:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教師專業發展評鑑方案成效評估之研究
書刊名:教育資料與研究
作者:張素貞李俊湖
作者(外文):Chang, Su-chenLee, Jun-fun
出版日期:2014
卷期:114
頁次:頁95-124
主題關鍵詞:教師專業發展評鑑專業發展成效評估Teacher evaluation for professional developmentTEPDProfessional developmentEffectiveness evaluation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:47
  • 點閱點閱:26
教師專業發展確能提升教學效果,然而,教師專業發展成效, 需要經過評估歷程來檢視確認,評估結果能改善及提升專業發展的品 質。評估不僅在滿意度調查,更需關注學習者知識、技能與行為的改 變,並反映至學生學習的成效上,則專業發展之成效才能真正展現。 本研究係針對教師專業發展成效評估之內涵及作法加以探究,以「教 師專業發展評鑑方案」為焦點,透過文獻分析及焦點團體訪談進行資 料蒐集並分析。主要之研究目的有四:第一、探討國內外評估教師專 業發展成效之常見作法;第二、了解國內外評估教師專業發展成效之 相關研究;第三、分析國內辦理教師專業發展成效評估之作法與意見; 第四、探討評估教師專業發展成效實踐之挑戰與因應;綜合初步研究 結果,提出評估教師專業發展成效之作法及建議。整體獲致之結論, 分別為:一、將評估視為歷程或關注評估層面;二、專業發展能提升 專業知識,有助於教學實踐,確實能影響學生學習;三、教專推動成 效,主要在於檢視教學問題及增進同儕分享,評估概念及作法較不明 確;四、評估成效尚待改進。根據結論提出五點建議供未來評估之參 考。
Professional development of teachers is the main factor behind teaching effectiveness. However, professional development course itself needs to be evaluated to see whether it works. The purpose of assessment aims rather at improving the learner’s knowledge, skills and behaviors, and at producing the good effect of students’ learning. This study is exploring the connotation between evaluation and the effect of professional development, and evaluation practices. It also provides an effective teacher professional development program as reference. Our analysis is focused on the teacher evaluation for professional development. Document analysis and focus group interviews for collecting information are taken for this purpose. Our research consists of: 1) an exploration of domestic and international research methods which are used to assess the effectiveness of teacher professional development; 2) an understanding of relevant researches on the evaluation of the effects of teacher professional development; 3) an analysis of the effects of local teacher’s professional development and assessment practices ; 4) an exploration of new evaluation in order to cope with the challenges of assessing teachers’ professional development’s effectiveness. It then proceeds with a synthesis of the primary effectiveness of planning strategy from which recommendations are given as follows: 1) Assessment is the process of observing and measuring learning, as seen in Guskey’ 5 levels, which can improve professional developmentprogram. 2) An enhancement of advanced knowledge by professional development activities would be an aid to classroom practice, that impacts student’s learning effectiveness. 3) Professional development evaluation would promote peer sharing, and would help in discovering the teaching problems. 4) In order to evaluate the impact of professional development more effectively, more support and training are required. Drawn from these conclusions, five suggestions are given for consideration.
期刊論文
1.Guskey, T. R.(2002)。Does It Make a Difference? Evaluating Professional Development。Educational Leadership,59(6),45-51。  new window
2.潘慧玲、高嘉卿(20120800)。臺北市國民小學試辦教師專業發展評鑑之成效分析:理論導向評鑑取徑之應用。教育政策論壇,15(3)=43,133-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Coldwell, M.、Simkins, T.(2010)。Level models of continuing professional development evaluation: A grounded review and critique。Professional Development in Education,37(1),143-157。  new window
4.Davis, N. E.、Preston, C.、Sahin, I.(2009)。ICT teacher training: Evidence for multi-level evaluation from a national initiative。British Journal of Educational Technology,40(1),135-148。  new window
5.Edmonds, S.、Lee, B.(2001)。Teacher feelings about continuing professional development。Education Journal,61,28-29。  new window
6.McGee, Jennifer R.、Wang, Chuang、Polly, Drew(2013)。Guilding teachers in the use of a standards-based mathematics curriculum: Teacher perceptions and subsequent instructional practices after intensive professional development program。School Science and Mathematics,113(1),16-28。  new window
7.McGee, J. R.、Wang, C.、Polly, D.(2013)。Guiding teachers in the use of a standards-based mathematics curriculum: Teacher perceptions and subsequent instructional practices after an intensive professional development program。School Science and Mathematics,113(1),16-28。  new window
8.Lowden, C.(2006)。Reality check: Survey highlights the disparity between the ideal and real in professional learning programs。Journal of Staff Development,27(1),61-64。  new window
9.Lydon, S.、King, C.(2009)。Can a single, short continuing professional development workshop cause change in the classroom?。Professional Development in Education,35(1),63-82。  new window
10.Shaha, S.H.、Lewis, V. K.、O'Donnell, T. J.、Brown, D. H.(2004)。Evaluating professional development: An approach in verifying program impact on teachers and students。Journal of Research in Professional Learning,7(1),1。  new window
11.潘慧玲、陳文彥(20110900)。中小學試辦教師專業發展評鑑全國診斷性後設評鑑之研究。中等教育,62(3),70-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭淑惠、潘慧玲(20130600)。全國性試辦方案實施之過程與成果評鑑:以中小學教師專業發展評鑑為例。中等教育,64(2),78-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.馮莉雅(20101000)。教師專業發展評鑑的實施與成效:以高雄市國小為例。教育研究學報,44(2),85-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.秦夢群、陳清溪、吳政達、郭昭佑(20130200)。教師專業發展評鑑實施成效之調查研究。教育資料與研究,108,57-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.丁一顧(20130200)。教師專業發展評鑑實徵研究之回顧與展望。教育資料與研究,108,31-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.蔡進雄(20040200)。學校行政領導與教師專業發展。研習資訊,21(1),55-59。  延伸查詢new window
17.張素貞(20100300)。推動教師專業發展評鑑方案與教師專業發展之研究。教育研究月刊,191,55-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.楊慶麟、林合懋、張淑慧(2012)。國民小學參與專業發展評鑑之教師其教學效能、創新教學、組織公民行爲與學校效能關係之硏究。2012全球教育論壇:教育經營與學校效能國際學術研討會--教育制度及政策,231-272。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Goodall, J.、Day, C.、Lindsay, G.、Muijs, D.、Harris, A.(2005)。Evaluating the impact of continuing professional development。London, United Kingdom:Department for Education and Skills。  new window
2.Kutner, M.、Sherman, R.、Tibbetts, J.、Condelli, L.(1997)。Evaluating professional development: A framework for adult education。Washington, DC:Pelavin Research Institute。  new window
圖書
1.Basarab, D. J. Sr.、Root, D. K.(1992)。The training evaluation process: A practical approach to evaluating corporate training programs。Kluwer Academic。  new window
2.Bubb, S.、Earley, P.(2007)。Leading and managing continuing professional development developing people, developing schools。London, United Kingdom:P. Chapman。  new window
3.Guerra-Lopez, I.(2007)。Evaluating impact: Evaluation and continual improvement for performance improvement practitioners。Amhearst, MA:HRD。  new window
4.Hannum, K. M.、Martineau, J. W.(2008)。Evaluating the impact of leadership development。San Francisco, CA:Pfeiffer。  new window
5.Harris, A.、Busher, H.(2000)。Effective subject leadership: Final report。London, United Kingdom:Teacher Training Agency。  new window
6.Horton, D.、Alexaki, A.、Bennett-Lartey, S.(2003)。Evaluating capacity development: Experiences from research and development organizations around the world。Wageningen, Netherlands:ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation。  new window
7.Knox, A. B.(2002)。Evaluation for continuing education: A comprehensive guide to success。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
8.Kirkpatrick, Donald L.、Kirkpatrick, James D.(2006)。Evaluating training programs: The four levels。Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.。  new window
9.Kirkpatrick, D. L.(1998)。Evaluating training programs: The four levels。Berrett-Koehler Pub.。  new window
10.Guskey, Thomas R.、Sparks, Dennis(2000)。Evaluating Professional Development。Corwin Press。  new window
其他
1.Harris, A.,Day, C.,Goodall, J.,Lindsay, G.,Muijs, D.(2008)。Evaluating the Impact of continuing professional learning in schools,http://www.stepstoexcellence.org.uk/steps_to_excellence/reflection_folder/reflec%20text%20pdf/116.pdf。  new window
2.Haslam, M. B.(2010)。Teacher professional development evaluation guide,http://learningforward.org/docs/pdf/evaluationguide.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Tait-McCutcheon, S.、Sherley, B.(2006)。In the hands of the learner: The impact of self-assessment on teacher education。Identities, cultures and learning spaces: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia, Canberra。Sydney, Australia:MERGA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE