:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高職學校評鑑人員評鑑能力與角色之研究
書刊名:當代教育研究
作者:徐昊杲 引用關係曾淑惠 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, How-gaoTseng, Shu-hui
出版日期:2008
卷期:16:2
頁次:頁101-131
主題關鍵詞:高職學校評鑑人員評鑑能力評鑑人員角色Senior vocational schoolEvaluation staffEvaluation competenceRole-playing of evaluating committee
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:86
  • 點閱點閱:86
近年來,為符應社會對高職教育的要求,並講求績效責任,高職學校已有許多評鑑實務。由於評鑑人員所應具備的能力十分多元與廣泛,因此本研究之目的,即在建立高職學校評鑑人員的評鑑能力清單,並探究高職學校評鑑人員在所需扮演角色中重視的評鑑能力。為達成研究目的,本研究於文獻分析後經30位德懷術專家三回合問卷調查,以建立評鑑人員之評鑑能力內涵。而後為釐清評鑑人員的角色及其對應之能力,除分別召開高職學校行政主管及評鑑委員兩場專家座談會議,以釐清各角色之定義與獲取對研究之建議之外,並編製問卷商請24位專家學者進行問卷實施調查。 經由資料處理與分析後,本研究獲致結論如下,以提供高職學校評鑑人員評鑑能力建立後續的相關研究參考: 一、高職學校評鑑人員應重視的評鑑能力,主要可分為系統化的探究、評鑑技巧,以及評鑑專業等3項主要構面,共有27項評鑑能力。 二、高職學校評鑑人員應扮演之角色有規劃者、促進者、教育訓練者、監督稽核者、調查判斷者、診斷者、諮詢者、調停/仲裁者、倡導闡明者以及資訊提供者等10種。 三、高職學校評鑑人員扮演不同角色,應具備不同之評鑑能力,其中尤以扮演診斷者、諮詢者及促進者角色者所重視之評鑑能力較多。
Educational evaluation has become a popular trend since 1980’s and has responded to social expectation and accountability of senior vocational education in Taiwan over the years. Competences of evaluating staff are much diversified and this study tries to build up a list of evaluation parameters, so as to explore the role-playing of evaluating committee. To achieve the set goal, this study proceeded the literature review, questionnaire survey via Delphi method of 30 experts to build the required list. To figure out problems gained from Delphi method, this study held 2 focus-group meetings and turned the conclusions into the questionnaire. 24 experts were asked to fill in the questionnaires. The conclusions obtained include: (a) Roles for evaluation parameters are designer, facilitator, educational trainer, inspector, investigator, diagnostician, consultant, mediator, advisory illustrator, information specialist. (b) Items of competence for external evaluating staff are divided into 3 categories: 1.systematic inquiry-including 13 competence criterions 2.evaluation skills-including 11 competence criterions 3.evalution profession-including 6 competence criterions. (c) Evaluators of vocational high school have different roles and evaluation competences. Evaluation competences are much emphasized in the roles of diagnostician, consultant, and facilitator.
期刊論文
1.King, J. A.、Stevahn, L.、Ghere, G.、Minnema, J.(2001)。Toward a taxonomy of essential evaluator competencies。American Journal of valuation,22(2),229-248。  new window
2.Scriven, M.(1996)。Types of evaluation and types of evaluator。American Journal of Evaluation,17(2),151-161。  new window
3.Morabito, S. M.(2002)。Evaluator roles and strategies for expanding evaluation process influence。American Journal of Evaluation,23(3),321-330。  new window
4.黃曙東(20070600)。教育評鑑規劃人員能力內涵之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,24(1),109-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.郭昭佑(20010600)。學校本位評鑑--內外部評鑑的差異與結合。國立政治大學學報,82,27-61。  延伸查詢new window
6.潘慧玲(20060300)。彰權益能評鑑之探析。當代教育研究,14(1),1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.曾淑惠、徐昊杲、饒達欽(2007)。高職評鑑取向的氛圍:利害關係人的觀點。教育研究,160,118-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Wholey, J. S.(2001)。Managing for Results: Roles for Evaluators in a New Management Era。American Journal of Evaluation,22(3),343-347。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部中部辦公室(2005)。臺灣省暨金馬地區第三期程職校訪評報告。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.游家政(1994)。國民小學後設評鑑標準之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉智豪(2004)。國民小學校務評鑑委員評鑑專業能力指標建構之研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Stake, R. E.(1975)。Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach。Columbus, OH:Merrill。  new window
2.Fitzpatrick, J. L.、Sanders, J. R.、Worthen, B. R.(2004)。Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines。Pearson Education, Inc。  new window
3.Rossi, P. H.、Freeman, H. E.、Lipsey, M. W.(2004)。Evaluation: A systematic approach。Sage。  new window
4.曾淑惠(2002)。教育方案評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.林清山(1988)。多變項分析統計法。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Fetterman, D. M.(2001)。Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation。Sage。  new window
7.Chen, Huey-Tsyh(1990)。Theory-Driven Evaluations。Sage。  new window
8.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1989)。Fourth generation evaluation。Sage Publications。  new window
9.Stufflebeam, D. L.、Shinkfield, A. J.(2007)。Evaluation Theory, Models and Application。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
10.Clarke, A.、Dawson, R.(1999)。Evaluation Research: An Introduction to Principles, Mechods and Practice。Evaluation Research: An Introduction to Principles, Mechods and Practice。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
11.Smith, M. F.(2005)。Evaluator。Encyclopedia of Evaluation。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
12.Greene, J. C.(2004)。The Educative Evaluator: An Interpretation of Lee J. Cronbach's Vision of Evaluation。Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists' Views and Influences。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
13.Elden, M.、Levin, M.(1991)。Cogenerative Learning: Bringing Participation into Action Research。Participatory Action Research。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
其他
1.Stevens, D. F.,Lawrenz, F.,Sharp, L.(1997)。User-friendly handbook for project evaluation,http://red.www.nsf.org/Her /RED/ EVAL/ handbook/handbook.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.Patton, M. Q.(2003)。Utilization-focused Evaluation。International handbook of educational evaluation。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE