:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教師領導行為與學生的期待、學業成就及生活適應
書刊名:教育心理學報
作者:吳武典 引用關係陳秀蓉 引用關係
出版日期:1978
卷期:11
頁次:頁87-104
主題關鍵詞:生活適應教師期待領導行為學生學業成就
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(35) 博士論文(5) 專書(2) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:33
  • 共同引用共同引用:48
  • 點閱點閱:30
  The study investigated the relationships between teacher leadership behavior perceived by students and the expectation, achievement, and adjustment of the students. A Teacher Leadership Behavior Questionnaire (TLBQ) was designed to assess the three types of teacher's behavior, i.e., Democracy, Authoritarian, and Laissez-faire. The TLBQ, along with five adjustment tests, were administered to 13 classes of a junior high school, the subjects consisted of 223 boys and 485 girls. By means of simple correlational analysis, t test, and one-way analysis of variance, the prominent findings are as follows:   (1) Democratic leadership was in general in accordance with students' expectation, while authoritarian produced the greatest "expectation distance".   (2) Teacher's democratic behavior correlated positively with the students 'academic achievement, their beliefs in internal control, their achievement motivation, and personal and social adjustment, while teacher's authoritative behavior correlated negatively with those variables, except academic achievement at the expense of higher test anxiety. Teacher's laissez-faire behavior, on the other hand, though produced less "expectation distance" and test anxiety than anthoritative behavior, also correlated negatively with the students' academic achievement, their beliefs in internal control, their achievement motivation, and personal and social adjustment.   (3) The greater the students' "expectatation distance" to teacher leadership behavior is, the poorer the students' academic achievement, beliefs in internal control, achievement motivation, and personal and social adjustment would be. It seemed that the "expectation distance" variable is more effective in predicting students' behavior.   (4) It was evident that boys differed from girls in many aspects, i.e., boys tended to perceive more teacher's authoritative and laissez-faire behavior with greater "expectation distance", while girls appeared to perceive more teacher's democratic behavior with less "expectation distance". Otherwise, girls showed better academic achievement, beliefs in internal control, achievement motivation, and personal and social adjustment and lower test anxiety, though higher general anxiety, than boys. It can be concluded that how students perceived and expected teacher leadership behavior to be is significantly related to their behavior in school.
期刊論文
1.許錫珍(19780600)。能力分班教學情境下前、後段班級氣氛之比較研究。教育心理學報,11,141-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳武典(1976)。中美小學班級氣氛之比較研究。測驗年刊,23,82-95。  延伸查詢new window
3.路君約(1968)。少年人格測驗的編製。心理與教育,2,23-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Silberman, M. L.(1969)。Behavioral expression of teachers' attitudes toward elementary school students。Journal of Educational Psychology,60(5),402-407。  new window
5.deCharms, R.(1972)。Personal causation training in the schools。Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2,95-113。  new window
6.張春興、陳李綢(19770600)。國小男女生學業成績的性別差異與其教師性別差異的關係。教育心理學報,10,21-33。  延伸查詢new window
7.張春興(19760600)。國小男女兒童學習行為的差異與其教師性別的關係。教育心理學報,9,1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Fiedler, M. L.(1975)。Bidirectionality of influence in classroom interaction。Journal of Educational psychology,67(6),735-744。  new window
9.郭生玉(19730600)。國中低成就學生心理特質之分析研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,15,左451-534。  延伸查詢new window
10.吳武典(19750600)。Children's sex, locus of control, and academic achievement。教育心理學報,8,107-114。new window  new window
11.Bradford, L. P.、Lippitt, R.(1945)。Building a democratic work group。Personnel and Guidance Journal,22,142-148。  new window
會議論文
1.Barclay, J. R.(1978)。Temperament clusters and individual differences in the elementary classroom: a summary。AERA National Meeting,(會議日期: 1978/03/28-1978/03/31)。Toronto。  new window
圖書
1.Hargreaves, D. H.(1975)。Interpersonal relations and education。London, England:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
2.Flanders, N. A.(1960)。Teacher influence, pupil attitudes and achievement。Minneapolis, Minn:University of Minnesota。  new window
3.Adorno, T. W.、Frenkel-Brunswik, E.、Levinson, D. J.、Standford, R. N.(1950)。The authoritarian personality。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
4.Anderson, H. H.、Brewer, H. M.(1945)。Studies of teachers' classroom personalities。Stanford University。  new window
5.DeCharms, R.、Bridgeman, W. J.(1961)。Leadership compliance and group behavior。St Louis:Washington University。  new window
圖書論文
1.林碧峰、楊國樞、繆瑜、楊有維(1973)。中國學童焦慮量表之修訂。中國兒童行為的發展。臺北:環宇出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Horwitz, M.(1963)。Hostility and its management in classroom groups。Readings in the social psychology of education。Boston:Allyn & Bacon, Inc。  new window
3.White, R.、Lippitt, R.(1968)。Leader behavior and member reaction in three "social climates"。Group dynamics: research and theory。New York, NY:Harper & Row。  new window
4.郭為藩(1976)。教師的角色。教育心理學。台北:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE