)。國學略說。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.顧炎武(1984)。日知錄。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.汪榮祖(1983)。晚清變法思想論叢。晚清變法思想論叢。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.More, Thomas(2003)。烏托邦。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.徐希燕(2001)。墨學研究:墨子學說的現代詮釋。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.梁啟超(1981)。飲冰室全集。臺北:文化圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.Hobbes, Thomas、黎思復、黎廷弼(1986)。利維坦。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.錢穆(1998)。國學概論。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.梁啓超(1975)。墨經校釋。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.王韜(1998)。弢園文新編。生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
14.梁啟超(20020830)。中國近三百年學術史:清代學術概論合刊。台北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.張朋園(1981)。梁啟超與民國政治。臺北:食貨出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.劉仲華(200408)。清代諸子學研究。北京:中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.梁啟超、夏曉虹(2001)。論中國學術思想變遷之大勢。上海:上海古籍出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.胡寄窗(1998)。中國經濟思想史。上海:上海財經大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.胡適(2008)。中國哲學史大綱。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
20.朱一新(1963)。無邪堂答問。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.郭慶藩(1991)。莊子集解。臺北:貫雅。  延伸查詢new window
22.梁啟超(2009)。儒家哲學。上海:上海人民出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.黃克武(19940000)。一個被放棄的選擇:梁啟超調適思想之研究。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.梁啟超(1975)。墨子學案。台北:新文豐出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.梁啟超(2001)。開明專制論。飲冰室文集點校(第3集)。雲南。  延伸查詢new window
26.梁啟超(2002)。清代學術概論。清代學術概論。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.周富美(1983)。墨子。墨子。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
28.Kant, Immanuel(2007)。實踐理性批判。實踐理性批判。北京。  延伸查詢new window
29.Smith, Adam(1965)。國富論。國富論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
30.Smith, Adam(2009)。原富。原富。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
31.Marx, Karl(1992)。1844年經濟學哲學手稿。1844年經濟學哲學手稿。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
32.梁啟超(2001)。中國立國大方針。飲冰室文集點校(第4集)。雲南。  延伸查詢new window
33.張灝(2006)。梁啟超與中國思想的過渡(1890-1907):烈士精神與批判意識。梁啟超與中國思想的過渡(1890-1907):烈士精神與批判意識。北京。  延伸查詢new window
34.孫中山(1987)。第五講。三民主義。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
35.梁啟超(1987)。康南海傳。康南海傳。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
36.梁啟超(1975)。子墨子學說。子墨子學說。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)康有為(1987)。孟子微,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(東漢)許慎(2000)。說文解字,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)顏元(1985)。存學篇。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)黃遵憲(1968)。日本國志,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(漢)劉安(1991)。淮南子,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.孫詒讓(1991)。墨子閒詁。新編諸子集成。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE