臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：解讀高等教育課程評鑑的樣貌及迷思：後設評鑑觀點
書刊名：課程與教學
作者：劉修豪／白亦方 引用關係
作者(外文)：Liu, Hsiu-hao／Pai, Yi-fong
出版日期：2013
卷期：16:2
頁次：頁33-56
主題關鍵詞：課程評鑑；後設評鑑；高等教育；Curriculum evaluation；Meta-evaluation；Higher education
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:152
  • 點閱點閱:96
當前臺灣高等教育充滿評鑑的文化，社會大眾的想像及學術自我規範的期待，導致評鑑議題爭論不休。循此脈絡，高等教育的課程展開一系列以品質管理、責任績效、能力指標等原則的成就目標導向評鑑模式，如全面品質管理（Total Quality Management, TQM）、背景輸入過程成果模式（Context Input Process Product , CIPP）、品質機能展開（Quality Function Deployment, QFD）等。然而，此種模式是否理所當然地成為高等教育課程發展的未來？宜酌予衡量。課程評鑑不只是全球化競爭之使然，也是政治的一部分。本文從後設評鑑的觀點，解讀課程評鑑的本質、自主性、模式及能力效標，質疑當前課程評鑑的合理性與客觀性。文末提出社會正義、多元圖像、演進式課程評鑑的概念，盼為高等教育課程帶來一些啟示及具體建議。
Many evaluative cultures exist in higher education. Social images and academic self-regulation has led to the creation of the discourse of evaluation. According to the current context, higher education launches into a variety of curriculum evaluation modes, including Total Quality Management (TQM), Context Input Process Product (CIPP), and Quality Function Deployment (QFD). All of these place emphasis on quality, efficiency, and indicator. Are these measures suitable for the curriculum in higher education? Curriculum evaluation is not only a process of global competition but also a part of the political system. From the viewpoint of a meta-evaluation approach, this paper interprets the outline of curriculum evaluation. This includes the nature of evaluation, the autonomy of curriculum, the TQM mode, and the indicators of performance achievement. This paper also draws some conclusions on their validity, feasibility, practicality, and objectivity. Finally, social justice, multiple images, and evolutionary evaluation are desired before these measures can be considered as an adequate alternative approach to other methods of evaluation for the curriculum in higher education.
期刊論文
1.Levine, T.(2002)。Stability and change in curriculum evaluation。Studies in Educational Evalution，28(1)，1-33。  new window
2.王敏(2008)。對大學課程評價之元評價的思考。雲夢學刊，29(5)，120-121。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱子葳(200803)。我國大學校院系所評鑑政策執行情形之分析。學校行政，54，155-174。  延伸查詢new window
4.Apple, M. W.、Beyer, L. E.(1983)。Social evaluation of curriculum。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，5(4)，425-434。  new window
5.Barnett, R.(2009)。Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum。Studies in Higher Education，34(4)，429-440。  new window
6.Bier, I. D.、Cornesky, R.(2001)。Using QFD to construct a higher education curriculum。Quality Process，34(4)，64-68。  new window
7.Donald, J. G.(1986)。Knowledge and the university curriculum。Higher Education，15(3/4)，267-282。  new window
8.Frick, T. W.、Chadha, R.、Watson, C.、Zlatkovska, E.(2010)。Improving course evaluations to improve instruction and complex learning in higher education。Educational Technology Research and Development，58(2)，115-136。  new window
9.Garcia-Aracil, A.、Palomares-Montero, D.(2010)。Examining benchmark indicator systems for the evaluation of higher education institutions。High Education，60，217-234。  new window
10.Hamilton, D.(1977)。Making sense of curriculum evaluation: Continuities and discontinuities in an educational idea。Review of Research in Education，5，318-347。  new window
11.Harvey, L.(2002)。The end of quality?。Quality in Higher Education，8(1)，5-22。  new window
12.Harvey, L.(2004)。The power of accreditation: Views of academics。Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management，26(2)，207-223。  new window
13.Harvey, L.(2008)。Rankings of higher education institutions: A critical review。Quality in Higher Education，14(3)，187-207。  new window
14.Horng, J. S.、Teng, C. C.、Baum, T.(2009)。Evaluating the quality of undergraduate hospitality, tourism and leisure programmes。Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education，8(1)，37-54。  new window
15.Kells, H. R.(1999)。National higher education evaluation systems: Methods for analysis and some propositions for the research and policy void。Higher Education，38(2)，209-232。  new window
16.Lawrence, R. J.、Robert, A. O.(1997)。A violation of assumptions: Why TQM won't work in theivory tower。Journal of Quality Management，2(2)，279-291。  new window
17.Merritt, B. K.、Mclntyre, A. H.、Packer, T. L.(2012)。Curriculum evaluation: Linking curriculum objectives to essential competencies。Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy，79(3)，175-180。  new window
18.Onwuegbuzie, A. J.、Daniel, L. G.、Collins, K. M. T.(2009)。A meta-validation model for assessing the score-validity of student teaching evaluatins。Qual Quant，43，197-209。  new window
19.Sinjindawong, S.、Lawthong, N.、Kanjanawasee, S.(2011)。The development and application of the meta-evaluation standards for Thai higher education institutions。Research in Higher Education Journal，10，1-9。  new window
20.Tsinidou, M.、Gerogiannis, V.、Fitsilis, P.(2010)。Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: An empirical study。Quality Assurance in Education，18(3)，227-244。  new window
21.Vanhoof, J.、Petegem, P. V.(2010)。Evaluating the quality of self-evaluations: The (mis)match between internal and external meta-evaluation。Studies in Educational Evaluation，36，20-26。  new window
22.Weiner, G.(1990)。Ethical practice in an unjust world: Educational evaluation and social justice。Gender and Education，2(2)，231-238。  new window
23.黃政傑(200312)。大學評鑑的爭論話題。師友月刊，438，1-3。  延伸查詢new window
24.Bornmann, L.、Mittag, S.、Daniel, H. D.(2006)。Quality assurance in higher education-meta-evaluation of multi-stage evaluation procedures in Germany。Higher Education，52(4)，687-709。  new window
25.Scriven, Michael(2001)。Evaluation: Future Tense。American Journal of Evaluation，22(3)，301-307。  new window
26.Stufflebeam, D. L.(2000)。The Methodology of Metaevaluation as Reflected in Metaevaluations by the Western Michigan University Evaluation Center。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education，14(1)，95-125。  new window
27.王嘉陵(20110600)。臺灣高等教育課程地圖繪製之反思。教育研究與發展期刊，7(2)，57-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.王金龍(201011)。銘傳大學學習成果評量推動之經驗分享。評鑑雙月刊，28，23-29。  延伸查詢new window
29.Norris, N.(1998)。Curriculum evaluation revisited。Cambridge Journal of Education，28(2)，207-219。  new window
30.Weert, D. E.(1990)。A Macro-Analysis of Quality Assessment in Higher Education。Higher Education，19(1)，57-72。  new window
31.游家政、曾祥榕(20041200)。教育評鑑的後設評鑑。教育資料集刊，29，53-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.王保進(20100500)。專業化評鑑之效度總體展現--評鑑報告撰寫。評鑑雙月刊，25，16-21。  延伸查詢new window
33.李坤崇(20090500)。成果導向教育的大學課程革新。教育研究月刊，181，100-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.戴曉霞(20020600)。從福特主義到後福特主義及其對高等教育課程之影響。教育研究集刊，48(2)，199-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Nevo, D.(1983)。The conceptualization of educational evaluation: An analytical review of the literature。Review of Educational Research，53(1)，117-128。  new window
36.李秉乾(20081100)。逢甲大學推動成果導向教學品保機制之經驗。評鑑雙月刊，16，31-34。  延伸查詢new window
37.顏秀如(20041200)。我國大學評鑑政策爭議之探討。臺東大學教育學報，15(2)，1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.House, ERNEST R.(1978)。Assumptions Underlying Evaluation Models。Educational Researcher: a Publication of the American Educational Research Association，7(3)，4-12。  new window
39.Hwarng, H. B.、Teo, C.(2001)。Translating customers' voices into operations requirements: A QFD application in higher education。International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management，18(2)，195-226。  new window
40.Leathwood, C.、Phillips, D.(2000)。Developing curriculum evaluation research in higher education: Process: Process, politics and practicalities。Higher Education，40(3)，313-330。  new window
41.Plaza, Cecila M.、Draugalis JoLaine R.、Slack Marion K.、Skrepnek Grant H.、Sauer Karen A.(2007)。Curriculum mapping in program assessment and evaluation。American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education，71(2)，1-20。  new window
42.Bridges, D.(2000)。Back to the future: The higher education curriculum in the 21st century。Cambridge Journal of Education，30(1)，37-55。  new window
43.Apple, M. W.(1992)。Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，23(5)，412-431。  new window
44.Mehralizadeh, Y.、Safaeemoghaddam, M.(2010)。The applicability of quality management systems and models to higher education。TQM Journal，22(2)，175-187。  new window
45.Meyer, M. H.、Bushney, M. J.(2008)。Towards a multi-stakeholder-driven model for excellence in higher education curriculum development。South African Journal of Higher Education，22(6)，1229-1240。  new window
46.Venkatraman, S.(2007)。A framework for implementing TQM in higher education programs。Quality Assurance in Education，15(1)，92-112。  new window
會議論文
1.Usmani, M. A. W.(200812)。Meta evaluation of a teacher's evaluation programme using CIPP model。2nd International conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education。Lahore, Pakistan。  new window
2.白亦方(201005)。台灣高等教育課程發展議題分析。「兩岸教育高階論壇：教育功能與均等的省思」研討會，國立臺南大學教育學系 。臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
3.Huang, S.、Su, J. L.(200505)。Establishment of an integrated evaluation system for Taiwan's university: Integrating internal evaluation and external meta-evaluation。Conference of Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice.。  new window
4.Rana, R. A.、Reid, N.(200812)。Dimensions of quality assurance in higher education: Challenges for future。2nd International conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education。Lahore, Pakistan。  new window
圖書
1.Hendry, P. M.(2011)。Engendering curriculum history。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
2.MacDonald, B.(1978)。Accountability, standards and the process of schooling。Accountability in education。Slough,UK：NFER。  new window
3.歐用生(2006)。課程理論與實踐。臺北：學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1989)。Forth generation evaluation。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
5.Kennedy, Donald、楊振富(2000)。學術這一行。台北：天下遠見出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.戴曉霞(2006)。世界一流大學之卓越與創新。臺北市：高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃政傑(1991)。課程設計。臺北：東華。  延伸查詢new window
8.白亦方(2008)。臺灣高等教育課程評鑑的現況與未來：兼論教學卓越計畫。課程評鑑：理念、研究與應用。臺北市：五南。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中原大學(2008)。教學卓越計畫--計劃總覽，http://tle.cycu.edu.tw/module.php?page=member_n02_1。  延伸查詢new window
2.政治大學(2008)。教學卓越計畫-具體成效，http://www.e-upgrade.nccu.edu.tw/e-upgrade/profile/effect.htm。  延伸查詢new window
3.輔仁大學(2008)。教學卓越計畫-課程面成果，http://www.excellence.fju.edu.tw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=607&Itemid=229。  new window
4.Brian, S.(1992)。Program review and evaluation: A survey of contemporary literature，http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED356261.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.賴鼎銘(2006)。量化指標並非學術評鑑的萬靈丹--以國外幾種代表性的學術評鑑為例。全球化與知識生產：反思臺灣學術評鑑。臺北：台社論壇。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：503（臺灣：499，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67592930
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上