:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從政黨情感溫度計解析臺灣民眾的政治極化
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:蕭怡靖 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, Yi-ching
出版日期:2014
卷期:21:2
頁次:頁1-42
主題關鍵詞:政治極化情感溫度計政黨競爭Political polarizationFeeling thermometerParty competition
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(17) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:492
  • 點閱點閱:126
近年來臺灣藍綠對立衝突不斷,是否意味臺灣的政治競爭已出現兩極化的現象?本文將從民眾的政治態度出發,藉由 1996至 2012年五次總統選舉選後的民意調查資料,建構臺灣民眾政治極化的測量方式,同時檢視政治極化的程度與趨勢。研究發現,即便兩岸統獨議題是臺灣最主要的政治分歧,但臺灣民眾的政治極化並非是狹義的在統獨立場上呈現兩極分布,而是廣義的在藍綠黨性之間存在相互敵視與對立。這種極化態勢自 2000年首次政黨輪替後開始升高,於民進黨執政期間最為嚴峻, 2008年二次政黨輪替後則出現緩和的趨勢。至於在形塑民眾政治極化的原因上,民眾的黨性及其政治涉入程度具顯著的影響力,當民眾的黨性愈強、政治涉入的程度愈高,其藍綠對立的政治極化態勢愈明顯。此外,民眾的年齡愈長、教育程度愈低,也因其政治態度愈穩固,或較傾向情緒性的政治思考,以致有顯著偏高的政治極化結果。至於選舉輸家是否比選舉贏家有更強烈的藍綠對立極化心理,則有待後續藉由更長期的民意調查資料進行檢證。本文的研究發現也意味著,要緩和臺灣藍綠對立的政治極化,並非政治菁英或民眾調整其議題立場,而是政黨、政治人物或媒體應避免以煽動或渲染方式動員群眾,民眾更應提高公民素養,以理性取代激情來進行政治思考。
Political conflicts between the pan-blue camp and the pan-green camp have been increasingly severe since the 1990’s. Whether Taiwanese politics has become more polarized hence is an important issue on research agenda. This study analyzes survey data collected after 1996-2012 presidential elections, exploring the degree of political polarization and the factors affecting political polarization in Taiwan. It is found that political polarization appeared in Taiwan since 2000 and then continuously increased until 2008. The polarization was the product of the clash of partisanship, instead of mass attitude of “U shaped distribution” on unification independence issues. Regarding the causes of political polarization, people’s partisanship and political involvement are main factors. People who have strong partisanship and high level of political involvement are more likely to become political polarized. In addition, the elder and the less educated people are also more possible to become polarized. As to the effect of election results on political polarization, longitudinal survey data are needed to do further analysis. In conclusion, the author suggests that efforts of political elites and the citizens to adjust their issue positions might not diminish political polarization. For a better solution, party elites and mass media in Taiwan should adopt rational communication instead of emotional mobilization.
期刊論文
1.徐仁全(20080100)。不滿意2007,不太期望2008--民情大調查:藍綠對立,人民最痛。遠見雜誌,259,82-89。  延伸查詢new window
2.張傳賢(20091200)。民主的脆弱性與鞏固:一個敗者同意的視角。政治科學論叢,42,43-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Abramowitz, Alan I.、Saunders, Kyle L.(2008)。Is Polarization a Myth?。The Journal of Politics,70(2),542-555。  new window
4.Ansolabehere, Stephen、Rodden, Jonathan、Snyder, Jr. James M.(2006)。Purple America。The Journal of Economic Perspectives,20(2),97-118。  new window
5.Bartels, Larry(2000)。Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996。American Journal of Political Science,44(1),35-50。  new window
6.Evens, John H.、Bryson, Bethany、DiMaggio, Paul(2001)。Opinion Polarization: Important Contributions, Necessary Limitations。Necessary Limitations."American Journal of Sociology,106(4),944-959。  new window
7.Fiorina, Morris P.(2008)。Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings。Journal of Politics,70(2),556-560。  new window
8.Hetherington, Marc J.(2009)。Review Article: Putting Polarization in Perspective。British Journal of Political Science,39(2),413-448。  new window
9.Layman, Geoffrey C.、Carsey, Thomas M.、Horowitz, Juliana Menasce(2006)。Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristic, Causes, and Consequences。Annual Review of Political Science,9,83-110。  new window
10.Olson, Joel(2008)。Whiteness and the Polarization of American Politics。Political Research Quarterly,61(4),704-718。  new window
11.Stoker, Laura、Jennings, M. Kent(2008)。Of Time and the Development of Partisan Polarization。American Journal of Political Science,52(3),619-635。  new window
12.蔡佳泓(20080300)。Making Sense of Issue Position, Party Image, Party Performance, and Voting Choice: A Case Study of Taiwan's 2004 Legislative Election。人文及社會科學集刊,20(1),1-24。new window  new window
13.Weisberg, Herbert F.、Devine, Christopher J.(2010)。Partisan Defection and Change in the 2008 US Presidential Election。Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties,20(2),213-240。  new window
14.Weisberg, Herbert F.、Christenson, Dino P.(2007)。Changing Horses in Wartime? The 2004 Presidential Election。Political Behavior,29(2),279-304。  new window
15.王鼎銘(20011100)。The Impacts of Policy Issues on Voting Behavior in Taiwan: A Mixed Logit Approach。選舉研究,8(2),95-123。new window  new window
16.Dalton, Russell J.(2008)。The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences。Comparative Political Studies,41(7),899-920。  new window
17.Dalton, Russell J.、Tanaka, Aiji(2007)。The Patterns of Party Polarization in East Asia。Journal of East Asian Studies,7(2),203-223。  new window
18.Hsieh, John Fuh-Sheng、Niou, Emerson M. S.(2005)。Measuring Taiwanese Public Opinion on Taiwanese Independence。China Quarterly,181,158-168。  new window
19.劉嘉薇、耿曙、陳陸輝(20091200)。務實也是一種選擇--臺灣民眾統獨立場的測量與商榷。臺灣民主,6(4),141-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Niou, Emerson M. S.(2005)。A New Measure of Preferences on the Independence-Unification Issue in Taiwan。Journal of Asian and African Studies,40(1/2),91-104。  new window
21.Poole, Keith T.、Rosenthal, Howard(1984)。The Polarization of American Politics。The Journal of Politics,46(4),1061-1079。  new window
22.Niou, Emerson M. S.、Paolino, Philip(2003)。The Rise of the Opposition Party in Taiwan: Explaining Chen Shui-bian's Victory in the 2000 Presidential Election。Electoral Studies,22(4),721-740。  new window
23.林聰吉(20130300)。換了位置就換了腦袋嗎?--探索臺灣總統大選的選舉輸家。臺灣民主,10(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.石之瑜(20050700)。消失的中間選民:2004年總統大選對空間理論的修正。問題與研究,44(4),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Anderson, Christopher J.、Yuliya V. Tverdova(2001)。Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies。International Political Science Review,22(4),321-38。  new window
26.張佑宗(20090300)。選舉輸家與民主鞏固--臺灣2004年總統選舉落選陣營對民主的態度。臺灣民主季刊,6(1),41-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Hsieh, John Fun-sheng、Niou, Emerson M. S.(199605)。Salient Issue in Taiwan's Electoral Politics。Electoral Studies,15(2),219-235。  new window
28.耿曙、劉嘉薇、陳陸輝(20091200)。打破維持現狀的迷思:臺灣民眾統獨抉擇中理念與務實的兩難。臺灣政治學刊,13(2),3-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Dennis, Jack(1988)。Political Independence in American, Part II: Toward a Theory。British Journal of Political Science,18(2),197-219。  new window
30.王中天(20101100)。獨立選民的類型及其投票行為:臺灣2008年總統選舉的觀察。選舉研究,17(2),35-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Chu, Yun-han(2004)。Taiwan's National Identity Politics and the Prospect of Cross-Strait Relations。Asian Survey,44(4),484-512。  new window
32.Niou, Emerson M. S.(2004)。Understanding Taiwan Independence and Its Policy Implications。Asian Survey,44(4),555-567。  new window
33.盛杏湲(20020500)。統獨議題與臺灣選民的投票行為:一九九〇年代的分析。選舉研究,9(1),41-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.吳乃德(20051200)。麵包與愛情:初探臺灣民眾民族認同的變動。臺灣政治學刊,9(2),5-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.蕭怡靖、游清鑫(20121100)。檢測臺灣民眾六分類統獨立場:一個測量改進的提出。臺灣政治學刊,16(2),65-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.吳乃德(19960700)。自由主義和族群認同:搜尋臺灣民族主義的意識形態基礎。臺灣政治學刊,1,5-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.吳重禮、許文賓(20030600)。誰是政黨認同者與獨立選民?--以二〇〇一年臺灣地區選民政黨認同的決定因素為例。政治科學論叢,18,101-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Brambor, Thomas、Clark, William Roberts、Golder, Matt(2006)。Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses。Political Analysis,14(1),63-82。  new window
39.黃秀端(20040500)。政黨輪替前後的立法院內投票結盟。選舉研究,11(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.陳陸輝(19981100)。Presidential Voting of 1996 in Taiwan: An Analysis。選舉研究,5(2),161-184。new window  new window
41.謝復生、牛銘實、林慧萍(19950500)。民國八十三年省市長選舉中之議題投票:理性抉擇理論之分析。選舉研究,2(1),77-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.蔡佳泓、徐永明、黃琇庭(20070500)。兩極化政治:解釋臺灣2004總統大選。選舉研究,14(1),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.盛杏湲、陳義彥(20030500)。政治分歧與政黨競爭:二○○一年立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究,10(1),7-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.王鼎銘(20030500)。政策認同下的投票效用與選擇:空間投票理論在不同選舉制度間的比較。選舉研究,10(1),171-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.莊淑媚、洪永泰(20111100)。特定政黨不認同:臺灣地區民意調查中關於政黨認同的新測量工具。選舉研究,18(2),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.蕭怡靖、鄭夙芬(2010)。左右怎麼分?台灣民衆對左派與右派的認知。2010台灣政治學會年會曁「重新思考國家:五都之後,百年前夕」學術研討會,(會議日期: 12月4-5日)。台北:東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hsiao, Yi-ching(2010)。Citizens' Perceptions of the Left-Right Ideology in Taiwan。International Symposium on “Designing Governance for Civil Society”。Japan。  new window
3.Yu, Eric Chen-hua(2008)。Dynamic of Partisanship, National Identity, and Issue Cleavages in the DPP Era。The Conference on Democratic Consolidation in Taiwan。  new window
研究報告
1.黃秀端(2000)。公元二千年總統大選選民投票行爲研究 (計畫編號:NSC89-2414-H- 031-009-SSS)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Abramowitz, Alan I.(2010)。The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy。Yale University Press。  new window
2.Agresti, Alan、Finlay, Barbara(2009)。Statistical Methods for the Social Science。New Jersey:Pearson Hall, Inc。  new window
3.Anderson, Christopher J.、Blais, André、Bowler, Shaun、Donovan, Todd、Listhaug, Ola(2005)。Loser's Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Fiorina, Morris P.、Abrams, Samuel J.(2009)。Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics。Norman:University of Oklahoma Press。  new window
5.Gelman, Andrew、Park, David、Shor, Boris、Bafumi, Joseph、Cortina, Jeronimo(2010)。Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
6.Stanley, Harold W.、Niemi, Richard G.(2010)。Statistics on American Politics 2009-2010。Washington, DC:CQ Press。  new window
7.Theriault, Sean M.(2008)。Party Polarization in Congress。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Hunter, James D.(1991)。Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America。New York:Basic Books。  new window
9.Fiorina, Morris P.、Abrams, Samuel J.、Pope, Jeremy C.(2006)。Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America。New York:Longman。  new window
10.McCarty, Nolan M.、Poole, Keith T.、Rosenthal, Howard L.(2006)。Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches。MIT Press。  new window
11.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.朱雲漢,胡佛(1997)。「選舉體系比較研究」國際合作案台灣地區先驅計畫,https://srda.sinica.edu.tw, 2013/08/10。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.盛杏湲(2008)。如何評估選制變遷對區域立委的代表角色與行爲的影響:研究方法的探討。如何評估選制變遷:方法論的探討。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Abramowitz, Alan I.(2011)。The 2008 Election: Polarization Continues。Controversies in Voting Behavior。CQ Press。  new window
3.Fiorina, Morris P.(2011)。Where's the Polarization?。Controversies in Voting Behavior。Washington, DC:CQ Press。  new window
4.Hetherington, Marc J.(2011)。Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization (Updated)。Controversies in Voting Behavior。Washington, DC:CQ Press。  new window
5.Kimball, David C.、Gross, Cassie A.(2007)。The Growing Polarization of American Voters。The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties。Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
6.Niemi, Richard G.、Weisberg, Herbert F.(1993)。How Meaningful Is Party Identification?。Classics in Voting Behavior。Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly Inc.。  new window
7.Niemi, Richard G.、Weisberg, Herbert F.、Kimball, David C.(2011)。Is the American Electorate Polarized?。Controversies in Voting Behavior。CQ Press。  new window
8.Niou, Emerson M. S.(2008)。The China Factor in Taiwan’s Domestic Politics。Democratization in Taiwan: Challenges in Transformation。Aldershot, UK:Burlington, VT:Ashgate。  new window
9.蕭怡靖、林聰吉(2013)。臺灣政治極化之初探:測量與分析。台灣選舉與民主化調查(TEDS)方法論之回顧與前瞻。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
10.Fiorina, Morris P.、Matthew Levendusky(2007)。Disconnected: The Political Class versus the People。Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics。Washington, D.C:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
11.吳乃德(1993)。省籍意識、政治支持和國家認同--臺灣族群政治理論的初探。族群關係與國家認同。臺北:業強。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Tajfel, Henri、Turner, John C.(1986)。The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior。Psychology of Intergroup Relations。Nelson-Hall。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE