為想暸解同一個研究主題，採用兩種不同的評量方法，會不會產生不同的研究結果？乃將一份「母親職分調查問卷」包含的30個項目，分別設計安排成「利克特氏量尺」與「等級次序量尺」，選擇127位受試，同時接受兩種評量方式的問卷。分析受試兩種方法評量母親職分重要程度的結果，發現：(1) 兩法所評母親職分重要程度，在斯氏等級相關上未現統計差異；(2) 變異數分析顯示兩法評量的母親職分重要程度，存在顯著的差異； (3) 兩法評量的母親職分重要程度，只分析重要程度的方向，與同時分析方向與差異量，產生不同的研究結果。本研究根據上述研究發現，提供兩項具體建議。

This study was done to understand whether applied different measurements to the same topic producing different results. A "Mother's Roles Questionnaire," 30 items, was designed into Likert-type scale and rank order scale. 127 Ss received two scales. Analyzed the ratings of Ss of important extent of mothers roles. The results showed: (1) the important extent of mothers roles of two measurements had no significant Spear­man's rank correlation; (2) ANOVA of two measurements showed the important extent of mothers roles had significant difference; (3) analyzed the direction of important extent only, and analyzed the direction and value of important extent simultaneously, the results of two measurements was different. According to the findings, this study has two suggestions.