:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從《儀禮.士喪禮》中的喪葬禮儀論先秦儒家喪葬觀--兼論墨家對「厚葬久喪」的批評
書刊名:修平人文社會學報
作者:陳月秋 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Yueh-chiu
出版日期:2010
卷期:15
頁次:頁33-54
主題關鍵詞:喪禮儀禮士喪禮儒家喪葬觀厚葬久喪Funeral ritualsShi SangliYiliThe Confucian concepts of funeral ceremonyLavish burial and long mourning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:80
  • 點閱點閱:215
熊十力先生《讀經示要》說:「死喪之禮,禮經最重,此是儒家精神所在」。而最早對儒家提出批評的墨家,對儒家批評最嚴厲的部份也正是儒家最重視的喪禮,墨子甚至以「足以喪天下」來批判儒家喪禮的「厚葬久喪」問題。儒家在各種闡發禮義的論述中,極力強調「喪禮」的根本精神,在於表現「生者追思亡者的哀戚之情」,具有「報本返始」的深意,這是一種美好的人文思想,為什麼會遭到這麼嚴厲的批評?由於儒家和墨家對喪禮的種種討論,都以當時實際的喪葬儀節為基礎,為充分了解儒家的喪葬觀及其受批判的是非真相,本文擬返本探源,先據《儀禮》與《禮記》的相關篇章整理儒家的喪葬觀與當時喪禮的具體儀節,進而與同時代文獻記載的喪葬現象比較,再參酌出土的考古資料來作觀察,以探「厚葬久喪」的原委。
“Funeral ceremony is greatly emphasized by the Book of Rites and represents the core of Confucian spirits,” quoted from the Essentials for Studying the Classics (讀經示要) by Xiong Shi-li (熊十力) . For the Mohist School, which hurled the first criticism on Confucianism, the most criticized part is ironically the most valued part of Confucianism. The criticism is so harsh as the Mohists remark that Confucian Lavish Burial and Long Mourning (厚葬久喪) would literally bury the country. In many discourses which expound on the meanings of rituals and justice (禮義), the Confucian scholars reiterate that the fundamental spirit of the funeral rituals is an expression of sadness and sorrow of the alive for the dead. However, if it is a beautiful humanistic idea containing a profound meaning of respecting and remembering the origin, why is the spirit severely criticized? Discussions of the Confucian and Mohist schools on funeral rituals were based on contemporary facts of funeral ceremony. In the view to fully understand what the Confucian school thinks of funeral ceremony and why the Confucian concept of funeral ceremony was being criticized, this paper traces back to the origin. Related chapters of Yili and the Book of Rites are plowed through to give a clear picture of the Confucian concepts of funeral rituals and their practical performance at that time; furthermore, contemporary documented funeral facts are compared with archeological data being observed to investigate the truth of Lavish Burial and Long Mourning.
期刊論文
1.孔德成。論儒家之「禮」。民主評論,7(13)。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳藝苑 許秀霞。儀禮士喪禮中的禮義。孔孟月刊,32(9)。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃啟方(19700800)。儀禮士喪禮中的喪俗。中國東亞學術研究計劃委員會年報,9,16-75。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳公柔(1956)。士喪禮、既夕禮中所記載的喪葬制度。考古學報,1956(4),67-84+142-143。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐福全(19800600)。儀禮士喪禮既夕禮儀節研究。國立臺灣師範大學國文研究所集刊,24(上),225-517。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃俊郎(19830600)。小戴禮記之喪禮理論研究。中華學苑,27,107-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林素英(20011200)。先秦儒家的喪葬觀。漢學研究,19(2)=39,83-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳公柔(1956)。儀禮士喪禮既夕禮儀節研究。考古學報,4。  延伸查詢new window
9.孔德成。論儒家之禮。民主評論,7(13)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.徐福全(197906)。儀禮士喪禮既夕禮儀節研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.韓碧琴(1996)。儀禮鄭註句讀校記。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
2.李滌生(1984)。荀子集解。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.李漁叔(1972)。墨子今註今譯。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.朱筱新(1994)。中國古代禮儀制度。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.王先謙(197907)。荀子集解。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.林素英(19970000)。古代生命禮儀中的生死觀:以〈禮記〉為主的現代詮釋。臺北:文津。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.王貴民(1993)。中國禮俗史。文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.王夢鷗(1987)。禮記今註今譯。台北:台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.林品石註譯(1983)。《呂氏春秋今註今譯》。  延伸查詢new window
10.林品石(1983)。呂氏春秋今註今譯。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE