科學想像力學習進程之驗證：測量觀點__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	科學想像力學習進程之驗證：測量觀點
書刊名：	教育心理學報
作者：	王佳琪／何曉琪／鄭英耀／邱文彬
作者(外文)：	Wang, Chia-chi／Ho, Hsiao-chi／Cheng, Ying-yao／Chiou, Wen-bin
出版日期：	2017
卷期：	49:1
頁次：	頁69-94
主題關鍵詞：	科學想像力；學習進程；BEAR評量系統；Rasch部份給分模式；BEAR assessment system；Learning progression；Rasch partial credit model；Scientific imagination
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:305 點閱:20

本研究旨在以Wang、Ho 和Cheng（2015）所發展的科學想像力學習進程為架構，提出一個國小三至六年級學生科學想像力之假設性學習進程模式，運用BEAR 評量系統以實徵證據驗證，進而修編科學想像力情境測驗，試圖釐清科學想像力的核心概念與發展途徑。研究對象分為評量工具施測對象為臺灣國小三至六年級學生共767 名；另依據研究結果，訪談兩名指導科學發明展且獲獎無數的自然科績優教師。研究工具有科學想像力情境測驗、心像問卷修編版和訪談大綱。資料分析方面，本研究採用Rasch部份給分模式分析學生在科學想像力情境測驗的反應，提供量表的多元效度證據（Wolfe & Smith, 2007），並輔以訪談資料解釋結果。研究結果指出，運用BEAR評量架構和Rasch測量模式的分析，能開發具多元效度證據的科學想像力之學習進程評量工具；結果亦支持科學想像力的學習進程由「漫想力、聯想力、奇想力、妙想力」所發展之理論假設。最後，針對「科學想像力學習進程」的應用，提出未來研究之建議。

以文找文

This study aimed to validate a learning progression (LP) for the scientific imagination (Authors, 2015) based on a measurement approach using the BEAR Assessment System (BAS; Wilson, 2005, 2009) in an attempt to better understand the core ideas and developmental path of the scientific imagination process as well as align curriculum, instruction, and assessment through LP. Participants in this study were selected from Taiwan and classified into two categories. The first category, which included 767 third to sixth grade elementary school students, was administered the Scientific Imagination Test-Verbal (SIT-Verbal). The second category consisted of two award-winning teachers who were interviewed in order to achieve more information for the LP. The SIT-Verbal, Imagery Questionnaire, and the outline of interview were used in this study. Among these, the SIT-Verbal covered four key components of the scientific imagination process: brainstorming, association, transformation/elaboration, and conceptualization/organization/formation. The Imagery Questionnaire covered imagery ability, which could generate imagery, objects, and pictures in one’s mind. For analysis, the multiple validities (Wolfe & Smith, 2007) of the SIT-Verbal were assessed using the Rasch partial credit model. The findings showed that (1) the BEAR assessment system and Rasch measurement approaches provided a feasible framework for developing validated tools to assess the LP of scientific imagination; (2) the empirical data supported that students' scientific imagination progressed ＂from brainstorming, association, and transformation/elaboration to conceptualization/organization/formation.＂ Implications for the assessments with the LPs and revisions for both the SIT-Verbal and the scientific imagination LP are also proposed.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Lee, H.-S.、Liu, O. L.(2010)。Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective。Science Education，94(4)，665-688。
2.	Briggs, D. C.、Alonzo, A. C.、Schwab, C.、Wilson, M.(2006)。Diagnostic Assessment With Ordered Multiple-Choice Items。Educational Assessment，11(1)，33-63。
3.	王依仁、葉忠達、江怡瑩(20120500)。國小六年級學童的繪畫創作想像力研究。藝術教育研究，23，105-137。延伸查詢
4.	Plummer, J. D.、Krajcik, J. S.(2010)。Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth-based perspective。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，47(7)，768-787。
5.	Freidenreich, H. B.、Duncan, R. G.、Shea, N.(2011)。Exploring middle school students, understanding of three conceptual models in genetics。International Journal of Science Educa- tion，33(17)，2323-2349。
6.	Raju, N. S.、Price, L. R.、Oshima, T. C.、Nering, M. L.(2007)。Standardized conditional SEM: A case for conditional reliability。Applied Psychological Measurement，31(3)，169-180。
7.	Songer, N. B.、Gotwals, A. W.(2012)。Guiding explanation construction by children at the entry points of learning progressions。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，49，141-165。
8.	Alonzo, A. C.、Steedle, J. T.(2009)。Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression。Science Education，93(3)，389-421。
9.	Songer, N. B.、Kelcey, B.、Gotwals, A. W.(2009)。How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，46(6)，610-631。
10.	Adadan, E.、Trundle, K. C.、Irving, K. E.(2010)。Exploring grade 11 students' conceptual pathways of the particulate nature of matter in the context of multirepresentational instruction。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，47(8)，1004-1035。
11.	Duschl, R.、Maeng, S.、Sezen, A.(2011)。Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis。Studies in Science Education，47(2)，123-182。
12.	Shea, N. A.、Duncan, R. G.(2013)。From theory to data: The process of refining learning progressions。Journal of the Learning Sciences，22(1)，7-32。
13.	邱發忠、陳學志、林耀南、涂莉苹(20121200)。想像力構念之初探。教育心理學報，44(2)，389-410。延伸查詢
14.	Ward, Thomas B.(1994)。Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation。Cognitive Psychology，27(1)，1-40。
15.	許育齡、梁朝雲、林志成(20130600)。教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究。當代教育研究，21(2)，113-148。延伸查詢
16.	Zabriskie, B.(2004)。Imagination as laboratory。Journal of Analytical Psychology，49(2)，235-242。
17.	Wood, K. D.、Endres, C.(2004)。Motivating student interest with the imagine, elaborate, predict, and confirm (IEPC) strategy。The Reading Teacher，58(4)，346-357。
18.	Wilson, M.(2009)。Measuring processions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，46(6)，716-730。
19.	Wang, C.-C.、Ho, H.-C.、Wu, J.-J.、Cheng, Y.-Y.(2014)。Development of the scientific imagination model: A concept-mapping perspective。Thinking Skills and Creativity，13，106-119。
20.	Wang, C.-C.、Ho, H.-C.、Cheng, Y.-Y.(2015)。Building a learning progression for scientific imagination: A measurement approach。Thinking Skills and Creativity，17，1-14。
21.	Robinson, A.(2010)。Chemistry's visual origins: Vivid imagination was key to unlocking the secrets of molecular structure in the nineteenth century。Nature，465，36。
22.	Ren, Fujun、Li, Xiuj、Zhang, Huiliang、Wang, Lihui(2012)。Progression of Chinese students' creative imagination from elementary through high school。International Journal of Science Education，34(13)，2043-2059。
23.	Pendry, John B.、Schurig, David、Smith, David R.(2006)。Controlling electromagnetic fields。Science，312(5781)，1780-1782。
24.	Hadzigeorgiou, Y.、Stefanich, G.(2000)。Imagination in science education。Contemporary Education，71(4)，23-28。
25.	Ho, H.-C.、Wang, C.-C.、Cheng, Y.-Y.(2013)。Analysis of the scientific imagination process。Thinking Skills and Creativity，10，68-78。
26.	Campbell, K. H. S.、Mcwhir, J.、Ritchie, W. A.、Wilmut, I.(1996)。Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line。Nature，380，64-66。
27.	Cruz, H. D.、Smedt, J. D.(2010)。Science as structured imagination。Journal of Creative Behavior，44(1)，37-52。
28.	Wang, W.-C.(2008)。Assessment of differential item functioning。Journal of Applied Measurement，9(4)，387-408。
29.	Claesgens, J.、Scalise, K.、Wilson, M.、Stacy, A.(2009)。Mapping student understanding in chemistry: The perspectives on chemists。Science Education，93(1)，56-85。
30.	Duncan, R. G.、Hmelo-Silver, C. E.(2009)。Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，46(6)，606-609。
31.	Mohan, L.、Chen, J.、Anderson, C. W.(2009)。Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，46(6)，675-698。
32.	Plummer, J. D.、Palma, C.、Flarend, A.、Rubin, K.、Ong, Y. S.、Botzer, B.、McDonald, S.、Furman, T.(2015)。Development of a learning progression for the formation of the solar system。International Journal of Science Education，37(9)，1381-1401。
33.	Steedle, J. T.、Shavelson, R. J.(2009)。Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，46(6)，699-715。
34.	Elmesky, R.(2013)。Building capacity in understanding foundational biology concepts: A K-12 learning progression in genetics informed by research on children's thinking and learning。Research in Science Education，43(3)，1155-1175。
35.	王精文、黃琬婷、李建道(20160300)。運用抽象概念結合思考模式對管院學生想像力的激發。教育心理學報，47(3)，373-390。延伸查詢
36.	Al-Balushi, Sulaiman M.(20091200)。Factors Influencing Pre-Service Science Teachers' Imagination at the Microscopic Level in Chemistry。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education，7(6)，1089-1110。
37.	Berland, L. K.、McNeill, K. L.(2010)。A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts。Science Education，94(5)，765-793。
38.	Black, P.、Wilson, M.、Yao, S. Y.(2011)。Road maps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions。Measurement，9，71-123。
39.	Blajenkova, O.、Kozhevnikov, M.、Motes, M. A.(2006)。Object-spatial imagery: A new self-report imagery questionnaire。Applied Cognitive Psychology，20，239-263。
40.	Cooper, M. M.、Underwood, S. M.、Hilley, C. Z.、Klymkowsky, M. W.(2012)。Development and assessment of a molecular structure and properties learning progression。Journal of Chemical Education，89，1351-1537。
41.	Cullen, D. M.(2015)。Modeling instruction: A learning progression that makes high school chemistry more coherent to students。Journal of Chemical Education，92，1269-1272。
42.	Dilek, D.(2009)。The reconstruction of the past through images: An iconographic analysis on the historical imagination usage skills of primary school pupils。Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice，9(2)，665-689。
43.	Duncan, Ravit Golan、Castro-Faix, Moraima、Choi, Jinnie(20160400)。Informing a Learning Progression in Genetics: Which Should Be Taught First, Mendelian Inheritance or the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology?。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education，14(3)，445-472。
44.	Duncan, R. G.、Rivet, A. E.(2013)。Science learning progressions。Science，339，396-397。
45.	Duncan, R. G.、Rogat, A. D.、Yarden, A.(2009)。A learning progression for deepening students' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，46(6)，655-674。
46.	Gallas, K.(2001)。Look, Karen, I'm running like Jell-O: Imagination as a question, a topic, a tool for literacy research and learning。Research in the Teaching of English，35，457-492。
47.	Gotwals, A. W.、Songer, N. B.(2013)。Validity evidence for learning progression-based assessment items that fuse core disciplinary ideas and science practices。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，50，597-626。
48.	Hernandez, M. I.、Couso, D.、Pinto, R.(2015)。Analyzing students' learning progressions throught a teaching sequence on acoustic properties of materials with a model-based inquiry approach。Journal of Science Education and Technology，24，356-377。
49.	Jin, H.、Anderson, C. W.(2012)。A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，49(9)，1149-1180。
50.	Johnson, P.、Tymms, P.(2011)。The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，48，849-877。
51.	Schwarz, C. V.、Reiser, B. J.、Davis, E. A.、Kenyon, L.、Achér, A.、Fortus, D.、Shwartz, Y.、Hug, B.、Krajcik, J.(2009)。Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，46(6)，632-654。
52.	Sevian, H.、Talanquer, V.(2014)。Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking。Chemistry Education Research and Practice，15(1)，10-23。
53.	Smith, C. L.、Wiser, M.、Anderson, C. W.、Krajcik, J.(2006)。Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory。Measurement，14，1-98。
54.	Stevens, S. Y.、Delgado, C.、Krajcik, J. S.(2010)。Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter。Journal of Research in Science teaching，47(6)，687-715。
55.	Cheng, Y.-Y.、Wang, W.-C.、Ho, Y.-H.(2009)。Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma。Educational and Psychological Measurement，69(3)，369-388。
56.	Eckhoff, A.、Urbach, J.(2008)。Understanding imaginative thinking during childhood: Sociocultural conceptions of creativity and imaginative thought。Early Childhood Education Journal，36(2)，179-185。
57.	LeBoutillier, N.、Marks, D. F.(2003)。Mental imagery and creativity: A meta-analytic review study。British Journal of Psychology，94(1)，29-44。
58.	Linacre, J. M.(1998)。Thurstone thresholds and the Rasch model。Rasch Measurement Transactions，12(2)，634-635。
59.	Masters, G. N.(1982)。A Rasch model for partial credit scoring。Psychometrika，47(2)，149-174。
60.	Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich(2004)。Imagination and Creativity in Childhood。Journal of Russian and East European Psychology，42(1)，7-97。
61.	Wolfe, E. W.、Smith, E. V. Jr.(2007)。Understanding Rasch measurement: Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II--Validation activities。Journal of Applied Measurement，8(2)，204-234。
62.	Mednick, Sarnoff A.(1962)。The Associative Basis of the Creative Process。Psychological Review，69(3)，220-232。
63.	Zarnowski, Myra(2009)。The thought experiment: An imaginative way into civic literacy。Social Studies，100(2)，55-62。
64.	Schumacker, R. E.、Smith, E. V. Jr.(2007)。Reliability: A Rasch perspective。Educational and Psychological Measurement，67(3)，394-409。

會議論文
1.	Smith, C.、Wiser, M.、Carraher, D.(2010)。Using a comparative, longitudinal study with upper elementary school students to test some assumptions of a learning progression for matter。NARST。Philaelphia, PA。

研究報告
1.	詹志禹(2010)。「未來想像與創意人才培育」中程個案計畫 (計畫編號：MOE-100-2-2-B005)。台北：教育部。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Holland, P. W.、Wainer, H.(1993)。Differential item functioning。Hillsdale, New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
2.	Wilson, M. R.(2005)。Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
3.	Osbom, A. F.(1953)。Applied imagination。New York：Charles Scribner's Sons。
4.	Sternberg, Robert J.、Williams, Wendy M.(1996)。How to develop student creativity。Alexandria, Virginia：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。
5.	Amabile, T. M.(1996)。Creativity in context。Westview Press。
6.	American Educational Research Association、American Psychological Association、National Council on Measurement in Education(1999)。Standards for educational and psychological testing。Washington, DC：American Educational Research Association。
7.	Miles, Mathew B.、Huberman, A. Michael(1994)。Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods。Sage Publications。
8.	鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學：理論與實踐。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。延伸查詢
9.	Wilson, M.(2004)。Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。

其他
1.	Wu, M. L.，Adams, R. J.，Wilson, M. R.(2007)。ConQuest，Camberwell, Victoria：Australian Council for Educational Research。
2.	The Next Generation Science Standards(2013)。Appendix H: Understanding the scientific enterprise: The nature of science in the next generation science standards，http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/Appendix%20H%20-%20The%20Nature%20of%20Science%20in%20the%20Next%20Generation%20Science%20Standards%204.15.13.pdf。
3.	科技部(2012)。98 年度--「想像力與科技研究／實作能力培育」整合型計畫徵求書，http://www.nsc.gov.tw/sci/ct.asp?xItem=16326&ctNode=3395。延伸查詢
4.	教育部(2012)。未來想像與創意人才培育計畫--計畫緣起，http://hss.edu.tw/wSite/ct?xItem=2937&ctNode=274&mp=2。延伸查詢
5.	Gale, B.，Zemeckis, R.(1989)。Back to the future，http://www.echinsicler.io/things-back-to-the-future-z-got-right-2015-10。

圖書論文
1.	National Research Council(2006)。Systems for state science assessment。Committee on testing design on K-12 Science achievement。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。
2.	National Research Council(2007)。Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8。Committee on Science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade。Washington, DC：The National Academy Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	電子繪本對發展遲緩與非發展遲緩幼兒之閱讀腦波注意力與繪本理解表現影響之研究
2.	想像力與不同幽默風格對幼兒音樂教師工作滿意度之影響
3.	「教」在疫情蔓延時--一所大型華語中心的線上教學及其啟示
4.	理性與偏見：利得與損失的轉職心理知覺及其影響
5.	想像與現實的交織：設計領域想像-創造歷程之建構
6.	高職學生攝影想像力量表之編製
7.	強調寫生與自由聯想之教學策略應用於全盲青少年圖像創造力之養成
8.	科學想像力歷程模式融入工程教育課程之教學效果
9.	景觀敘事應用於植物園之解說效果評估--以國立自然科學博物館植物園為例
10.	體育教學新嘗試--翻轉教學策略在進階棒球打擊教學上可行性之探討
11.	科學想像力圖形測驗之驗證
12.	家長和幼兒科技產品使用現況與幼兒專注力之關聯
13.	運用AR技術探討沿海文化雕塑造型建構
14.	國中教師運用數位教材於英語教學之認知、態度與行為意向之相關研究
15.	探討科學想像力融入國小自然科課程單元之成效：以「簡單力學--力與運動」單元為例

1.	以眼球追蹤技術探討不同後設認知能力護生在圖文表徵的辨識歷程之研究
2.	大學生品味、創意自我效能、廚藝創造力關係之研究
3.	國小差異化閱讀教學之言說分析
4.	校園空間美學之教育論述與實踐－一位國小校長之自傳俗民誌研究
5.	閱讀與記憶策略在公職考試應用之研究
6.	國小學童數學文字題解題自我調整學習策略、文字題閱讀理解與文字題解題表現關聯模式之建構與驗證—以因倍數單元為例
7.	西漢儒家知識理論探析
8.	聆聽音樂對設計師構想發展階段之創意構想內容影響研究
9.	定向越野的美學體驗
10.	想像力教學模式建構與驗證
11.	科學探究歷程想像力測驗發展及其相關因素之研究
12.	阿茲海默氏失智症患者語言使用能力之研究
13.	大學生品味能力、創意自我效能與個人創意關係之研究：創意支持的影響
14.	建構曖昩錯視圖形設計研究
15.	科學想像力學習進程之驗證

1.	知天者：西漢儒家知識理論探索
2.	老人心理學
3.	視覺藝術教育的理論建構與實踐 : 審美關懷教學行動研究
4.	華語文教材分級研制原理之建構
5.	數學閱讀指導的理論與實務
6.	解嚴前後國小社會科教科書中的臺灣圖像
7.	資源教室方案 : 班級經營與補救教學
8.	心身優勢活出精華：以世界運動名人格言為借鏡
9.	音樂治療
10.	語言學與詩歌詮釋
11.	認知與教學
12.	古代禮俗左右之辨研究 : 以三禮為中心
13.	有意義的學習 : 概念構圖之研究
14.	多元評量
15.	數位原生圖像認知之探究及其在教學上的應用

無相關著作

1.	科學想像力歷程模式融入工程教育課程之教學效果
2.	想像與現實的交織：設計領域想像-創造歷程之建構
3.	科學想像力圖形測驗之驗證
4.	探討科學想像力融入國小自然科課程單元之成效：以「簡單力學--力與運動」單元為例
5.	幼兒想像力教學模式課程實踐之行動研究
6.	想像力教學模式建構與驗證
7.	科學探究歷程想像力測驗發展及其相關因素之研究

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫