:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:網路學生出題策略應用於國小古典詩課程其成效之研究
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:邱廷榮于富雲 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiu, Ting-jungYu, Fu-yun
出版日期:2011
卷期:56:4
頁次:頁99-128
主題關鍵詞:上課情意古典詩教學網路學生出題策略學習成就學習動機Attitudes toward classClassic Chinese poetryOnline student question-generation strategyAcademic performanceMotivation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:73
  • 點閱點閱:56
摘要: 本研究旨在探究網路學生出題策略應用於國小古典詩課程對學習成就、學習動機與上課情意之影響。本研究採準實驗研究設計法,受試者為屏東縣某一國小六年級共三班學生(共100人),分為網路學生出題實驗組(68人)與傳統學習單習寫對照組(32人)。實驗教學前進行前測,5週實驗課程後再進行後測。資料以單因子共變數分析以及成對樣本t檢定進行分析。主要研究發現:一、實驗組在學習成就、學習動機與上課情意上顯著優於對照組;二、實驗組能有效提升受試者的學習動機與上課情意。文末,根據研究發現提出教學與未來研究之建議。
Abstract: This study investigates the comparative effects of an online student question-generation strategy against the use of traditional worksheets on student academic performance, learning motivation and attitudes toward classic Chinese poetry using a quasi-experimental research design. Three 6th-grade classes (N=100) participated in the study and were randomly assigned to the experimental group (2 classes, N=68) and the control group (N=32). Several findings were obtained. First, analysis of covariance indicated that students in the online student question-generation group scored significantly higher than those in the traditional worksheet group in academic performance, learning motivation and attitudes toward class, compared to those in the contrast group. Second, a paired sample t test revealed that the learning motivation and attitudes toward class for the online student question-generation group significantly improved after the question-generation experience. Finally, the learning motivation for the worksheet group significantly lowered after the treatment. Suggestions for instructional practices and future studies are provided.
期刊論文
1.陳錦芬、曾泓璋(20060300)。小組電腦擬題活動對英語字彙學習成就與學習情意之影響。國立臺北教育大學學報. 教育類,19(1),89-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Deci, E. L.、Ryan, R. M.、Williams, G. C.(1996)。Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning。Learning and Individual Differences,8(3),165-183。  new window
3.Barak, M.、Rafaeli, S.(2004)。On-line question-posing and peer assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning。Human-Computer Studies,61(1),84-103。  new window
4.Sliver, E. A.、Mamona-Downs, J.、Leung, S.、Kenney, P. A.(1996)。Posing mathematical problems: An exploratory study。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,27(3),293-309。  new window
5.Rosenshine, B.、Meister, C.、Chapman, S.(1996)。Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies。Review of Educational Research,66(2),181-221。  new window
6.Yu, F. Y.(2009)。Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system。Computers in Human Behavior,25(5),1129-1138。  new window
7.English, L. D.(1997)。Promoting a problem-posing classroom。Teaching Children Mathematics,4(3),172-180。  new window
8.Wilson, E. V.(2004)。ExamNet asynchronous learning network: Augmenting face-to-face courses with student-developed exam questions。Computers & Education,42(1),87-107。  new window
9.Yu, F.-Y.、Liu, Y.-H.(2009)。Creating a psychologically safe online space for a student-generated questions learning activity via different identity revelation modes。British Journal of Educational Technology,40(6),1109-1123。  new window
10.Yu. F. Y.、Liu, Y. H.、Chan, T. W.(2005)。A Web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment。Innovations in Education and Teaching International,42(4),337-348。  new window
11.Silver, E. A.、Cai, J.(2005)。Assessing students, mathematical problem posing。Teaching Children Mathematics,12(3),129-135。  new window
12.張新仁(20060600)。學習策略的知識管理。教育研究與發展期刊,2(2),19-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Deci, Edward L.、Ryan, Richard M.(1985)。The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality。Journal of Research in Personality,19(2),109-134。  new window
14.張毓仁、柯華葳、邱皓政、歐宗霖、溫福星(20110600)。教師閱讀教學行為與學生閱讀態度和閱讀能力自我評價對於閱讀成就之跨層次影響:以PIRLS 2006為例。教育科學研究期刊,56(2),69-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Shulman, Lee S.(1986)。Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching。Educational Researcher,15(2),4-14。  new window
16.徐雍智、蔡今中、陳明璋(20020400)。數學創意類比與同儕評量及其網路案例設計之初探。師大學報. 科學教育類,47(1),1-13。  延伸查詢new window
17.Yu, F.-Y.、Liu, Y.-H.(2008)。「學生出題」與「傳統練習」策略對大學生學習成就、認知與後設認知策略使用之影響。教育與心理研究,31(3),25-52。  延伸查詢new window
18.Chen, M.-F.、Huang, K.-J.、Hsieh, C.-N.、Lin, Y.-C.(2010)。高中同儕寫作回饋的效度與效果探析。教育科學研究期刊,55(1),63-90。  延伸查詢new window
19.Zeng, C.-W.(2009)。國小高年級數學試行「用擬題評量」之合作行動研究。嘉義市教育研究集刊,1,1-21。  延伸查詢new window
20.Tsai, L.-W.(2004)。國小唐詩教學探析。花蓮師院學報,18,141-158。  延伸查詢new window
21.Mestre, J.(2002)。Probing adults' conceptual understanding and transfer of learning via problem posing。Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,23(1),9-50。  new window
22.Yu, F.-Y.(2011)。Multiple peer assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes。Computers & Education,56(2),484-494。  new window
23.Choi, I.、Land, S. M.、Turgeon, A. J.(2005)。Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion。Instructional Science,33(5/6),483-511。  new window
24.Yu, F.-Y.、Liu, Y.-H.(2008)。The comparative effects of students question-posing and questionanswing strategies on promoting college students' academic achievement, cognitive and metacognitive strategies use。Journal of Education and Psychology,31(3),25-52。  new window
25.Bain, R.、Packer, J.、Mills, C.(1999)。Using journal writing to enhance student teachers' reflectivity during field experience placement。Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,5(1),51-73。  new window
26.Behrend, J. L.、Mohs, L. C.(2006)。From simple question to powerful connections: A two-year conversation about negative numbers。Teaching Children Mathematics,12(5),206-264。  new window
27.Cai, J.(2003)。Singaporean students' mathematics thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study。International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology,34(5),719-737。  new window
28.Fellenz, M. R.(2004)。Using assessment to support higher level learning: The multiple choice item development assignment。Assessment & Education in Higher Education,29(6),703-719。  new window
會議論文
1.Chiu, T.-J.、Yu, F.-Y.(2010)。學習遷移與學習能力對應用合作網路學生出題策略教學成效之探究。臺北市。53-64。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chiu, T.-J.、Yu, F.-Y.(2010)。網路學生出題策略應用於國小古典詩課程的理論基礎及教學設計。新加坡。259-262。  延伸查詢new window
3.Akira, N.、Tsukasa, H.、Akira, T.(2004)。A support environment for learning by describing problem map in arithmetical word problems。Melbourne, Australia。  new window
4.Denny, P.、Hamer, J.、Luxton-Reilly, A.、Purchase, H.(2008)。PeerWise: Students sharing their multiple choice questions。Sydney, Australia。  new window
5.Lin, K. M.、Leng, L. W.(2008)。Using problem-posing as an assessment tool。Singapore。  new window
學位論文
1.陳怡君(2010)。學生網路出題結合練習活動對國小學童社會學習領域學習成效之影響(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳金章(2007)。擬題活動融入國小五年級數學學習對數學解題表現、數學學習態度影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淑芳(2007)。擬題活動融入小數乘除問題補救教學之研究--以受暗隱模式影響之迷思概念為例(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭景文(2005)。合作擬題線上合作解題系統在國小五年級數學學習成就及態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.李正如(2007)。國小五年級分數擬題教學之研究--以台東縣原住民學童為例(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.邱廷榮(2008)。運用「多元表徵交互應用策略」對國小對流概念教學成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張育綾(2008)。學生網路出題於國小英語學科對學習成效的影響(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.Li, M.-H.(2010)。線上學生出題題型在國小社會學習領域學習效果之研究。國立成功大學,臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hung, P.-S.(2011)。以ADDIE 模式發展電腦多媒體教材應用於國小唐詩學習之研究。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ku, C.-C.(2010)。資訊科技融入國小四年級唐詩教學實施成效之研究。國立臺南大學,臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
11.Wu, P.-S.(2008)。九年一貫國語文領域古典詩歌教材知識平台建置與研究。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.Lin, C.-Y.(2003)。創造性唐詩教學對國小五年級兒童創造力及學習動機之影響。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
13.Weng, Y.-L.(2008)。以註解算式引導小學數學文字題擬題之鷹架設計。國立中央大學,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
14.Chang, H.-J.(2009)。九年一貫國語文古典文學教材之研究。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
15.Chen, Y.-T.(2008)。TIP-BC 數學教學策略對原住民學生數學學習成效之研究。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
16.Huang, A.-C.(2001)。國小五年級學生之美育電腦網頁教學研究--以中國古典詩歌教學為例。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
17.Tung, K.-J.(2005)。電腦輔助學生於出題中學習之系統設計與評估。國立中央大學,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
18.Tang, T.-Y.(2008)。支援國小學童網路出題與評題活動之系統設計與應用。國立中央大學,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
19.Yang, H.-F.(2010)。台灣地區兒童古典詩讀本述評(1995-2009)--以國小高年級為例。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bruner, J. S.(1966)。Toward a theory of instruction。New York, NY:W. W. Norton and Company。  new window
2.Deci, Edward L.、Ryan, Richard M.(2002)。Handbook of self-determination research。University of Rochester Press。  new window
3.Anderson, Lorin W.、Krathwohl, David R.、Airasian, Peter W.、Cruikshank, Kathleen A.、Mayer, Richard E.、Pintrich, Paul R.、Wittrock, Merlin C.、Raths, James(2001)。A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives。Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
4.張春興(1994)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Ausubel, David Paul(1963)。The psychology of meaningful verbal learning: an introduction to school learning。Grune & Stratton, Inc.。  new window
6.Ebel, Robert L.、Frisbie, David A.(1991)。Essentials of educational measurement。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
7.Smaldino, S. E.、Lowther, D. L.、Russell, J. D.(2007)。Instructional technology and media for learning。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
8.Gagné, R. M.(1985)。Essentials of learning for instruction。Hinsdale, IL。  new window
其他
1.Yu, F.-Y.(2009)。網路學生出題學習系統之建置、運用與影響分析,http://140.122.147.25/subject/000-quarks-b.htm, 20111202。  延伸查詢new window
2.Council for Cultural Affairs(2009)。大家來讀古典詩教案補助作業要點,http://eyvisit.ey.gov.tw/public/Attachment/93311715271.pdf, 20101021。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Snow, R. E.、Corno, L.、Jackson, D. III(1996)。Individual differences in affective and conative functions。Handbook of Educational Psychology。New York:Macmillan。  new window
2.Reeve, J.(2002)。Self-determination theory applied to educational settings。Handbook of self-determination research。Rochester, New York:The University of Rochester Press。  new window
3.梁淑坤(1994)。擬題的研究及其在課程的角色。國民小學數學科新課程概說(低年級)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Schramm, Wilbur(1954)。How Communication Works。The Process and Effects of Mass Communication。Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE