:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:體育運動組織治理互賴之探討:以體育署和中華奧會為例
書刊名:體育學報
作者:熊道天 引用關係鄭志富 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiung, Tao-tienCheng, Chih-fu
出版日期:2014
卷期:47:2
頁次:頁275-290
主題關鍵詞:治理運動治理資源互賴組織GovernanceSport governanceResource interdepencyOrganization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:1343
  • 點閱點閱:57
目的:本研究根據治理互賴觀點,探討我國體育運動主管機關及民間非營利運動組織間治理互賴之內涵。方法:採立意抽樣的方式,選取體育署及中華奧會之高階主管共三人,以半結構式深度訪談的研究方法蒐集所需資料,並和理論及文獻相互對照。結果:1. 體育署與中華奧會彼此資源依賴,形成治理互賴模式;2. 體育署扮演中央功能性部門的角色,而中華奧會則是一個中介的橋樑,負責對外聯繫,雙方透過補助與委辦方式互動;3. 因為權力不對等,中華奧會之決策及執行自主權會受影響;4. 雙方治理互賴模式中不但具有互信基礎,其溝通協調也相當充足。然而,主事者的態度與立場卻是影響治理互賴模式運作的關鍵因素。結論:中華奧會與體育署之治理互賴模式確實存在,但二組織間長期存在的治理關係之灰色地帶如政治立場、權力運作、衝突等議題較敏感,雙方的感受與立場皆不盡相同。且治理模式為動態互動關係,現在如此,不代表過去也如此,更不能用以預測未來的狀況。
Purpose: This study discussed the content of intergovernmental relationship between government sport authority (Taiwan Sports Administration) and non-governmental sport organization (Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee) base on the intergovernmental perspective. Methods: This study purposive sampled 3 executives from Taiwan Sports Administration and Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee and used semi-structured interview to acquire information. Results: (1) There is intergovernmental relationship between Sports Administration and Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee in Taiwan. The intergovernmental mode was under resource interdependency within each organization. (2) In the intergovernmental mode, Taiwan Sports Administration acted the role of central functional departments, while Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee acted like an intermediary organization, which was response for external connection. (3) The decision-making and execution autonomy would be affected by power imbalance. (4) There was not only mutual trust bus also communication and coordination in the interdependent relationship. However, the position and attitude of those in charge might be key factors for the operation of intergovernmental mode. Conclusion: Intergovernmental mode between Taiwan Sports Administration and Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee does exist indeed. However, there has been a grey area such as political status, power operation, and conflicts between the two organizations. This remained some issues for further discussion in the future research. In addition, governance modes are dynamic relationships, which cannot represent past, nor can it predict future.
期刊論文
1.Shilbury, D.(2001)。Examining board member roles, functions and influence: A study of Victorian sporting organizations。International Journal of Sport Management,2,253-281。  new window
2.Ferkins, L.、Shilbury, D.、McDonald, G.(2005)。The role of the board in building strategic capability: Towards an integrated model of sport governance research。Sport Management Review,8(3),195-225。  new window
3.Ferkins, L.、Shilbury, D.、McDonald, G.(2009)。Board involvement in strategy: Advancing the governance of sport organizations。Journal of Sport Management,23,245-277。  new window
4.Hayhurst, L.、Frisby, W.(2010)。Inevitable tensions: Swiss and Canadian sport for development NGO perspectives on partnerships with high performance sport。European Sport Management Quarterly,10(1),75-96。  new window
5.Inglis, S.(1997)。Shared leadership in the governance of amateur sport。AVANTE,3(1),14-33。  new window
6.Pfeffer, J.、Salancik, G. R.(1975)。Determinants of supervisory behavior: A role set analysis。Human Relations,28,139-153。  new window
7.李炳昭(20111200)。探討運動治理觀點在運動行政管理的研究應用。中華體育季刊,25(4)=99,730-739。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.楊綺儷、熊鴻鈞(20030900)。大專女性體育教師組織疏離之質性研究。體育學報,35,207-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳國銑、徐偉庭(20080600)。以組織文化觀點探討我國全國性體育組織之運作。中華體育季刊,22(2)=85,134-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.余佳珍(19970300)。運動組織開源的策略。中華體育季刊,10(4)=40,21-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.張俊一(20021200)。臺灣地區民間體育團體發展析論。國教世紀,203,39-48。  延伸查詢new window
12.郭哲君、鄭志富、陳美燕(20121200)。社會資本的流動:以社會網絡分析觀點論我國體育運動組織之資源發展。中華體育季刊,26(4)=103,455-463。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Hitt, M. A.、Dacin, M. T.、Levitas, E.、Arregle, J. L.、Borza, A.(2000)。Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-based and Organizational Learning Perspectives。Academy of Management Journal,43(3),449-467。  new window
14.Gulati, Ranjay(1998)。Alliances and Networks。Strategic Management Journal,19(4),293-317。  new window
15.官有垣、李宜興(20020600)。地方民間組織與政府在社區營造的夥伴關係--以嘉義新港文教基金會推動淨港計畫為例。研考雙月刊,26(3)=229,87-99。  延伸查詢new window
16.官有垣(20010600)。第三部門與公民社會的建構:部門互動的理論探討。臺大社會工作學刊,4,163+165-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Rhodes, Robert A. W.(1996)。The New Governance: Governing without Government。Political Studies,44(4),652-667。  new window
18.Smouts, Marie-Claude(1998)。The Proper Use of Governance in International Relations。International Social Science Journal,50(155),81-89。  new window
圖書
1.江明修(2001)。非營利管理。臺北市:空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院體育委員會(2007)。體育團體法制議題研修研究計畫。臺北市:行政院體育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Graham, J.、Amos, B.、Plumptre, T.(2003)。Governance principles for protected areas in the 21st century。Ottawa, ON:Institute on Governance。  new window
4.Rhodes, R. A. W.(1988)。Beyond westiminster and whitehall。London:Unwin Hyman。  new window
5.UK Sport(2003)。Investing in change--High level review of the modernisation programme for governing bodies of sport。London:Deloitte and Touche。  new window
6.Hoye, R.、Cuskelly, G.(2007)。Sport governance。Elsevier。  new window
7.Marsh, David、Rhodes, R. A. W.(1992)。Policy Networks in British Government。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
8.Girdon, B.、Kramer, R. M.、Salamon, L. M.(1992)。Government and the Third Sector: Emergong Relationships in Welfare States。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
9.Salamon, Lester M.(1992)。America's Nonprofit Sector: A Primer。New York, NY:Maryland:The Johns Hopkins University, The Foundation Center。  new window
10.丘昌泰(2007)。非營利部門研究--治理、部門互動與社會創新。臺北:智勝。  延伸查詢new window
11.鄭志富(2010)。體育行政與管理。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Salamon, Lester M.(1995)。Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State。The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
13.陳恆鈞(2012)。治理互賴理論與實務。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
14.Kooiman, Jan(1993)。Modern governance: New Government-society Interactions。Sage。  new window
15.陳向明(20020000)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Williamson, Oliver E.(1985)。The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms Markets, Relational Contracting。Macmillan, Ltd:Free Press。  new window
17.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Australian Sports Commission(2012)。Sports Governance Principles,http://www.ausport.gov.au/data/assets/file/0010/485857/ ASC_Governance_Principles.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE