臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：為何職業婦女決定離職？結構限制下的母職認同與實踐
書刊名：臺灣社會研究季刊
作者：唐文慧 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tang, Anna Wen-hui
出版日期：2011
卷期：85
頁次：頁201-265
主題關鍵詞：工作與照顧衝突；建制民族誌；選擇差距；照顧者認同；母職實踐；Work-care conflict；Institutional ethnography；Choice gap；Carers' identities；Mothering practices
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(19) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:19
  • 共同引用共同引用:157
  • 點閱點閱:387
許多研究者認為，台灣的兒童照顧制度公共化程度低，勞動市場對母親不友善，而導致許多婦女因親自育兒的壓力，而決定離開職場。然而，過去研究多從結構面，較少從母親個人的角度出發，探討她們面對衝突時，為何決定離職，以及離職後的生活與照顧安排。本研究透過訪談十五位中產階級母親，採建制民族誌視角，檢視這群母親面臨衝突時，在結構限制下的認同和行動的選擇。研究發現她們強調離職是「自願的選擇」，但作者分析其面臨的是結構限制下的「選擇差距」。離職後她們會展現自主性並操演認同，採「密集母職」扮演社會所期待的「好媽媽」角色。另外，她們以兼職工作或參與志工的方式，來逃避社會對「傳統家庭主婦」的負面標籤，以建立自我的正向認同。值得注意的是，從制度的層面來看，其母職認同與離職的選擇， 卻間接地鞏固了台灣性別化與市場化的兒童照顧體制，加深兒童照顧是個人與家庭責任的社會氛圍。對於推動照顧與工作共容的社會運動與政策制訂者來說，這群離職母親的真實聲音，值得被慎重地考量。
Most of the studies in the past had stressed the disadvantages of mothers in labor market when encountering work-care conflict from a structural point of view. Yet, this research, adopting narrative method and institutional ethnography perspective, explores and analyzes the identity construction and action of middle-class mothers under the same situation from a different viewpoint. Through interviews with 15 stay-at-home mothers, it is found that they identified themselves’ choice to quit is a voluntary one, while we argued that it is a choice gap under structural constrains. They would practice intensive mothering in order to preserve the social image of a good mother. Meanwhile, to avoid social stigma as a traditional housewife, they would also work part-time or as a volunteer which helps establish positive self-identification. Yet, on the other hand, it is worth noting that this action has consolidated the traditional gender roles as well as encourages low state intervention on child care. This paper emphasized the group of middle-class mothers’ real voices should be taken into account seriously by the public child care policy makers and activists in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Lewis, J.(1997)。Gender and Welfare Regimes : Futher Thoughts。Social Politics，4(2)，160-177。  new window
2.Hill, E. J.(2005)。Work-family Facilitation and Conflict, Work- family Stressors and Support。Journal of Family Issues，26(6)，793-819。  new window
3.周玟琪(19960300)。從勞工階級動員觀點看母性保護立法--臺灣與瑞典的比較。勞資關係論叢，4，131-170。  延伸查詢new window
4.唐文慧、王怡君(19991000)。女性參政者之角色扮演與政策議題--以一九九八年立法委員選舉為例。國立政治大學社會學報，29，75-116。  延伸查詢new window
5.翁麗芳、黃怡貌(19951000)。臺灣幼兒教育發展之研究--托兒所的演變在臺灣幼兒教育發展上的意義。史聯雜誌，25，9-38。  延伸查詢new window
6.Elvin-Nowak, Y.、Thomsson, H.(20010600)。Motherhood as Idea and Practice a Discursive Understanding of Employed Mothers in Sweden。Gender and Society，15(3)，407-428。  new window
7.唐文慧(19991200)。國家、婦女運動與婦女福利：一九四九年後的臺灣經驗。社會政策與社會工作學刊，3(2)，143-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.伊慶春、簡文吟(20010600)。已婚婦女的持續就業：家庭制度與勞動市場的妥協。臺灣社會學，1，149-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張晉芬(20021200)。找回文化：勞動市場中制度與結構的性別化過程。臺灣社會學刊，29，97-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.唐文慧、楊佳羚(20060100)。瑞典育嬰休假制度之研究：共同照顧的價值。政大勞動學報，19，75-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.潘淑滿(20051200)。臺灣母職圖像。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，20，41-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林津如(20071200)。父系家庭與女性差異認同：中產階級職業婦女家務分工經驗的跨世代比較。臺灣社會研究季刊，68，1-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Cha, Youngjoo(2010)。Women's Employment in Dual-Earner Households。American Sociological Review，75，303-329。  new window
14.Johnston, Deirdre D.、Swanson, D. H.(2006)。Constructing the 'Good Mother' : the Experience of Mothering Ideologies by Work Status。Sex Role，54，509-519。  new window
15.Johnston, Deirdre D.、Debra H. Swanson(2007)。Cognitive Acrobatics in the Construction of Worker-mother Identity。Sex Role，57，447-459。  new window
16.Cha, Youngjoo、Thebaud, Sarah(2009)。Labor Markets, Bredawinning, and Beliefs : How Economic Context Shapes Men's Gender Ideology。Gender and Society，23，215-243。  new window
17.Cook, A.(2009)。Connecting Work-family Policies to Supportive Work Environments。Group & Organization Management，34(2)，206-240。  new window
18.Webber, Gretchen(2009)。Book Review : Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home。Gender and Society，23，125-127。  new window
19.England, Paula(2005)。Emerging Theories of Care Work。Annual Review of Sociology，31，381-399。  new window
20.Ho, Petula Sik-ying(2007)。Eternal Mothers or Flexible Housewives? Middle-affed Chinese Married Women in Hong Kong。Sex Role，57，249-265。  new window
21.Marsiglio, William、Amato, Paul、Day, Randal D.、Lamb, Michael E.(2000)。Scholarship on Fatherhood in the 1990s and Beyond。Journal of Marriage and the Family，62，1173-1191。  new window
22.Repo, Katja(2004)。Combining Work and Family in Two Welfare State Contexts : A Discourse Analytical Perspective。Social Policy and Administration，38(6)，622-639。  new window
23.Hanson, Shirley M. H.、Bozect, Frederick W.(1987)。Fatherhood : A Review and Resources。Family Relations，36，333-340。  new window
研究報告
1.Kröger, Teppo(2007)。The Proposal 'WoCaWo : Working Carers and Caring Workers in Finland, Britain and Siueden, 2008-2011。  new window
學位論文
1.Tang, Wen-Hui Anna(1997)。Explaining social policy in Taiwan since 1949: State, Politics, and gender。  new window
圖書
1.Smith, D.(1990)。The Conceptual Practices of Power。Toronto：University of Toronto Press。  new window
2.Gornick, Janet C.、Meyers, Marcia K.(2003)。Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment。Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
3.Griffith, A. I.、Smith, D. E.(2005)。Mothering for schooling。RoutledgeFalmer。  new window
4.Hattery, A.(2001)。Women, work, and family: Balancing and weaving。Thousand Oaks. CA：Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
5.Smith, Dorothy(1999)。Writing the Social : Critique, Theory, and Investigations。Writing the Social: Critique, Theory and Investigations。Toronto, Canada：University of Toronto Press。  new window
6.Lareau, Annette(2003)。Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life。University of California Press。  new window
7.Folber, Nancy(1994)。Who pays for the kids?: gender and the structures of constraint。Routledge。  new window
8.Hochschild, A.、Machung, A.(1989)。The Second Shift：Working Parents and the Revolution at Home。New York, N. Y.：Viking Penguin。  new window
9.Hobson, B.(2002)。Making Men into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.王連生(1998)。親職教育：理論與運用。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
11.Ong, Aihwa(1999)。Flexible citizenship: the cultural logics of transnationality。Durham：Duke University Press。  new window
12.Foucault, Michel、Hurley, Robert(1978)。The History of Sexuality: An Introduction。New York：Random House Press。  new window
13.王舒芸(2003)。新手爸爸難為？。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.Smith, Dorothy E.(1987)。The everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology。Northeastern University Press。  new window
15.Smith, Dorothy E.(1990)。Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling。Routledge。  new window
16.Hays, Sharon(1996)。The cultural contradictions of motherhood。Yale University Press。  new window
17.Griffith, Alison I.、Smith, Dorothy E.、呂明蓁、林津如、唐文慧(2007)。母職任務與學校教育的拔河。臺北：高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
18.行政院主計處(2009)。就業、失業調査。台北。  延伸查詢new window
19.謝淑美(2008)。荳芽, 不上安親班。台北。  延伸查詢new window
20.Stone, Pamela(2007)。Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home。  new window
21.Blankenhorn, David(1995)。Fatherless America : Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem。New York。  new window
22.Daniels, C. R.(1998)。Lost Fathers : The Politics of Fahterlessness in America。New York。  new window
23.Bock, Gisela、Thane, Pat(1991)。Maternity and Gender Policies : Women and the Rise of the European Welfare States, 1880-1950s。New York。  new window
24.Dienhart, A.(1998)。Reshaping Fatherhood: The Social Construction of Shared Parenting。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
25.OECD(2005)。Babies and Bosses : Reconciling Work and Family Life。Paris。  new window
26.Ribbens, Jane(1994)。Mothers and Their Children : A Feminist Sociology of Childrearing。Sage Publications。  new window
27.唐文慧、王怡君(2000)。父權國家vs. 母性社會 : 台灣社會福利運動中的婦女角色議題。台灣的社會福利運動。台北。  延伸查詢new window
28.Bergman, Helena、Hobson, Barbara(2002)。Compulsory Fatherhood : The Coding or Fatherhood in the Swedish Welfare State。Making Men into Fathers : Men, Maschulinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(2006)。婦女婚育與就業調査，台北：行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Glenn, E. N.(1994)。Social Constructions of Mothering: A Thematic Overview。Mothering: Ideology, Experience, and Agency。London, UK/ New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
2.Smith, D.(1995)。"Political Correct": An Ideological Code。Beyond Political Correctness: Toward the Inclusive University。Toronto：University of Toronto Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：555（臺灣：555，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1366978 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67163519
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上