:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:通用設計概念應用於大學校園開放空間評價之研究
書刊名:建築學報
作者:王維民 引用關係彭立沛陳楚翹
作者(外文):Wang, Wei-mingPeng, Li-peiChen, Chu-chiao
出版日期:2014
卷期:90
頁次:頁91-111
主題關鍵詞:通用設計大學校園開放空間模糊德爾菲法Universal designUniversity campusOpen spaceFuzzy Delphi method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:104
  • 點閱點閱:64
大學校園開放空間是構成現代大學重要的元素;然而,過去大學校園規劃卻多側重於建築與工程的硬體建設,校園開放空間僅被視為建築配置後的剩餘物,而欠缺整體環境發展與使用者互動之考量。通用設計是一為能創造最多數人使用、以促進使用者與環境友善互動的泛用式設計概念,而為相關規劃設計領域所廣泛應用。然因通用設計概念於應用時,多依賴於主觀感受認知的優先次序,故本研究主張當以通用設計概念應用於大學校園開放空間規劃設計時,應先建立一客觀整體評價模式以資依循。是以本研究先行藉由相關文獻回顧整合通用設計概念應用於大學校園開放空間規劃設計時的五大影響構面,包括:建設性、人性化、安全性、效益性和永續性,同時並彙整出構面下所涵蓋之51項可能影響因子。而後再透過模糊德爾菲法篩選出15項確切的評價準則與整併待評價的開放空間集合建立起整體評價架構;後續進一步援引產品性能計畫評價法進行個案對象之實際驗證。研究結果不僅能將實證案例現況之優劣具體評比呈現、以作為後續管理改善的依循基礎;整體評價模式也可作為未來相關大學校園規劃設計與評價時之參考。
Campus open space is an important component of a modern university. University campus planning frequently emphasize hardware constructions so that these open spaces have been empty spaces after the plan is drawn up and treated as on comprehensive environmental developments with little consideration of the interactions among users. Universal design is an approach to creating usability by all people to the greatest extent possible in order to intensify friendly interactions among users and environments for planning and design disciplines. However, because application of universal design concepts mostly relies on subjective perceptions for priority evaluations, this paper claims a need for establishing an objective and comprehensive evaluation for planning and design in terms of university campus open spaces. Therefore, this paper integrated universal design principles concerning university campus open spaces through review of the literature, and generalized five major dimensions: constructiveness, humanity, security, availability and sustainability, comprising 51 possible influential factors. The Fuzzy Delphi method was applied to extract 15 explicit criteria in order to establish a comprehensive evaluation. The product performance program method was then adopted to examine the practical evaluation on an empirical case. The results show that the evaluation could be not only to the advantage of management improvement in the empirical campus, but to be a reference for evaluating university campus planning and design in the future.
期刊論文
1.曾光宗(20070700)。都心型大學校園的限制與挑戰--新竹教育大學校園規劃課題之探討。設計學研究,10(1),91-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊敏芝(19960600)。都市開放空間設計指標建立之研究。朝陽學報,1,147-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳勁甫、蕭玉華(20080600)。國際會議地點選址評估模式之研究--模糊AHP法之應用。環境與管理研究,9(1),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.魚住早智子(1997)。世界商品へ導く新たな作法。日経デザイン,127,50-56。  延伸查詢new window
5.Afacan, Y.(2011)。Teaching universal design: An empirical research in interior architecture。Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,15,3185-3192。  new window
6.Afacan, Y.、Demirkan, H.(2010)。A priority-based approach for satisfying the diverse users' needs, capabilities and expectations: A universal kitchen design case。Journal of Engineering Design,21(2/3),315-343。  new window
7.Alshuwaikhat, H. M.、Abubakar, I.(2008)。An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: Assessment of the current campus environmental management practices。Journal of Cleaner Production,16,1777-1785。  new window
8.Gumprecht, B.(2007)。The campus as a public space in the American college town。Journal of Historical Geography,33,72-103。  new window
9.Mace, R. L.(1985)。Universal design: barrier free environments for everyone。Designers West,33(1),147-152。  new window
10.Pliner, S. M.、Johnson, J. R.(2004)。Historical, theoretical, and foundational principles of universal instructional design in higher education。Equity & Excellence in Education,37,105-113。  new window
11.Story, M. F.(1998)。Maximising usability: The principles of universal design。Assistive Technology,10,4-12。  new window
12.Trost, G.(2005)。State affairs in universal design。Fujitsu Science and Technology Journal,41(1),19-25。  new window
13.Wu, J. J.、Plantinga, A. J.(2003)。The influence of public open space on urban spatial structure。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,46(2),288-309。  new window
14.Thompson, C. Ward(2002)。Urban open space in the 21st century。Landscape and Urban Planning,60(2),59-72。  new window
15.Rowe, G.、Wright, G.、Bolger, F.(1991)。Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory。Technological Forecasting and Social Change,39(3),235-251。  new window
16.徐村和(19980800)。模糊德菲層級分析法。模糊系統學刊,4(1),59-72。  延伸查詢new window
17.李重毅(20110100)。通用設計與無障礙校園環境之建構。學校行政,71,73-89。  延伸查詢new window
18.Ishikawa, Akira、Amagasa, Michio、Shiga, Tetsuo、Tomizawa, Giichi、Tatsuta, Rumi、Mieno, Hiroshi(1993)。The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,55(3),241-253。  new window
19.Shen, Yung-Chi、Lin, Grace T. R.、Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung(2011)。Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection。Expert Systems with Applications,38(3),1468-1481。  new window
會議論文
1.吳信緯、游萬來、蔡登傳(1999)。通用設計概念應用於中文網頁設計原則的探討。中華民國設計學會第四屆學術研究成果研討會。台北市:中華民國設計學會。239-244。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wang, W. M.、Chen, C. C.(2012)。Universal design applied to establishing evaluation criteria for university campus open space。2012 International Conference on Business and Information。New Taipei City:ATISR。880-888。  new window
研究報告
1.黃定國、溫琇玲(1992)。建築基地開放空間暨避難空間設置之檢討與研究。新北市:內政部建築研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.周蓓珍(2009)。以通用設計探討中高齡者ATM操作之介面設計研究(碩士論文)。大同大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.管天麟(2011)。由通用設計理念探討高齡者使用公園步道之設計--以台北市大安森林公園為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃麗琪(1994)。大學校園開放空間管理體系之研究:以東海大學為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳楚翹(2012)。以通用設計建構於大學校園開放空間評價模式之研究--以中華大學為例(碩士論文)。中華大學,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭淳煜(2006)。大學校園規劃之營造形式管制之研究--以國立台灣大學與國立台灣海洋大學為例--(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭曼姝(2007)。應用人性化規劃理念於國立屏東科技大學校園空間規劃之研究(碩士論文)。屏東科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.謝憲一(2004)。從領域觀點探討特殊教育學校開放空間之研究--以國立桃園啟智學校為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳姿伶(2010)。從通用設計原則探討大學校園無障礙環境之研究--以成功大學為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.謝伯昌(1995)。都市開放性空間模式研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南。  延伸查詢new window
10.洪慧珊(2002)。校園開放空間使用者滿意度研究--以東華大學校園核心區為例(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.中川聰、張旭晴(2006)。通用設計的教科書。臺北:龍溪國際圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Story, Molly F.、Mueller, James L.、Mace, Ronald L.(1998)。The Universal Design File: Designing for People of All Ages and Abilities。Raleigh, NC:The Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University Press。  new window
3.中川聰(2008)。Universal Design通用設計的法則:從人性出發的設計學。博碩文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.余虹儀(2008)。愛X 通用設計:充滿愛與關懷的設計概念。台北市:網路與書。  延伸查詢new window
5.Trancik, R.、謝慶達(1989)。找尋失落空間的理論-都市設計理論。台北市:創興。  延伸查詢new window
6.Aslaksen, F.、Bergh, S.、Bringa, O. R.、Heggem, E. K.(1997)。Universal Design: Planning and Design for All。Oslo, NO:The Norwegian State Council on Disability。  new window
7.Marcus, C. C.、Francis, C.(1990)。People Places, Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space。NY:Van Nostrand Reinhold Company。  new window
8.Mace, R. L.(1988)。An introduction to the Americans with Disabilities Act. A teleconference tape。London:Architectural Association。  new window
9.Shirvani, H.(1981)。Urban Design Review: A Guide for Planners。Washington, D. C.:Planners Press。  new window
10.The Center for Universal Design(1997)。The Principles of Universal Design。NC:North Carolina State University。  new window
11.張有恆(1998)。運輸計畫評估與決策--模糊理論之探討與應用。台北:華泰文化事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃世孟(2005)。校園規劃理念與實踐。台北市:建築情報季刊。  延伸查詢new window
13.Noorderhaven, N. G.(1995)。Strategic Decision Making。Addison-Wesley。  new window
14.湯志民(1992)。學校建築與校園規畫。臺北:五南出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bremer, C. D.(2004)。Universal design in secondary and postsecondary education。Impact: Feature Issue on Achieving Secondary Education and Transition Results for Students with Disabilities。MN:University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration。  new window
2.Mace, R. L.、Hardie, G. J.、Plaice, J. P.(1991)。Accessible environments: Toward universal design。Design Interventions: Toward A More Human Architecture。NY:Van Nostrand Reinhold。  new window
3.Linstone, H. A.(1978)。The Delphi technique。Handbook of Futures Research。Greenwood Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE