:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:影響原住民政策利益分配的因素:族群代表或選舉競爭?
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:羅清俊 引用關係陳文學 引用關係
作者(外文):Luor, Ching-jyuhnChen, Wen-hsueh
出版日期:2009
卷期:16:2
頁次:頁167-207
主題關鍵詞:分配政策少數族群原住民立法委員原住民立法委員選舉制度族群代表Distributive policyMinorityIndigenous legislatorsIndigenous legislative electoral systemMinority representation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:289
  • 點閱點閱:144
本文基於少數族群代表理論與分配政策理論,藉由次級資料的統計分析,探討民國 92至 94年行政院原民會分配給 23縣市的原住民補助款是否受到原住民立法委員族群代表因素的影響?或是受到與原住民立法委員選舉相關政治因素的影響?假如原住民立委真的會比較關心自己的族群,而表現在補助款的爭取上,那麼現行以全國為唯一選區的原住民立委選舉制度就可能要思考是否要朝向族群代表制的選舉制度,才能讓原住民各族群平衡發展。 透過統計分析,本文發現,第一,原住民立委並沒有特別利用爭取補助款來照顧自己的族群,反而會關心與自己不同族的原住民。雖然如此,但是與原住民立委相同族群的原住民,仍然能獲得基本的補助款額度。第二,原住民立委選舉相關的政治因素是影響原住民補助款分配的重要因素。這些發現隱含著目前原住民立委選舉制度大致上仍能均衡各族群的發展。最後,本文基於研究發現,討論現行原住民選舉制度對大族與小族發展的影響,並提出未來進行原住民選舉、族群代表與政策利益關係研究的方向。
Based on the minority representation and distributive theories, the present study investigates whether the distribution of indigenous grants in Taiwan is determined by ethnic representation in the Legislative Yuan or electoral factors. By intuition, ethnicity-laden consideration might be the most important one in deciding the distribution of indigenous people-related benefits, in the sense that the ethnic groups represented more by the same ethnic legislators in the Legislative Yuan tend to receive more benefit than otherwise. However, statistical results in this paper show that indigenous legislators are not likely reaping disproportionate largess for the areas where their own ethnic groups account for most of the indigenous population. They care even more on others. Why? Maybe the legislators believe that simply asking votes by ethnic identification is enough so that pouring more benefits for their ethnic groups may not increase the marginal utility of the votes. They probably need extra votes from other ethnic groups for electoral safety. In addition, the statistical finding shows that disproportionate benefit goes to the higher turn-out rate areas, electoral competitive areas, and the areas where most indigenous legislators’ votes are concentrated, indicating that indigenous legislators’ electoral concern are more important than the ethnic one. This paper has implications on the design of electoral system of indigenous legislators in Taiwan. For those who worry that current electoral system of indigenous legislators leads to the disadvantaged position of minority groups among indigenous people, the evidences provided in this paper possibly alleviate their anxieties.
期刊論文
1.楊婉瑩(20011200)。性別差異下的立法院。政治科學論叢,15,135-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張其祿(20020600)。我國地方補助款分配模式之經驗研究。社會文化學報,14,79-99。  延伸查詢new window
3.McCarty, Nolan M.(2000)。Presidential Pork: Executive Veto Power and Distributive Politics。American Political Science Review,94(1),117-129。  new window
4.羅清俊、謝瑩蒔(20080600)。選區規模與立法委員分配政策提案的關聯性研究:第三、四屆立法院的分析。行政暨政策學報,46,1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Alvarez, R. Michael、Saving, Jason L.(1997)。Congressional Committees and the Political Economy of Federal Outlays。Public Choice,92(1),55-73。  new window
6.Rundquist, Barry、Lee, Jeong-Hwa、Rhee, Jungho(1996)。The Distributive Politics of Cold War Defense Spending: Some State Level Evidence。Legislative Studies Quarterly,21(2),265-281。  new window
7.Levitt, Steven D.、Poterba, James M.(1999)。Congressional Distributive Politics and State Economic Performance。Public Choice,99,185-216。  new window
8.Bickers, Kenneth N.、Stein, Robert M.(2000)。The Congressional Pork Barrel in a Republican Era。The Journal of Politics,62(4),1070-1086。  new window
9.Carey, John M.、Shugart, Matthew Soberg(1995)。Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas。Electoral Studies,14(4),417-439。  new window
10.Banducci, Susan A.、Donovan, Todd、Karp, Jeffery A.(2004)。Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation。Journal of Politics,66(2),534-556。  new window
11.Mansbridge, Jane(1999)。Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"。The Journal of Politics,61(3),628-657。  new window
12.Lancaster, Thomas D.(1986)。Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics。International Political Science Review,7(1),67-81。  new window
13.Roberts, Brian E.(1990)。A Dead Senator Tells No Lies: Seniority and the Distribution of Federal Benefits。American Journal of Political Science,34(1),31-58。  new window
14.Sellers, Patrick J.(1997)。Fiscal Consistency and Federal District Spending in Congressional Elections。American Journal of Political Science,41(3),1024-1041。  new window
15.盛杏湲(20050900)。選區代表與集體代表:立法委員的代表角色。東吳政治學報,21,1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Lowi, Theodore J.(1964)。American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory。World Politics,16(4),677-715。  new window
17.高德義(19960100)。原住民與選舉政治--原住民精英選舉行為調查分析。山海文化雙月刊,11,34-50。  延伸查詢new window
18.羅清俊(20000300)。猜猜看誰把醃肉帶回家了:補助款利益在縣市分配的分析。人文及社會科學集刊,12(1),1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.羅清俊、萬榮水(19991100)。選舉與補助款的分配:綁樁?還是平衡地方財政?。選舉研究,6(2),121-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Bickers, Kenneth N.、Stein, Robert M.(1996)。The Electoral Dynamics of the Federal Pork Barrel。American Journal of Political Science,40(4),1300-1326。  new window
21.洪鴻智(20070600)。自然災害後政府重建資源分配之決策因素分析:以921地震為例。公共行政學報,23,95-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Ames, Barry.(1995)。“Electoral Rule, Constituency Pressures, and Pork Barry: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress.”。Journal of Politics,57(2),324-343。  new window
23.Bratton, Kathleen, and Leonard Ray.(2002)。“Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.”。American Journal of Political Science,46(2),428-437。  new window
24.Crisp, Brian, and Rechael E. Ingall.(2002)。“Institutional Engineering and the Nature of Representation: Mapping the Effects of Electoral Reform in Colombia.”。American Journal of Political Science,46(4),733-748。  new window
25.Fleras, Augie.(1985)。“From Social Control toward Political Self-Determination? Maori Seats and the Politics of Separate Maori Representation in New Zealand.”。Canadian Journal of Political Science,18(3),551-576。  new window
26.Haider-Markel, Donald P.、Joslyn, Mark R.、Kniss, Chad J.(2000)。Minority Group Interests and Political Representation: Gay Elected Officials in the Policy Process。Journal of Politics,62(2),568-577。  new window
27.Hurwitz, Mark S., Roger J. Moiles, and David W. Rohde.(2001)。“Distribution and Partisan Issues in Agriculture Policy in the 104th House.”。American Political Science Review,95(4),911-922。  new window
28.Larcinese, Valentino, Leonzio Rizzo, and Cecilia Testa.(2006)。“Allocating the U.S. Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President.”。Journal of Politics,68(2),447-456。  new window
29.Lizzeri, Alessandro、Persico, Nicola(2001)。The Provision of Public Goods under Alternative Electoral Incentives。American Economic Review,91(1),225-239。  new window
30.Martin, Paul S.(2003)。Voting’s Reward: Voter Turnout, Attentive Publics, and Congressional Allocation of Federal Money。American Journal of Political Science,41(3),1024-1041。  new window
31.Meier, K. J.(1993)。“Representative Bureaucracy: A Theoretical and Empirical Exposition.”。Research in Public Administration,2,1-36。  new window
32.Shepsle, Kenneth, and Barry Weingast.(1981)。“Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel.”。American Journal of Political Science,25(1),96-111。  new window
33.Whitby, Kenny J., and George A. Krause.(2001)。“Race, Issue Heterogeneity and Public Policy: The Republican Revolution in the 104th US Congress and the Representation of African-American Policy Interests.”。British Journal of Political Science,31(3),555-572。  new window
會議論文
1.Hirano, Hiroshi.(2005)。“National Issues and District Interests: Impact of the 1994 Electoral Reform on Japanese Voting Behavior.”。Washington, D.C.。  new window
2.Holman, Mirya.(2008)。“Who Represents? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Female and Minority Representation in U.S. Municipalities.”。Boston。  new window
3.Stein, Robert M., and Kenneth N. Bickers.(1992)。“Congressional Election and the Pork Barrel: The Interest Group Connection.”。Chicago。  new window
研究報告
1.羅清俊(2007)。《台灣分配政治的理論建構與實證檢驗(I)》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.潘春義(2002)。〈原住民的身份與選區劃分之研究〉,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Greene, William H.(2002)。LIMDEP: User's Manual and Reference Guide。New York:Econometric Software。  new window
2.Fiorina, Morris P.(1977)。Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment。Yale University Press。  new window
3.Swain, Carol M.(1993)。Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Barry, Brian(1965)。Political Argument。London, UK:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
5.羅清俊(20010000)。臺灣分配政治。臺北:前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Mosher, F. C.(1982)。Democracy and the Public Service。New York, NY。  new window
7.黃鈴華(2005)。原住民族運動的國會路線。台北:國家發展文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
8.Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel(1967)。The Concept of Representation。University of California Press。  new window
9.Young, Iris Marion(1990)。Justices and the politics of difference。Princeton University Press。  new window
10.施正鋒(19980000)。族群與民族主義:集體認同的政治分析。臺北:前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.班納迪克.安德森、吳叡人(1999)。想像的共同體:民族主義的起源與散布。時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
12.施正鋒(2007)。《原住民族人權》。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
13.Buchanan, J., and Gordon Tullock.(1962)。Calculus of Consent。Ann Arbor。  new window
14.Guinier, Lani(1994)。The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy。New York:Free Press。  new window
15.Gupta, Dipak K.(2001)。Analyzing Public Policy。Washington D.C.:A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc。  new window
16.Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini.(2000)。Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy。Cambridge。  new window
17.Rich, Michael J.(1993)。Federal Policymaking and the Poor。New Jersey。  new window
其他
1.黃錦堂(2005)。立法委員選區劃分,http://ccms.ntu.edu.tw/~hwngntn/。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Arnold, R. Douglas(1981)。The Local Roots of Domestic Policy。New Congress。Washington, DC:American Enterprise Institute。  new window
2.Rundquist, Barry S.、Ferejohn, John A.(1975)。Two American Expenditure Programs Compared。Comparative Public Policy。New York:Wiley Inc。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE