:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:宗教教育國際比較分析
書刊名:臺灣社會學研究
作者:瞿海源 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiu, Hei-yuan
出版日期:1997
卷期:1
頁次:頁43-75
主題關鍵詞:社會道德宗教宗教教育國際比較研究Social moralityReligionReligious educationInternational comparative study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(4) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:130
  • 點閱點閱:35
     在1980年代,世界上幾個保守政權,如英、美、新加坡和台灣 都試圖強調宗教教育以協助重建社會秩序。宗教應否和現代教育制度結合而對 社會秩序和價值社會化做出貢獻這個議題就有必要加以探究。英國在柴契爾主 政時曾特予加強,但宗教教育仍然不成功。在德國則比較穩定,但亦面臨世俗 化和德東的問題。在日、韓、台、美、法諸國則均未在公立學校施行宗教教育, 但多允許私立學校設有非強迫性的相關課程與活動。本研究分析了六國宗教教 育的異同並探究各國宗教情勢與宗教教育施行與否間的關係,指出德國兩大宗 教並立且以地方宗教組成為施行宗教教育之重要依據,此一條件在其他五國並 不存在。新加坡施行宗教教育已告失敗。於是社會內多宗教的現象可能是在各 國不施行宗教教育的重要條件。同時從涂爾幹有關道德教育的研究和理論,顯 示了現代教育不再依靠宗教來進行有關道德和倫理教育的特質。這是一個現代 社會如何培育並維持社會道德倫理的問題,也是社會學者應關切的社會秩序建 構和維持的問題。本文就這個問題也根據對六國的研究進行了討論。
     Several conservative regimes, such as in the UK, the USA, Singapore, and Taiwan have tried to enforce religious education in the public school system to improve social morality and reconstruct social order. The issue that whether religion should be introduced into the educational institution to reconstruct social order and improving the process of socialization of values is worth being reanalyzed. The differences and similarities of religious education and its relation with the religious composition of the society are analyzed comparatively. In sum, Germany, with two major religious forces, has institutionalized religious education in the public school system under the local government and religious authorities. In the rest of the countries in this study, there is no such religious condition. The failed experiment of Singapore shows that plural religious persuasions are likely to be a crucial factor which leads to the exclusion of religious education from the public school system. The rest of the countries studied do not practise religious education in the public school system and allow private schools to provide religious courses and activities under unforced conditions. In Durkheim's theory, moral education without religion or involvement of religious groups is not only necessary but also a crucial social arrangement in modern society. The theoretical and fundamental implications of this are tentatively discussed.
期刊論文
1.Digiacomo, James J.(1989)。Schools and moral development。Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science,37(2),159-169。  new window
2.Haldane, John(1986)。Religious education in a pluralist society: a philosophical examination。British Journal of Educational Studies,34(2),161-181。  new window
3.Paris, David C.(1991)。Moral education and the 'tie that binds' in liberal political theory。American Political Science Review,85(3),875-901。  new window
4.Lodge, B.(1991)。Curriculum council is 'too secular'。Time Educational Supplement,20,11。  new window
5.Tamney, Joseph B.(1994)。Conservative government and support for the religious institution: religious education in English schools。British Journal of Sociology,45(2),195-210。  new window
6.Tamney, Joseph B.(1992)。Conservative government and support for the religious institution in Singapore: an uneasy alliance。Sociological Analysis,53(2),210-217。  new window
7.Pritchard, Ivor(1988)。Character education: Research prospects and problems。American Journal of Education,96(4),469-495。  new window
8.Tamney Joseph B.、Johnson, Stephen D.(1987)。Church-state relations in the eighties: Public Opinion in Middletown。Sociological Analysis,48(1),1-16。  new window
9.Gutmann, Amy(1995)。Civic Education and Social Diversity。Ethics,105,557-579。  new window
會議論文
1.瞿海源(1996)。跨世紀公民教育的問題。跨世紀台灣民主發展問題研討會,紀念殷海光先生基金會主辦 (會議日期: 1996/07/07-07/08)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.瞿海源(1989)。宗教法研究。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.韓相敦(1995)。韓國的宗教教育。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉純仁(1995)。美國的宗教教育。  延伸查詢new window
4.李亦園、黃智慧(1995)。日本的宗教教育。  延伸查詢new window
5.古正美(1995)。新加坡的宗教教育。  延伸查詢new window
6.瞿海源(1995)。國內宗教教育現況之分析。  延伸查詢new window
7.立法院(1974)。立法院公報。  延伸查詢new window
8.顧忠華(1995)。德國的宗教教育。  延伸查詢new window
9.瞿海源(1994)。台灣地區社會變遷基本調查計劃:第二期第五次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC 83-0301-H-001-034-B1)。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Provenzo, Eugene F.(1990)。Religious Fundamentalism and American Education。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
2.Stock-Morton, Phyllis(1988)。Moral Education for a Secular Society, The Development of Morale Laique in Nineteenth Century。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
3.Thayer V. T.(1979)。Religion in Public Education。Westport, Connecticut:Greenwood Press。  new window
4.Taylor, Monica(1975)。Progress and Problems in Moral Education。Windsor:NFER。  new window
5.Barrett, David(1982)。World Christian Encyclopedia。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Tulasiewicz, Witold、To, Cho-yee(1993)。World Religions and Educational Practice。New York:Cassell。  new window
7.Galston, William(1991)。Liberal Purpose: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State。Cambridge:New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Hunter, James Davison(1991)。Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America。New York:Basic Books。  new window
9.Bellah, Robert N.(1991)。The Good Society。New York:Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
10.羊憶蓉(1993)。教育與國家發展:台灣經驗。台北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.台灣基督長老教會學校教材研編會(1992)。人生哲學。  延伸查詢new window
12.中國主教團教育文化委員會(1992)。倫理初階補充教材。台北:光啓社。  延伸查詢new window
13.中國主教團教育文化委員會(1986)。倫理教育補充讀物。台北:光啓社。  延伸查詢new window
14.Cox, E.、Cairns, J. M.(1989)。Reforming Religions Education。London:Kogan Page。  new window
15.Durkheim, Emile、Wilson, Everett K.、Schnurer, Herman(1973)。Moral Education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education。New York:Free Press。  new window
16.Dreeben, Robert(1968)。On What Learned in School。Reading, Mass:Addison-Wesley。  new window
17.Elias, John L.(1989)。Moral Education: Secular and Religious。Malabar, Florida:Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company。  new window
18.瞿海源(1989)。社會心理學新論。巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Lenski, Gerhard(1971)。Conservatives and radicals。Contemporary Sociological Theory。New York:Random House。  new window
2.Darendorf, Ralf(1989)。Changing values under Mrs. Thatcher。Thatcherism。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE