臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺北市教學輔導教師彰權益能的建構與分析
書刊名：中正教育研究
作者：林梅琴／張德銳 引用關係／趙珮晴 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Mei-chin／Chang, Derray／Chao, Pei-ching
出版日期：2016
卷期：15:1
頁次：頁1-42
主題關鍵詞：性別；教學輔導教師；彰權益能；臺北市；Gender；Mentor teacher；Empowerment；Taipei City
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:137
  • 點閱點閱:47
為求教育成功改革和營造開放創新的環境，本研究以教師彰權益能為研究核心，除了自編問卷外，也將以此分析臺北市教學輔導教師彰權益能的現況及其影響變項因素。本研究以臺北市332位教學輔導教師為施測對象，以因素分析、主成分分析、Cronbach’s α信度分析、獨立樣本單因子多變量變異數分析和LISREL進行多變量多元迴歸分析模型等進行分析，研究結果如下：本研究編擬的彰權益能問卷具有良好的一致性和穩定性；現況相較之下，以自主決策為優，而校務決策偏弱。其次，男教師、有擔任行政主管、專任教學教師或兼行政的教學輔導教師，在校務決策和自我效能會比其他教師好；而影響力又以男教師高於女教師。最後，校長正向支持和教師合作風氣，對教學輔導教師彰權益能的各因素向度都有正向顯著影響。本研究將依據研究發現，提出相關建議。
Teacher empowerment is said to be a crucial component in successful education reform. This study used a teacher empowerment scale to analyze the factors that influence mentor teacher empowerment condition and its effect in Taipei. A total of 332 mentor teachers in Taipei were surveyed. Factor analysis, principal component analysis, Cronbach’s α reliability, independent-samples and one-way multivariate analysis of variance, in addition to LISREL’s model of multivariate multiple regression analysis were used in this research. The proposed teacher empowerment questionnaire used proved to be reliable and valid. Results show autonomous decisionmaking was found to be more significant in teachers’ empowerment than school decision-making. Teachers were male or had full or part-time administrative work also scored higher in school decision-making and selfefficacy. Lastly, positive support from school principals and administration in a cooperative school atmosphere were shown to have a positive effect on teacher empowerment. Further implications from this study are provided.
期刊論文
1.Gagen, L.、Bowie, S.(2005)。Effective mentoring: A case for training mentors for novice teachers。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance，76(7)，40-45。  new window
2.張民杰(20100600)。臺北市教學輔導教師方案的功能--代理教師觀點。新竹教育大學教育學報，27(1)，33-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Blasé, J. J.、Mattews, K.(1984)。How principals stress teachers。The Canadian School Executive，4，8-11。  new window
4.丁一顧(20110500)。臺北市校本教學輔導教師制度運作模式建構之初探。臺北市立教育大學學報. 教育類，42(1)，1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林新發、龔素丹(2012)。臺灣地區國民小學教師專業權能對學校教育品質影響之研究。國民教育，52(4)，67-82。  延伸查詢new window
6.侯一欣(20110600)。學校課程決策的另一層思考：以教師為主體。教師專業研究期刊，1，5-22。  延伸查詢new window
7.張德銳、簡賢昌(20090500)。教學輔導教師與夥伴教師互動歷程與專業發展之研究。臺北市立教育大學學報. 教育類，40(1)，1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Allinder, R. M.(1994)。The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants。Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children，17(2)，86-95。  new window
9.Ashbaugh, C. R.(1982)。What is job satisfaction?。Planning & Changing-a Journal for School Administrators，14，195-203。  new window
10.Bacharach, S. B.、Bauer, S. C.、Conley, S.(1986)。Organizational analysis of stress: The case of elementary and secondary schools。Work and Occupations，13，7-32。  new window
11.Brown, S.、Nagel, L.(2004)。Preparing future teachers to respond to stress: Sources and solutions。Action in Education，26，34-42。  new window
12.Cayci, B.(2011)。The relationship between the elementary teacher candidates' teacher efficacy and their attitudes toward profession of teaching。Education，132(20)，402-418。  new window
13.Chambers, S. M.、Hardy, J. C.(2005)。Length of time in student teaching: Effects on classroom control orientation and self-efficacy beliefs。Educational Research Quarterly，28(3)，3-9。  new window
14.Dworkin, A. G.、Haney, C. A.、Dworkin, R. J.、Telschow, R. L.(1990)。Stress and illness behavour among urban public school teachers。Educational Administration Quarterly，26，60-72。  new window
15.Knight, J.(2009)。What can we do about teacher resistance?。Phi Delta Kappan，90，508-513。  new window
16.Komarraju, M.(2008)。A social-cognitive approach to training teaching assistants。Teaching of Psychology，35(4)，327-334。  new window
17.McKenzie, K.、Seheurich, J.(2008)。Teacher resistance to improvement of schools with, diverse students。International Journal of Leadership in Education，12，117-133。  new window
18.Sharif, S.、Kanik, S.、Omar, A. T.、Sulaiman, S.(2011)。The relationship between teachers,' empowerment and teachers’ organizational commitment in rural secondary schools。The International Journal of Learning，17，245-266。  new window
19.Stake, J. E.、Katz, J. F.(1982)。Teacher-pupil relationships in the elementary school classroom: Teacher-gender and pupil-gender differences。American Educational Research Journal，19(3)，465-471。  new window
20.Swanson, B. B.、Koonce, P. M.(1986)。Teacher incentives: Is merit pay enough?。Action in Teacher Education，8，87-90。  new window
21.Thornburg, D. G.、Mungai, A.(2011)。Teacher empowerment and school reform。Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research，5(4)，205-217。  new window
22.Yin, H. B.、Jin, Y. L.、Lee, C. K.(2009)。The impact of trust and empowerment culture on curriculum reform。Journal of Capital Normal University，1，125-132。  new window
23.吳慎慎(20011200)。性別與教師的專業認同--女性主義的觀點。藝術評論，12，181-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.張德銳、李俊達(20040500)。發展性教學輔導系統的實施與展望。教育資料與研究，58，79-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Gitlin, A.、Margonis, F.(1995)。The political aspect of reform: Teacher resistance as good sense。American Journal of Education，103(4)，377-405。  new window
26.Lee, J. C. k.、Yin, H. B.、Zhang, Z. H.、Jin, Y. L.(2011)。Teacher empowerment and receptivity in curriculum reform in China。Chinese Education and Society，44(4)，64-81。  new window
27.Marks, H. M.、Printy, S. M.(2003)。Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformation and instructional leadership。Education Administration Quarterly，39(3)，370-397。  new window
28.White, P. A.(1992)。Teacher empowerment under the "Ideal" school-site autonomy。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，14(1)，69-82。  new window
29.Youngs, P.(2002)。Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity。Education & Educational Research，38(5)，643-670。  new window
30.鍾任琴、黃增榮(19980900)。國民中學教師權能之分析。朝陽學報，3，183-213。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.潘慧玲(20060300)。彰權益能評鑑之探析。當代教育研究，14(1)，1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Chan, D. W.(2003)。Multiple intelligences and perceived self-efficacy among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong。Educational Psychology，23(5)，521-533。  new window
33.Short, P. M.、Rinehart, J. S.(1992)。School Participant Empowerment Scale: Assessment of Level of Empowerment Within The School Environment。Educational and Psychological Measurement，52(4)，951-960。  new window
34.Guskey, T. R.、Passaro, P. D.(1994)。Teacher Efficacy: A Study of Construct Dimensions。American Educational Research Journal，31(3)，627-643。  new window
35.Pearson, L. Carolyn、Moomaw, William(2005)。The Relationship between Teacher Autonomy and Stress, Work Satisfaction, Empowerment, and Professionalism。Educational Research Quarterly，29(1)，37-54。  new window
36.Tschannen-Moran, Megan、Hoy, Anita Woolfolk(2001)。Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct。Teaching and Teacher Education，17(7)，783-805。  new window
37.秦夢群、吳勁甫、簡瑋成(20140300)。群體層次教師組織公民行為、教師彰權益能與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究，37(1)，1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change。Psychological Review，84(2)，191-215。  new window
39.張德銳(19961200)。美國良師制度對我國實習輔導制度之啟示。初等教育學刊，5，41-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.Bandura, Albert(1989)。Human agency in social cognitive theory。American Psychologist，44(9)，1175-1184。  new window
41.張德銳、王淑珍、何嘉惠(20140300)。教師彰權益能的現況、歷程、成效與困境之研究：以八位國小資深優良教師為例。教育研究與發展期刊，10(1)，23-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.Wilson, S. M.、Coolican, M. J.(1996)。How high and low self-empowered teachers work with colleagues and school principals。Journal of Education Thought，30(2)，99-117。  new window
43.王麗雲、潘慧玲(20000100)。教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略。教育研究集刊，44，173-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部統計處(2013)。國中小女性校長人數及比率。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部統計處(2013)。國中小主任--按性別與縣市別分。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳靜宜(2010)。學校組織氣氛、教師權能、教師集體效能與學校經營績效關係之研究--以台中縣公立國中為例(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李勁霆(2012)。國民小學校長正向領導、教師賦權增能與教師心理契約關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪慈蔚(2013)。走在增權賦能的道路上--高中團隊教師增權賦能之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉梅蘭(2012)。彰化縣國小教師彰權益能與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。  延伸查詢new window
5.王艷蕉(2011)。國民中學教師賦權增能與學校組織氣氛知覺相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.余民寧(2006)。潜在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市：高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Yukl, G. A.(2010)。Leadership in organization。New Jersey：Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
4.Middlewood, D.、Lumby, J.(1998)。Human resource management in schools and colleges。Landon：Paul Chapman。  new window
5.Senge, P.、Kleiner, A.、Roberts, C.、Ross, R.、Roth, G.、Smith, B.、廖月娟、陳绣玲(2001)。變革之舞。臺北：天下。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
7.Tabachnick, Barbara G.、Fidell, Linda S.(2007)。Using multivariate statistics。Pearson/Allyn and Bacon。  new window
8.邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式--LISREL的理論、技術與應用。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2009)。多變量分析方法：統計軟體應用。五南。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York：Freeman。  new window
11.余民寧(2002)。教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量。臺北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Wan, E.(2005)。Teacher empowerment as perceived by teachers in Hong Kong(ED 492639)。  new window
其他
1.臺北市教育局(2006)。臺北市立高級中等以下學校教學輔導教師設置方案，http://web2.fg_tp.edu.tw/experiment/blog/wpcontent/uploads/2009/l 0/%E8%87%BA%E5%8C%97%E5%B8%82%E7%AB%8B%E9%AB%98%E7%B4%9A%E4%B8%AD%E7%AD%89%E4%BB%A5%E4%B8%8B%E5%AD%B8%E6%A0%A1%E6%95%99%E5%AD%B8%E8%BC%94%E5%B0%8E%E6%95%99%E5%B8%AB%E8%A8%AD%E7%BD%AE%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88.pd。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：574（臺灣：556，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1408417 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67213411
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上