:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從國際比較觀點探討臺灣學生PISA 2006閱讀素養表現特徵
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:張貴琳黃秀霜 引用關係鄒慧英 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Kuei-linHuang, Hsiu-shuangTzou, Huey-ing
出版日期:2010
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁21-45
主題關鍵詞:OECDPISA閱讀素養國際比較Reading literacyInternational comparison
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(10) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:15
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:135
本文旨在從國際比較觀點探討臺灣學生PISA 2006閱讀素養表現特徵,以提供課程與教學政策參考。資料來源包括參加PISA 2006的臺灣、香港、芬蘭和OECD國家,文中以國家常模爲參照,比較各國不同百分等級學生閱讀素養分數差異幅度剖面,及閱讀素養表現落後學生在三個主要閱讀歷程的得分率差異,同時討論臺灣學生表現不佳的試題特徵。分析結果顯示,百分等級爲5、10、25、75和95的臺灣學生,閱讀素養分數落後香港和芬蘭.28-.53個標準差(OECD量尺),其中以百分等級5和10的落後幅度爲最大。相對而言,百分等級10以下閱讀素養表現落後的臺灣學生,得分率明顯較低的層面是在擷取訊息和解釋文本的歷程,這些學生在識別文章主旨的題目上表現較差。整體而言,PISA著重功能性閱讀,擷取資訊和解釋文本是現代國民終身學習和社會適應的重要基礎能力,針對閱讀素養落後學生進行多元素材文章理解的補救教學是當務之急。
This study explored the characteristics of Taiwanese students' reading performance on PISA 2006 by comparing them with those counterparts of students from other countries. The main purpose of this study was to determine Taiwanese students' performance on a large-scale international assessment and provided implications on the research of curriculum and instruction. The research samples in this study included participants from four different countries who took PISA reading literacy assessment in 2006 (OECD was defined as a country in this study). The data included are Taiwan, Hong Kong, Finland, and OECD. The authors compared scores of students at different percentile ranks based on each national norm. In addition, the test items where Taiwanese students performed relatively poor were further investigated. The authors also discussed the characteristics of at-risk students on three different reading aspects of the PISA 2006 reading literacy assessment: retrieving information, interpreting text, and reflecting and evaluating. Based on the OECD scale, the results showed that Taiwanese students at the percentile ranks 5, 10, 25, 75, and 95 were below. 28 and. 53 standard deviations when comparing with students from Hong Kong and Finland respectively. Among these percentile ranks, the ones at 5 and 10 had the largest gaps. Those who were below the percentile rank 10 had lower scoring rate at retrieving information and interpreting what was read. They also perform poorly on identifying the main points of texts. In short, PISA defined reading literacy as a foundational skill. That is, reading literacy skills are required for individual growth and economic participation in the future. Therefore, a need to provide remedial classes for these at-risk students is proposed as students need to learn various kinds of texts under guidance.
期刊論文
1.李雪莉(20071205)。卡住的閱讀--臺灣十年為何不如香港四年?。天下雜誌,386,206-212+214。  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭富元(20071107)。一個也不能少--芬蘭教育世界第一的秘密。天下雜誌,384,52-56+58+60-61。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hvistendahl, R.、Roe, A.(2004)。The literacy achievement of Norwegian minority students。Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,48(3),307-325。  new window
4.Linnakyla, P.、Malin, A.、Taube, K.(2004)。Factors behind low reading literacy achievement。Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,48(3),231-250。  new window
5.楊深坑(20081200)。社會公義、差異政治與教育機會均等的新視野。當代教育研究,16(4),1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.江芳盛、李懿芳(2009)。國際學生評量計畫(PISA)試題特色分析及其對我國教育之啟示。教育資料與研究雙月刊,87,27-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張佃富、吳慧子、吳舒靜(2009)。國際學生評量計畫(PISA)表現頂尖五國優勢條件分析。教育資料與研究雙月刊,87,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳之華(2009)。芬蘭教改的成功之路。教育資料集刊,40,227-238。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳精芬(2007)。歐洲國家兒童閱讀活動之探討:以芬蘭、愛爾蘭、英國、瑞典及奧地利為例。中華民國圖書館學會電子報,18。  延伸查詢new window
10.Leino, K.、Malin, A.、Linnakyla, P.(2004)。Finnish students’ multiliteracy profiles。Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,48(3),251-271。  new window
11.Turmo, A.(2004)。Scientific literacy and socio-economic background among 15 year olds: A Nordic perspective。Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,48(3),287-306。  new window
研究報告
1.林煥祥、劉聖忠、林素微、李暉(2008)。臺灣參加PISA2006成果報告 (計畫編號:NSC95-2522-S-026-002)。花蓮:國立花蓮教育大學科學教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪碧霞(2008)。臺灣15歲學生閱讀、數學和科學素養調查研究:教育品質和均等議題 (PISA 2009) (計畫編號:NSC-97-2522-S-024-001)。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅(2008)。PIRLS 2006報告:臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養 (計畫編號:NSC 96-MOE-S-008-002)。桃園縣:國科會科學教育處。  延伸查詢new window
4.OECD(2004)。Knowledge and skills for life: First results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000。Paris。  new window
5.OECD(2006)。PISA released items: Reading。Paris。  new window
6.OECD(2008)。Reading literacy: A framework for PISA 2009。Paris。  new window
學位論文
1.張瓊元(2002)。國際性學生閱讀能力評量之分析(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006。Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006。Paris:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
2.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2009)。PISA 2006 technical report。Paris:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development。  new window
3.陳照雄(2007)。芬蘭的教育制度。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域(國語文),臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE