:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:概念構圖在幼兒教學活動設計實施之個案分析
書刊名:教育科學期刊
作者:吳培源
作者(外文):Wu, Peir-yuan
出版日期:2011
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁27-54
主題關鍵詞:概念構圖教學活動設計個案研究Concept-mappingInstructional activity designCase study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:176
  • 點閱點閱:42
本研究旨在探討「概念構圖」融入幼兒教學活動的可行性,期使幼兒教師經由實踐概念構圖的教學活動設計歷程中,重建更清晰的概念構圖教學圖像,進而提升幼兒教師的教學品質。本研究以立意取樣,選擇一位幼兒教師分別設計「蛛網圖」、「鎖鍊圖」、「階層圖」、「心智圖」等教學活動設計。研究發現包括,幼兒教師在教學活動設計融入概念構圖時,其所面臨的問題包括受教師意識型態的影響、認知的巴爾幹化現象與過度工具理性思考等三方面。其次,經由教學省思過程,發現幼兒教師在進行教學活動設計時,比較能從教學實務的多元角度思考教學活動可能面臨的問題。第三,將概念構圖融入幼兒教學活動設計中,確能激發幼兒的學習好奇心與高昂的興趣。最後,概念構圖的邏輯理性思考,有助於幼兒教師於設計教學活動時,有效縮短其在應然與實然間之差距。
The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of the Concept-Mapping instructional design in the children instructional activity. On the one hand, it tried to reconstruct the complete instructional concept through the Concept-Mapping Instructional Design for the kindergarten teacher. On the other hand, it attempted to promote learning interest and elevate instructional quality for the Children.This study used purposive sampling to select happy kindergarten as research objects. The author asked one kindergarten teacher to design the spider Concept-Mapping, chain Concept-Mapping, hierarchy and mind Concept-Mapping teaching activities respectively. The findings were as follows:1. There were three problems as ideology, balkanization, rational instrument, when the child teacher designed the instructional activity.2. It provided multi-directions of teaching practical for child teacher to think about instructional problems and the instructional design perspectives.3. The Concept-Mapping instructional activity design can promote the learning interest for children.4. The Concept-Mapping instructional activity design can provide the practice knowledge and experience for kindergarten teachers.
期刊論文
1.Novak, J. D.(1990)。Concept Maps and Vee Diagrams: Two Metacognitive Tools for Science and Mathematics Education。Instructional Science,19,29-52。  new window
2.林進材(19980600)。教學研究發展及其對師資培育的啟示。初等教育學報,11,121-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.郭重吉(19920500)。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展月刊,20(5),548-570。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.謝美琪(2008)。電影教學、概念構圖暨體驗活動融入幼兒生命教育之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.王俐文(2008)。概念構圖教學對幼兒創造力效應之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳裕聖(2007)。鷹架概念構圖教學模式的建立與實施成效研究(博士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.楊璧娟(2008)。概念構圖運用於幼兒圖畫書故事理解教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陽琬(2004)。學前教育。臺北市:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gowin, D. Bob(1981)。Educating。Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press。  new window
3.Rose, Colin、Nicholl, Malcolm J.、戴保羅(1999)。學習地圖:21世紀加速學習革命。新北市:經典傳訊文化股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Giroux, H. A.(1981)。Ideology, culture and the process of schooling。Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press。  new window
5.Piaget, J.、Inhelder, B.、Weaver, H.(1969)。The Psychology of the Child。New York, NY:Basic Book。  new window
6.張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.余民寧(19970000)。有意義的學習:概念構圖之研究。臺北:商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Vygotsky, Lev S.(1962)。Thought and language。Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press。  new window
9.張春興(1996)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ausubel, David Paul(1963)。The psychology of meaningful verbal learning: an introduction to school learning。Grune & Stratton, Inc.。  new window
11.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Tarquin, P.、Walker, S.(1997)。Creating Success in the Classroom。Englewood, CO:Teacher Ideas Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1989)。Constructivism in education。The International Encyclopedia of Education: Research and Studies。Oxford。  new window
2.簡紅珠(2004)。教學研究的多元典範發展趨勢與研究方法之省思。課程與教學研究之發展與前瞻。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE