:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:全球跨域治理浪潮中的「客家文化重點發展區」議題:建構「客家地域發展計畫」之芻議
書刊名:客家公共事務學報
作者:鄭春發 引用關係
作者(外文):Cheng, Chun-fa
出版日期:2015
卷期:12
頁次:頁45-68
主題關鍵詞:客家文化重點發展區客家政策特定區域計畫國土計畫Hakka culture development areaHakka policyHakka region planTaiwan region plan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:209
  • 點閱點閱:22
2010年公布之《客家基本法》為客家族群保障與發展的重要圭臬。面對世界趨同的潮流,客家文化產業能否創造差異,趨異成為客家發展競爭力關鍵。另一方面,由歐洲共同體、北北基等跨區域整合的形成,到莫拉克風災引發河川治理、地方防救災的跨區議題,讓我們體悟到跨域治理已是全球必然趨勢。然而,在《客家基本法》現行體制下,傳統客家地域的發展卻面臨著客庄分處不同行政轄區,各自發展而無法形成客庄空間整體發展構想,例如,「桐花祭」為客庄帶來新的發展契機,這樣無心插柳的客家行銷,卻讓「桐花」與「客家」劃上相同的文化符號。客家文化正走向了一致性(趨同),同時間也抹煞了不少真正的在地客家文化,掩蓋了樸實客庄獨特的美麗。 本研究發現《客家基本法》未訂施行細則,以鄉鎮市區為空間單位的「客家文化重點發展區」未考量到行政區區劃的更動,以及明清時期形成的傳統客庄與今日鄉鎮範圍截然不同,特別是民俗文化、產業發展原本就是跨域發展的活動,受現行行政組織機器的思考,而無法跳脫行政框架。因此,需要一個客家發展政策(白皮書),更需要一個客家空間發展計畫的藍圖指引。本研究建議,應依2014年元月行政院修訂之《區域計畫法》規定,由客家委員會與內政部營建署會商研擬全國「客家特定區域計畫」。
The movement of 1988 “recollecting my mother tongue” parade, opened the Hakka language awareness, prompting the government to rebuild a pluralistic liberal language policy. In 2010, the Hakka basic law bred in this context. Since then, the Hakka Basic Law is safeguard and development of the main pillar. However, when the world is convergence into a trend, could it make a difference, otherwise divergence has become competitive sources. On the other hand, from European Community has cross-regional integration to Morakot disaster, river governance, ecological conservation, and waste processing, these have made us understand the importance of cross-boundary governance. However, geographical of development of the original traditional Hakka is faced with the locations in different administrative areas, and cannot be formed as a Hakka village. Moreover, the opportunity of “Hakka Tung Blossom Festival” for local industries that has become the unintentional Hakka marketing and allowed the “flowers” and “Hakka” marked by the same cultural symbols. Current announcements of the development of Hakka culture the Hakka basic law remain a negative definition, the design of grants program cannot clearly guide by the Hakka counties, towns, and even the development of Hakka. The paper found the Hakka Basic Law did not set purposes rules. For township urban for space scale, it did not considered to district division of changes, and in Ming and Qing dynasties, and day rule period city and today township range has different, now administrative organization machine of thinking, Hakka culture industry development failed to jumped de geographical, and across departments will be integrated, and folk culture and industry development become more and across domain development. The existing over emphasized on Hakka policy “people” culture, ignored culture rooted in the man-land relationship, in particular, in the face of global rise in local, culture, identity, sense of place. Therefore, we should need a Hakka development policy or white paper, but any policy required a blueprint for spatial development guidelines and planning system in national land planning law. According to the 2014 the Executive Yuan’s revised the regional planning law, the Hakka commission and the Ministry of the Interior Department have to consultant with developing “Hakka plans in specific areas.”
期刊論文
1.王保鍵(20120900)。「客家文化重點發展區」的發展途徑。城市學學刊,3(2),33-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文尚、黃士哲(19981100)。區域尺度的風格研究--一個地理學實踐的核心議題。環境與世界,2,15-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭春發(20141100)。由1915年日治國勢調查檢視六堆地區客家族群分布與社經特性。臺北市立大學學報,45(2),37-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.顧朝林、曠薇、徐玲玲(2007)。新自由主義地理學。世界地理研究,16(4),5-18。  延伸查詢new window
5.王秋原、趙建雄、何致中(19970500)。區域地理研究的探討。國立臺灣大學理學院地理學系地理學報,22,83-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.李俊霖、黃書禮、詹士樑(20070900)。生態永續思潮下之國土資源保育。都市與計劃,34(3),167-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.吳綱立(2007)。從西方近代都市設計思潮的發展看台灣都市設計專業的定位。建築學報,55,111-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.施正峰(2013)。王保鍵、邱榮舉:《台灣客家運動--《客家基本法》》。全球客家研究,1,235-244。  延伸查詢new window
9.富田芳郎、許粵華(1955)。台灣鄉鎮之研究。台灣銀行季刊,7(3),85-100。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭春發(20150600)。由日治時期不同尺度的人口資料與地圖看六堆客庄傳統地域。臺中教育大學學報. 人文藝術類,29(1),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Groth, N. B.(2000)。Urban system between policy and geography。Regional Studies,34(6),571-580。  new window
12.Hart, J. F.(1982)。The highest form of the geographer's art。Association of American Geographers,72(1),1-29。  new window
13.Harvey, D.(1995)。Globalization in question。Rethinking Marxism,5(4),1-17。  new window
14.田上智宜(20120600)。Symbolic Ethnicity among the Taiwanese Hakka: An Analysis of the Hakka Basic Law。臺灣國際研究季刊,8(2),173-190。new window  new window
會議論文
1.吳連賞、鄭春發(2004)。港市互依的發展機制與課題之研究。高雄建市80年暨打狗開港140年學術研討會。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
2.李建平(2009)。發展全球關聯導向的地理課程設計與理解多元文化。社會學習領域教學精進研討會。台中:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.立法院(2010)。委員會紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.施雅軒(2001)。竹苗區域的變遷歷程--新區域地理的歷史分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭春發(2011)。再尺度化的都市區域--由能值評估論全球化下高屏城鄉的時空變遷(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cloke, P.、Philo, C.、Sadler, D.(1991)。Approaching Human Geography: An Introduction to Contemporary Theoretical Debates。New York:Guildford Press。  new window
2.行政院客家委員會(2011)。99年至100年全國客家人口基礎資料調查研究。臺北:行政院客家委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Roland, Robertson(1992)。Globalization: Society Theory and Global Culture。London:Sage Publication。  new window
4.施正鋒(2004)。台灣客家族群政治與政策。台中:新新台灣文化教育基金會。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.內政部(2013)。全國區域計畫。台北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bake, Alan R. H.(2003)。Geography and history geography and history: Bridging the divide。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Crang, M.(1998)。Cultural geography。London:Routledge。  new window
8.林正慧(20080000)。六堆客家與清代屏東平原。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Burt, Tim(2003)。Scale: Upscaling and Downscaling in Physical Geography。Key Concepts in Geography。London:SAGE Publications。  new window
2.丘昌泰(2009)。台灣客家族群的社團參與與族群認同。客家族群與文化再現。台北:智勝文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE