參 考 書 目
壹、中文部分
丁一顧、張德銳（民90）。中小學校長評鑑制度的比較分析與改革芻議。載於國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所（主編）。中小學校長專業成長制度規劃（頁115-146）。高雄：復文。
朱淑雅（民88）。校長評鑑制度之初探。國民教育，40(2)，98-103。
江文雄（民66）。當前國民中小學人事制度之檢討與改進。師友月刊，125，80。
江文雄（民87）。校長評鑑可行性探討。教師天地雙月刊，96，10-18。
江文雄（民88）。校長做得好，不必怕評鑑：談校長評鑑的觀念。教育資料與研究雙月刊，28，17-21。
江文雄等（民88）。台北市中小學校長評鑑方案之探討。台北市政府教育局委託研究論文，台北。
李慈純（民88）。國民小學校長遴選制度之研究。國立台中師範學院國民就愈研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。
吳政達（民88）。國民小學教師評鑑指標體系建構之研究：模糊德菲術、模糊層級分析法與模糊綜合評估法之應用。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北。吳美蓮、林俊毅（民86）。人力資源管理：理論與實務。台北：智勝文化。
吳清山（民90）。中小學實施校長評鑑的挑戰課題與因應策略。教育研究月刊，84，28-36。吳德業（民90）。苗栗縣國民小學校長評鑑制度實施現況之調查研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所學校行政碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
吳錦森（民89）。國民小學校長評鑑制度之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。
林文生（民88）。校長評鑑制度的問題、省思與前瞻。國民教育，39（6），107-112。
林欽榮（民87）。人事管理。台北：前程。
侯世昌等（民89）。台北縣國民小學校長評鑑之研究。行政院八十八年研考經費補助研究論文，台北。
倪靜貴（民90）。國民中學校長評鑑制度之研究。載於國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所（主編）。中小學校長專業成長制度規劃（頁255-275）。高雄：復文。
孫本初（2001）。公共管理。台北：智勝。
徐木蘭（民89）。360度績效評估市政府部門的胎盤素。刊載於行政管理論文選輯第十四輯（頁239-245）。秦夢群（民87）。教育行政：實務部分。台北：五南。
翁福元（民90）。國民中小學校長評鑑制度之初探：以阿拉巴馬州為例。載於國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所（主編）。中小學校長專業成長制度規劃（頁147-173）。高雄：復文。
高熏芳（民87）。校長評鑑之應為與難為。教師天地雙月刊，96，19-24。
黃光雄編譯（民78）。教育評鑑的模式。台北：師大書苑。
張火燦（2000）。策略性人力資源管理。台北：楊智。
張春興（1989）。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華。
張清楚（民85）。國民小學校長成績考核之研究。台北市立師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
張德銳（民87）。以校長評鑑提升辦學品質：談校長評鑑的目的、規準與程序。教師天地雙月刊，96，4-9。
張德銳（民88）。國民中小學校長評鑑系統的初步建構。初等教育學刊，7，15-38。張德銳、丁一顧（民90）。台北縣國小教育人員對校長評鑑規準知覺之調查研究。載於國立新竹師範學院（主編）。第八次教育行政論壇論文集（頁133-157）。新竹：作者。教育部（民89）。各級學校名錄。台北：作者。
郭工賓（民90）。國民小學校長評鑑指標建構之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
馮丰儀（民88）。國民中小學校長遴選制度之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，南投。
楊國賜（民90）。序。載於國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所（主編）。中小學校長專業成長制度規劃（頁序1-2）。高雄：復文。
陳淑滿（民70）。國民教育人事制度之探討。台灣教育輔導月刊，31（5），20。
齊德彰（1999）。人力資源管理：理論與實務。台北：三民。
蔡書憲（民90）。從校長評鑑談校長的專業成長：一位基層教師的看法。載於國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所（主編）。中小學校長專業成長制度規劃（頁277-295）。高雄：復文。
盧增緒（民84）。論教育評鑑觀念之形成。載於中國教育學會（主編）。教育評鑑（頁3-59）。台北：師大書苑。
謝文全（民88）。中小學校長培育、任用、評鑑制度。教育資料與研究雙月刊，28，1-5。謝金青（民86）。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北。顏秉嶼等人（民81）。台灣省國民中學初任校長行政效能評量研究。新竹：國立新竹師範學院。
羅英豪（民88）。國民中學校長辦學績效評鑑指標之研究。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文，未出版，台北。
羅清水（民84）。台灣省國民中學校長考核制度之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
羅清水（民88）。校長評鑑與專業發展。教育資料與研究雙月刊，29，30-39。嚴秀如（民86）。360度績效評估方法之初探：多角化評估與管理才能發展。一九九七年企業管理國際研討會，75-84。
貳、英文部分
Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service, ACAS (1986). Report of the Appraisal and Training Working Group. In Department of Education and Science (DES), School teacher appraisal: A national framework (pp. 25-58). London: HMSO.
Allen. C., & Pellicer, L. (1984). Staff development: The missing link in administrator evaluation. Oxford, OH：National Staff Development Council. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED293 824)
Anderson, M. E. (1989). Evaluating Principals: Strategies to assess and enhance their performance. Eugene, OR：Oregon School Study Council. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 306 672)
Anderson, M. E. (1991). How to train, recruit, select, induct, and evaluate leaders for America''''s schools. Oregon: University of Oregon.
Andrews, C. (1990). Evaluating principals: research roundup. Research-Roundup, 6(2). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 318 131)
Andrews, R. L., & Soder, R. (1987). Principal leadership and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 44, 9-11.
Beck, L. G., & Murphy, J. (1993). Understanding the principalship: Metaphorical themes, 1920s - 1990s. New York: Teacher College Press.
Black, K. W. (1995). A study of principal evaluation in Illinois high school districts: Current practice as articulated by. Unpublished doctor dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Bolam, R. (1990). Principal evaluation and appraisal in England. A draft paper presented at the AERA Annual Conference, Boston, Friday, April 20th.
Bolton, D. L. (1980). Evaluating administrative personnel in school system. New York: Teachers College Press.
Bonnell, B. E. (1993). An assessment of principal evaluation practices in State of Oklahoma. Unpublished doctor dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
Bossert, S. T. et al. (1982). The instructional management role of principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34-64.
Buser, R. L., & Banks, F. A. Jr. (1984). The why, what, how, and by whom of evaluating principals. NASSP Bulletin, 68(468), 1-4.
Cambridge Institute of Education (1988). Teacher appraisal for professional development: a review of research. Cambridge：Author
Candoli, I. C., Cullen, K., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1997). Superintendent performance evaluation：Current practice and directions for improvement. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Carnes, M. L. (1985). Evaluating administrative performance. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
Clayton-Jones, L. et al. (1993). Appraisal of school principals in an Australian Department of Education. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 110-131.
Connecticut Principal’s Academy. (1990). A guide to the process of evaluating school principals. Hartford, CT: Connecticut State Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319 141)
Cook, T. D. (1974). The potential and limitations of secondary evaluation. In M. W. Apple, M. J. Subkoviak, & H. S. Lufler, Jr. (Eds.), Educational evaluation: Analysis and responsibility (pp. 155-235). Berkeley, CA: MrCutrhan.
Cook, T. D., & Gruder, C. L. (1978). Metaevaluation Research. Evaluation Quarterly, 2(1), 5-51.
Cullen, K. (1997). An evaluation of the United Kingdom’s national system of headteacher appraisal. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(2), 103- 130.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285-328.
Davis, S. H., & Hensley, P. A. (1999). The politics of principal evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(4), 383-403.
Deal, T. E., Dornbusch, S. M., & Crawford, R. A. (1977). Villains as victims: evaluating principals. Phi Delta Kappan. 59(4), 273-274.
Deal, T. E., Neufeld, B., & Rallis, S. (1982). Hard choices in hard times. Educational Leadership. 39(2), 298-302.
DES (1983) Teaching quality. Cmnd 8836 London: HMSO.
DES (1985a). Better schools: a summary. Cmnd 9469. London: HMSO
DES (1985b). Quality in schools: evaluation and appraisal. London: HMSO.
DES (1989). School teacher appraisal: A national framework. London: HMSO.
DES (1991a). The Education (School Teacher Appraisal) Regulations (No. 1511). London: HMSO.
DES (1991b). School Teacher Appraisal Circular (No. 12/91). London: HMSO.
DfEE (1997). Excellence in Schools. London: the Stationery.
DfEE (1998). Teachers: meeting the challenge of change. London: the Stationery.
DfEE (1999a). Teachers: pay and performance management. London: the Stationery.
DfEE (1999b). Teachers: taking forward the challenge of change. DfEE Publications.
DfEE (1999c). Teacher appraisal. [www page]. http://www.dfee.gov.uk/circulars/dfeepub/may99/120599/maintext.htm. (Visited 2000/1/18).
DfEE (2000). The Education (School Teacher Appraisal)（England） Regulations 2000 (No. 1620). London: The Statationary Office.
Drake, T. L., & Roe, W. H. (1999). The principalship (fifth edition). New Jersery: Prentice Hall.
Dresslar, D. W. (1987). The use of teacher feedback in the evaluation of school principals. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2389A.
Duhamel, R., Cyze, M., Lanacraft, G., & Rutherford, C. (1981). The evaluation of principals. Education Canada, 20-27.
Duke, D. L. (1987). School leadership and instructional improvement. New York: Random House.
Duke, D. L., (1992). Concepts of administrative effectiveness and the evaluation of school administrators. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 6, 103-121.
Duke, D. L., & Iwanicki, E. (1992). Principal assessment and the notion of "fit". Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 25-36.
Duke, D. L., & Stiggins, R. J. (1985). Evaluating the performance of principals: A descriptive study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(4), 71-98.
Duttweiler, P. C., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Resources for administrator assessment and staff development. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334 629)
Ebmeier, H. (1991). The development and field test of an instrument for client-based principal formative evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4(2), 245-278
Ellett, C. D., Wren, C. Y., Callender, K. E. Loup, K. S., & Liu, X. (1996). Looking backwards with the Personnel Evaluation Standards: An analysis of the development and implementation of a statewide teacher assessment program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22(1), 79-113.
Ernest, B. (1985). Can you eat? Can you sleep? Can you laugh? The why and how of evaluating principal. The Clearing House, 58 (7), 290-292.
Etzioni, A. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations (rev. ed.). New york: Free Press.
Evans, A., & Tomlinson, J. (1989). Teacher appraisal: An overview. In Evans, A. & Tomlinson, J. (Ed.) Teacher appraisal: A nationwide approach（pp. 9-27）. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Ferrandino, V. L. (2001). Challenges for 21st-century elementary school principals. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(6), 440-442.
Fletcher, T. E. (1994). An analysis of the principal performance domains within the principal evaluation process in Indiana. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Purdue University.
Fletcher, T. E., & Mclnerney, W. D. (1995). Principal performance areas and principal evaluation. ERS Spectrum, 13 (4), 16-21.
France, S. (1997). 360-degree appraisal. London: The Industrial Society.
Frerking, R. A. (1992). Principal performance evaluation: A nationwide status report on the type and effectiveness of evaluation as perceived by principals and supervisor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Iowa State University.
Gane, V. (1986). Secondary headteacher appraisal: The nub of credibility. Bristol: NDC.
Gane, V. (1989). The appraisal of headteachers. In A. Evans & J. Tomlinson (Eds.), Teacher appraisal (pp. 68-83). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Gane, V., & Morgan, A. (1992). Managing headteacher appraisal. London: Paul Chapman.
Getzels, J. W., & Guba, E. G. (1957). Social behavior and the administrative process. The School Review, 65, 423-441.
Gilbert, B. W. (1990). Criteria, procedures, and instruments for the evaluation of Texas elementary principals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Baylor University.
Ginsberg, R., & Berry, B. (1990). The folklore of principal evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3, 205-230.
Ginsberg, R., & Thompson, T. (1992). Dilemmas and solutions regarding principal evaluation. Peabody Journal of Education, 68 (1), 58-74.
Glasman, N. S. (1992). Toward assessing test score-relates actions of principal. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 108-123.
Glasman, N. S., & Heck, R.H. (1992). The changing leadership role of the principal: implications for principal assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 68 (1), 5-24.
Glasman, N. S., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Role-based evaluation of principals: developing an appraisal system. In Leithwood, K. et al. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration（pp. 369-394）. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Glassman, N. S., & Martens, P. A. (1993). Personnel evaluation standards: the use in principal assessment systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 47-63.
Green, R. E. (1972). Administrative appraisal: A step to improved leadership. Washington, D. C. National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. California: Sage Publications.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of the empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1999). Can leadership enhance school effectiveness? In Bush, T. et al. (Eds.). Educational management: redefining theory, policy and practice
（pp. 178-190）. London: Sage Publications.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-247.
Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. (1987). Assessing and developing principal instructional leadership. Educational Leadership, 45(1), 54-61.
Hargreaves, A. et al. (1998). Introduction. In A. Hargreaves et al. (Eds.), International handbook of educational change. MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Harrison, W. C. (1988). The status of evaluation of principals: Administrators perceptions and opportunities and obstacles to improving the process. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 293 895)
Harrison, W. C., & Peterson, K. D. (1986). Pitfalls in the evaluation of principals. The Urban Review, 18(4), 221-235.
Harrison, W. C., & Peterson, K. D. (1988). Evaluation of principals: he process can be improved. NASSP Bulltin, 72(508), 1-4.
Hart, A.W. (1992). The social and organizational influence of principals: Evaluating principals in context. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 37-57.
Hart, A. W. (1994). Evaluating principals in light of context and socialization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Hart, D. M. (1997). Foreword. In Spear, E. (ed.) Headteacher appraisal. England: Ashgate: xi.
Heck, R.H., & Glasman, N. S. (1993). Merging evaluation and administration. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 132-142.
Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1992). Principal assessment: Conceptual problem, methodological problem, or both? Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 124-144.
Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). The assessment of principal performance: A multilevel approach. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10, 11-28.
Hellawell, D. E. (1997). Appraisal of primary school headteachers in schools in England: the perceptions of three LEA appraisal coordinators. School Leadership & Management, 17(2), 257-271.
Hellawell, D., & Hancock, N. (1997). Appraisal for primary heads. Professional Development Today, 1, October, 29-39.
Herman, J. J. (1988). Evaluating administrators: Assessing the competencies. NASSP Bulltin, 72(508), 5-10.
Herman, J. J. (1991). Evaluating the performance of administrators: The process and the tools. NASSP Bulltin, 75(539), 79-87.
Hewton, E., & West, N. (1992). Appraisal primary headteachers: challenge, confidence, and clarity. Buckingham: Open University.
Hickcocx, E. S. et al. (Eds.) (1988). Making a difference through performance appraisal. Ontario, Canada: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Holman, J. (1997). Headteacher appraisal towards 2000. In C. E. Spear (ed.). Headteacher Appraisal (pp. 1-10). England: Ashgate.
Illes, P. (1999). Management staff selection and assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Jackson, J. R. (1996). Policies, procedures, and instruments used in evaluating public school principals in the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. East Texas State University.
Johnston, B. J., & Holliday, J. R. (1987). Evaluating school principal performance: The North Carolina Quality Assurance Program for Administrators. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Regional Council on Educational Administration, Gatlinburg, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 293 194)
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1981). The program evaluation standards: how to assess evaluations of educational program. CA: Sage.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988). The personnel evaluation standards: how to assess systems for evaluation educators. CA: Sage.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994). The program evaluation standards: how to assess evaluations of educational program (2nd). CA: Sage.
Katz, J. S., & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology & organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
Langlois, D. E., & McAdams, R. P. (1992). Performance appraisal of school management: Evaluating the administrative team. Lancaster, IL: Tecnomic.
Langston, W. E. (1999). An investigation of effective principal behaviors in relationship to principal evaluation practices. Unpublished doctor dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Leithwood, K., Edge, K. & Jantzi, D. (1999). Educational accountability: the state of the art. Gutersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.
Leithwood, K., Jantxi, D., Silins, H., & Dart, B. (1993). Using the appraisal of school leaders as an instrument for restructuring. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 85-109.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2000)(3rd ed). Educational administration: concepts and practices. CA: Wadsworth.
Mackinnon, D., & Statham, J. (1999). Education in UK: facts & figures. London: Open University.
Macpherson, R. J. S., & Taplin, M. (1995). Principals’ policy preferences concerning accountability: Implications for key competencies, performance indicators, and professional development. Journal of School Leadership, 5, 448-481.
Madaus, G. F., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). Program evaluation: A historical overview. In G. F. Madaus, & D. L.Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Maeroff, G. I. (1988). The empowerment of teachers: overcoming the crisis of confidence. New York: Teachers College Press.
Martens, P. A. (1991). A study of the nature and extent of use of standards in the principal evaluation process in selected districts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Martin, M., Damon, D., & Schory, W. (1994). The portfolio approach to administrator appraisal. ERS Spectrum, 12, 39-46.
Mathias, J., & Jones, J. (1989). Appraisal of performance: teachers'''' guide. Oxford: NFER-NELSON.
McCleary, L. (1979). Evaluation of principals. Theory into Practice, 18(1), 45-49.
McConney, A. (1995). Introduction: common ground for a unified approach. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 105-110.
McDonald, M. S. (1979). Administrator evaluation: A look at Georgia and the nation. Atlanta GA: Georgia Professional Standards Commission. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 180 106)
McMahon, A. (1992). Teacher appraisal: development and accountability. Teacher Development, February 19-28.
McMahon, A., Bolam, R., Abbot, R., & Holly, P. (1984). Guidelines for Review and Internal Development in Schools. London, Longmans.
Middlewood, D., & Lumby, J. (1998). Human resource management in schools and college. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Murphy, J. (1992). Preface. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 1-4.
Murphy, J. (1994). Transformational change and the evolving role of the principal: Early empirical evidence. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts （pp. 20-53）. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. California: Sage Publications.
Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1992). The principalship in an era of transformation. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 77-88.
Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., Peterson, K. D., & Lotto, L. S. (1987). The administrative control of principals in effective school districts. The Journal of Educational Administration, 25(2), 161-192.
Murphy, J., & Louis, K. A. (1994) (Eds.). Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
Murphy, J. A., & Pimental, S. (1996). Grading principals. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(1), 74-81.
Murphy, J., & Rodi, M. S. (2000). Principal Evaluation: A review. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration (1998). Principals for our changing world：the knowledge and skill base（2nd ed）. Fairfax, VA: Author.
National Study of School Evaluation (1984). A self-directed program for developing teacher and administrator evaluation procedures. Falls Church, Virginia: National Study of School Evaluation.
Nygaard, D. D. (1974). Evaluating administrative performance. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (1993) Curriculum-foundations, principals and theory (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Payne, D. A., Ellett, C. D., Perkins, M. L., & Shellenberger, S. (1976). The validity of student assessments of principals’ competencies. The Journal of Educational Research, 70(3), 156-159.
Peter, M. (1992). Performance indicators in New Zealand higher education: Accountability or control? Journal of Education Policy, 7(3), 267-283.
Peters S., & Bagenstos, N. S. (1988). State-mandated principal evaluation: A report on current practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 292 889)
Peterson, D. (1991). Evaluating Principals (ERIC Digest Series Number 60). Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 330 064)
Poliakoff, L. (1973). Recent trends in evaluating school personnel. National Elementary Principal, 52(5), 39-44.
Rallis, S. F., & Goldring, E. B. (1993). Beyond the individual assessment of principals: School-based accountability in dynamic schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 3-23.
Rammer, R. A. (1991). How the literature on administrator evaluation relates to actual practice. NASSP Bulletin, 75(53), 72-78.
Razik, T. A., & Swanson, A. D. (1995). Fundamental concepts of educational leadership and management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Redfern, G. B. (1972). Principals: who''''s evaluating them, why, and how? NASSP Bulletin, 56 (34), 85-93.
Redfern, G. B. (1980). Evaluating teachers and administrators: A performance objectives approach, Boulder, CO: Westview.
Redfern, G. B. (1986). Techniques of evaluation of principals and assistant principals: four case studies. NASSP Bulletin, Feb, 66-74.
Research for Better Schools. (1987). Analysis of Delaware’s instruments for evaluating the performance of building level administrators. Philadelphia, PA: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 376 616)
Richardson, R. (1990). Evaluation of principal performance. In L. Witters-Churchill & D. A. Eraldson (Eds.), The Principalship in the 1990s and Beyond: Current Research on based-Based Preparation and Professional Development （pp. 49-75）. Tempe, AZ: University Council for Educational Administration.
Richardson, E., Johnson, Jr. F., & Walters, B. (1999). Alabama professional education personnel evaluation program for principals: evaluation manual. Alabama: State Department of Education.
Risk, M. C. (1986). Principal mull the merits of new evaluation techniques. The Executive Educator, 8(4), 37-43.
Russell, N., & Willinsky, J. (1997). Fourth generation educational evaluation: On school based evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(3), 187-199.
Schmitt, N. & Schechtman, S. (1990). The selection of school administrators. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3, 231-238.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In AERA monograph series on curriculum evaluation, 1, (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Scriven, M. (1972). An interduction to metaevaluation. In P. A. Taylor & D. M. Cowley (Eds.), Reading in curriculum evaluation (pp. 84-86). Dubuque, Iowa: Brown.
Scriven, M. (1983). Evaluation ideologies. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing..
Scriven, M. (1995). A unified theory approach to teacher evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 111-129.
Scriven, M. (1997). Due process in adverse in adverse personnel action. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11 (2), 127-137.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Shabana Dastageer Muhajir, B. C. (1996). Practices and perceptions of principle evaluation: Avalon Consolidated School Board. Unpublished M.Ed. dissertation. Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada.
Shinkfield, A. J., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1995). Teacher evaluation: guide to effective practice. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Smith, W. F. & Andrews, R. L. (1987). Clinical supervision for principals. Educational Leadership, 45(1), 34-37.
Smylie, M. A., & Crowson, R. L. (1993), Principal assessment under restructured governance. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 64-84.
Snyder, J., & Ebmeier, H. (1992). Empirical linkages among principal behaviors and intermediate outcomes: Implications for principal evaluation. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 75-107.
South Carolina State Department of Education. (1982). Evaluating school administrators: A guide to establishing criteria and procedures. Columbia, SC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 218 794)
South Carolina State Department of Education. (1990). Management by results model, extended evaluation model, combination model：South Carolina principal incentive program 1990-91. Columbia, SC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334654)
Spear, C. E. (1997) (Ed.). Headteacher Appraisal. England: Ashgate.
Stow, S. B., & Manatt, R. P. (1982). Administrator evaluation tailored to your district or independent school. Educational Leadership, 39(5), 353-356.
Stronge, J. H. (1995). Balancing individual and institutional goals in educational personnel evaluation: a conceptual framework. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 131-151.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1974). Toward a technology for evaluating evaluation. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 090 319)
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1981). Metaevaluation: Concept, standards, and uses. In R. A. Beck (Ed.), Educational evaluation methodology: The state of the art (pp. 146-163). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services in evaluation (pp. 117-141). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1995). Evaluation of superintendent performance: Toward a general model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21(2), 153-225.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000a). Foundational models for 21st century program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, & D. L.Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000b). The methodology of metaevaluation as reflected in metaevaluations by the Western Michigan University Evaluation Center. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(1), 95-125.
Stufflebeam, D. L. et al. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision-making. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
Stufflebeam, D., & Pullin, D. (1998). Achieving legal viability in personnel evaluations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(3), 215-230.
Stufflebeam, D., & Nevo, D. (1993). Principal evaluation: New directions for improvement. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 24-46.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation. MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Su, J. L., & Wu, T. Y. (2001). Analysis of the principal evaluation projects for elementary and junior high schools in the ROC. Paper presented at International Conference on School Leader Preparation, Licensure, Certification, Selection, Evaluation and Professional Development. Taipei, R.O.C., March 3-4.
The School Board of Leon County Schools (1998). Principal appraisal and support system: Procedures and forms. Tallahassee, Florida: Author.
Thomas, C., & Vomberg, J. A. (1991). Evaluating principal: new requirements, directions for the ‘90s. NASSP Bulletin, 75(539), 59-64.
Thomas, D., Holdaway, E. A., & Ward, K. L. (2000). Policies and practices involved in the evaluation of school principals. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(3), 215-240.
Tornow, W. W. (1993). Perception or reality: Is multi-perspective measurement a means or an end? Human Resource Management, 32(2ſ), 221-229.
TTA & OFSTED (1996). Review of headteacher and teacher appraisal: Summary of evidence. London: authors.
Tucker, N., & Bray, S. E. (1984). Performance based leadership assessment: DeKalb County Schools. Decatur. GA: DeKalb County School System. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 252 957)
Valentine, J. W., & Bowman, M. L. (1988a). Audit of principal effectiveness: A method for self-improvement. NASSP Bulletin, 72(508), 18-26.
Valentine, J. W., & Bowman, M. L. (1988b). The audit of principal effectiveness: Instrumentation for principalship research. Columbia: Missouri University, Department of Educational Administration. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 311 554)
Valentine, J. W., & Bowman, M. L. (1991). Effective principal, effective school: Does research support the assumption? NASSP Bulletin, 75(539), 1-7.
Valentine, J. W., & Harting, R. D. (1988). Based-based principal evaluation in Missouri: A three-year report. Columbia: Missouri University, Department of Educational Administration. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 311 589)
Vornberg, J. A. (1988). Evaluating your evaluation process: A checklist for principals. NASSP Bulltin, 72(508), 27-29.
Warwickshire County Council (1991). Appraisal in Warwickshire: a structured approach to professional review and development. Warwickshire: Author.
Weiss, K. (1989). Evaluation of elementary and secondary school principals. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of School Administrators, Orlando, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 904)
Weller, Jr. et al. (1994). Teacher evaluation of principals: as viewed by teachers, principals, and superintendents. The Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(2), 112-117.
Williams, D. M. V. (1997). The effects of state statutes and case law on the evaluation of public school principals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Arizona State University.
Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation：alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York: Longman.
Zakrajsek, B. (1979). Evaluation Systems: A critical look. NASSP Bulletin. 63(4), 100-111.