:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:優質學校環境規劃與問題探析
書刊名:初等教育學刊
作者:湯志民 引用關係
作者(外文):Tang, Chih-min
出版日期:2003
卷期:14
頁次:頁49-82
主題關鍵詞:學校環境優質學校環境學校建築規劃規劃與設計規劃問題School environmentQuality school environmentSchool buildings planningPlanning and designPlanning problems
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(6) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:125
  • 點閱點閱:192
優質學校環境係指學校建築所建構的校園環境,具有優良的整體特質,其各項設施能夠符應或超越使用者的教育、生活和學習的需求。基本上,優質學校環境對師生的教學、學習、成就、態度、健康和行為有積極正面的影響,其重要實不容忽視。惟有些教育領導者,誤認為學校建築的品質對學業成就並無影響,致教育人員之間,對改進學校建築品質以及規劃和管理學校的歷程,其觀點有很大的落差。 優質學校環境的規劃原則有四:適切性、舒適性、效率性和安全性。在規劃面向上,包括:心理環境、生理環境、哲理環境、管理環境、物理環境和地理環境,可以人、事、物為思考軸線,以建立「理」性環境。 近8年,研究者走過臺灣的每一個縣市,超過400所以上的大學、中小學和幼兒園,一步一腳印的實地踏勘,可以清楚的看到臺灣學校建築的發展,感受到學校建築之美和成長的活力,當然也能深刻體會到學校環境深沉的規劃和設計問題,如學校空間、教室設計、集會所設計、運動場地、校園設計、附屬設施、無障礙環境和使用管理問題等等,這些問題深藏在學校空間之中,值得探討了解,並供未來優質學校環境規劃與建構之省思。
Quality school environment means a campus environment constructed by school building that has excellent character in entity and its separate facility enables to fit or to surpass the user's education, life and learning needs. Fundamentally, the importance of quality school environment cannot be ignored for its positive impact to the teachers and students on teaching, learning, accomplishment, attitude, health and behavior. However, those educational leaders misconceive that the quality of school building has no impact on academic performance-As a result, a gap exists between the educators view of improving quality and the process of planning and managing schools. There are 4 principles to plan a quality school environment: adequacy, comfort, efficiency and safety. On the face of planning, psychological environment, physiological environment, philosophical environment, management environment, physical environment, and geographical environment included, we can meditate on people, affairs and objects as an axis to build a "rational" environment. In recent 8 years, researcher has been to over 400 colleges, middle high school, elementary school and kindergartens in Taiwan every county and city with one foot a step to investigate practically, to see the development of Taiwan school environment clearly, to feel the beauty and growing power of the school building, and of course, also to understand strongly to the profound plan and design problems of the school environment. For example, there are the school space, the classroom design, the meeting design, the playground, the campus design, affiliated facilities, barrier-free environment and using management problems, etc. These questions lie hidden deeply in the school space worth to investigate, to understand and to provide a reflection of quality school environment plan and construct.
期刊論文
1.Moore, D. P.(2002)。School facility planning's top 10 list。School Planning & Management,41(1),16-17。  new window
2.Moore, D. P.(2002)。School building day。School Planning & Management,41(5),12-13。  new window
3.湯志民(2000)。體驗校園空間元素。人本教育札記,135,140-144。  延伸查詢new window
4.Agron, J.(2000)。Defining quality。American School and University,73(2),6-7。  new window
5.DiNola, R.、Guerra, J.(2002)。Green building and school constructio。School Planning and Management,41(5),40-43。  new window
6.Kennedy, M.(2002)。Creating ideal facilities。American School and University,74(5),30-33。  new window
7.Morauer, K.(2002)。Building an effective building trades program。Tech Directions,61(6),23-27。  new window
8.Sims, J. K.(2001)。Green school: A design fad or a trend worth embracing。School Planning and Management,40(3),25-30。  new window
9.Mader, D. R.、Willi, J. G.(2002)。New generation of Schools。Building Operating Management,49(3),28-33。  new window
10.湯志民(19941200)。學校建築的人文教育環境規畫。初等教育學刊,3,237-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Harvey, Lee、Green, Diana(1993)。Defining quality。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,18(1),9-34。  new window
會議論文
1.楊清芬、陳永興、曾旭正、林志成(2000)。攜手營造我們的社區學校。921校園重建--新校園運動工作坊會議,臺大城鄉基金會、人本教育文教基金會、專業者都市改革組織主辦 。臺中縣:教育部:教育部中部辦公室。6-17。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Abramson, P.(2002)。School planning and management: 2002 construction report。  new window
2.教育部(2001)。中華民國教育統計。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.湯志民(2002)。臺灣的學校建築。臺北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃康宇(1996)。建築學英漢辭典。臺北市:地景企業公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Abend, A. C.(2000)。Planning and designing for students with disabilities。Washington, D. C.:National Cleaning house for Educational Facilities。  new window
4.Evans, W. H.、Evans, S. S.、Schmid, R. E.(1989)。Behavior and instructional managemant: An ecological approach。Boston:Allyn and Bacon, Inc.。  new window
5.Gauzin-Muller, D.(2002)。Sustainable architecture and urbanism: Concepts, technologies, examples。Basel, Switzerland:Birkhauser-Publishers for Architecture。  new window
6.Kitchen, D.、Kaye, M.、Sadat, M.(2001)。Providing quality school facilities for the nation's children: An invitational forum for state school facilities leaders。San Diego, CA:The National Center for 21st Century Schoolhouse, San Diego State University。  new window
7.林憲德(2001)。綠建築設計技術彙編。臺北:內政部建築研究所。  延伸查詢new window
8.林憲德(2001)。綠建築解說與評估手冊。台北:內政部建築研究所。  延伸查詢new window
9.林憲德(2002)。國民中小學綠建築設計手冊。臺北:內政部建築研究所。  延伸查詢new window
10.湯志民(2000)。學校建築與校園規畫。臺北市:五南圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.American Institute of Architects(2002)。Educational facilities。Mulgrave, Australia:The Images Publishing Group Pty Ltd。  new window
12.Ansley, J.(2000)。Creating Accessible Schools。Washington, D. C.:National Cleaninghouse for Educational Facilities。  new window
13.Heimstra, N. W.、McFarling, L. H.(1978)。Environmental psychology。Monterey, California:Brooks / Cole Publishing Company。  new window
14.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(1995)。Redefining the place to learn。Paris:Head of Publications Service, OECD。  new window
15.Oldroyd, D.、Elsner, D.、Poster, C.(1996)。Educational management today: A concise dictionary and guide。London:Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.。  new window
16.Pillari, Vimala(1988)。Human behavior in the social environment。Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
17.蔡保田(1977)。學校建築學。臺北市:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
18.Castaldi, Basil(1994)。Educational facilities: Planning, modernization, and management。Boston:Allyn and Bacon, Inc.。  new window
單篇論文
1.Earthman, G. I.(1998)。The impact of school building condition and student achievement, and behavior(ED441329)。  new window
2.Lackney, J. A.(1999)。Reading a school building like a book: The influence of the physical school setting on learning and literacy(ED 433692)。  new window
3.Earthman, G. L.,Cash, C. S.,Van Berkum, D.(1995)。A Statewide Study of Student Achievement and Behavior and School Building Condition(ED387878)。  new window
4.Edwards, M. M.(1991)。Building conditions, parent involvement and student achievement in the D. C. public school system(ED338743)。  new window
5.Earthman, G. I.,Lemaster, L.(1998)。Where children learn: A discussion of how a facility affect learning(ED 419368)。  new window
6.Maxwell, L. E.(1999)。School building renovation and student performance: One district's experience(ED443272)。  new window
其他
1.Environmental Protection Agency(2002)。Healthy school environments: School design, Construction and renovation,http://cfpub.epa.gov/schools/top-sub. cfm?t-id=45, 2002/10/06。  new window
2.Daigneau, W. A.(2002)。Facilities and educational quality,http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00021000/M2002195.pdf, 2002/10/06。  new window
3.Energy Smart School(2002)。Statistics about school buildings and buses,http://www.eren.doe.gov/energysmartschools/about-stat.html, 2002/10/06。  new window
4.Franta, G.,Yarmuth, L.,Olgyay, V.(2002)。The greening of educational facilities: Systems intergation,http://www.ensargroup.com/GreenEdFac.pdf, 2002/10/06。  new window
5.Hopkins, G.(1998)。Hard hat area: The deteriorating state of school buildings,http://www.educationworld.com/a-admin/admin089_shtml, 2002/10/01。  new window
6.Little Hoover Commission(2000)。To build a better school,http://www.lhc.ca.gov, 2002/10/01。  new window
7.教育部(2002)。國民中小學設備基準,台北市:教育部。,http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/SearchAllResultList.aspx?KeyWord=%e5%9c%8b%e6%b0%91%e4%b8%ad%e5%b0%8f%e5%ad%b8%e8%a8%ad%e5%82%99%e5%9f%ba%e6%ba%96, 。  new window
圖書論文
1.湯志民、廖文靜(2001)。校園文化藝術環境的規劃,學校建築研究學會。e世紀的學校新貌。臺北市:中華民國學校建築學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.湯志民、廖文靜(2000)。教學革新與空間規劃。二十一世紀的學校建築與設施。臺北:中華民國學校建築研究學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳清山(2002)。教育品質與績效責任。教育績效責任研究。臺北市:高等教育文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE