:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:結合Fuzzy AHP與TOPSIS評估主題樂園之服務品質
書刊名:休閒事業研究
作者:葉子明 引用關係蔡秉良
作者(外文):Yeh, Tsu-mingTsai, Ping-liang
出版日期:2014
卷期:12:3
頁次:頁1-21
主題關鍵詞:主題樂園服務品質模糊層級分析法Theme parkService qualityFuzzy analytic hierarchy processFAHPTechnique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutionTOPSIS
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:660
  • 點閱點閱:58
隨著經濟環境成長,民眾越來越重視休閒生活,各大企業競相投入遊樂服務業,相繼設立主題樂園。然而面對眾多主題樂園的競爭中,如何提升服務品質以創造企業競爭力,是企業經營的一項重要課題。本研究首先經由文獻探討,找出影響主題樂園服務品質的因素,將評估準則分為主題意象、遊樂設備、節目表演、周邊設備、操作與安全…等五大構面,共十八項衡量指標。再運用模糊層級分析法評估各項指標的權重,接著以TOPSIS將國內五間主要的主題樂園進行服務品質優劣排序。模糊層級分析法評估各指標的權重結果顯示,操作與安全為權重值最高的構面。以TOPSIS法所分析之服務品質排序分為劍湖山世界、月眉育樂世界、小人國、九族文化村及六福村。
People are focusing more on leisure life with the growing economic environment that enterprises have largely invested in entertainment service industry and established theme parks. In the face of so many competitive theme parks, promoting service quality to create enterprise competitiveness becomes a critical issue for enterprise operation. With literature review, this study first concludes the factors in the service quality of theme parks and classifies the evaluation into five dimensions of Theme image, Entertainment equipment, Program of shows, Peripheral equipment, and Operation and security, including eighteen indices. Furthermore, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process is applied to evaluating the weights of the indices, and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is utilized for ranking the service quality of five major theme parks in Taiwan. With Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to evaluate the weights of the indices, Operation and security appears the highest weight. Having TOPSIS to analyze the service quality, the theme parks are ranked as Janfusun Fancyworld, Lihpao Land, Miniature World, Formosan Aboriginal Culture Village, and Leofoo Water Park.
期刊論文
1.呂文琴、藍淑娟(200411)。主題樂園遊客消費型態之探討--以花蓮地區為例。大漢學報,19,213-232。  延伸查詢new window
2.Johns, Nick、Gyimóthy, Szilvia(2002)。Mythologies of a theme park: An icon of modern family life。Journal of Vacation Marketing,8(4),320-331。  new window
3.Zeithaml, V. A.(1981)。How consumer evaluation processes differ Between goods and services。Marketing of Services,9(1),25-32。  new window
4.宋玉麒(20061200)。探索樂園遊客遊憩體驗滿意度之研究。旅遊管理研究,6(2),125-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Torlak, G.、Mehmet, S.、Mehmet, S.、Selim, Z.(2011)。Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airline industry。Expert Systems with Applications,38(4),3396-3406。  new window
6.Jung, Hosang(2011)。A fuzzy AHP-GP approach for integrated production-planning considering manufacturing partners。Expert Systems with Applications,38(5),5833-5840。  new window
7.李孟璁、潘巧瑜、陳亞孜、張哲嘉(20091200)。衡量休閒渡假中心的服務品質--以墾丁統一休閒渡假中心為例。海洋休閒管理學刊,2,43-57。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳秀芬、唐吉民(20110200)。國內大型主題樂園顧客滿意度之研究--以劍湖山世界為例。屏東教大體育,14,487-505。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.賴宗智、鄭振威(20101100)。應用模糊TOPSIS法求解多重目標設定之最佳化能力集合調整。習慣領域期刊,2(1),73-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Büyüközkan, Gülçin、Çifçi, Gizem、Güleryüz, Sezin(2011)。Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology。Expert Systems with Applications,38(8),9407-9424。  new window
11.Dodge, D. A.(2001)。Product safety and the amusement park industry, Professional Safety。Park Ridge,46(10),43-47。  new window
12.Javanbarg, M. B.、Charles, S.、Kiyono, J.、Shahbodaghkhan, B.(2012)。Fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria decision making systems using particle swarm optimization。Expert Systems with Applications,39(1),960-966。  new window
13.Morteza, Y.、Ali, A.、Mohammad, H. I.(2012)。Risk Analysis for Critical Infrastructures Using Fuzzy TOPSIS。Journal of Management Research,4(1),1-19。  new window
14.Pophali, G. R.、Chelani, A. B.、Dhodapkar, R. S.(2011)。Optimal selection of full scale tannery effluent treatment alternative using integrated AHP and GRA approach。Expert Systems with Applications,38(9),10889-10895。  new window
15.Richards, G.(2001)。Marketing china overseas: The role theme parks and tourist attractions。Journal of Vacation Marketing,8(1),28-39。  new window
16.張淑青(2009)。目的地意象、滿意度與行為意圖的關係--目的地意象的區隔效果。臺灣管理學刊,9(1),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.石崎肇士、音哲丸、郭生發(19910900)。主題園在日本--日本主題園之現況與趨勢。造園季刊,7,40-46。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃長發、李貞(20101000)。主題樂園遊客體驗價值與顧客滿意度相關之研究。中州學報,28,131-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.周秀蓉(20080800)。遊憩吸引力和遊憩體驗對顧客滿意度及重遊意願之影響--以六福村主題樂園為例。明新學報,34(2),267-288。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.林隆儀、林苑地(20070300)。主題樂園遊樂品質評量指標之建立及遊樂滿意度評量模式發展之研究--以國內民營綜合主題樂園為例。中華管理學報,8(1),11-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.曾國雄、胡宜珍(19960100)。公車系統營運與服務績效指標擷取之研究--灰色關聯分析之應用。模糊系統學刊,2(1),73-82。  延伸查詢new window
22.楊文燦、吳佩芬(19970600)。主題園遊客對主題意象認知之研究--以六福村主題遊樂園為例。戶外遊憩研究,10(2),67-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Zadeh, L. A.(1975)。The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning。Information Sciences,9(1),43-80。  new window
24.Buckley, James J.(1985)。Fuzzy hierarchical analysis。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,17(3),233-247。  new window
25.Van Laarhoven, P. J. M.、Pedrycz, W.(1983)。A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's Priority Theory。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,11(1-3),229-241。  new window
26.王振琤、李穎杰(20060700)。灰關聯分析法輔助設計方案評價模式之建構。設計學研究,9(1),43-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.鄧振源、曾國雄(19890700)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用。中國統計學報,27(7),13767-13786。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Zadeh, Lotfi Asker(1965)。Fuzzy sets。Information and Control,8(3),338-353。  new window
29.Parasuraman, A. P.、Zeithaml, Valarie A.、Berry, Leonard L.(1985)。A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research。Journal of Marketing,49(4),41-50。  new window
30.Parasuraman, Ananthanarayanan Parsu、Zeithaml, Valarie A.、Berry, Leonard L.(1988)。SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service quality。Journal of Retailing,64(1),12-40。  new window
31.Deng, Ju-Long(1982)。Control Problems of Grey system。System and Control Letters,1(5),288-294。  new window
會議論文
1.王進欽、李怡萱(2003)。遊客對於原住民文化園區之歌舞場旅遊動機。觀光休閒暨餐旅產業永續經營學術研討會,1-13。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳炳男(1981)。遊樂園規劃研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉連茂(2000)。21世紀主題樂園的夢幻與實現。台北市:詹氏書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊錦洲(2002)。服務品質。中華民國品質學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Klir, G. J.、Yuan, B.(1995)。Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic Theory。Boston, MA:New Jersey:Kluwer Academic Publishers:Prentice Hall PTR。  new window
4.曹勝雄(2001)。觀光行銷學。台北:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝其淼(1995)。主題遊樂園。台北:詹氏書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Saaty, T. L.、Kearns, K. P.(1985)。Analytical planning: The organization of systems。Pergamon Press。  new window
7.Zimmermann, H. J.(1991)。Fuzzy set theory and its applications。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
8.江金山、吳佩玲、蔣祥第、張廷政、詹福賜、張軒庭、溫坤禮(1998)。灰色理論入門。臺北:高立圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.李銘輝、郭建興(2000)。觀光遊憩資源規劃。台北:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Hwang, Ching-Lai、Yoon, Kwangsun(1981)。Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey。Springer-Verlag。  new window
11.Yoon, K. Paul、Hwang, Ching-Lai(1995)。Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction。Sage。  new window
12.Dubois, D.、Prade, H. M.(1980)。Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications。Academic Press。  new window
其他
1.交通部觀光局(2010)。2010觀光年報,http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE