:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:地方教育行政機關校務評鑑運用之研究
書刊名:當代教育研究季刊
作者:鄭淑惠 引用關係
作者(外文):Cheng, Shu-huei
出版日期:2016
卷期:24:4
頁次:頁33-69
主題關鍵詞:評鑑運用校務評鑑教育評鑑地方教育行政機關Evaluation useSchool evaluationEducational evaluationLocal educational agencies
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:359
  • 點閱點閱:88
研究目的本研究旨在探討地方教育行政機關的校務評鑑運用情形,以及影響評鑑運用的因素。研究設計/方法/取徑本研究採取質性取徑,以半結構式訪談法蒐集資料,選取持續實施中小學校務評鑑且有評鑑運用意圖的縣市。受訪者為地方教育行政機關之校務評鑑主辦及業務相關單位代表,共訪談三縣市23 位行政人員。研究發現或結論針對地方教育行政機關的校務評鑑運用,首先,在結果性運用方面,包括:瞭解學校辦學情形、協助學校改善辦學品質、輔助行政決定,以及政策說服。其次,在過程性運用方面,包括:增進對學校辦學及意見的瞭解、促進專業學習,以及引導學校發展。第三,影響校務評鑑之結果性運用的因素,包括:追蹤輔導制度的設置、評鑑人員的可信度、評鑑報告的溝通、評鑑報告的回應性、對評鑑結果運用的態度,以及組織權責與資源。最後,影響校務評鑑之過程性運用的因素,則包括:評鑑參與機制,以及對評鑑參與的態度。研究原創性/價值評鑑運用是評鑑專業化不可忽略的部分,也是國內教育評鑑研究較少探討的議題,透過本實徵性研究,能加深對行政機關評鑑運用的瞭解,並提供評鑑實務與研究的建議。
Purpose This study aims to explore school evaluation use among local educational agencies and the factors affecting it. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach was adopted with semi-structured interviews. The interviewees were recruited from three agencies that had continually performed elementary and junior high school evaluations, with an intention to use the evaluations. In total, the interviewees included 23 administrators whose responsibilities were related to evaluation processes and reports within the agency. Findings First, school evaluation findings were used by local educational agencies to understand school development, assist in school improvement, assist in decision making, and convince external agencies to support a particular position. Second, regarding process use, school evaluations were used by local educational agencies to understand school development and opinions about schools, enhance professional learning, and direct school improvement. Third, the factors affecting the use of evaluation findings included follow-up assistance, evaluator credibility, communication of evaluation reports, responsiveness of evaluation reports, attitude toward the use of evaluation findings, and authority and resources. Finally, the factors affecting process use comprised the mechanism of evaluation involvement and attitude toward evaluation involvement. Originality/value Evaluation use is an indispensable part of professional evaluation. Research on evaluation use has seldom been conducted in Taiwan. This study provides empirical evidence that assists in an understanding of evaluation use and provides suggestions for evaluation practice and research.
期刊論文
1.Amo, C.、Cousins, J. B.(2007)。Going through the process: An examination of the operationalization of process use in empirical research on evaluation。New Directions for Evaluation,116,5-26。  new window
2.王麗雲(20111000)。學校課責。教師天地,174,30-34。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃嘉雄(20120700)。影響小學對課程與教學評鑑發現利用之因素研究。課程與教學,15(3),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Alkin, M. C.、Taut, S. M.(2003)。Unbundling evaluation use。Studies in Educational Evaluation,29(1),1-12。  new window
5.Saunders, M.(2012)。The use and usability of evaluation outputs: a social practice approach。Evaluation,18(4),421-436。  new window
6.Johnson, K.、Greenseid, L. O.、Toal, S. A.、King, J. A.、Lawrenz, F.、Volkov, B.(2009)。Research on evaluation use: A review of the empirical literature from 1986 to 2005。American Journal of Evaluation,30(3),377-410。  new window
7.Kirkhart, K. E.(2000)。Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence。New Directions for Evaluation,88,5-23。  new window
8.Shulha, L. M.、Cousins, J. B.(1997)。Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986。Evaluation Practice,18(3),195-208。  new window
9.郭昭佑、陳美如(20121200)。評鑑信任初探--校務評鑑制度專業化之可行策略。教育行政與評鑑學刊,14,59-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.湯志民、陳木金、郭昭佑、朱佳如(20121200)。中小學校長評鑑層面之初構。教育研究月刊,224,5-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Cousins, J. B.、Leithwood, K. A.(1986)。Current empirical research on evaluation utilization。Review of Educational Research,56(3),331-364。  new window
12.潘慧玲、陳文彥(20100900)。教師專業發展評鑑促進組織學習之個案研究。教育研究集刊,56(3),29-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭淑惠(20110900)。教師專業發展評鑑之個案研究:促進組織學習的觀點。教育研究與發展期刊,7(3),37-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.吳煥烘、蕭永勝、魏玉縣(2005)。國民小學校務評鑑之評析與建議--以臺中市為例。教師之友,46(2),64-73。  延伸查詢new window
15.林和春、張素貞(2005)。國民中小學校務評鑑之實務探究--以桃園縣為例。人文及社會學科教學通訊,15(6),72-90。  延伸查詢new window
16.曾淑惠、周士琦(2014)。促進高職校務評鑑使用的途徑。中等教育,65(2),45-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.D'Ostie-Racine, L.、Dagenais, C.、Ridde, V.(2016)。A qualitative case study of evaluation use in the context of a collaborative program evaluation strategy in Burkina Faso。Health Research Policy and System,14(37),1-16。  new window
18.Hojlund, S.(2014)。Evaluation use in evaluation systems: The case of the European Commission。Evaluation,20(4),428-446。  new window
19.Lawrenz, F.、Gullickson, A.、Toal, S.(2007)。Dissemination: Handmaiden to evaluation use。American Journal of Evaluation,28(3),275-289。  new window
20.Preskill, H.、Zuckerman, B.、Matthews, B.(2003)。An exploratory study of process use: Findings and implications for further research。American Journal of Evaluation,24(4),423-442。  new window
21.Weiss, C. H.、Murphy-Graham, E.、Birkeland, S.(2005)。An alternative route to policy influence: How evaluations affect D.A.R.E。American Journal of Evaluation,26(1),12-30。  new window
22.吳清山(20020400)。校務評鑑的實施挑戰與因應策略。教師天地,117,6-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.王保進(20030100)。國民中小學校務評鑑現況與重要議題之省思。教育資料與研究,50,2-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.林天祐(20020400)。校務評鑑的理念與作法。教師天地,117,15-20。  延伸查詢new window
25.Fleischer, D. N.、Christie, C. A.(2009)。Evaluation use: Results from a survey of U.S. American Evaluation Association members。American Journal of Evaluation,30(2),158-175。  new window
學位論文
1.謝杏佳(2011)。我國國民中小學校務評鑑制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
2.周士琦(2014)。高職學校行政主管對學校評鑑使用及其影響因素知覺之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳錦玉(2016)。新北市國民中學校務評鑑應用之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fitzpatrick, J. L.、Sanders, J. R.、Worthen, B. R.(2004)。Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines。Boston, Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
2.Owen, J. M.(2007)。Program evaluation: Forms and approaches。New York, NY:Guilford。  new window
3.黃嘉雄(2010)。課程評鑑。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sanders, J. R.、Sullins, C. D.(2006)。Evaluating school programs: A evaluators' guide。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin。  new window
5.黃政傑(2005)。課程評鑑。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
6.Shadish, William R. Jr.、Cook, Thomas D.、Leviton, Laura C.(1991)。Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice。Sage Publications。  new window
7.Yarbrough, Donald B.、Shulha, Lyn M.、Hopson, Rodney K.、Caruthers, Flora A.(2011)。The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage。  new window
8.Patton, M. Q.(2008)。Utilization-focused evaluation。Sage。  new window
9.鄭崇趁(2007)。國民中小學校務評鑑指標及實施方式研究。臺北市:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Alkin, M. C.(2011)。Evaluation essentials: From A to Z。New York, NY:Guilford。  new window
11.郭昭佑(20070000)。教育評鑑研究:原罪與解放。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.曾淑惠(2002)。教育方案評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
13.蘇錦麗(19970000)。高等教育評鑑:理論與實際。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.吳清山、黃美芳、徐緯平(20020000)。教育績效責任研究。臺北:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Weiss, Carol H.(1998)。Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies。Prentice Hall。  new window
16.Patton, M. Q.(2012)。Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation。Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hofstetter, C. H.、Alkin, M. C.(2003)。Evaluation use revisited。International Handbook of Educational Evaluation。Kluwer Academic。  new window
2.Sanders, J. R.、Davidson, E. J.(2003)。A Model for School Evaluation。International Handbook of Educational Evaluation。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
3.Chelimsky, E.(2015)。A strategy for improving the use of evaluation findings in policy。Evaluation use and decision making in society: A tribute to Marvin C. Alkin。Charlotte, NC:Information Age。  new window
4.Christie, C. A.、Alkin, M. C.(2013)。An evaluation theory tree。Evaluation roots: A wider perspective of theorists' views and influences。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
5.Loud, M. L.(2014)。What can we learn from practitioners? Some thoughts and takehome messages for internal evaluation units。Enhancing evaluation use: Insights from internal evaluation units。Los Angeles, CA:Sage。  new window
6.林天祐(20040000)。校務評鑑專業化的探討。教育政策與教育革新。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE