臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：學齡前幼兒的隱喻理解發展研究
書刊名：臺東大學教育學報
作者：鄭雅丰 引用關係
作者(外文)：Cheng, Ya-feng
出版日期：2016
卷期：27:2
頁次：頁77-104
主題關鍵詞：語言發展；認知發展；隱喻；隱喻理解；Language development；Cognitive development；Metaphor；Metaphor comprehension
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:18
本研究旨在探討4～6歲幼兒的隱喻理解發展情形。實驗採用八個名詞隱喻句 為材料，輔以圖片的揭示，採取選擇題的題型，使用一對一的施測方式，共有111 位幼兒參與研究。研究發現：4～6歲幼兒處於隱喻理解發展中的階段，不同年齡 組間存在發展差異。年齡較大的幼兒較能掌握隱喻意義，傾向於選擇更多符合世 界運作法則的答案，並減少從字面意義進行想像和解釋的理解表現。綜合結果顯 示，幼兒對於理解結果現實性的敏銳程度以及統合整體語意的協調能力，都是影 響幼兒隱喻理解表現的可能因素。根據研究結果，本研究認為幼兒的隱喻理解應 是認知作用反映在語言發展的結果，隨著年齡拓展的世界知識在過程中可能扮演 重要角色。 本研究亦提出教學實務與未來研究的建議：一、教師需以擴展幼兒的生活經 驗為首要，並提供幼兒覺察理解結果現實性和統合整體語意的機會，促進幼兒理 解隱喻。二、探究認知能力與隱喻理解發展的關係，持續精進隱喻理解研究的選 材與測量方法，建構與充實幼兒隱喻理解理論。
This study experimentally investigated the development of metaphor comprehension in a sample of 4~6-year-old children. In the experiment, eight metaphorical noun expressions and graphical guidance were used to test the children’s comprehension in the form of a multiple-choice questionnaire. A total of 111 children participated in the experiment, and each took the test individually. The results showed that older children exhibited better metaphor comprehension. Moreover, older children tended to choose answers that were more realistic and they were less likely to rely on their creative imagination or interpret the expressions literally when attempting to comprehend the metaphors. Overall, the children’s metaphor comprehension was affected by their sensitivity to the realism of comprehension and their ability to integrate semantic information contained in the expressions. The results of this study suggest that young children’s metaphor comprehension derives from their cognitive development, which should be reflected in their language development. Moreover, gaining world knowledge as they age may play a crucial role in this process. Based on the findings, this study provides the following suggestions. First, to promote metaphor comprehension in young children, teachers should prioritize expanding the life experiences of young children and offer them more opportunities to become aware of the realism of comprehension and how to integrate semantic information. Second, future researchers should explore how cognitive ability is related to the development of metaphor comprehension. Furthermore, related research materials and measurement methods should be improved, and theories about metaphor comprehension in young children should be developed or refi ned.
期刊論文
1.梁雲霞(20120900)。課文中的比喻語言與閱讀能力發展。國教新知，59(3)，37-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Winner, E.(1979)。New naming for old thing: The emergence of metaphoric language。Journal of Child Language，6，469-491。  new window
3.Winner, E.、McCarthy, M.、Kleinman, S.、Gardner, H.(1979)。First metaphor。New Direction for Child Development，3，29-42。  new window
4.Winner, E.、Rosenstiel, A. K.、Gardner, H.(1976)。The development of metaphoric understanding。Developmental Psychology，12(4)，289-297。  new window
5.白麗芳(2004)。兒童隱喻性思維的特點及其發展。外語與外語教學，181，53-57。  延伸查詢new window
6.束定芳(1998)。論隱喻的本質及語義特徵。外國語.上海外國語大學學報，1998(6)，10-19。  延伸查詢new window
7.梁雲霞(20130600)。字字珠璣：文本中的隱喻與理解。教育論叢，1，43-58。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳學志、詹雨臻、馮彥茹(20131200)。臺灣地區華人情緒與相關心理生理資料庫--中文情緒隱喻的刺激常模。中華心理學刊，55(4)，525-553。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.彭宣維、張莎(2009)。比喻認知能力的發展--一項以學齡前兒童為對象的實證研究。外語教學與研究（外國語文雙月刊），41(5)，359-364。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉正光、米小玲(2008)。學齡前兒童隱喻理解能力研究。四川外語學院學報，24(6)，40-44。  延伸查詢new window
11.Dryll, E.(2009)。Changes in metaphor comprehension in children。Polish Psychological Bulletin，40(4)，204-212。  new window
12.Gentner, D.(1977)。If a tree had a knee, where would it be? Children's performance on simple spatial metaphors。Child Language Development，13，157-164。  new window
13.Gentner, D.(1988)。Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift。Child Development，59(1)，47-59。  new window
14.Jiang, Y.(2015)。Metaphorical thought in Chinese children's learning process。Studies in Literature and Language，10(1)，67-74。  new window
15.Keil, F. C.(1986)。Conceptual domains and the acquisition of metaphor。Cognitive Development，1(1)，73-96。  new window
16.Nippold, M. A.、Sullivan, M. P.(1987)。Verbal and perceptual analogical reasoning and proportional metaphor comprehension in young child。Journal of Speech and Hearing Research，30，367-376。  new window
17.Pollio, M. R.、Pollio, H. R.(1979)。A test of metaphoric comprehension and some preliminary development data。Journal of Child Language，6(1)，111-120。  new window
18.Seitz, J. A.(1997)。The development of metaphoric understanding: Implications for a theory of creativity。Creativity Research Journal，10(4)，347-353。  new window
19.Siltanen, S. A.(1986)。"Butterflies are rainbows?": A developmental investigation of metaphor comprehension。Communication Education，35(1)，1-12。  new window
20.Vosniadou, S.(1987)。Children and metaphor。Child Development，58(3)，870-885。  new window
21.Vosniadou, S.、Ortony, A.(1983)。The emergence of the Literal-Metaphorical-Anomalous distinction in young children。Child Development，54(1)，154-161。  new window
22.Vosniadou, S.、Ortony, A.、Reynolds, R. E.、Wilson, P. T.(1984)。Sources of difficulty in the young child's understanding of metaphorical language。Child Development，55(4)，1588-1606。  new window
23.Waggoner, J. E.、Palermo, D. S.、Kirsh, S. J.(1997)。Bouncing bubbles can pop: Contextual sensitivity in children's metaphor comprehension。Metaphor and Symbol，12(4)，217-229。  new window
24.錡寶香(20020800)。嬰幼兒溝通能力之發展：家長的長期追蹤記錄。特殊教育學報，16，23-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王建邦(2006)。學齡前幼兒中文隱喻理解的初探(碩士論文)。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.白鋒宇(2008)。兒童對隱喻的意義理解及其隱喻理解認知過程分析(碩士論文)。華東師範大學，上海市。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄒夢雨(2012)。2-6歲兒童隱喻理解能力發展研究(碩士論文)。南京師範大學，南京市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Winner, E.(1988)。The point of words: Children's understanding of metaphor and irony。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。  new window
2.吳念陽(2009)。隱喻的心理學研究。上海市：上海百家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gibbs, R. W.(1994)。The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Keil, F. C.(1979)。Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark(1980)。Metaphors We Live by。University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.周世箴(2006)。中譯導讀。我們賴以生存的譬喻。臺北市：聯經。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ortony, A.(1993)。Metaphor, language and thought。Metaphor and thought。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：969（臺灣：859，外國：110） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1328876 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67131087
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上