:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:《老子》本性論探究
書刊名:臺北大學中文學報
作者:許宗興 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Chung-hsing
出版日期:2008
卷期:4
頁次:頁103-134
主題關鍵詞:道家老子本性論性善TaoismLao-tzuTheory of true natureGood nature
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:2031
  • 點閱點閱:78
「本性論」在探討吾人是否本具成就生命圓滿之質素,這在生命實踐哲學上是一重要論題,在中國主要哲學流派之儒釋道三家中,除道家外類皆明言人具此本質,故本文乃對道家始祖老子進行探究,以瞭知其對「本性論」之主張。 本文首依牟宗三先生「主觀體證境界」之詮釋系統,將老子哲學定位爲生命實踐哲學,它所追求之理想是「聖」,而聖之內涵爲「道」,故本文主要便在探究:在老子哲學系統中,「道」是否本具於吾人「性」中。 嚴格本性論需證明三命題:「吾人本具成聖質素」(本具)、「人人皆具成聖質素」(皆具)、「人人圓具成聖質素」(圓具)。本文依《老子》主「爲道」乃向內求取,且是經由銷解生命負面情愫,以創造「道」呈顯之有利條件,而讓「道」自然呈顯;據此證明「吾人本具成聖質素」。至於「皆具」與「圓具」,因《老子》僅五千言,限於資料,無法詳盡縝密論述此等主張;本文僅透過《老子》近似之論與消極性之證明入路,而謂《老子》在某種程度上亦主張「皆具」與「圓具」。 故本文以爲道家老子與儒釋兩家哲人,對本性論看法並無二致,雖然《老子》未做文字上明白宣示,但經由本文之探究,可知《老子》當是主張吾人本具成聖質素。
”True nature theory” intends to examine whether people have natural characters to achieve a satisfactory life, which is an important issue in the philosophy of life practice. Among Chinese mainstream philosophy in three schools of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism, theories suggest that humans are provided with this natural character except Taoism. This study intends to investigate ”true nature theory” by Lao-tzu, the ancestor of Taoism. Based on the interpretation system of ”state of subjective testimony” by Mr. Mou Tsung-san, we position the philosophy of Lao-tzu as a life practice philosophy. It pursues the ideal of ”holiness” with the content of ”doctrine”. This study intends to investigate: in the system of Lao-tzu philosophy, if ”doctrine” exists in humans' ”nature”. True nature theory needs to prove three assumptions: ”humans are provided with the nature of being a whole person” (originally provided), ”everyone is provided with the nature of being a whole person” (all provided), ”everyone is satisfactorily provided with the nature of being a whole person” (satisfactorily provided). Based on the theory of Lao Tzu, ”practice the doctrine” is to self-demand. It is to eliminate negative feelings and create a condition that is beneficial to demonstrate ”doctrine” so that the ”doctrine” can be naturally presented. So, it proves ”humans are originally provided with the nature of being a whole person”. As to ”all provided” and ”satisfactorily provided”, limited by the 5000 words of Lao-tzu, it cannot be explained in detail concerning the arguments. We can only argue that, to some extent, Lao Tzu suggests ”all provided” and ”satisfactorily provided” through Lao Tzu theories on similarity and inactivity. Hence, our study suggests that there is no difference regarding the theory of true nature among Taoism Lao-tzu, Confucianism and Buddhism. Without clear written statement by Lao Tzu, our study indicates Lao Tzu believes that humans are provided with the nature of being a whole person.
期刊論文
1.許宗興(20070100)。「中國生命實踐哲學」的範疇論。華梵人文學報,8,53-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.許宗興(20050100)。「孟子性善論」解析。華梵人文學報,4,31-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.牟宗三、盧雪崑(20040100)。老子《道德經》講演錄。鵝湖,29(7)=343,1-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳康(19640200)。What Does Lao-Tzu Mean by the Term "Tao"?。清華學報,4(2),150-161。  new window
5.郭沂(19970400)。從道論到心性之學--老子哲學之建立。哲學與文化,24(4)=275,351-368。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳德和(19990600)。略論老子的年代與思想--對劉笑敢《老子》的幾點質疑。鵝湖學誌,22,179-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.牟宗三(2003)。老子《道德經》講演錄(五)。鵝湖月刊,29(2)=338,5。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.牟宗三(2003)。老子《道德經》講演錄(八)。鵝湖月刊,29(5)=341。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王邦雄(1992)。徐復觀詮釋老子理路的研討。鵝湖月刊,18(4)=208。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.袁保新(1984)。老子形上思想之詮釋與重建(3)。鵝湖月刊,112。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.袁保新(1984)。老子形上思想之詮釋與重建(4)。鵝湖月刊,113。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.高柏園(2004)。論唐君毅先生的老子學。鵝湖月刊,348。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭志明(2005)。彰顯生命體道的工夫境界,《老子》的醫療觀。鵝湖月刊,357。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.嚴靈峰(1996)。老莊研究。臺北:臺灣中華。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳新民(2002)。中國行政法學原理。北京:中國政法大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃宗羲、全祖望、王梓材、黃百家(1975)。宋元學案。臺北:河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.牟宗三(1992)。心體與性體。臺北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.牟宗三(1987)。智的直覺與中國哲學。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.牟宗三(1983)。中國哲學十九講:中國哲學之簡述及其所涵蘊之問題。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳鼓應(1993)。老莊新論。五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.唐君毅(1984)。中國哲學原論.導論篇。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.方東美(1983)。中國哲學之精神及其發展。中國哲學之精神及其發展。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.徐復觀(1994)。中國本性論史(先秦篇)。中國本性論史(先秦篇)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(魏)王弼(2006)。老子四種,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE