:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:住宅標籤化與社區意識及維護績效路徑分析--結構方程模型應用
書刊名:住宅學報
作者:胡志平 引用關係林帝佑
作者(外文):Hu, Chich-pingLin, Di-yo
出版日期:2013
卷期:22:1
頁次:頁81-105
主題關鍵詞:弱勢群體貧窮次文化外部成本標籤化結構方程模型The disadvantaged groupsPoverty subcultureExternal costLabelingStructural equation model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:237
  • 點閱點閱:47
政府為幫助弱勢群體推出「國民住宅」,由於大量聚集弱勢同質居民造成貧窮次文化、犯罪問題等,對附近社區造成外部成本。城市中的隔離現象越演越烈,聚集弱勢同質人群的地方甚至被標籤化、汙名化。本文將標籤化視為外衍變數討論它對社區管理維護績效的影響,並藉由社區意識、社區參與兩個中介變數,透過結構方程模型(structural equation model)了解彼此間的因果關係。建商在產品定位時最常採取面積混合策略,即「主力坪數」和「非主力坪數」策略,本文也針對兩者在社區管理維護績效的差異進行分析。操作結果發現,主力坪數住戶社區意識確實較高,且標籤化程度越高,隔離程度相對較高,意味居民背景集中趨於一致,有助社區意識凝聚;居民背景相當,社區活動也較能得到認同,參與狀況隨之熱絡。維護績效也因社區認同程度高,居民能集結起來參與社區事務而提高。
The government has assisted disadvantaged groups that cannot afford housing with ”public housing” projects. However, the poverty subculture and increasing crimes around the community where the disadvantaged groups have gathered has led to an increase in the external cost for the city. Residential segregation in the city grows in intensity due to labeling and stigmatization in places where the disadvantaged groups with homogeneous characteristics are gathered. In this paper, housing labeling is imported as an exogenous variable to investigate what can influence the performance of property management in the community. In order to investigate the interrelationships between community consciousness and maintained performance on the basis of the labeling level, two intervening variables including community consciousness and community participation are also introduced into the theoretical framework by the structural equation model. Investors often adopt a strategy of mix in size whenever they make a decision on a project on either the ”main floor” or ”non-main floor” in product positioning. This paper attempts to investigate the differences in community maintained performance between the ”main floor” and ”non-main floor” and the demonstrative results show that residents in the ”main floor” have a high level in community consciousness. Moreover this paper shows that the higher the level in housing labeling is, the more segregated the community will be. This implies that consistency in families' backgrounds is contributing to coherence in community consciousness, and that community activities can then be accepted by families easily as well as participation proportions consequentially increased. Therefore, the community maintained performance level becomes high due to overall participation in activities with residents in the community.
期刊論文
1.Andersson, R.、Musterd, S.(2005)。Area-based Policies: A Critical Appraisal。Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie,96(4),377-389。  new window
2.Andersson, R.、Musterd, S. G.、Galster, G.、Kauppinen, T. M.(2007)。What Mix Matters? Exploring the Relationships between Individuals' Incomes and Different Measures of their Neighborhood Context。Housing Studies,22(5),637-660。  new window
3.Bauder, H.(2002)。Neighborhood Effects and Cultural Exclusion。Urban Studies,39(1),85-93。  new window
4.Brattbakk, I.、Hansen, T.(2004)。Post-War Large Housing Estates in Norway- Well-kept Residential Areas still Stigmatized?。Journal of Housing and Built Environment,19,311-332。  new window
5.Galster, G. C.(2002)。An Economic Efficiency Analysis of Deconcentrating Poverty Populations。Journal of Housing Economics,11,303-329。  new window
6.Galster, G.、Godfrey, E.(2005)。By Words and Deeds- Racial Steering by Real Estate Agents in the U.S. in 2000。Journal of American Planning Association,71(3),251-268。  new window
7.Hal, J. D. M. van(2007)。A Labeling System as Stepping Stone for Incentives Related to the Profitability of Sustainable Housing。Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,22,393-408。  new window
8.Hastings, A.、Dean, J.(2003)。Challenging Images: Tackling Stigma through Estate Regeneration。Policy and Politics,31(2),171-184。  new window
9.Jacobs, J. M.(1993)。The City Unbound: Qualitative Approaches to the City。Urban Studies,30(4/5),827-848。  new window
10.Heller, K.、Mansbach, W. E.(1984)。The Multifaceted Nature of Social Support in a Community Sample of Elderly Women。Journal of Social Issues,40(4),99-112。  new window
11.Li, Z. G.、Xue, D.、Wei, L.(2007)。Housing Mix in European and American Cities: Theories, Application and Implication。City Planning Review,2,38-44。  new window
12.Mazanti, B.、Ploger, J.(2003)。Community Planning- From Politicised Places to Lived Spaces。Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,18(3),309-327。  new window
13.Murie, A. S.、Musterd, S.(2004)。Social Exclusion and Opportunity Structures in European Cities and Neighborhoods。Urban Studies,41(8),1441-1459。  new window
14.Newbrough, J. R.、Chavis, D. M.(1986)。Psychological Sense of Community: Theory and Concepts。Journal of Community Psychology,14(1),3-5。  new window
15.Ostendorf, W.、Musterd, S.、Sjoerd, D. V.(2001)。Social Mix and the Neighborhood Effect: Policy Ambitions and Empirical Evidence。Housing Studies,16(3),371-380。  new window
16.Permentier, M.、Ham, van M.、Bolt, G.(2007)。Behavioral Responses to Neighborhood Reputations。Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,22,199-213。  new window
17.Wacquant, L. J. D.(1993)。Urban Outcasts: Stigma and Division in the Black American Ghetto and the French Periphery。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,17(3),366-383。  new window
18.Haurin, D.(1988)。The Duration of Marketing Time of Residential Housing。American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal,16(4),396-410。  new window
19.Kingston, S.、Mitchell, R.、Florin, P.、Stevenson, J.(1999)。Sense of Community in Neighborhoods as a Multi-level Construct。Journal of Community Psychology,27(6),681-694。  new window
20.Massey, D. S.、Denton, N. A.(1988)。The Dimensions of Residential Segregation。Social Forces,67(2),281-315。  new window
21.Puddifoot, J. E.(1996)。Some Initial Considerations in the Measurement of Community Identity。Journal of Community Psychology,24(4),327-336。  new window
22.Wilson, G.、Baldassare, M.(1996)。Overall Sense of Community' in a Suburban Region: The Effects of Localism, Privacy, and Urbanization。Environment and Behavior,28(1),27-43。  new window
23.Speak, S.、Tipple, G.(2006)。Perceptions, Persecution and Pity: The Limitations of Interventions for Homelessness in Developing Countries。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,30(1),172-188。  new window
24.侯錦雄、宋念謙(19980300)。臺中市黎明住宅社區居民社區意識之研究。建築學報,24,51-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.黃源協、蕭文高、劉素珍(20071200)。社區意識及其影響因素之探索性研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊,11(2),1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.林瑞欽(19941200)。社區意識的概念、測量與提振策略。社會發展研究學刊,1,1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.黃毅志(20051200)。教育研究中的「職業調查封閉式問卷」之信效度分析。教育研究集刊,51(4),43-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.楊宗憲(20030800)。住宅市場之產品定位分析--建商推案行為之研究。住宅學報,12(2),123-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.黃毅志(20080600)。如何精確測量職業地位?--「改良版臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構。臺東大學教育學報,19(1),151-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Tannenbaum, F.(1938)。The Dramatization of Evil, Crime and the Community。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
2.Shannon, T. R.(1983)。Urban Problems in Sociological Perspective。New York:Random House。  new window
3.Lemert, E. M.(1951)。Social Pathology。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Wilson, W. J.(1987)。The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.大前研一、劉錦秀、江裕真(2006)。M型社會:中產階級消失的危機與商機。台北:商周出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE