:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:磨課師設計類學習者自我效能與學習表現之關係
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:劉光夏 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Kuang-hsia
出版日期:2016
卷期:272
頁次:頁88-102
主題關鍵詞:自我效能設計類學習者學習表現磨課師Self-efficacyDesign learnersLearning performanceMOOCs
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:63
  • 點閱點閱:15
本文探討在磨課師學習模式下,設計類學習者自我效能與學習表現之關係性。本研究以修習磨課師「數位影像創作」課程之大學一年級學生做為研究對象,透過問卷調查法及數位作品評量來蒐集相關資料。結果顯示:一、磨課師設計類學習者整體自我效能表現高於中間值,但對此學習模式仍感到壓力;二、磨課師設計類學習者整體學習表現佳,且男生在影像創作的技能表現傾向優於女生;三、磨課師設計類學習者自我效能與學習表現的相關性未達顯著,但整體自我效能與「美感構圖」及「技能運用」兩個面向達到顯著相關;且高自我效能學習者,在「技能運用」分項之表現,顯著優於低自我效能學生。期望本研究結果能提供磨課師教師啟示,並對臺灣大學設計教育在數位時代下的發展有所助益。
This study focuses on the relationship between self-efficacy and learning performance of design learners under the MOOCs’ learning model. The research subjects of this study were first-year graduate students in a “digital image creation” course, and data were collected by means of a questionnaire survey and the assessment of digital artworks. The results indicated: First, the MOOCs’ design learners were highly aware of self-efficacy, but felt pressure with this new learning model. Secondly, the overall leaning performance of MOOCs’ design learners were above average, and male students tended to have better performance in the dimension “use of skills” than female students. Thirdly, there was a negative correlation between self-efficacy and learning performance among MOOCs’ design learners, but a significant positive relationship in the dimension “aesthetic design” and “use of skills.” In addition, students who had high self-efficacy had significantly better performance in the use of skills than students who had low self-efficacy. It is hoped that the findings will provide some insight for instructors to design suitable curriculum for MOOCs’ learners and contribute to the improvement of design teaching in the information age.
期刊論文
1.Hsieh, P.、Sullivan, J. R.、Guerra, N. S.(2007)。A closer look at college students: Self-efficacy and goal orientation。Journal of advanced academics,18(3),454-476。  new window
2.陳瑋婷(20111200)。自我效能、學習策略與學業成就之關係研究:結合後設分析與結構方程模式。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,4(2),83-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Wang, C. H.、Shannon, D. M.、Ross, M. E.(2013)。Students' characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning。Distance Education,34(3),302-323。  new window
4.梁茂森(19980600)。國中生學習自我效能量表之編製。教育學刊,14,155-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Pajares, F.(1996)。Self-efficacy beliefs in academic setting。Review of Educational Research,66(4),543-578。  new window
6.Multon, Karen D.、Brown, Steven D.、Lent, Robert W.(1991)。Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation。Journal of Counseling Psychology,38(1),30-38。  new window
7.李堅萍、游光昭、朱益賢(2008)。自我效能影響創作性技能之發展階層研究--以陶藝拉坯技能為例。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳清山(2013)。教育名詞--磨課師。教育資料與研究,111,267-268。  延伸查詢new window
9.教育部高教司(2015)。清華大學第一所認可MOOCs學分的大學。高教創新,2,28-29。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ahrache, S. I. E.、Badir, H.、Tabaa, Y.、Medouri, A.(2013)。Massive open online courses: A new awn for higher education?。International Journal on Computer Science & Engineering,5(5),323-327。  new window
11.Hampton, N. Z.、Mason, E.(2003)。Learning disabilities, gender, sources of self-efficacy, self-efficacy beliefs, and academic achievement in high school students。Journal of School Psychology,41,101-112。  new window
12.Martinez, C. T.、Kock, N.、Cass, J.(2011)。Pain and pleasure in short essay writing: Factors predicting university students' writing anxiety and writing self-efficacy。Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,54(5),351-360。  new window
13.Onoda, Sakae(20130100)。Investigation of the Relationships among Self-efficacy, Willingness to Communicate and English Speaking Skills。SPECTRUM,10,43-55。new window  new window
14.李堅萍(20061200)。工藝技能學習成效與自我效能之相關性研究。藝術教育研究,12,39-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.王淑玲、蔡今中(2004)。社會認知論中自我調制學習在網路合作設計之應用與評估 (計畫編號:NSC90-2520-S-011-001)。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃佳琳(2007)。學習者在網路教學環境中自我效能、學習策略與學習成就之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂麗儀(2009)。電腦自我效能與網路自我效能對資管系學生學習成效與工作選擇意圖之影響(碩士論文)。明新科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔣葆琳(2002)。大學生在非同步網路教學環境中自我效能研究(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hutchins, H. M.(2004)。Enhancing skill maintenance through relapse prevention strategies: A comparison of two models(博士論文)。University of North Texas。  new window
5.杜依倩(2014)。大學教師參與MOOCs之科技需求及問題研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Social Learning Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
2.Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York:Freeman。  new window
3.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.Glance, D. G.,Forsey, M.,Riley, M.(2013)。The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses,http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4350/3673。  new window
2.Biemiller, L.(2014)。Colleges race to keep up with technology change,http://chronicle.com/article/Almanac-2014-Students/148151/。  new window
3.Mangan, K.(2012)。A first for Udacity: A U.S. university will accept transfer credit for one of its courses,https://chronicIe.com/article/A-First-for-Udacity-Transfer/134162/。  new window
4.McGuire, R.(2014)。The best MOOC provider: A review of Coursera, Udacity and edX.,http://www.skilledup.com/articles/the-best-mooc-provider-a-review-of-coursera-udacity-and-edx。  new window
5.Sidorko, P. E.(2013)。MOOC and SPOCs: Where is the library?,http://hdl.handle.net/10722/198282。  new window
6.Top Ten Online Colleges(2014)。The rising power of MOOCs: Now, everyone can learn at Harvard,http://www.top10onlinecolleges.org/mooc/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Schunk, D. H.(1989)。Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning。Research on motivation in education。San Diego, CA。  new window
2.劉光夏(2016)。MOOC融入新世代藝術教學之實踐研究:以「數位影像創作」課程為例。面對新世代的課程實踐。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE