:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:校長多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐與學校效能 之研究
作者:周美慧
作者(外文):Mei-Hui Chou
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:教育政策與行政學系
指導教授:翁福元
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:多元文化領導策略教育正義實踐學校效能校長領導multicultural leadership strategieseducational justice practiceschool effectivenessleadership of principals
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:194
本研究旨在瞭解目前台灣公立國民中小學校長對多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐與學校效能的看法、具體作為與面臨的挑戰為何?以及探討國民中小學教育人員對校長多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐與學校效能之關係知覺差異、相關情形,並進一步探討與分析其預測力情形。本研究採用混合研究取徑,質性研究以焦點座談法進行,採用半結構式訪談大綱蒐集資料,研究對象以台中市、南投縣公立中小學十二位校長為對象;量化研究採用問卷調查法,研究對象以台灣地區公立國民中小學教育人員為母群體,依北、中、南、東四區分層隨機抽樣,抽取樣本數總計1,012位教育人員,回收問卷計有735份,無效問卷有19份,有效問卷計有716份。最後,問卷調查所得資料,以SPSS19版統計套裝軟體,進行描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數、Pearson積差相關、多元逐步迴歸等統計分析。
本研究之主要發現歸納整理如下:
一、校長多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐對於學校效能有其重要性及價值性。
二、校長對於多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐各有不一致的具體作為。
三、校長認為多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐主要的挑戰來自教師的認知、
支持以及認同感,其次,家長的觀念。
四、國民中小學教育人員在校長多元文化領導策略之整體層面上知覺屬於「高」的
程度;在教育正義實踐與學校效能整體層面上知覺屬於「中高」的程度。
五、不同背景的教育人員知覺校長多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐與學校效能
各層面有部分顯著差異。
六、校長多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐各層面對整體學校效能有顯著正相關。 七、校長多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐各層面對整體學校效能具有最佳預測力。
依據以上之研究發現,本研究對教育相關單位機關、中小學校長與未來研究分別提出建議。
This study aimed at investigating the opinions of Taiwanese public elementary and junior high school principals on multicultural leadership strategies, education justice practice, and school effectiveness dimensions. In addition, the study explored the actions of these principals and the challenges that they face with respect to the three dimensions. Moreover, the researcher studied the perceived difference that school staff have on the correlation between school effectiveness and the multicultural leadership strategies and educational justice practice employed by the principals. The researcher also investigated and analyzed the predictive power that the multicultural leadership strategies and educational justice practice had on school effectiveness. The study adopted a mixed research method. For the qualitative research, the researcher conducted focus group discussions with 12 principals from elementary and junior high schools in Taichung City and in Nantou County by semi structured interview. For the quantitative research, the researcher used the questionnaire survey method and randomly selected school staff from elementary and junior high schools in northern, central, southern, and eastern Taiwan; the sample comprised a total of 1012 school staff members and 735 questionnariers were returned. After removing the 19 invalid questionnaires, a total of 716 valid questionnaire were colected. The researcher performed statistical analyses on the questionnaire data by using descriptive statistics, an independent samples t test, one-way analysis of variance, the Pearson product-moment correlation, and stepwise multiple regression analysis.
The results of this study are as follows:
1.The multicultural leadership strategies employed by principals and their educational justice practice exhibited a crucial and valuable effect on school effectiveness;
2. The multicultural leadership strategies employed by the principals and their educational justice practice differed from each other;
3. The principals maintained that the greatest challenge when employing multicultural leadership strategies and educational justice practice come from teacher perceptions. The second challenge comes from the parent perceptions ;
4. The overall perception that school staff have on the multicultural leadership strategies employed by the principals was “high;” the overall perception of the principals’ educational justice practice and school effectiveness was “middle to high;”
5. School staff members of various backgrounds have various perceptions of the multicultural leadership strategies employed by the principals, their educational justice practice, and school effectiveness; several of the differences were substantial;
6. A positive and significant correlation existed between a school’s overall effectiveness and the multicultural leadership strategies employed by principals and their educational justice practice; and
7. The multicultural leadership strategies employed by principals and their educational justice practice demonstrated optimal predictive power on a school’s overall effectiveness.
According to the research findings, we offered recommendations to related education institutions, principals of junior and middle schools, and for future research.
一、中文部分
朱子君(2007)。學校領導與經營。載於秦夢群(主編),學校行政(pp. 43-86)。
臺北市:五南。
江志正(2000)。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、學校發展策略與學校效能關係之
研究。國立師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄。
江滿堂(2004)。領導策略與學校氣氛對教師知識分享意願影響之研究。屏東師院new window
學報。21,243-270。
吳明隆(2006)。SPSS操作與應用多變量分析實務。臺北市:五南。
吳清山、林天祐(2006)。教育新辭書。臺北市:高等教育。
吳清山、林天祐(2007)。教育小辭書。臺北市:五南。
吳清山、林天祐(2008)。教育e辭書。臺北市:高等教育。
吳清山(2010a)。學校效能研究。臺北市:五南。new window
吳清山(2010b)。關照弱勢族群教育實現教育公平正義。教育人力與專業發展雙
月刊,27(6),1-2。
吳清山(2012)。打造有效能學校的策略。教育人力與專業發展雙月刊,29(5),
1-6。
吳清基(2011)。教育政策與行政新議題 。臺北市:五南。
吳柏林、謝名娟(2010)。現代教育與心理統計學。臺北縣:Airiti Press。
余玉眉、田聖芳、蔣欣欣(1911)。質性研究-田野研究法於護理學之應用。臺北
市:巨流。
林清江(1992)。教育社會學新論-我國社會與教育關係之研究。臺北市:五南。
林清江(1996)。教育社會學。臺北市:臺灣書店。
林信榕(2007)。校長領導與學校文化探究。臺北市:師大書苑。new window
林明地(2008)。校長學工作分析與角色研究取向。臺北市:五南。
林明地(2010)。學校與社區關係。臺北市:五南。new window
林彩岫(2004)。教育研究的兩個典範:質與量之探討。載於賈馥茗、楊深坑(主
編),教育學方法論(pp.209-225)。臺北市:五南。
林淑馨(2010)。質性研究理論與實務。臺北市:巨流。
邱錦昌(2003)。教育視導與學校效能。臺北市:高等教育。new window
邱皓政(2005)。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北
市:五南。
周新富(2005)。布爾迪厄論學校教育與文化再製。臺北市:心理。
周新富(2012)。教育研究法。臺北市:五南。
周美慧(2013年11月)。校長教育正義實踐與學校效能之探討。張慶勳(主持人),
「2013教育人員專業發展學術研討會」,暨南大學。
周美慧、楊振昇、賴文宗(2012)。從社會正義觀點評析十二國民教育政策。論文
發表於2012兩岸教育行政與政策論壇,嘉義。
周美慧、翁福元、蔡仁政、李垣武 (2012年11月)。十二年國教實施下國中校長
學校經營之探討。楊洲松(主持人),「2012十二年國教中的課程與 教學改革
研究生論文交流研討會」,中興大學。
周美慧、翁福元、李瑞金、鍾芳玲(2013)。從教育公平檢視臺灣幼托整合政策。new window
幼兒教育年刊,24,49-65。
周美慧、翁福元、陳靜怡(2013年9月)。十二年國教推動實施下校長多元文化領
導之研究。林海清(主持人),「2013年 E時代教學專業與研究與學術研討會」
論文集,台中大學。
范光瑞(2012)。國民小學校長的多元文化教育理念與實踐之個案研究。中原大學
碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市:巨流。
赵中建(2004)。学校文化。上海:华东师范大学出版社。
翁文艳(2003)。教育公平与学校选择制度。北京市 : 北京师范大学。
翁福元(2004)。教育研究中意義理解問題析論。載於賈馥茗、楊深坑(主編),教育學方法論(pp.209-225)。臺北市:五南。
翁福元(2007)。教育政策社會學教育政策與當代社會思潮之對話。臺北市:五南。
翁福元、周美慧、盧秋菊 (2013年3月)。校長學校經營的工作壓力之研究。湯志民(主持人),「教育領導與學習共同體」國際研討會,淡江大學。
秦夢群、黃貞裕 (2001)。教育行政研究方法論。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群(2012)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
張鈿富(2006)。教育概論。臺北市:三民。
張鈿富、張曉琪(2010)。書評〈社會公義領導:促動教育界的革命〉,當代教育new window
研究,18,(1),147-156。
張清濱(2005)。教學視導與評鑑。臺北市:五南。new window
張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特色與組織效能之研究(未出版博士論文)。高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window
張慶勳(2006a)。學校組織文化與領導。臺北市:五南。new window
張慶勳(2006b)。校本文化領導的理念與實踐。高雄市:麗文文化。new window
張德永(2006)。多元文化與新移民教育。2013年3月01日,
取自lifelong.jxes.tc.edu.tw/show/95_exercise_basic/immigrte_edu.ppt
莊富源(2010)。肯認差異:多元文化主義的弱勢教育意涵。教育人力與專業發展
雙月刊,27(6),3-8。
黃宗顯(2010)。領導理論研究概覽。載於黃宗顯等(合著),學校領導新理論與實
踐(pp.2-25)。臺北市:五南。
黃文三(2012)。倫理學。臺北市:高等教育。
黃嘉莉(2013)。我國師資培育評鑑之研究:品質保證的觀點。教育行政與評鑑學刊,15,57-84。new window
湯志民(2006)。學校建築與校園規畫(第三版)。臺北市:五南。new window
馮丰儀(2009)。多元觀點的教育行政倫理決定。載於張鈿富(主編),教育行政理念與創新(pp.201-219)。臺北市:高等教育。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理。
陳麗玉(2010)。文化領導。載於黃宗顯等(合著),學校領導新理論與實踐
(pp.46-62)。臺北市:五南。
楊荊生(2004)。哲學研究法與其他教育研究法的關係。載於賈馥茗、楊深坑(主編),教育學方法論(pp.285-310)。臺北市:五南。
楊振昇(2008)。教育組織變革與學校發展研究。臺北市:五南。new window
溫明麗(2008)。教育理論與實踐。臺北市:高等教育。
劉世閔(2006)。質性研究資料分析與文獻格式之應用:以QSR N6與 EndNote8為
例。臺北市:心理。
蔡培村、武文瑛(2004)。領導學:理論、實務與研究。高雄:麗文文化。
蔡文輝、李紹嶸(2003)。社會學概論。臺北市:三民書局。
蔡進雄(2000)。轉型領導與學校效能。臺北市:師大書苑。new window
蔡進雄(2009)。國民中小學校長領導之研究專業、情緒與靈性的觀點。臺北市:高等教育。
蔡進雄(2013)。真誠領導在教育領導的應用與評析。教育人力與專業發展雙月刊,30(2),61-68。
謝文全(2008)。教育行政學。臺北市:高等教育。
簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)。社會工作研究法。臺北市:巨流圖書。new window
譚光鼎、劉美慧與游美惠(2008)。多元文化教育。臺北市:高等教育。


二、西文部分
Banks, J. A. (1994). An introducation to multicultural education. Boston,MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Barbour, R. S. (1990). Using focus groups in general practice research. Family Practice, 12 (3), 328-34.
Barth, R.S. (1990). Improving school from with :Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Beck, L. G. (1994). Reclaiming educational adminstration as a caring profession. New York,NY:Teachers College Press.
Bennis, W. (1989). On becoming aleader.Wilming, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Blankstein, A. M. & Houston, P. D. (2011). Leadership for social justice and democracy in our schools.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
Bloor, M. Frankland.J.,Thomas, M, & Robson, K. (2001). Focus groups in social research. London:Sage.
Branden, K. V., Avermaet. P. V. & Houtte, M. V. (2011). Equity and excellence in education towards maximal learning opportunities for all students. NY: Routlege.
Cheng, Y. C. (2000). Culture factors in educational effectiveness: A franmework for comparative research.School leadership & managenent, 20(2),207-225.
Cheng,Y. C. (1994). Principal,s leadership as a critical factor for school performance: Evidence from multi-levels of primary schools.School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3),299-317.
Chou, M. H (2013,1). School management ideas of primary principals:From the multi-cultural leadership perspective, The 11th Annual Hawaii International on Education , Hawaii, USA.
Coleman, M., & Glover, D. (2010). Educational leadership and management: Developing insights and skills. Maidenhead, UK: Open University
Connerley, M. L, & Pedersen, P. B. (2005). Leadership in a diverse and multicultural environment: Developing awareness, knowledge, and skill.. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Cowie, M. (2011). New primay leaders international perspective. NY: Continuum.
Crane, C. (2001). General classroom space. School leadership & managenent, 40,54-55.
Creemers, B.P. (1994).The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
Crowson, R. (1989). Managenent ethics in educational administration: The rational choice approach.Urban Education, 23(4),412-435.
Davies, B. (2009). The essentials of school leadership. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D (1994).The leadership paradox:Balancing logic and artistry in Schools. San Francisco,CA : Jossey-Bass.
Dimmock, C., & walker, A. (2005). Educational leadership cultural and diversity. London Eciyisp.
Drew, C. F. (1980). Introduction to designing and conducting research(2nd ed.). St.Louis:C.V.Mosby.
Dronkers, J. (2010). Quality and inequality of education Cross-National Perspective. New York:Springer.
Fägerlind, G. N. (2004). Mångfald i praktiken – handbok för verksamhetsutveckling,
Uppsala: Konsultförlaget.
Fink, D. (2005). Leadership for mortals : Developing and sustaining leaders of learning. London: Sage.
Flick, U. (2002 ). Qualitative reseach in psychology: A textbook . London: Sage.
Gardiner, M. & Enomoto, E. K. (2004). Administrator preparation for multicultural leadership: Inside four nationally accredited programs. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 2 (3) ,25-43.
Glanz, J. (2006a). Operational leadership.Thousand Oaks,CA:Corwin.
Glanz, J. (2006b). What every principal should know about cultural leadership. Thousand Oaks,CA:Corwin.
Glenn, R. & Sheila,W. (2010). Beginning teachers, pupil control ideologies: An empirical exmination of the impact of beliefs about edcation, mentorship, induction, and principal leadership style. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 104, 43-48.
Goldring, E. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1993). Principals of dynamic schools: Taking charge of change. Newbury park, CA: Corwin.
Gorard , S. & Smith, E. (2010). Equity in education : An international comparison of pupil perspectives . New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gordon , E. W.(1999). Education and justice a view from the back of the bus. New York, NY : Teachers College Press.
Gordon , E.W.(2011). Education and justice : a view from the back of the bus. New York, NY: Routledge.
Grant, C. A.& Sleeter, C. E. (2007). Doing multicultural education for achievement and equity .New York, NY:Routledge.
Hebert, E. A. (2006).The boss of the whole school.New York:Teachers College Press.
Hill, D. & Cole, M. (2001). Schooling and equality : Fact, concept and policy. London: Kogan Page.
Hoyle, E. & Wallance, W. (2005). Educational Leadership Ambiguity professionals and managerialism. London sage.
Huber, S.G. (2010). School leadership-international perspectives. New York, NY:Springer.
Johnson, S. M. (2012). Build the capacity of teachers and their schools. Phi Delta Kappan,94(2), 62-65.
Karstanje, P., & Webber, C. F. (2008). Programs for school principal preparation in East Europe. Journal of Educational Administration,46(6),739-751.
Kuzel, A. J. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry,in B.F. Crabtree and Mathematics with Applications, 55, 2623-2630.
Lahdenperä, P. (2006). Intercultural leadership in school environments. The Multicultural Centre, Botkyrka, Sweden.
Leithwood.K. A., & Riehl. C., (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Retrieved from http://www.leadersdesktop.sa.edu.au/leadership/files/links/School_leadership.pdf.
Marion, R. (2002). Leadership in educational organization theory for the practitioner. Upper Saddle River, N J.
Marshall, C. (2004). Social justice challenges to educational administration: Introduction to aspecial issue. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 5-15.
Marzano, R. J. (2011).Classroom management: whose job is it? (Art & Science Teaching).
Educational Leadership, 69(2), p.85-86.
Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mays, N. & Pope, C. (1995). Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311,109-12.
Mlekov, K. & Widell, G. (2003). Hur vi möter mångfald på arbetsplatsen. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Moore, K. D., & Hansen. J. (2012). Effective strategies for teaching in K-8 Classrooms. London: Sage.
Muna, F. A., & Zennie. Z. A. (2011). Developing multicultural leaders:The journey to leaderhip success.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social Research Methods:Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston, MA :Allyn and Bacon.
Niesche, R. (2011). Foucault and educational leadership disciplining the principal. New York, NY:Routledge.
Norris,C. J., Barnett, B. G., Bason, M. R., & Yerkes, D. M.(2002). Developing educational leaders. Aworking model:The learning community in action. New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
Nussbaum, M. C.(1999). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, J. (1972). The theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Reiss, K. (2007). Leadership coaching for educators. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Reynolds, D., Teddlie, C. & Schaffer (2003). World class schools international perspectives on school effectiveness .New York:Routledge Falmer.
Riehl, C. (2000). The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: A reviewof normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration.Review of Educational Research, 70 (1), 55-81.
Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002).Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research. Quality & Quantity, 36,43–53.
Savage, T. V., Savage, M. K. (2010). Successful classroom management and discipline. Thousand Oake,CA: Corwin.
Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R.J.(1997). The foundation of educational effectiveness. New York: Elsevier.
Schein, E. H. (1922). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Scheurich, J. J. (2002). Anti-racist scholarship: An advocacy. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
Seidman, E.(1985). In the words of the faculty: Perspectives on improving teaching and educational quality in community colleges. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1984). Leadership and excellence in school. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 4-11.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship:A reflective practice perspective(3rd). Bosten, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2005). Strengthening the heartbeat: Leading and learning together in schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Shriberg, A. Shriberg, D. L. & Kumari, R. (2005). Practicing Leadership Principles and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons.
Stevenson, H. P. (2007). A case study in leading schools for social justice: when morals and markets collide. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(6),769 -781.
Strike, K. A. (1988). Ethical leadership in schools. Thousand Oake,CA: Corwin.
Strike, K. A. (2007). Ethical leadership in schools. Thousand Oake,CA: Corwin.
Theoharis, G. & Frattura, E. (2008). Leading from the Center: Social Justice Leadership in the District Office. Education and Urban Society ,41( 3), 1-25.
Theoharis, G. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theoryof social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2) 228-251.
Thomas, D. C. (2008). Cross-cultural management essential concepts. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Tillman,L.C. & scheurich, J.J.(2013). Handbook of research on educational leadership for diversity and equity, New York: Routledge.
Walker, A., D. (2012). Effective leadership in multi-ethnic School. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 592-609.
West, P. T. (1985). Educational public relations. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Pub.
Mathematics with Applications, 55, 2623-2630.
Wilson, A. B.(2013). Exploring the multicultural competence of leadership educators. Journal of Leadership Education. 12(2), 35-54.
Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE