臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：合作設計過程中個人的創造潛能與團隊的概念衍伸對設計成果之影響
書刊名：設計學報
作者：唐玄輝 引用關係／林智文／陳文誌
作者(外文)：Tang, Hsien-hui／Lin, Chih-wen／Chen, Wen-zhi
出版日期：2009
卷期：14:3
頁次：頁51-71
主題關鍵詞：創造潛能；合作式設計；設計內容導向編碼系統；探索階段的預設結構；概念衍伸度；DCOCS；PSEP；Creative potentials；Collaborative design；Rate of concept evolution
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:147
  • 點閱點閱:27
本研究的主要目的，在於探討合作設計過程中，團隊成員的創造潛能、設計過程的認知變化、概念衍伸度等因素，對於設計成果與創意表現的交互關係。研究使用「新編創造思考測驗」量測受測者的創造潛能，並利用口語分析法對合作設計實驗的過程資料進行分析。設計過程資料使用設計內容導向編碼系統 (DCOCS) 加以編碼後，分別進行探索階段的預設結構 (PSEP) 比例以及概念衍伸度等分析。研究結果發現：1) 創造潛能組合相似的設計團隊，其設計成果不一定相同；2) 合作設計過程中，設計師的認知變化與創意展現和設計成果之間沒有顯著的關係；3) 團隊概念衍伸度較高的團隊，能得到較佳的設計成果。綜合上述結果發現，在合作式設計過程中，要產生良好的設計成果，最重要的是團隊所提出的設計概念需要經由成員的相互合作、持續地發展與衍伸。
The high demand of creativity in industry results in the emphasis on the multidisciplinary collaborative design. Our research question is which of designers, or design processes, or collective concepts influence the design performance most during this process. The purpose is to explore the relationship between creative potentials of team members, cognitive change during the design process, evolution of the concepts, and design performance in a collaborative design process. This was a concurrent protocol study, utilizing Design Content Oriented Coding Scheme (DCOCS). The evaluative methods used in this study included a new version of the Torrance Test of Creativity, the rate of Preinventive Structure in the Explorative Phase (PSEP), and the rate of concept evolution. Results showed first, the teams that had similar combination of creative potentials of members produced different design performance; second, the cognitive change of the team members in the design process had no correlation to design performance; and finally, the design team having a higher rate of concept evolution had better design performance. To conclude, the most important thing to consider in a collaborative design process is whether the collaborative interactions between team members can consistently develop and evolve their concepts and consequently produce better design performance.
期刊論文
1.唐玄輝(20061100)。設計過程中創意產出的可能性--以PSEP比例為測量標準。工業設計，34(2)=115，155-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Simon, H. A.(1983)。Search and reasoning in problem solving。Artificial Intelligence，21(1/2)，7-29。  new window
3.Cross, N.、Cross, A. C.(1995)。Observations of teamwork and social processes in design。Design Studies，16(2)，143-170。  new window
4.Demhis, A. R.、Valacich, J. S.(1993)。Computer brainstorms: More head are better than one。Journal of Applied Psychology，78(4)，531-536。  new window
5.Goldschmidt, Gabriela(1994)。On Visual Design Thinking: The Vis Kids of Architecture。Design Studies，15(2)，158-174。  new window
6.Guilford, J.(1957)。Creative abilities in the arts。Psychological Review，64(2)，110-118。  new window
7.Haymaker, J.、Keel, P.、Ackermann, E.、Porter, W.(2000)。Filter-mediated design: Generating coherence in collaborative design。Design Studies，21(2)，205-220。  new window
8.Olson, G. M.、Olson, J. S.(2000)。Distance matters。Human-Computer Interaction，15(2)，139-178。  new window
9.Paulus, P. B.(2000)。Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups。Applied Psychology: An International Review，49(2)，237-262。  new window
10.Taylor, D. W.、Berry, P. C.、Block, C. H.(1958)。Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking?。Administrative Science Quarterly，3(1)，23-47。  new window
11.Wang, L.、Shen, W.、Xie, H.、Neelamkavil, J.、Pardasani, A.(2002)。Collaborative conceptual design--state of the art and future trends。Computer-Aided Design，34(13)，981-996。  new window
12.Suwa, M.、Gero, J.、Purcell, T.(2000)。Unexpected Discoveries and S-invention of Design Requirements: Important Vehicles for a Design Process。Design Studies，21(6)，539-567。  new window
13.Purcell, A. T.、Gero, J. S.(1998)。Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology。Design Studies，19(4)，389-430。  new window
14.Gardner, H.(1988)。Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective。Creativity Research Journal，1(1)，8-26。  new window
15.Feldhusen, John F.、Goh, Ban Eng(1995)。Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development。Creativity Research Journal，8(3)，231-247。  new window
16.Woodman, Richard W.、Sawyer, John E.、Griffin, Ricky W.(1993)。Toward a theory of organizational creativity。The Academy of Management Review，18(2)，293-321。  new window
17.Runco, M. A.、Chand, I.(1995)。Cognition and creativity。Educational Psychology Review，7(3)，243-267。  new window
18.Gruenfeld, D. H.、Mannix, E. A.、Williams, K. Y.、Neale, M. A.(1996)。Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes，67(1)，1-15。  new window
19.Guilford, J. P.(1956)。The structure of intellect。Psychological Bulletin，53(4)，267-293。  new window
20.Dorst, Kees、Cross, Nigel(2001)。Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution。Design Studies，22(5)，425-437。  new window
會議論文
1.Warr, A.、O'Neill, E.(2006)。The effect of group composition on divergent thinking in an interaction design activity。The 6th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems。NY, USA：ACM。122-131。  new window
2.Gabora, L.(2002)。Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process。The Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition。New York：ACM。126-133。  new window
3.Tang, H.-H.、Gero, J. S.(2002)。A cognitive method to measure potential creativity in designing。Lyon：IOS Press。47-54。  new window
4.Tang, H. H.、Lee, Y. Y.(2009)。Establishing an on-virtu digital sketching environment being identical to in-situ free-hand sketching an empirical study of protocol analysis。Yunlin：National Yunlin University of Science and Technology。473-482。  new window
5.Tang, H. H.(2003)。The anatomy of the design process revealed by DCOCS。2003 Pan-Pacific Vocational Design Conference。Yulin：National Yulin University of Science and Technology。35-46。  new window
6.吳靜吉、陳嘉成、林偉文(1998)。創造力量表簡介。『技術創造力』研討活動(二)：研究方法探討會議。高雄：國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.唐玄輝、林智文、蕭貴霙(2009)。探討創造潛能與概念衍伸度對合作式設計之影響。第十四屆中華民國設計學會研討會。台北市：中華民國設計學會。95。  延伸查詢new window
8.Warr, A.、O'Neill, E.(2005)。Understanding design as a social creative process。The 5th Conference on Creativity & Cognition。London：ACM。629-642。  new window
學位論文
1.詹鎔瑄(2002)。學生創造力及其相關因素研究--以中原大學室內設計系為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林美玲(2006)。「漢字詩歌」對設計創造力之影響研究--以晚唐詩人「李商隱」作品為例(碩士論文)。長庚大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lawson, B.(2005)。How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified。Oxford, UK：Architectural Press。  new window
2.Torrance, E. P.(1974)。The torrance tests of creative thinking--TTCT manual and scoring guide: Verbal test A, figural test。Lexington, KY：Ginn。  new window
3.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(1997)。Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention。New York：Harper Perennial。  new window
4.郭有遹(2001)。創造心理學。臺北市：正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Newell, Allen、Simon, Herbert Alexander(1972)。Human Problem Solving。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
6.Finke, R. A.、Ward, T. B.、Smith, S. M.(1996)。Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications。Bradford：The MIT Press。  new window
7.毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(20000000)。創造力研究。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Torrance, E. Paul(1979)。The search for satori and creativity。Creative Education Foundation。  new window
圖書論文
1.Simonton, Dean Keith(1990)。History, chemistry, psychology, and genius: An intellectual autobiography of historiometry。Theories of creativity。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
2.Bachelor, P. A.、Michael, W. B.(1997)。The Structure-of-Intellect model revisited。The creativity research handbook。Cresskill, New Jersey：Hampton Press。  new window
3.Warr, A.、O'Neill, E.(2005)。The effect of operational mechanisms on creativity。Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT。Berlin：Springer。  new window
4.Brown, R. T.(1989)。Creativity: What are we to measure?。Handbook of Creativity。New York, NY：Plenum Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：728（臺灣：713，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1563831 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67376916
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上